pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14361 · v2 · pith:SI7UL7FSnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

From spin splitting to projected mass in altermagnetic Chern matter

Gyanti Prakash Moharana This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 21:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismChern matterquantum anomalous Hall effectprojected exchange masscompensated magnetismtopological materialsspin splittingHall-active sectors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Altermagnetic spin splitting alone does not define Chern matter; the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active sectors does.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that altermagnetic spin splitting by itself is not what produces Chern matter or topological Hall responses. What actually controls the topology is the exchange mass after it is projected onto the specific Hall-active sectors such as surfaces, valleys, orbitals or interfaces. The authors introduce a projected-mass criterion for compensated magnetic topology and show that it yields a two-channel diagnostic capable of separating hidden compensated Hall signals from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases inside a single insulating gap. A reader would care because the same criterion also supplies concrete rules for choosing interfaces, layer thicknesses and material combinations that favor one response over the other.

Core claim

Altermagnetic spin splitting alone does not define Chern matter. The relevant object is the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active surface, valley, orbital or interface sectors. The paper formulates this projected-mass criterion for compensated magnetic topology. The resulting two-channel (C, A) diagnostic separates hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases in a global insulating gap and guides interface, thickness and materials design strategies.

What carries the argument

The projected exchange mass onto Hall-active sectors, which determines whether compensated altermagnetic systems exhibit topological Hall responses rather than raw spin splitting.

If this is right

  • The two-channel (C, A) diagnostic separates hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases inside a global insulating gap.
  • The projected-mass criterion supplies rules for interface engineering, thickness tuning, and materials selection in compensated magnets.
  • Only the projected mass, not the overall spin splitting, sets the topological character of the insulating state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the projection to concrete altermagnetic compounds with known surface states could identify which ones host robust quantum anomalous Hall phases at accessible temperatures.
  • Varying film thickness would systematically change the surface-sector projection and thereby offer a direct experimental knob for switching between compensated and additive Hall responses.
  • The same projection logic might be tested at altermagnet–normal-metal or altermagnet–superconductor interfaces to predict induced topological states.

Load-bearing premise

The projected exchange mass onto Hall-active sectors is the dominant and sufficient quantity controlling the topological character, rather than other band-structure or interaction details not captured by this projection.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement that finds a nonzero Chern number or Hall conductivity in an altermagnetic system where the projected exchange mass on all Hall-active sectors is zero would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14361 by Gyanti Prakash Moharana.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Exchange projection, not spin splitting alone, generates a Chern mass. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two-channel topology separates hidden Hall order from additive QAHE. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Materials roadmap for additive altermagnetic Chern matter. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnetic spin splitting alone does not define Chern matter. The relevant object is the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active surface, valley, orbital or interface sectors. We formulate this projected-mass criterion for compensated magnetic topology. The resulting two-channel $(C,\mathcal{A})$ diagnostic separates hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases in a global insulating gap. It also guides interface, thickness and materials design strategies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper argues that altermagnetic spin splitting by itself does not define Chern matter. The central object is instead the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active sectors (surface, valley, orbital or interface). The authors formulate a projected-mass criterion for compensated magnetic topology and introduce a two-channel (C, A) diagnostic that separates hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases inside a global insulating gap; they also outline implications for interface, thickness and materials design.

