The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2409.07772 · v1 · pith:SC62H4TL · submitted 2024-09-12 · cs.LG

Alignment with Preference Optimization Is All You Need for LLM Safety

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:SC62H4TLrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG
keywords safetyalignmentmodelsoptimizationpreferencetechniquesachieveadversarial
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that preference optimization methods can effectively enhance LLM safety. Applying various alignment techniques to the Falcon 11B model using safety datasets, we achieve a significant boost in global safety score (from $57.64\%$ to $99.90\%$) as measured by LlamaGuard 3 8B, competing with state-of-the-art models. On toxicity benchmarks, average scores in adversarial settings dropped from over $0.6$ to less than $0.07$. However, this safety improvement comes at the cost of reduced general capabilities, particularly in math, suggesting a trade-off. We identify noise contrastive alignment (Safe-NCA) as an optimal method for balancing safety and performance. Our study ultimately shows that alignment techniques can be sufficient for building safe and robust models.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.