Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 123 references

An iterative method to deblend AGN-Host contributions for Integral Field spectroscopic observations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An iterative method fits a Moffat point-spread function for the AGN and a Sérsic profile for the host at every wavelength slice of an IFS cube, separating the two without any prior PSF model.

desk verdict A useful, code-shipping AGN-host deblender for IFS, but the mock validation never tests whether a real AGN PSF is actually Moffat. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13270 v1 pith:SISBUVN5 submitted 2024-11-20 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IM

Héctor Ibarra-Medel , Castalia Alenka Negrete , Ivan Lacerna , Héctor Manuel Hernández-Toledo , Edgar Cortes-Suárez , Sebastián Francisco Sánchez This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
keywords AGN-hostdecompositionintegralfieldspectroscopyMoffatprofileSérsicquasardeblendingPSFmodelingMaNGAemission-line
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents an iterative method for separating the unresolved AGN (quasar) emission from the spatially resolved host galaxy in integral-field spectroscopic (IFS) datacubes. The method fits a two-dimensional Moffat profile for the AGN point source and a two-dimensional Sérsic profile for the host simultaneously per monochromatic slice. It needs no prior PSF characterization from a foreground star, no external host-light model, and no user-supplied AGN/host flux ratio. On mock IFS cubes the recovered AGN and host spectra agree with the input within roughly 10–25 percent of the total flux, with the best performance in AGN-dominated, well-resolved observations. On three MaNGA galaxies, the residual cube shows host stellar absorption and narrow-line emission while the recovered AGN spectrum retains broad and narrow emission lines.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the Moffat profile $F_{\rm psf}(i,j)=A_t (1+R(i,j)^2/\alpha^2)^{-\beta}$ for the unresolved point source and the Sérsic profile $F_{\rm ext}(i,j)=I_0\exp[-b_n((R'/R_e)^{1/n_s}-1)]$ for the host. The method first fits both profiles on spectral windows of ten pixels to boost signal-to-noise, then interpolates the smoothly varying parameters ($b_n$, $n_s$, $\beta$, and optional ellipticity and position angle) to every wavelength pixel, and finally re-fits each monochromatic slice with a reduced free-parameter set. The AGN spectrum follows from analytically integrating the Moffat profile at each wavelength, and the host cube is the residual. This two-stage fitting design is what allows the method to operate without prior PSF or host-galaxy information.

What would settle it

Build a mock IFS cube with a host that has a strong bar or spiral arms and a PSF whose wings deviate from the Moffat form, then check whether the recovered AGN spectrum departs from the true input by more than the reported 10–25% residual; alternatively, compare the recovered AGN flux against high-resolution imaging photometry of the same source.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a datacube of an AGN-host system can be deblended by modelling each monochromatic slice as the sum of a Moffat profile for the unresolved AGN and a circular Sérsic profile for the host, with the host Sérsic index, shape parameter, and PSF wing index interpolated smoothly from coarse spectral windows to full spectral sampling. The recovered AGN spectrum is the analytic total flux of the fitted Moffat profile, $F_{\rm AGN}(\lambda)=\pi\alpha(\lambda)^2 A_t(\lambda)/(\beta(\lambda)-1)$, and the host cube is the residual after subtracting the reconstructed AGN model cube. The paper argues that this disengages the bright, nonresolved AGN emission from the host continuum and its narrow emission lines, and that the accuracy is limited mainly by how well the IFS resolves the PSF and by the AGN-to-host flux contrast.

