Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Movable Subarray-Aided ISAC in Hybrid Near-Far Field Channels

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An ISAC system with movable subarrays achieves a 24 dB trace-CRB gain over fixed sparse subarrays, using a hybrid near-far field channel model accurate within 0.75 dB of the spherical-wave model.

desk verdict Clean CRB math and a sensible hybrid-field model, but the headline 24 dB MSA gain likely conflates mobility with an unfairly centered fixed baseline; a corner-placed fixed comparison is needed before that claim stands. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01854 v1 pith:SIBVVGYU submitted 2026-08-03 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

Ruiqi Liu , Yuanshuo Gang , Honghao Wang , Tianqi Mao This is my paper
classification cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT
keywords integratedsensingandcommunicationmovablesubarrayhybridnear-farfieldchannelCramér-Raoboundbeamformingoptimizationnear-fieldalternating6G
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that in a 6G integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system, mounting the antenna array as several small movable subarrays gives a large sensing accuracy boost, and that the channel can be modeled cheaply and accurately as a hybrid of far-field (within each subarray) and near-field (across subarrays) propagation. The authors derive the Cramér-Rao bound for joint range, elevation, and azimuth estimation under this hybrid model, then jointly optimize the transmit beamforming matrix and the subarray positions. They report a 24 dB reduction in trace CRB compared to fixed subarrays, with the hybrid model within 0.75 dB of a full spherical-wave model. If true, this means ISAC systems can get near-field-grade sensing resolution without the cost of modeling every antenna element individually.

What carries the argument

The key object is the hybrid channel vector g_s(T) = b_s(T) ⊗ a_s, where b_s(T) is the inter-subarray spherical-wave phase response and a_s is the intra-subarray planar-wave steering vector. This Kronecker structure makes the channel separable in target parameters and subarray positions, enabling a tractable Fisher information matrix (expressed via Schur complement to eliminate the unknown reflection coefficient) and an alternating optimization algorithm: rank-one-penalized semidefinite relaxation for the beamforming matrix, and projected finite-difference block descent for subarray positions.

