REVIEW 1 cited by
Lepton flavor model with modular $A_4$ symmetry in large volume limit
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider the modular symmetry associated with the compactification of extra dimensions as the flavor symmetry on lepton sector. Especially, we propose a model based on the modular $A_4$ symmetry with three right-handed neutrinos and a gauge singlet Higgs, which works well in the so-called large volume limit of the extra dimensions, i.e., $\mbox{Im}\tau \to \infty$ for a modulus $\tau$. The right-handed neutrinos are introduced to realize the seesaw mechanism for tiny neutrino masses observed in oscillation experiments. The vacuum expectation value of the singlet Higgs gives the Majorana masses for right-handed neutrinos and the $\mu$-term for Higgs fields. The model can explain the observed masses and mixing angles of neutrinos successfully. We find that one of the mixing angles should be in the range $\sin^2 \theta_{23} \ge 0.58$. Importantly, the CP violating phases of neutrinos are predicted in the two restricted regions. One is that the Dirac phase is $\delta_{\rm CP} \simeq - 0.5 \pi$ and the Majorana phases are $\alpha_{21} \simeq 0$ and $\alpha_{31} \simeq \pi$. The other is $\delta_{\rm CP} \simeq + 0.5 \pi$, $\alpha_{21} \simeq 2 \pi$ and $\alpha_{31} \simeq \pi$. The effective neutrino mass in the neutrinoless double beta decay is found to be $m_{\rm eff} = 0.037$--0.047 eV. These predictions will be tested in the future neutrino experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Neutrino Mass Predictions with an AI-based Algorithm under $A_4$ Modular Symmetry
An A4 modular linear-seesaw neutrino model is fitted with the ILA optimizer, and the fitted parameters agree with oscillation and cosmological bounds.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.