REVIEW 2 cited by
Developing Social Robots with Empathetic Non-Verbal Cues Using Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose augmenting the empathetic capacities of social robots by integrating non-verbal cues. Our primary contribution is the design and labeling of four types of empathetic non-verbal cues, abbreviated as SAFE: Speech, Action (gesture), Facial expression, and Emotion, in a social robot. These cues are generated using a Large Language Model (LLM). We developed an LLM-based conversational system for the robot and assessed its alignment with social cues as defined by human counselors. Preliminary results show distinct patterns in the robot's responses, such as a preference for calm and positive social emotions like 'joy' and 'lively', and frequent nodding gestures. Despite these tendencies, our approach has led to the development of a social robot capable of context-aware and more authentic interactions. Our work lays the groundwork for future studies on human-robot interactions, emphasizing the essential role of both verbal and non-verbal cues in creating social and empathetic robots.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Speaking Beyond Language: A Large-Scale Multimodal Dataset for Learning Nonverbal Cues from Video-Grounded Dialogues
VENUS is a large podcast-derived dataset aligning text with 3D facial and body cues, and MARS is an LLM fine-tuned on it to generate both words and nonverbal tokens.
-
LLM-Driven Augmented Reality Puppeteer: Controller-Free Voice-Commanded Robot Teleoperation
A controller-free AR teleoperation system uses voice commands processed by a local LLM to puppeteer a Franka robot through a virtual copy in Meta Quest 3, with only an informal demonstration as evidence.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.