What would settle it

Re-evaluate the trace CRB using a full element-wise spherical-wave channel that includes distance-dependent amplitude attenuation across every subarray element, using the same optimized positions and beamformers; if the CRB differs from the hybrid model by more than 0.75 dB, or the reported 24 dB gain narrows substantially, the uniform-power assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that when a sensing target lies in the near field of a large overall aperture but in the far field of each compact subarray, the channel response factors as a Kronecker product: a spherical-wave phase vector across subarray centers (responsible for range and angle information) and a planar-wave steering vector within each subarray (reusable and independent of subarray position). On this hybrid model, the paper derives the equivalent Fisher information matrix and trace CRB for joint range, elevation, and azimuth estimation, then jointly optimizes beamforming and subarray positions. Numerical results show the hybrid model matches the element-wise spherical-wave model withi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the uniform-power hybrid-field approximation: subarray movement changes only propagation phases, while amplitude variation over the movable aperture is neglected because path ranges are much larger than the array radius.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The hybrid near-far field model can replace the element-wise spherical-wave model in MSA-aided ISAC design with negligible accuracy loss, reducing channel dimension and optimization complexity.
  • Optimizing subarray positions jointly with beamforming yields about 24 dB lower trace CRB than fixing subarrays at region centers, under the same transmit power and SINR constraints.
  • For a fixed total aperture and antenna count, partitioning the array into more subarrays improves the sensing-communication tradeoff: trace CRB decreases as the array is split into 4, 8, or 16 MSAs.
  • The alternating optimization algorithm converges to a finite objective value and produces the reported gains, making the approach directly implementable for target tracking scenarios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Kronecker separability suggests subarray position optimization is effectively reconfiguring the large-scale array geometry while reusing fixed intra-subarray responses; one might expect even larger gains in wideband or low-SNR regimes where cross-subarray phase curvature provides richer information.
  • The 24 dB gain is computed against a benchmark where subarrays are fixed at the centers of their regions; a comparison against the best fixed subarray layout or against a dense fixed array with the same antenna count would clarify how much of the gain comes from mobility versus sparse-array geometry.
  • The uniform-power approximation neglects amplitude variation within each subarray. A natural extension is to include distance-dependent amplitude taper while preserving the Kronecker structure, which would make the model valid for closer targets or larger subarrays.
  • The hybrid model could accelerate other ISAC tasks, such as beam training and target localization, since the intra-subarray response is reusable across all subarray positions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies an ISAC system in which the base station is equipped with movable subarrays (MSAs). It adopts a hybrid near-far field model: spherical-wave phase variation across subarray centers and planar-wave responses within each subarray. The authors derive an equivalent Fisher information matrix and CRB for target range/elevation/azimuth estimation, formulate a joint beamforming and subarray-position optimization problem under SINR, power, and movement constraints, and propose an alternating optimization algorithm combining rank-one-penalized SDR with projected finite-difference block descent. Numerical results claim less than 0.75 dB CRB mismatch relative to an element-wise spherical-wave model and a 24 dB trace-CRB gain of movable subarrays over a fixed sparse-subarray baseline.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution: a tractable hybrid channel model for MSA-aided ISAC, a closed-form FIM/CRB characterization with nuisance-parameter elimination, and an AO algorithm for joint beamforming and subarray placement. The CRB derivation is self-contained and follows the standard complex-Gaussian FIM framework, and the comparison against an external spherical-wave benchmark is a good practice. However, the central numerical claim of a 24 dB gain is threatened by an unfair fixed baseline, and the convergence statement is not fully justified. These issues are fixable, but they are load-bearing for the paper's main conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, Fig. 2] The fixed sparse-subarray baseline is defined with each subarray at the center of its movement region C_m, while the movable subarrays can move to the outer corners, roughly doubling the baseline aperture. Since angular CRB scales as 1/D^2 and near-field range CRB can scale as 1/D^4, a large fraction of the reported 24 dB 'subarray movement gain' may simply be the gain of choosing a better static layout. Please add a comparison against a fixed sparse baseline with subarrays placed at the outer corners of their regions (or the best fixed placement for the known target). Report the gain relative to that optimized static baseline. This is necessary to substantiate the claim that movability, rather than the initial poor placement, is what yields the 24 dB improvement.
  2. [Section IV.A/IV.B (convergence claim)] The proof that the AO objective sequence is non-increasing is incomplete. The W-update in Section IV.A minimizes a rank-one-penalized SDR problem, not the original trace CRB; if the SDR solution is not rank-one, Gaussian randomization can yield a recovered beamformer whose original CRB is larger than that of the previous iterate. Thus the statement near the end of Section IV.B that 'the accepted AO objective sequence is non-increasing and therefore converges' is not established for the full alternating algorithm. Please either add a safeguard that retains W^(r) when the recovered W^(r+1) increases the original objective, or prove monotonicity of the W-update. Also, 'converges to a finite value' should be qualified as objective-sequence convergence, not convergence to a stationary or optimal solution.
  3. [Section V (numerical validation)] The numerical results are based on a single random configuration of users and target, with no error bars, percentiles, or code. Figures 2 and 3 are therefore not sufficient to support general claims such as 'MSAs substantially reduce the CRB' or the tradeoff trends. Please average over multiple random target/user drops and report the spread (e.g., median and 10th/90th percentiles). If code is provided, this also improves reproducibility. This is important because the 24 dB gain and the model-mismatch value could be configuration-dependent.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section V, Fig. 3] The comparison of 4, 8, and 16 MSAs is not fully specified. The text says 'fixed total aperture and antenna number,' but the earlier setup uses 4 subarrays of 4x4 elements, giving 64 antennas. If each MSA remains 4x4 for M=8 or M=16, the antenna count changes. If the antenna count is fixed, the subarray size must change. Please state the exact subarray partitioning and element counts, otherwise the conclusion that more MSAs improve performance is ambiguous.
  2. [Section IV (algorithm parameters)] The numerical implementation does not report the values of the algorithmic constants: initial penalty weight rho^(0), penalty increase factor tau_rho, finite-difference step h, backtracking factor tau_alpha, initial step alpha_0, minimum step alpha_min, rank-gap threshold epsilon_rank, and number of Gaussian randomization trials. These are needed to reproduce the results and to assess sensitivity.
  3. [Section II/V (uniform-power approximation)] The uniform-power hybrid-field approximation is stated qualitatively ('path range is much larger than array radius'). The 0.75 dB mismatch check only covers the optimized configurations. Please quantify the amplitude variation over the aperture in the simulated regime (e.g., less than 1% at 30 m range with a 0.4 m aperture) or add a direct comparison separating phase and amplitude effects.
  4. [Notations and text] There are several typos: 'identify matrix' should be 'identity matrix', 'Subarrarys' should be 'subarrays', and the accent in 'Cram´er' is inconsistently rendered. Please also define C_m as a partition or set of regions and clarify whether the movement regions tile the 0.4 m x 0.4 m aperture.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CRB derivation is self-contained from the stated hybrid-field model, and the numerical comparisons are against an independent spherical-wave benchmark.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The hybrid near-far-field channel model in (3)-(7) is introduced as an explicit modeling assumption with the uniform-power approximation stated in Section II ('subarray movement changes the propagation phases while the amplitude variation over the movable aperture is neglected'), not as a fitted or self-referential result. The FIM (15)-(17) is derived from the received signal model (13) via the standard complex Fisher information formula and Schur complement, with no parameter fitted to the quantity being predicted. The CRB is simply the inverse of the resulting equivalent FIM, and the optimization problem (18) minimizes that derived CRB. The 0.75 dB mismatch claim is checked against an independent element-wise spherical-wave model in Fig. 2, where the dashed curves re-evaluate the same beamforming and positions under the spherical-wave model; this is an external benchmark, not a circular validation. The 24 dB MSA gain is a numerical comparison between an optimized movable configuration and a fixed sparse configuration; while one could question the fairness of the fixed baseline, that is a benchmark-design concern, not circularity, because the gain is not forced by equation identity or by fitting. The only self-references with author overlap are [1] and [5], used as background/related-work citations; they are not load-bearing for the CRB derivation or the numerical claims. No equation reduces to its own input, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain is present. Thus the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or fitted physical constants are introduced. The central claim rests on the hybrid-field geometry assumption and the uniform-power amplitude approximation, both inherited from the channel modeling literature. The only hand-chosen quantities are algorithm tuning constants.