Load-bearing premise

The input datacube is well described by a single Moffat profile for the AGN plus a single circular Sérsic profile for the host, sharing one centroid, and the host and PSF shape parameters vary smoothly with wavelength so they can be interpolated from coarse spectral windows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Large IFS surveys can be processed without hand-built PSF models, producing AGN-free host cubes and pure AGN spectra automatically.
  • The residual host cube is clean enough for standard stellar-population and emission-line analyses, as the recovered BPT spaxels move from AGN to star-forming regions after deblending.
  • The deblended AGN spectra preserve broad and narrow emission-line properties, with broad and narrow line fluxes recovered to within a few percent in the mock tests.
  • The method's reported accuracy depends on spatial resolution and AGN/host contrast: in AGN-dominated, well-resolved cases the recovered PSF FWHM is within about 5%, while in low-resolution or host-bright cases the residuals grow to 20–40%.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same per-slice Moffat+Sérsic decomposition could in principle be applied to other unresolved sources in IFS data, such as supernovae or tidal disruption events, whenever the host provides a smooth background.
  • Because the PSF is built from the AGN itself, the method could be repurposed as a wavelength-dependent empirical PSF estimator for AGN-dominated cubes, useful for calibrating other subtraction tools.
  • The analytic total-flux formula ties the method to a direct measurement of the AGN spectral energy distribution; comparing that flux against independent narrow-aperture photometry would be a clean external validation.
  • The single circular Sérsic host is the main structural limitation; adding bar, disk, or asymmetric components would likely reduce the 20–40% residuals seen in the low-resolution and intermediate-flux mock cases.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents an automatic, iterative deblending method for integral-field spectroscopic data that simultaneously models the unresolved AGN as a 2D Moffat profile and the resolved host galaxy as a 2D Sérsic profile in each monochromatic slice. The AGN spectrum is obtained by analytically integrating the fitted Moffat profile (Eq. 4), and the residual cube is taken as the AGN-free host. The method is validated on six mock IFU cubes built from three MaNGA galaxies and a quasar composite, with reported continuum residuals of 10-30% and host emission-line flux residuals of 6-40% depending on spatial resolution and AGN dominance. The authors compare the method with QDeblend3D and apply it to three MaNGA Type 1 AGN, showing BPT shifts and recovered stellar absorption features in the host residuals.