Significance. If the projected-mass criterion can be shown to be both necessary and sufficient, the work would supply a practical diagnostic for distinguishing different classes of compensated magnetic topology and would directly inform materials and interface engineering strategies. The (C, A) diagnostic itself is a concrete, falsifiable proposal that could be tested in existing or proposed altermagnetic candidates.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that the projected exchange mass onto Hall-active sectors is the dominant and sufficient quantity for the topological character is load-bearing, yet the manuscript does not demonstrate sufficiency against full band-structure or interaction effects. A concrete counter-example in which the projection predicts trivial topology while a full calculation yields nonzero Chern number would falsify the criterion; no such test or controlled low-energy derivation is provided.
  2. It remains unclear whether the projection is obtained from a controlled effective Hamiltonian (e.g., via down-folding or k·p expansion around the relevant sector) or functions as an empirical filter. Without an explicit derivation or approximation scheme, the (C, A) diagnostic risks being circular with respect to the quantities it is meant to predict.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the two-channel diagnostic (C, A) should be defined at first use with explicit reference to the underlying Chern and anomalous Hall conductivities.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels for any band-structure or mass-projection plots should explicitly state the projection sector and the energy window used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation of the projected-mass criterion and the (C, A) diagnostic.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the projected exchange mass onto Hall-active sectors is the dominant and sufficient quantity for the topological character is load-bearing, yet the manuscript does not demonstrate sufficiency against full band-structure or interaction effects. A concrete counter-example in which the projection predicts trivial topology while a full calculation yields nonzero Chern number would falsify the criterion; no such test or controlled low-energy derivation is provided.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a direct numerical test of sufficiency against full band-structure calculations or strong interactions is not included in the current version. The criterion is motivated by symmetry analysis and controlled low-energy models in which the Hall-active sectors are isolated; within those models the projected mass determines the Chern number. To address the referee's concern we will add a dedicated subsection discussing the regime of validity, outlining how the projection can be validated against ab initio or interacting calculations, and explicitly noting that a counter-example outside the weak-coupling, sector-separated limit would falsify the criterion. This addition will be made without altering the central claims. revision: partial

  2. Referee: It remains unclear whether the projection is obtained from a controlled effective Hamiltonian (e.g., via down-folding or k·p expansion around the relevant sector) or functions as an empirical filter. Without an explicit derivation or approximation scheme, the (C, A) diagnostic risks being circular with respect to the quantities it is meant to predict.

    Authors: The projection is constructed via a k·p expansion around the relevant high-symmetry points or orbital/valley sectors, as already detailed in the supplementary material and model sections. This constitutes a controlled low-energy approximation. We will revise the main text to include an explicit step-by-step derivation of the projected exchange mass from the full Hamiltonian, making the controlled nature of the procedure transparent and removing any ambiguity about circularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in formulation of projected-mass criterion

full rationale

The paper formulates a projected exchange mass criterion and the (C, A) diagnostic as a new organizing principle for altermagnetic Chern matter, distinguishing it from plain spin splitting. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or renamed input; the derivation introduces the projection onto Hall-active sectors as an explicit modeling choice rather than deriving it tautologically from prior results. The abstract and claims remain self-contained without evidence of the diagnostic being equivalent to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such elements remain unidentified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5586 in / 972 out tokens · 78191 ms · 2026-05-20T21:39:46.363548+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Changet al., Experimental observation of the quantum anoma- lous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Science 340, 167–170 (2013)

    C.-Z. Changet al., Experimental observation of the quantum anoma- lous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Science 340, 167–170 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Changet al., High-precision realization of robust quantum anomalous Hall state in a hard ferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat

    C.-Z. Changet al., High-precision realization of robust quantum anomalous Hall state in a hard ferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat. Mater. 14, 473–477 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Tokura, K

    Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki, Magnetic topological insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126–143 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    C.-Z.Chang,C.-X.Liu,andA.H.MacDonald,Colloquium: Quantum anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Denget al., Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, Science 367, 895–900 (2020)

    Y. Denget al., Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, Science 367, 895–900 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Liuet al., Robust axion insulator and Chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antiferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat

    C. Liuet al., Robust axion insulator and Chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antiferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat. Mater. 19, 522–527 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    A. J. Bestwicket al., Precise quantization of the anomalous Hall effect near zero magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 187201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    E. J. Foxet al., Part-per-million quantization and current-induced breakdown of the quantum anomalous Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075145 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    J. G. Checkelskyet al., Trajectory of the anomalous Hall effect towards the quantized state in a ferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat. Phys. 10, 731–736 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Graueret al., Scaling of the quantum anomalous Hall effect as an indicator of axion electrodynamics, Phys

    S. Graueret al., Scaling of the quantum anomalous Hall effect as an indicator of axion electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 246801 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    M.Mogiet al., Magneticmodulationdopingintopologicalinsulators toward higher-temperature quantum anomalous Hall effect, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 182401 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    C.Zhanget al.,Zero-fieldchiraledgetransportinanintrinsicmagnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, Nat. Commun. 16, 5587 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    N. J. Huanget al., Quantum anomalous Hall effect for metrology, Appl. Phys. Lett. 126, 040501 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Saatjianet al., Quantum decoherence by magnetic fluctuations in a magnetic topological insulator, npj Quantum Mater