free parameters (1)
  • Algorithm tuning constants (h, tau_rho, alpha_0, alpha_min, epsilon_rank, randomization trials) = not specified
    Chosen by hand in Section IV; needed to reproduce the reported curves, though not fitted to physical data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Hybrid near-far field geometry: target/users/scatterers are in the near field of the overall aperture but in the far field of each subarray.
    Section II; if this geometry fails, the Kronecker product channel model (3) and (7) is invalid.
  • domain assumption Uniform-power model: path amplitudes are constant over the movable aperture.
    Section II; invoked so subarray movement affects only phases, with amplitude variation neglected; not independently validated.
  • domain assumption The sensing target is a point scatterer with an unknown complex reflection coefficient beta_s.
    Section II, eq (8); the CRB treats beta_s as a nuisance parameter, which would not hold for extended or fluctuating targets.
  • domain assumption Communication channel paths and scatterer positions are known for optimization.
    Section II and eq (11); SINR constraints require perfect channel state information at the transmitter.
  • standard math Standard complex Gaussian noise and snapshot model are used for the FIM/CRB.
    Section III, eq (15); CRB for a Gaussian observation model.
  • standard math Schur complement, semidefinite relaxation, and rank-one penalty machinery are valid.
    Sections III-IV; standard tools used to derive the equivalent FIM and to relax non-convex constraints.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Movable Subarray-Aided ISAC in Hybrid Near-Far Field Channels." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SIBVVGYU

@misc{pith2026260801854,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Movable Subarray-Aided ISAC in Hybrid Near-Far Field Channels},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SIBVVGYU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01854}
}
read the original abstract

