Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 44 references

Perfect absorption by metal-contacted two-dimensional systems with ultra-proximate reflectors

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two-dimensional strips between metal contacts can absorb 100% of incident light when the filling factor equals twice the dimensionless conductivity, and the back reflector can sit far closer than a quarter wavelength.

desk verdict Solid, honest theory paper: the deep-subwavelength perfect-absorption condition is genuinely new and the math holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07218 v1 pith:SCG5PCSG submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.optics

Kirill Kapralov , Vladislav Atlasov , Alina Khisameeva , Viacheslav Muravev , Dmitry Svintsov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords perfectabsorptiontwo-dimensionalelectronsystemsterahertzmetal-contacted2Dgratingequivalentcircuitdeep-subwavelengthreflectorimpedancematchingsheetconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that a periodic structure of narrow two-dimensional (2D) strips separated by wide perfectly conducting metal contacts can absorb far more light than the bare 2D material alone. The paper's central result is a pair of matching rules: without a back reflector, absorbance reaches 50% when the filling factor $f$ equals the dimensionless conductivity $\eta=\sigma Z_0/2$, and with a perfectly conducting reflector it reaches 100% when $f=2\eta$. More surprisingly, the reflector can sit far closer than the standard quarter-wavelength condition, with the optimum distance tending to zero for low filling factors, high substrate permittivity, and grating periods approaching $k_0L=\pi/n_{\mathrm{sub}}$. If correct, this gives a route to total absorption in 'dirty' 2D systems with purely real conductivity, without high electron mobility or plasmonic enhancement.

What carries the argument

The central object is the lumped equivalent circuit derived from the spectral solution of Maxwell's equations with perfectly conducting contacts and reflector. In this circuit the incident wave drives a parallel admittance $Y=\sigma+G_{\mathrm{rad}}-i\omega C_{\mathrm{eff}}$, with radiative conductance $G_{\mathrm{rad}}=\frac{f}{Z_0}\left[i n_{\mathrm{sub}}\cot(n_{\mathrm{sub}}k_0d)+1\right]$ and with $C_{\mathrm{eff}}$ the effective capacitance of the metal-2D grating expressed as a sum over reciprocal lattice vectors of spherical Bessel functions $j_0^2(\pi n f)$. Perfect absorption occurs when the 2D conductance equals the real part of $G_{\mathrm{rad}}$ and the total reactance vanishes; the capacitance provides the extra phase shift that lets the geometric phase plus reflection phase add to the matching condition at ultrashort $d$. For small $f$ and $d\to0$ the paper derives $d_{\mathrm{opt}} = \frac{\varepsilon\cot(\pi n_{\mathrm{sub}}L/\lambda_0)}{4(1+\varepsilon)}\left[\frac32-\ln(2\pi f)\right]$, which quantifies the approach of the optimum distance to zero.

What would settle it

A decisive test is to fabricate a metal-contacted 2D grating with $f=2\eta$ and sweep the reflector distance $d$ while keeping $\omega\tau\ll1$: the paper predicts a 100% absorption peak at $d$ well below $\lambda_0/(4n_{\mathrm{sub}})$ for small $f$ and periods approaching $k_0L=\pi/n_{\mathrm{sub}}$, with the peak absent above the critical period. Observing the maximum only near $d=\lambda_0/(4n_{\mathrm{sub}})$, or finding the peak capped below 100% by an amount tracking the metal sheet resistance, would settle that real conductor loss breaks the perfect-matching mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper shows that metal-contacted 2D gratings act as impedance-matched absorbers. The metal strips squeeze the incident field into the narrow 2D slits, so the effective load admittance seen by the wave is $\sigma/f$; matching this to free space yields 50% absorption at $\eta'=f$ in a uniform dielectric. With a perfect back reflector, the radiative conductance becomes complex and the matching condition splits into a reactance condition $\mathrm{Im}[G_{\mathrm{rad}}-i\omega C_{\mathrm{eff}}]=0$ and a conductance condition $\sigma=\mathrm{Re}\,G_{\mathrm{rad}}$, which combine into $f=2\eta$ and, in the conventional limit, $d=\lambda_0/(4n_{\mathrm{sub}})$. The novel claim is that the grating capacitance contributes an extra phase shift, so the same 100% absorption occurs at $d\ll\lambda_0/(4n_{\mathrm{sub}})$, with $d_{\mathrm{opt}}\to0$ as $k_0L\to\pi/n_{\mathrm{sub}}$; beyond that critical period, and below a critical filling factor, no perfect-absorption maximum exists. The paper further shows that near the critical point a low-mobility system with $\omega\tau\ll1$ displays a narrow absorption resonance that mimics a plasmonic one but persists for purely real conductivity.