    R. Saatjianet al., Quantum decoherence by magnetic fluctuations in a magnetic topological insulator, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 81 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Banerjeeet al., Materials for quantum technologies: a roadmap for spin and topology, Appl

    N. Banerjeeet al., Materials for quantum technologies: a roadmap for spin and topology, Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 041328 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Smejkal, J

    L. Smejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferro- magnetism and antiferromagnetism: a phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Smejkal, A

    L. Smejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jung- wirth,AnomalousHallantiferromagnets,Nat.Rev.Mater.7,482–496 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Songet al., Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat

    C. Songet al., Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 473–485 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    I. I. Mazinet al., Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2108924118 (2021). 5

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    I. I. Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of funda- mental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    L.Smejkal,J.Sinova,andT.Jungwirth,Emergingresearchlandscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Cheong and F.-T

    S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, Altermagnetism classification, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 38 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00756-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00756-5 2025

  23. [23]

    J.Krempaskýet al.,AltermagneticliftingofKramersspindegeneracy, Nature 626, 517–522 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Reimerset al., Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat

    S. Reimerset al., Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Commun. 15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Jianget al., A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat

    B. Jianget al., A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys. 21, 754–759 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Liuet al., Altermagnetic spin precession and spin transistor, Phys

    L.-S. Liuet al., Altermagnetic spin precession and spin transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 106301 (2026), doi:10.1103/j3qj-77yj

    work page doi:10.1103/j3qj-77yj 2026

  27. [27]

    Q. Wang, R. Wu, and J. Hu, Spin-biased quantum spin Hall effect in altermagnetic Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 113, L161101 (2026), doi:10.1103/kqwx-v6jv

    work page doi:10.1103/kqwx-v6jv 2026

  28. [28]

    Keßleret al., Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from 𝜇SR spectroscopy and neutron diffraction, npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024)

    P. Keßleret al., Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from 𝜇SR spectroscopy and neutron diffraction, npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Hiraishiet al., Nonmagnetic ground state in RuO2 revealed by muon spin rotation, Phys

    M. Hiraishiet al., Nonmagnetic ground state in RuO2 revealed by muon spin rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 166702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Smolyanyuk, I

    A. Smolyanyuk, I. I. Mazin, L. Garcia-Gassull, and R. Valentí, Fragility of the magnetic order in the prototypical altermagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134424 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    M. M. Otrokovet al., Prediction and observation of an antiferromag- netic topological insulator, Nature 576, 416–422 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Layer Hall effect induced by altermagnetism

    F. Qin and R. Chen, Layer Hall effect induced by altermagnetism, arXiv:2601.03937 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Liet al., Manipulating anomalous transport via crystal symmetry in two-dimensional altermagnetic systems, arXiv:2601.01564 (2026)

    D. Liet al., Manipulating anomalous transport via crystal symmetry in two-dimensional altermagnetic systems, arXiv:2601.01564 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    M. B. Tagani, A. Fakhredine, and C. Autieri, Quantum anoma- lous Hall conductivity in altermagnets under applied magnetic field, arXiv:2604.01948 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Chenet al., Tailoring topological altermagnetic spin texture via interfacialexchangecouplinginquasi-2DCrSb/(Bi,Sb) 2Te3 thinfilm, Nat

    P. Chenet al., Tailoring topological altermagnetic spin texture via interfacialexchangecouplinginquasi-2DCrSb/(Bi,Sb) 2Te3 thinfilm, Nat. Commun. (2026), doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72021-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72021-7 2026

  36. [36]

    Zhuet al., Altermagnetic proximity effect, Phys

    Z. Zhuet al., Altermagnetic proximity effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 186702 (2026), doi:10.1103/kqy8-myz1

    work page doi:10.1103/kqy8-myz1 2026

  37. [37]

    Jiang, S

    X. Jiang, S. A. A. Ghorashi, D. Lu, and J. Cano, Altermagnetism induced surface Chern insulator, Nano Lett. 26, 1327–1333 (2026)

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    Weiet al., La 2O3Mn2Se2: a correlated insulating layered d-wave altermagnet, Phys

    C.-C. Weiet al., La 2O3Mn2Se2: a correlated insulating layered d-wave altermagnet, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 024402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbo, Two-dimensional altermagnets: superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model, Phys. Rev. B 108, 224421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Kaushal and M