This letter investigates an integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system aided by movable subarrays (MSAs) using a hybrid near-far field channel model. The sensing target and communication users are assumed to lie in the near field of the overall MSA aperture but in the far-field region of each subarray. Accordingly, a hybrid near-far field channel model is established, and the equivalent Fisher information matrix and Cram\'er-Rao bound (CRB) for joint range, elevation, and azimuth estimation are derived. The transmit beamforming matrix and subarray positions are jointly optimized to minimize the trace CRB subject to minimum communication signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), maximum transmit power and subarray movement constraints. An alternating optimization algorithm is developed combining iterative rank-one-penalized semidefinite relaxation with projected finite-difference block descent and backtracking. Numerical results show that the hybrid-field model closely matches the spherical-wave model, while MSAs substantially reduce the CRB.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01854 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. System model of the MA-aided ISAC system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. CRB performance comparison under 5 dB SINR constraint. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references

  1. [10]

    Yan et al., ``Joint inter-path and intra-path multiplexing for terahertz widely-spaced multi-subarray hybrid beamforming systems,'' IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol

    L. Yan et al., ``Joint inter-path and intra-path multiplexing for terahertz widely-spaced multi-subarray hybrid beamforming systems,'' IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 1391--1406, 2022

    2022

  2. [1]

    R. Liu, L. Zhang, R. Y.-N. Li, and M. D. Renzo, `` The ITU Vision and Framework for 6G: Scenarios, Capabilities, and Enablers ,'' IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 114--122, 2025

    2025

  3. [2]

    Liu et al., ``Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for 6g and beyond,'' IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol

    F. Liu et al., ``Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for 6g and beyond,'' IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728--1767, 2022

    2022

  4. [3]

    Li et al., ``Transmit beamforming design for isac with stacked intelligent metasurfaces,'' IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol

    S. Li et al., ``Transmit beamforming design for isac with stacked intelligent metasurfaces,'' IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 6767--6772, 2025

    2025

  5. [4]

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, ``Movable antenna enhanced wireless sensing via antenna position optimization,'' IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16\,575--16\,589, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Lyu et al., ``Movable antenna enabled integrated sensing and communication,'' IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol

    W. Lyu et al., ``Movable antenna enabled integrated sensing and communication,'' IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2862--2875, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, ``Movable antenna enhanced integrated sensing and communication via antenna position optimization,'' IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 74, pp. 1522--1537, 2026

    2026

  8. [8]

    J. Ding, Z. Zhou, X. Shao, B. Jiao, and R. Zhang, ``Movable antenna-aided near-field integrated sensing and communication,'' IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 493--508, 2026

    2026

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Zhu et al., ``Movable antenna enabled near-field communications: Channel modeling and performance optimization,'' IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol

    L. Zhu et al., ``Movable antenna enabled near-field communications: Channel modeling and performance optimization,'' IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 7240--7256, 2025

    2025

  2. [11]

    Frequency-Domain Differential Interference Cancellation for Full-Duplex OFDM ISAC Systems , year=

    Duan, Baiyu and Chen, Cong and Pan, Wensheng and Shen, Ying and Liu, Ying and Shao, Shihai , journal=. Frequency-Domain Differential Interference Cancellation for Full-Duplex OFDM ISAC Systems , year=

  3. [12]

    A Wideband Co-Linearly Polarized Full-Duplex Antenna-in-Package With High Isolation for Integrated Sensing and Communication , year=

    Ma, Lina and Lai, Jun and Yin, Yuhang and Xia, Chenhui and Gu, Changzhan and Mao, Junfa , journal=. A Wideband Co-Linearly Polarized Full-Duplex Antenna-in-Package With High Isolation for Integrated Sensing and Communication , year=

  4. [13]

    2023 , volume=

    Liu, Ruiqi and Lin, Hui and Lee, Hyunjoong and Chaves, Fabiano and Lim, Hanna and Sköld, Johan , journal=. 2023 , volume=

    2023

  5. [14]

    Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond , year=

    Liu et al., Fan , journal=. Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond , year=

  6. [15]

    2025 , volume=

    Liu, Ruiqi and Zhang, Leyi and Zou, Minqiang and Parolari, Sergio and Tian, Li , journal=. 2025 , volume=

    2025

  7. [16]