Significance. If the central claim is established, this is a useful addition to the AGN-host deblending toolbox for IFS data, since it avoids external PSF characterization from foreground stars and does not require prior AGN/HG flux ratios. The paper is honest in reporting the residuals of its mock tests, makes the code publicly available, and includes a comparison with an established tool. The real-data demonstrations on MaNGA galaxies are valuable sanity checks, and the recovered stellar absorption features and BEL/NC fitting are qualitatively convincing. However, the quantitative validation is currently internal to the assumed Moffat+Sérsic model family, so the headline claim that the method is 'capable of disengaging' real AGN emission is not yet supported at the level the abstract states.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1 versus Section 2.1; Eq. (4)] The mock validation is self-consistent in the model family but not a test of the central claim. The injected AGN PSF is exactly the Moffat profile of Eq. (1), with constant beta and alpha taken from MaNGA stars, and the fitter then assumes the same functional family. Consequently, Table 1 and Figures 3-5 measure inversion error inside the assumed model and do not quantify the effect of a real PSF that deviates from a Moffat form. This matters because Eq. (4) integrates the fitted Moffat profile to infinity: any deviation in the PSF wings, fiber-convolution effects, or truncation by the IFU field of view will propagate directly into the recovered AGN spectrum and, through step (e), into the residual host cube. I request a model-mismatch test, for example injecting an empirical MaNGA stellar PSF or a Moffat profile perturbed by non-Moffat wings, and a quantitative statement of how much Moffat mismatch the method can tolerate.
  2. [Section 4.1 and Section 4.2] The real-data comparison with QDeblend3D compares two decomposition codes, not a recovered spectrum against a known truth. The statements that stellar Ca II H&K absorption lines are recovered in the residual and that BPT spaxels move from the AGN region to the composite/SF region are useful sanity checks, but they do not validate the absolute flux scale of the deblended AGN spectrum or the accuracy of the host residual. An independent PSF model derived from same-field stars, or a spectroastrometric or flux-scaling cross-check, would be needed to support the abstract's claim that the method is capable of disengaging real AGN emission from the host continuum and narrow lines.
  3. [Section 3.6 and Summary] The claim that galaxy morphology has little impact on performance is not supported by the mock design. The HighR and IntR hosts contain spirals and bars that are not well described by a single Sérsic profile, while the LowR host is the most Sérsic-like, yet the LowR cases show the largest EELR residuals (Table 1 and Figures 5-7). The differences among mock cases are degenerate with IFU spatial sampling and field-of-view effects, so the stated conclusion that morphology is not important needs a targeted test that varies morphology while holding resolution and AGN/HG flux ratio fixed.
  4. [Section 2.1, steps (a)-(b); Eq. (4)] The assumption that beta, b_n, n_s, and optionally e and theta vary smoothly with wavelength and can be interpolated from coarse windows is not stress-tested against spectral regions with emission lines or continuum breaks. Since beta enters Eq. (4) multiplicatively through the factor 1/(beta-1), an error in the interpolated beta directly scales the recovered AGN flux. A mock test with a non-monotonic wavelength dependence of beta, for example a perturbation localized at H alpha, would quantify this systematic and would also check the claim that the method does not require interpolation of the PSF between spectral regions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figures 3-5 captions] The captions use 'quasar-dominated' and 'intermediate quasar' while the body text uses 'AGN-dominated' and 'intermediate AGN'; please reconcile the terminology for consistency.
  2. [Figure 12 caption and Eq. (5)] The residual normalization in Figure 12 is described as 'QDeblend3D minus our method over the input flux', which is not identical to the definition in Eq. (5); please specify the exact normalization used in the comparison.
  3. [Section 3.2.2, velocity-shift residuals] The reported velocity-shift residuals are non-monotonic in spatial resolution (8% for HighR, 30% for IntR, 8% for LowR); a brief explanation of this non-monotonic behavior would help the reader interpret Figure 7.
  4. [Introduction, related-work paragraph] The citation 'Bruce, Dunlop, Mortlock, Kocevski, McGrath & Rosario Kim' is malformed and should be corrected to the proper author list from the reference list.
  5. [Data Availability] The paper states the code is public on GitHub but does not specify a version or a DOI; adding a versioned release would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Moffat/Sérsic decomposition is an explicit modeling assumption, and the mock tests measure inversion accuracy inside that assumed family; real MaNGA application and QDeblend3D comparison provide independent content.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a forward model: it assumes a Moffat PSF for the unresolved AGN and a Sérsic profile for the resolved host (Section 2.1), fits the parameters, and defines the AGN spectrum as the analytic integral of the fitted Moffat profile (Eq. 4). That is a definition of the method's output, not a hidden equivalence. The mock cubes in Section 3.1 inject the AGN with Eq. 1 and normalize it with Eq. 4, so the recovered-vs-input comparison in Table 1 and Figures 3–5 is a controlled inversion test inside the assumed model family; the nonzero residuals (5–40%) show the recovery is not tautological. The fact that the mocks do not include non-Moffat PSFs or more complex hosts is a robustness limitation, and the authors explicitly acknowledge it in Section 5 ('the model depends on how much information about the PSF can be retrieved from the IFS observation' and 'there are inaccuracies with the HG 2D SB profile model'). The application to three real MaNGA galaxies and the comparison with QDeblend3D provide external, non-circular checks. Self-citations (e.g., Ibarra-Medel 2022; Ibarra-Medel et al. 2019; Cortes-Suárez et al. 2022; Hernández-Toledo et al. 2023) are contextual and not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. Overall, no claim reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 13 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the adequacy of the Moffat + Sérsic decomposition, on the smooth spectral interpolation of Sérsic and Moffat shape parameters, and on the analytic Moffat integral (Eq. 4) that defines the AGN spectrum. No new physical entities are introduced. The mock tests add hand-chosen inputs (beta=26, FWHM 2.5-3 arcsec, flux ratios 1.2 and 3.2) that are shared with the fitting model.