Load-bearing premise

The argument treats the metal contacts and back reflector as perfect electric conductors with zero loss and zero field penetration, and it describes the 2D strips by the local Ohm's law $J=\sigma E$; if real metal dissipation or contact resistance is significant, the matching conditions shift and the predicted 100% absorption is only an ideal-limit result.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Without a reflector, any 2D material with small $\eta$ absorbs 50% of normally incident light once the filling factor is set to $f=\eta$, and the enhancement stays broadband up to frequencies where $L/\lambda_0$ becomes significant.
  • With a reflector, the same structure absorbs 100% at $f=2\eta$, and the optimum spacer can be far below $\lambda_0/(4n_{\mathrm{sub}})$, meaning gate dielectrics with sub-wavelength thickness can host perfect terahertz absorption.
  • As $k_0L$ approaches $\pi/n_{\mathrm{sub}}$ for small filling factors, the optimum reflector distance tends to zero; above the critical period or below the critical filling factor, no perfect-absorption maximum exists.
  • Near the critical parameters, a low-mobility 2D system with purely real conductivity shows a narrow resonance mimicking a plasmon, but longer momentum relaxation time lowers instead of raises the peak.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: With a real metal reflector of finite sheet resistance, the peak should fall below 100% and the optimum $d$ should shift upward; measuring that shift as a function of reflector impedance would isolate the ideal-conductor assumption.
  • Editorial inference: Since the mechanism is the capacitive phase shift rather than the specific strip shape, other capacitive metasurfaces over low-conductivity 2D layers, such as patch arrays or split rings, should show the same deep-subwavelength perfect absorption when $\mathrm{Im}[G_{\mathrm{rad}}]=\omega C_{\mathrm{eff}}$.
  • Editorial inference: The predicted narrow resonance in a purely dissipative system could be used as a terahertz conductivity sensor: the critical period and peak height give $\mathrm{Re}\,\sigma$ directly, and no high-mobility sample is needed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a semi-analytic electromagnetic theory for a one-dimensional periodic grating of narrow two-dimensional electron system (2DES) strips separated by perfectly conducting metal contacts, with and without a back reflector. It derives matching conditions for maximum absorption: f = η for the free-standing grating, giving 50% absorption, and f = 2η for the reflector-backed structure, giving perfect absorption. The central surprising claim is that the optimal reflector distance can lie far below the conventional λ0/4n_sub, and can even tend to zero for low filling factors, large substrate permittivity, or grating periods approaching a critical value. The analysis uses a spectral Green function, a Legendre-polynomial expansion of the local field, and a lumped equivalent circuit that is validated against the full numerical solution. The paper also predicts a critical behaviour where the absorption maximum ceases to exist above certain geometrical parameters, and discusses a narrow resonance in 'dirty' 2DES that mimics a plasmonic resonance without requiring high mobility.