    Ubiquitous UAV Communication Enabled Low-Altitude Economy: Applications, Techniques, and 3GPP’s Efforts , year=

    He, Dongxuan and Yuan, Weijie and Wu, Jun and Liu, Ruiqi , journal=. Ubiquitous UAV Communication Enabled Low-Altitude Economy: Applications, Techniques, and 3GPP’s Efforts , year=

  8. [17]

    Pre-Chirp-Domain Index Modulation for Full-Diversity Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing towards 6G , year=

    Liu, Guangyao and Mao, Tianqi and Xiao, Zhenyu and Wen, Miaowen and Liu, Ruiqi and Zhao, Jingjing and Basar, Ertugrul and Wang, Zhaocheng and Chen, Sheng , journal=. Pre-Chirp-Domain Index Modulation for Full-Diversity Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing towards 6G , year=

  9. [18]

    2025 , volume=

    Liu, Ruiqi and Zhang, Leyi and Li, Ruyue Yu-Ngok and Renzo, Marco Di , journal=. 2025 , volume=

    2025

  10. [19]

    Throughput Maximization for Movable Antenna Systems With Movement Delay Consideration , year=

    Wang, Honghao and Wu, Qingqing and Gao, Ying and Chen, Wen and Mei, Weidong and Hu, Guojie and Xu, Lexi , journal=. Throughput Maximization for Movable Antenna Systems With Movement Delay Consideration , year=

  11. [20]

    From Vision to Design Targets: Technical Performance Requirements for IMT-2030 , year=

    Ma, Liang and Grant, Marc and Lin, Hui and Sköld, Johan and Liu, Ruiqi and Shao, Jiafeng , journal=. From Vision to Design Targets: Technical Performance Requirements for IMT-2030 , year=

  12. [21]

    Reconfigurable Airspace: Synergizing Movable Antenna and Intelligent Surface for Low-Altitude

    Wang et al., Honghao , journal=. Reconfigurable Airspace: Synergizing Movable Antenna and Intelligent Surface for Low-Altitude. 2511.10310 , archivePrefix=

  13. [22]

    Joint Inter-Path and Intra-Path Multiplexing for Terahertz Widely-Spaced Multi-Subarray Hybrid Beamforming Systems , year=

    Yan et al., Longfei , journal=. Joint Inter-Path and Intra-Path Multiplexing for Terahertz Widely-Spaced Multi-Subarray Hybrid Beamforming Systems , year=

  14. [23]

    Movable-Antenna Assisted Cooperative ISAC in Near-Field Scenarios: Joint Transmit Beamforming and Antenna Positioning , year=

    Wang et al., Xinru , journal=. Movable-Antenna Assisted Cooperative ISAC in Near-Field Scenarios: Joint Transmit Beamforming and Antenna Positioning , year=

  15. [24]

    Movable Antenna Enabled Near-Field Communications: Channel Modeling and Performance Optimization , year=

    Zhu et al., Lipeng , journal=. Movable Antenna Enabled Near-Field Communications: Channel Modeling and Performance Optimization , year=

  16. [25]

    Movable Antenna Enhanced Integrated Sensing and Communication Via Antenna Position Optimization , year=

    Ma, Wenyan and Zhu, Lipeng and Zhang, Rui , journal=. Movable Antenna Enhanced Integrated Sensing and Communication Via Antenna Position Optimization , year=

  17. [26]

    Movable Antenna-Aided Near-Field Integrated Sensing and Communication , year=

    Ding, Jingze and Zhou, Zijian and Shao, Xiaodan and Jiao, Bingli and Zhang, Rui , journal=. Movable Antenna-Aided Near-Field Integrated Sensing and Communication , year=

  18. [27]

    Movable Antenna Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication , year=

    Lyu et al., Wanting , journal=. Movable Antenna Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication , year=

  19. [28]

    Transmit Beamforming Design for ISAC With Stacked Intelligent Metasurfaces , year=

    Li et al., Shunyu , journal=. Transmit Beamforming Design for ISAC With Stacked Intelligent Metasurfaces , year=

  20. [29]

    Movable Antenna Enhanced Wireless Sensing via Antenna Position Optimization , year=

