REVIEW 1 cited by
Do Audio-Language Models Understand Linguistic Variations?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Open-vocabulary audio language models (ALMs), like Contrastive Language Audio Pretraining (CLAP), represent a promising new paradigm for audio-text retrieval using natural language queries. In this paper, for the first time, we perform controlled experiments on various benchmarks to show that existing ALMs struggle to generalize to linguistic variations in textual queries. To address this issue, we propose RobustCLAP, a novel and compute-efficient technique to learn audio-language representations agnostic to linguistic variations. Specifically, we reformulate the contrastive loss used in CLAP architectures by introducing a multi-view contrastive learning objective, where paraphrases are treated as different views of the same audio scene and use this for training. Our proposed approach improves the text-to-audio retrieval performance of CLAP by 0.8%-13% across benchmarks and enhances robustness to linguistic variation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Omni-Embed-Audio: Leveraging Multimodal LLMs for Robust Audio-Text Retrieval
Omni-Embed-Audio uses multimodal LLMs to match CLAP on standard audio retrieval while improving text-to-text retrieval by 22% relative and hard negative discrimination by 4.3 points HNSR@10 on user-intent queries.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.