Significance. If correct, this work provides a practical and parameter-free design rule for achieving total absorption in low-mobility 2D systems with thin gate dielectrics, which is directly relevant to terahertz photodetection and spectroscopy. The strength of the paper is that the matching conditions f = η and f = 2η are derived from the scattering problem rather than fitted, and the lumped model (10)-(12) is cross-checked against the full numerical solution of Eq. (8). The explicit identification of the deep-subwavelength optimum as a cancellation between capacitive grating response and inductive reflector-spacer response is physically insightful and is backed by asymptotic formula (18). The main limitation—the idealization of metal contacts and reflector as perfect electric conductors—is stated clearly in the model section and is a legitimate scope condition rather than an internal inconsistency. The paper does not overclaim experimental realization, and its predictions are falsifiable through the stated dependencies on d, f, L, and σ.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II, after Eq. (12)] The word 'spectrak' in the sentence 'its advantage over equivalent circuit approach of [27] lies in accurate definition of radiative conductance and effective capacitance' is a typo and should read 'spectral'.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The panel label '(с)' uses a Cyrillic 'с' instead of the Latin '(c)', and the sublabels for panels (b) and (d) are inconsistent with the order in the text; please correct the transcription and unify the panel references.
  3. [Figure 4 caption] The phrase 'for for an ultrathin substrate' contains a duplicated 'for'; the intended wording appears to be 'for an ultrathin substrate'.
  4. [Section III.B, Eq. (18)] The asymptotic expression for d_opt is said to be derived in 'Supplementary Section II', but no supplementary material is included with the arXiv submission; please either include the supplement or state the derivation's key steps in the main text.
  5. [Section III.B, Eq. (16)] The notation σ_2d is introduced without definition; since the paper otherwise uses the dimensionless conductivity η = σZ0/2, please define σ_2d = 2η/Z0 or replace it with the equivalent expression in terms of η to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the matching conditions are derived from the scattering solution and are not imposed as the target absorbance.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained and non-circular. The central results are obtained from a spectral solution of Maxwell's equations: Eq. (4) is the integral equation linking the local field to the surface current via the Green function (3), and Eq. (8) is its Legendre-polynomial matrix representation. The lumped model (10)-(12) is explicitly derived from this spectral kernel rather than being an ansatz or a fit; C_eff is computed from the same Green-function series. The 50% and 100% absorption conditions are not inserted by hand. Instead, the paper maximizes the derived absorbance formula (9), leading to the matching conditions η' = f(nsub+1)/2 without a reflector and η' = f/2 with a reflector, and the deep-subwavelength optimum distance follows from the reactance-cancellation equation Im[Grad - iωCeff] = 0, with the asymptotic expression (18) obtained from the series in Eq. (12). No parameter is fitted to the claimed absorption values, and the full numerical solution of Eq. (8) independently confirms the lumped-model predictions. The only material approximation is the perfect-electric-conductor treatment of the metal contacts and back reflector, which is explicitly stated in Section II before Eq. (2) and is a scope condition rather than a circular input. Prior work, including Ref. [27], is cited for context and comparison, but the derivation does not rely on its conclusions: indeed, the paper argues that the deep-subwavelength matching effect was not revealed there. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. [40] and [44]) are comparative and not load-bearing. No self-definitional step, renamed known result, imported uniqueness theorem, or fitted-input-as-prediction was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on four clearly stated domain assumptions: local Ohm's law in the 2DES, ideal lossless metals, normal incidence with one polarization, and a lossless substrate. None of these are fitted or imported circularly; they define the ideal-limit regime of the calculation. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Local Ohm's law J(x) = sigma E(x) with scalar, frequency-dependent conductivity in the 2D sections.
    Used in Eq. (4) to close the integral equation for the local field; nonlocal or spatially dispersive conductivity would change the kernel and the matching conditions.
  • domain assumption Metal contacts and back reflector are perfect electric conductors with zero loss and zero field penetration.
    Stated in Section II before Eq. (2); this lets the field convolution span only the 2D slit and is required for the ideal 100% absorption result.
  • domain assumption Normal incidence with the electric field perpendicular to the metal contacts, and one-dimensional periodicity.
    Defines the scattering geometry in Section II; oblique incidence or parallel polarization would alter g(q) and the matching conditions.
  • domain assumption The substrate is lossless, homogeneous, and characterized by permittivity epsilon_sub.
    Used in the Green function g(q) in Eq. (3); substrate losses would add an extra absorptive channel and shift the optimum conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perfect absorption by metal-contacted two-dimensional systems with ultra-proximate reflectors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SCG5PCSG

@misc{pith2026260807218,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perfect absorption by metal-contacted two-dimensional systems with ultra-proximate reflectors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SCG5PCSG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07218}
}
abstract

Electromagnetic absorbance by most two-dimensional electron systems is typically well below unity, which hinders both practical applications in photodetection and fundamental studies of their optical properties. Here, we show that a periodic structure comprised of narrow two-dimensional sections connected with wide perfectly conducting metal sections enables large absorbance. It reaches 50 \% provided the filling factor by the two-dimensional system $f$ equals its dimensionless conductivity $\eta=\sigma Z_0/2$, where $Z_0$ is the free-space impedance. The absorbance is further raised to 100 \% if the periodic structure is placed above a perfectly conducting electromagnetic reflector, and provided $f=2\eta$. Surprisingly, the optimal distance between two-dimensional system and reflector may fall well below the quarter of incident wavelength $\lambda_0/4$, which was assumed as conventional absorption enhancement condition in optics. For low filling factors $f\ll1$, large dielectric constants of the substrate, and grating periods comparable with $\lambda_0$, the optimal distance to reflector tends to zero. Above the critical values of the grating geometrical parameters, the absorbance maximum ceases to exist. The critical behavior manifests as a large-amplitude resonance in 'dirty' two-dimensional system with purely real conductivity, while enhancement of carrier momentum relaxation time lowers the resonant peak. Such resonance mimics the plasmonic one, but does not rely on high electron mobility.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07218 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. ) the absorption maximization is no more possible. In terms of extra transmission phase ∆Φc, the critical point corresponds to ∆Φc = π. The geometric phase ∆Φg required for matching, becomes formally negative in that case, which forbids the absorption maximization in all the range d ∈ [0; λ0/4nsub]. Black line in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Wang and S