free parameters (13)
  • At (Moffat peak amplitude)
    Fitted per spectral slice (Section 2.1); defines the AGN continuum level.
  • alpha (Moffat dispersion)
    Fitted per spectral slice; controls the PSF width in Eq. 1.
  • beta (Moffat wing exponent)
    Fitted in 10-pixel windows, then smoothed and interpolated (step b); controls PSF wings.
  • x0 (centroid x)
    Fitted per spectral slice; matched for PSF and Sérsic profiles.
  • y0 (centroid y)
    Fitted per spectral slice; matched for PSF and Sérsic profiles.
  • Io (Sérsic central intensity)
    Fitted per spectral slice; represents the host galaxy background normalization.
  • Re (Sérsic effective radius)
    Fitted per spectral slice; controls the host scale radius.
  • ns (Sérsic index)
    Fitted in coarse windows and interpolated (step b); host shape parameter.
  • bn (Sérsic b_n)
    Fitted in coarse windows and interpolated; coupled to ns via the Sérsic definition (Eq. 3).
  • e (PSF isophotal ellipticity)
    Optional free parameter for elliptical PSF isophotes (Eq. 2); not used in the default circular case.
  • theta (PSF position angle)
    Optional free parameter for elliptical PSF isophotes (Eq. 2); not used in the default circular case.
  • Spectral window size for coarse fitting = 10 spectral pixels
    Hand-chosen in Section 2.1 step (a); sets the SNR boost of sqrt(10) and the resolution of the coarse parameter fit.
  • Gaussian smoothing kernel for interpolation = 2x window width
    Hand-chosen in Section 2.1 step (b); controls the smoothness of interpolated Sérsic and PSF parameters.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The AGN emission is spatially unresolved in the IFS observation and is well described by a single 2D Moffat profile (Eq. 1).
    This is the core physical model used throughout Section 2; if the real PSF has complex wings or the AGN is slightly resolved, the decomposition is biased.
  • domain assumption The host galaxy surface brightness is adequately described by a single circular Sérsic profile with the same centroid as the AGN (Eq. 3).
    Section 2.1; the authors acknowledge bars, disks and asymmetries are not modeled, which introduces residuals shown in Sections 3.2 and 3.6.
  • domain assumption Host Sérsic parameters (bn, ns) and PSF beta (and e, theta) vary smoothly or monotonically with wavelength, so they can be interpolated from coarse windows to full spectral sampling.
    Step (b) in Section 2.1; if these parameters vary sharply (e.g., at strong spectral features or skyline residuals), the per-pixel fits inherit errors.
  • standard math The total AGN flux is given by the analytic integral of the fitted Moffat profile (Eq. 4).
    Standard calculus; but note this makes the AGN spectrum a derived quantity of the fitted parameters.
  • domain assumption The mock AGN inputs are generated from a Moffat profile with beta = 26, FWHM of 2.5-3 arcsec, and centroids that drift with wavelength (Section 3.1).
    This is a validation assumption; it reproduces the same functional family used by the fitting method, limiting the test to model-matched conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An iterative method to deblend AGN-Host contributions for Integral Field spectroscopic observations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SISBUVN5

@misc{pith2026241113270,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An iterative method to deblend AGN-Host contributions for Integral Field spectroscopic observations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SISBUVN5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13270}
}
read the original abstract