    Ma, Wenyan and Zhu, Lipeng and Zhang, Rui , journal=. Movable Antenna Enhanced Wireless Sensing via Antenna Position Optimization , year=

  21. [30]

    Modeling and Performance Analysis for Movable Antenna Enabled Wireless Communications , year=

    Zhu, Lipeng and Ma, Wenyan and Zhang, Rui , journal=. Modeling and Performance Analysis for Movable Antenna Enabled Wireless Communications , year=

  22. [31]

    Movable Antenna Enabled Interference Network: Joint Antenna Position and Beamforming Design , year=

    Wang, Honghao and Wu, Qingqing and Chen, Wen , journal=. Movable Antenna Enabled Interference Network: Joint Antenna Position and Beamforming Design , year=

  23. [32]

    Hybrid Beamforming With Widely-Spaced-Array for Multi-User Cross-Near-and-Far-Field Communications , year=

    Shen, Heyin and Chen, Yuhang and Han, Chong and Yuan, Jinhong , journal=. Hybrid Beamforming With Widely-Spaced-Array for Multi-User Cross-Near-and-Far-Field Communications , year=

  24. [33]

    Near-Field Communications: A Tutorial Review , year=

    Liu, Yuanwei and Wang, Zhaolin and Xu, Jiaqi and Ouyang, Chongjun and Mu, Xidong and Schober, Robert , journal=. Near-Field Communications: A Tutorial Review , year=

  25. [34]

    6G Enabled Advanced Transportation Systems , year=

    Liu et al., Ruiqi , journal=. 6G Enabled Advanced Transportation Systems , year=

  26. [35]

    Integrated sensing and communication based outdoor multi-target detection, tracking, and localization in practical 5G Networks , year=

    Liu, Ruiqi and Jian, Mengnan and Chen, Dawei and Lin, Xu and Cheng, Yichao and Cheng, Wei and Chen, Shijun , journal=. Integrated sensing and communication based outdoor multi-target detection, tracking, and localization in practical 5G Networks , year=

  27. [36]

    Integrated Sensing and Communication Waveform Design: A Survey , year=

    Zhou, Wenxing and Zhang, Ruoyu and Chen, Guangyi and Wu, Wen , journal=. Integrated Sensing and Communication Waveform Design: A Survey , year=

  28. [37]

    Waveform Design and Performance Analysis for Full-Duplex Integrated Sensing and Communication , year=

    Xiao, Zhiqiang and Zeng, Yong , journal=. Waveform Design and Performance Analysis for Full-Duplex Integrated Sensing and Communication , year=

  29. [38]

    2025 , pages=

    Mohammad Heggo and Arman Shojaeifard and Alain Mourad and Chuangxin Jiang and Ruiqi Liu and Junchen Liu , booktitle=. 2025 , pages=

    2025

  30. [39]

    A Unified Channel Model for Both Communication and Sensing in Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems , year=

    Lou, Junpeng and Liu, Ruiqi and Jiang, Chuangxin and Han, Xianghui and Han, Zhiqiang and Yang, Qi and Wang, Zhongbin , booktitle=. A Unified Channel Model for Both Communication and Sensing in Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems , year=

  31. [40]

    and Nikookar, H

    Franken, G.E.A. and Nikookar, H. and Genderen, P. Van , booktitle=. Doppler Tolerance of OFDM-coded Radar Signals , year=

  32. [41]

    and Codina, Humbert and Rene, Sergi and Sorensen, Troels B

    Priyanto, Basuki E. and Codina, Humbert and Rene, Sergi and Sorensen, Troels B. and Mogensen, Preben , booktitle=. Initial Performance Evaluation of DFT-Spread OFDM Based SC-FDMA for UTRA LTE Uplink , year=

  33. [42]

    Cross-Domain Dual-Functional OFDM Waveform Design for Accurate Sensing/Positioning , year=

    Zhang, Fan and Mao, Tianqi and Liu, Ruiqi and Han, Zhu and Chen, Sheng and Wang, Zhaocheng , journal=. Cross-Domain Dual-Functional OFDM Waveform Design for Accurate Sensing/Positioning , year=

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.