    X. Wang and S. A. Tretyakov, Toward Ultimate Control of Terahertz Wave Absorption in Graphene, IEEE Trans- actions on Antennas and Propagation67, 2452 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [28]

    X. Chen, Z. Tian, Y. Lu, Y. Xu, X. Zhang, and C. Ouyang, Electrically Tunable Perfect Terahertz Ab- sorber Based on a Graphene Salisbury Screen Hybrid Metasurface, Advanced Optical Materials8, 1900660 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [1]

    K. F. Mak, M. Y. Sfeir, Y. Wu, C. H. Lui, J. A. Misewich, and T. F. Heinz, Measurement of the Optical Conduc- tivity of Graphene, Physical Review Letters101, 196405 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [2]

    H. Fang, H. A. Bechtel, E. Plis, M. C. Martin, S. Krishna, E. Yablonovitch, and A. Javey, Quantum of optical ab- sorption in two-dimensional semiconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, 11688 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [3]

    Stauber, D

    T. Stauber, D. Noriega-P´ erez, and J. Schliemann, Uni- versal absorption of two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B91, 115407 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [4]

    C. L. Cesar, M. N. Islam, R. D. Feldman, R. F. Austin, D. S. Chemla, L. C. West, and A. E. DiGiovanni, De- tailed characterization of HgCdTe/CdTe multiple quan- tum wells, Applied Physics Letters56, 283 (1990)

    work page 1990

  7. [5]

    A. M. de Paula, C. R. M. de Oliveira, G. E. Marques, A. M. Cohen, R. D. Feldman, R. F. Austin, M. N. Islam, and C. L. Cesar, Interband and intersubband absorption in HgCdTe multiple quantum wells, Physical Review B 59, 10158 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [6]

    Cervetti, E

    C. Cervetti, E. Heintze, B. Gorshunov, E. Zhukova, S. Lobanov, A. Hoyer, M. Burghard, K. Kern, M. Dressel, and L. Bogani, Sub-Terahertz Frequency-Domain Spec- troscopy Reveals Single-Grain Mobility and Scatter In- fluence of Large-Area Graphene, Advanced Materials27, 2635 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 44 references
  1. [7]

    A. V. Ikonnikov, A. A. Lastovkin, K. E. Spirin, M. S. Zholudev, V. V. Rumyantsev, K. V. Maremyanin, A. V. Antonov, V. Y. Aleshkin, V. I. Gavrilenko, S. A. Dvoret- skii, N. N. Mikhailov, Y. G. Sadofyev, and N. Samal, Terahertz spectroscopy of quantum-well narrow-bandgap HgTe/Cd...

    2010

  2. [8]

    Z. D. Kvon, E. B. Olshanetsky, D. A. Kozlov, E. Novik, N. N. Mikhailov, and S. A. Dvoretsky, Two-dimensional semimetal in HgTe-based quantum wells, Low Tempera- 9 ture Physics37, 202 (2011)

    2011

  3. [9]

    V. M. Muravev, P. A. Gusikhin, A. M. Zarezin, A. A. Zabolotnykh, V. A. Volkov, and I. V. Kukushkin, Phys- ical origin of relativistic plasmons in a two-dimensional electron system, Physical Review B102, 81301 (2020)

    2020

  4. [10]

    V. M. Muravev, P. A. Gusikhin, I. V. Andreev, and I. V. Kukushkin, Novel Relativistic Plasma Excitations in a Gated Two-Dimensional Electron System, Physical Re- view Letters114, 106805 (2015)

    2015

  5. [11]

    Bauer, S

    S. Bauer, S. Bauer-Gogonea, W. Becker, R. Fettig, B. Ploss, W. Ruppel, and W. von M¨ unch, Thin metal films as absorbers for infrared sensors, Sensors and Ac- tuators A: Physical37-38, 497 (1993), proceedings of Eurosensors VI

    1993

  6. [12]

    Yahniuk, M

    I. Yahniuk, M. Hild, L. E. Golub, J. Amann, J. Eroms, D. Weiss, W.-H. H. Kang, M.-H. H. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and S. D. Ganichev, Terahertz ratchet in graphene two-dimensional metamaterial formed by a pat- terned gate with an antidot array, Physical Review B 109, 235...