    N. Kaushal and M. Franz, Altermagnetism in modified Lieb lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 156502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Durrnagelet al., Altermagnetic phase transition in a Lieb metal, Phys

    M. Durrnagelet al., Altermagnetic phase transition in a Lieb metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Wuet al., Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal, Science 359, 76–79 (2018)

    S. Wuet al., Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal, Science 359, 76–79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    J. Liu, X. Qian, and L. Fu, Crystal field effect induced topological crystalline insulators in monolayer IV–VI semiconductors, Nano Lett. 15, 2657–2661 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    D. Wang, H. Wang, L. Liu, J. Zhang, and H. Zhang, Electric-field- induced switchable two-dimensional altermagnets, Nano Lett. 25, 498–503 (2025), doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05384

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05384 2025

  45. [45]

    Z. Li, Z. Li, and Z. Qiao, Altermagnetism-induced topological phase transitionsintheKane–Melemodel,Phys.Rev.B111,155303(2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Weiet al., The switchable quantum anomalous Hall effect and altermagnetism in Janus monolayer and bilayer V2WS2Se2, J

    Y. Weiet al., The switchable quantum anomalous Hall effect and altermagnetism in Janus monolayer and bilayer V2WS2Se2, J. Mater. Chem. C 13, 21498–21508 (2025), doi:10.1039/D5TC02517F

    work page doi:10.1039/d5tc02517f 2025

  47. [47]

    Zouet al., Floquet quantum anomalous Hall effect with in-plane magnetizationintwo-dimensionalaltermagnets,ACSNano19,35575– 35580 (2025), doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c10277

    X. Zouet al., Floquet quantum anomalous Hall effect with in-plane magnetizationintwo-dimensionalaltermagnets,ACSNano19,35575– 35580 (2025), doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c10277

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c10277 2025

  48. [48]

    Chenet al., Altermagnets enable gate-switchable helical and chiral topological transport with spin–valley–momentum-locked dual protection, arXiv:2603.06487 (2026)

    X. Chenet al., Altermagnets enable gate-switchable helical and chiral topological transport with spin–valley–momentum-locked dual protection, arXiv:2603.06487 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    134, 106802 (2025)

    M.Guet al.,Ferroelectricswitchablealtermagnetism,Phys.Rev.Lett. 134, 106802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Duanet al., Antiferroelectric altermagnets: antiferroelectricity alters magnets, Phys

    X. Duanet al., Antiferroelectric altermagnets: antiferroelectricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Penget al., Ferroelastic altermagnetism, npj Quantum Mater

    R. Penget al., Ferroelastic altermagnetism, npj Quantum Mater. 11, 5 (2026), doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00835-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00835-7 2026

  52. [52]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, Altermagnetic routes to Majorana modes in zero net magnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    G. Z. X. Yang, Z.-T. Sun, Y.-M. Xie, and K. T. Law, Topologi- cal altermagnetic Josephson junctions, npj Quantum Mater. (2026), doi:10.1038/s41535-026-00874-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-026-00874-8 2026

  54. [54]

    Jasiewicz, P

    K. Jasiewicz, P. Wójcik, M. P. Nowak, and M. Zegrodnik, Interplay between altermagnetism and superconductivity in two dimensions: intertwined symmetries and singlet–triplet mixing, npj Quantum Mater. (2025), doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00840-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00840-w 2025

  55. [55]

    P.Chatterjeeet al.,Interplaybetweenaltermagnetismandtopological superconductivity on an unconventional superconducting platform, Phys. Rev. B 112, 054503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    D. Wang, A. K. Ghosh, Y. Tao, F. Ma, and C. Song, Emerging anomaloushigher-ordertopologicalphasesinaltermagnet/topological- insulatorheterostructurebyFloquetengineering,Adv.Sci.13,e22203 (2026), doi:10.1002/advs.202522203

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202522203 2026

  57. [57]

    Anomalous thermoelectric and thermal Hall effects in irradiated altermagnets

    F. Qin and X.-B. Qiang, Anomalous thermoelectric and thermal Hall effects in irradiated altermagnets, arXiv:2602.05745 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Caro and F

    C. Caro and F. Gamez, Phase-rotated altermagnets as Chern valves for topological transport, arXiv:2510.24294 (2025). 6

    work page arXiv 2025