    2024

  7. [13]

    Olbrich, J

    P. Olbrich, J. Kamann, M. K¨ onig, J. Munzert, L. Tutsch, J. Eroms, D. Weiss, M.-H. Liu, L. E. Golub, E. L. Ivchenko, V. V. Popov, D. V. Fateev, K. V. Mashinsky, F. Fromm, T. Seyller, and S. D. Ganichev, Terahertz ratchet effects in graphene with a lateral superlattice, Physic...

    2016

  8. [14]

    Q. Ma, R. Krishna Kumar, S. Y. Xu, F. H. Koppens, and J. C. Song, Photocurrent as a multiphysics diagnostic of quantum materials, Nature Reviews Physics5, 170 (2023)

    2023

  9. [15]

    Krishna Kumar, G

    R. Krishna Kumar, G. Li, R. Bertini, S. Chaudhary, K. Nowakowski, J. M. Park, S. Castilla, Z. Zhan, P. A. Pantale´ on, H. Agarwal, S. Batlle-Porro, E. Ick- ing, M. Ceccanti, A. Reserbat-Plantey, G. Piccinini, J. Barrier, E. Khestanova, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C. Stampfer, G...

    2025

  10. [16]

    Sefidmooye Azar, J

    N. Sefidmooye Azar, J. Bullock, V. R. Shrestha, S. Bal- endhran, W. Yan, H. Kim, A. Javey, and K. B. Crozier, Long-Wave Infrared Photodetectors Based on 2D Plat- inum Diselenide atop Optical Cavity Substrates, ACS Nano15, 6573 (2021)

    2021

  11. [17]

    W. W. Salisbury, Absorbent body for electromagnetic waves (1952), uS Patent 2599944

    1952

  12. [18]

    R. L. Fante and M. T. McCormack, Reflection properties of the salisbury screen, IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation36, 1443 (1988)

    1988

  13. [19]

    Blake, E

    P. Blake, E. W. Hill, A. H. Castro Neto, K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, R. Yang, T. J. Booth, and A. K. Geim, Mak- ing graphene visible, Applied Physics Letters91, 063124 (2007)

    2007

  14. [20]

    S. Kim, M. S. Jang, V. W. Brar, K. W. Mauser, L. Kim, and H. A. Atwater, Electronically Tunable Perfect Ab- sorption in Graphene, Nano Letters18, 971 (2018)

    2018

  15. [21]

    S. H. Lee, M. Choi, T.-T. Kim, S. Lee, M. Liu, X. Yin, H. K. Choi, S. S. Lee, C.-G. Choi, S.-Y. Choi, X. Zhang, and B. Min, Switching terahertz waves with gate-controlled active graphene metamaterials, Nature Materials11, 936 (2012)

    2012

  16. [22]

    Y. Yao, R. Shankar, M. A. Kats, Y. Song, J. Kong, M. Loncar, and F. Capasso, Electrically Tunable Meta- surface Perfect Absorbers for Ultrathin Mid-Infrared Op- tical Modulators, Nano Letters14, 6526 (2014)

    2014

  17. [23]

    B. Zeng, Z. Huang, A. Singh, Y. Yao, A. K. Azad, A. D. Mohite, A. J. Taylor, D. R. Smith, and H.-T. Chen, Hy- brid graphene metasurfaces for high-speed mid-infrared light modulation and single-pixel imaging, Light: Science & Applications7, 51 (2018)

    2018

  18. [24]

    Lukianov, A

    M. Lukianov, A. Maevskiy, N. Kazeev, D. Mylnikov, D. Svintsov, K. Novoselov, A. Ustyuzhanin, and D. Ban- durin, Inverse design of broadband antennas for terahertz devices based on two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 054079 (2025)

    2025

  19. [25]

    Parmar, S

    J. Parmar, S. K. Patel, and V. Katkar, Graphene-based metasurface solar absorber design with absorption pre- diction using machine learning, Scientific Reports12, 2609 (2022)

    2022

  20. [26]

    M. M. Jadidi, A. B. Sushkov, R. L. Myers-Ward, A. K. Boyd, K. M. Daniels, D. K. Gaskill, M. S. Fuhrer, H. D. Drew, and T. E. Murphy, Tunable Terahertz Hy- brid Metal-Graphene Plasmons, Nano Letters15, 7099 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    S. A. Kuznetsov, A. G. Paulish, A. V. Gelfand, M. A. Astafiev, A. V. Arzhannikov, V. N. Fedorinin, and M. K. A. Thumm, Extremely thin metamaterial ab- sorbers for subterahertz waves: from fundamentals to- wards applications in uncooled bolometric sensors, in Metamaterials VII,...

    2012

  22. [30]

    S. A. Kuznetsov, A. G. Paulish, M. Navarro-Ci´ a, A. V. Arzhannikov, M. Navarro-C ´ ıa, and A. V. Arzhannikov, Selective Pyroelectric Detection of Millimetre Waves Us- ing Ultra-Thin Metasurface Absorbers, Scientific Reports 6, 21079 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Brown, The design of metallic delay dielectrics, Pro- ceedings of the IEE - Part III: Radio and Communication Engineering97, 45 (1950)

    J. Brown, The design of metallic delay dielectrics, Pro- ceedings of the IEE - Part III: Radio and Communication Engineering97, 45 (1950)

    1950

  24. [32]

    Brown, Artificial dielectrics having refractive indices less than unity, Proceedings of the IEE - Part IV: Insti- tution Monographs100, 51 (1953)

    J. Brown, Artificial dielectrics having refractive indices less than unity, Proceedings of the IEE - Part IV: Insti- tution Monographs100, 51 (1953)

    1953

  25. [33]

    J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, W. J. Stewart, and I. Youngs, Extremely low frequency plasmons in metallic mesostruc- tures, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4773 (1996)

    1996

  26. [34]

    J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, and W. J. Stewart, Low frequency plasmons in thin-wire structures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter10, 4785 (1998)

    1998

  27. [35]

    Muravev, K

    V. Muravev, K. Dzhikirba, P. Gusikhin, A. Astrakhant- seva, M. Sokolova, and I. Kukushkin, Plasmonic fabry- p´ erot resonator for enhanced terahertz sensing, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 014060 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    D. V. Fateev, V. V. Popov, and M. S. Shur, Transforma- tion of the plasmon spectrum in a grating-gate transistor structure with spatially modulated two-dimensional elec- tron channel, Semiconductors44, 1406 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    Popov, V

    M. Popov, V. V. Tsymbalov, G.S. Shur, W. Knap, V. V. Popov, G. M. Tsymbalov, M. S. Shur, and W. Knap, The Resonant Terahertz Response of a Slot Diode with a 10 Two-Dimensional Electron Channel, Semiconductors39, 142 (2005)

    2005

  30. [38]

    V. V. Popov, O. V. Polishchuk, and S. A. Nikitov, Elec- tromagnetic renormalization of the plasmon spectrum in a laterally screened two-dimensional electron system, JETP Letters95, 85 (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    Karch, P

    J. Karch, P. Olbrich, M. Schmalzbauer, C. Zoth, C. Brin- steiner, M. Fehrenbacher, U. Wurstbauer, M. M. Glazov, S. A. Tarasenko, E. L. Ivchenko, D. Weiss, J. Eroms, R. Yakimova, S. Lara-Avila, S. Kubatkin, and S. D. Ganichev, Dynamic Hall Effect Driven by Circularly Po- larize...

    2010

  32. [40]

    V. M. Muravev, I. V. Andreev, N. D. Semenov, P. A. Gusikhin, and I. V. Kukushkin, Absorption of electro- magnetic waves in a screened two-dimensional electron system, Phys. Rev. B110, 205416 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Lee and J

    S. Lee and J. H. Kang, Ultranarrow polaritonic cav- ities formed by one-dimensional junctions of two- dimensional in-plane heterostructures, Nanophotonics 14, 5417 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    I. V. Gorbenko and V. Y. Kachorovskii, Lateral Plas- monic Superlattice in Strongly Dissipative Regime, JETP Letters122, 55 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Massicotte, G

    M. Massicotte, G. Soavi, A. Principi, and K. J. Tielrooij, Hot carriers in graphene-fundamentals and applications, Nanoscale13, 8376 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Semkin, A

    V. Semkin, A. Shabanov, K. Kapralov, M. Kashchenko, A. Sobolev, I. Mazurenko, V. Myltsev, D. Mylnikov, E. Nikulin, A. Chernov, E. Kameneva, A. Bocharov, and D. Svintsov, Multifunctional 2D Infrared Photode- tectors Enabled by Asymmetric Singular Metasurfaces, Advanced Optical ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.