We present a new iterative deblending method to separate the host galaxy (HG) and their Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) emission with the use of Integral Field spectroscopic (IFS) data. The method decomposes the resolved HG emission from the unresolved AGN emission by modelling the two-dimensional surface brightness (SB) profile of the point-spread function (PSF) and the two-dimensional SB HG continuum simultaneously per each monochromatic slide. Our method does not require any prior information about the observed SB profile or a detailed fitting of the PSF, making it ideal for the automatic analysis of large galaxy samples. In this work, we test the quality of our method, its advantages, and its disadvantages. We test our method by using a set of IFS mock data cubes to quantify the reliability of our deblending process and further compare our method with the {\sc QDeblend3D} analysis tool. Furthermore, we applied our method to three data cubes selected from the MaNGA survey according to the dominance of either its HG or its AGN. We show that our deblending method is capable of disengaging the bright, nonresolved AGN emission from the HG continuum and its narrow emission lines. However, the decoupling depends on how well the IFS spatially resolves the PSF, and on the relative flux intensity of the HG-AGN. Therefore, the method is ideal for disentangling the bright-flux contribution from AGN-dominated spectra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13270 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Workflow diagram of our iterative AGN-HG deblending method. The boxes indicate the main process of the method: The AGN-HG decomposition. In addition, we add an optional process for the HG and AGN spectral analysis: The HG single stellar population and emission line analysts done by pyPipe3D, and the AGN analysis of the broad emission lines (BEL) and the narrow components (NC) done with IRAF-specfit. 𝑅𝑒, and 𝑛𝑠 (e, 𝜃… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Input host galaxy resolved spectra taken from MaNGA. The MaNGA-ID 1-211017 (top left) is used for the high-resolution case, 1-38348 (top right) for the intermediate-resolution case, and 1-458316 (bottom left) for the low-resolution case. galaxy 1-458316 is a 19 IFU bundle (12" in diameter) to test the low spatial resolution IFS. Assuming that the MaNGA FOV covers at least 1.5 effective radii (𝑅𝑒), the difference amo… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. High-resolution AGN-dominated (HighR-Dom) mock decomposed spectra (two upper panels), and High-resolution intermediate-AGN (HighR-Int) mock decomposed spectra (two lower panels). For each mock spectra, the main panel shows the total mock spectrum (AGN+HG) as a black solid line, the mock input HG spectrum as a yellow solid line, the input AGN spectrum as a solid blue line, the decomposed output HG spectrum as a green… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Intermediate-resolution AGN-dominated (IntR-Dom) mock decomposed spectra (two upper panels) and the Intermediate-resolution intermediate￾AGN (IntR-Int) mock decomposed spectra (two lower panels). The colour code is the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Low-resolution AGN-dominated (LowR-Dom) mock decomposed spectra (two upper panels) and the Low-resolution intermediate-AGN (LowR-Int) mock decomposed spectra (two lower panels). The colour code is the same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The HG H𝛼 EELR absolute residual maps for the High (second-row panels) and its input HG values (first-row panels). The absolute residual maps for the Intermediate and Low-resolution mock cases are the third and fourth-row panels. The left, middle and right panels show …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Absolute values of the normalised residuals Δ𝑣𝑎𝑙 = |𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑢𝑡 |/𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛, for the total integrated flux (upper panels), velocity shifts (middle panels) and the line FWHMs (lower panels). The left panels contain the flux-averaged Δ𝑣𝑎𝑙 within the central 3” for the HG …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Debledended FWHM PSF size normalised residual as a function of wavelength. The solid lines represent the Quasar-dominated cases (Dom), and the segmented lines represent the Intermediate quasar-dominated cases (Int). [Nii]𝜆𝜆6548,6584 and [Sii]𝜆𝜆6716,6731 scattered betwe…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Debledended PSF 𝑥0 and 𝑦0 normalised residuals as a function of wavelength. We use the same colour code as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The Baldwin, Philips & Terlevich NII diagram for the HighR (top), IntR (middle) Manga mock galaxies and its host galaxy input values (bottom). Top and middle panels from left to right: The spatially resolved BPT diagrams for the mock AGN+HG and the deblended host of t…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Composed RGB image with B-[Oiii]𝜆5007 , G-H𝛼 and R-[Nii]𝜆6584maps for the MaNGA mock galaxies for the AGN dominated cases: HighR￾Dom (top), IntR-Dom (middle), and LowR-Dom (bottom). The left panels show the non-deblended maps, the central left panels show the deblende…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: QDeblend3D comparison of our deblended AGN spectra for the HighR-Dom case (upper panels) and HighR-Int case (lower panels). The solid blue line represents the deblended quasar spectra obtained with our methodology, the solid red line represents the AGN spectra obtaine…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Radial profiles of the Age𝐿𝑊 for the high-resolution (upper panel) and intermediate-resolution (lower panel) cases. The black solid lines represent the radial profiles of the input MaNGA galaxies without the sim￾ulated AGN spectra. The red solid lines represent the ra…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Deblended spectra for the MaNGA galaxies 1-200510 (top), 1-235576 (middle), and 1-210017 (bottom). For all panels, the solid black line represents the input spectra (HG+AGN), the solid red line represents the deblended AGN spectra, and the blue solid line represents t…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: H𝛼 surface brightness maps for the MaNGA galaxies 1-200510 (top), 1-235576 (middle), and 1-210017 (bottom). The left panels show the non-deblended maps, the central panels show the deblended PSF maps, and the right panels show the deblended host map. and narrow compon…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: QDeblend3D comparison of our deblended quasar spectra for MaNGA galaxies 1-200510 (top), 1-235576 (middle), and 1-210017 (bottom). The solid blue line represents the deblended quasar spectra obtained with our methodology, and the solid red line represents the quasar s…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The Baldwin, Philips & Terlevich NII diagram for our three MaNGA galaxies: 1-200510 (top), 1-235576 (middle), and 1-210017 (bottom). The left panels show the spaxel positions on the BPT for the non-deblended galaxy spectra. The right panels show the spaxel’s positions…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: specfit modelling from the deblended PSF quasar spectra for 1-200510 (top), 1-235576 (middle) and 1-210017 (bottom). For each object, H𝛽 spectral region is shown in the left panels and H𝛼 in the right panels with a flux scale × 10−16 ergs s−1 cm−2 Å −1 . The solid bla…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abdurro'uf et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...35A 259, 35

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 2022

  2. [2]

    arXiv:2301.07688

    Almeida A., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2301.07688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230107688A p. arXiv:2301.07688

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07688 2023

  3. [3]

    Antonucci R., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ARA&A..31..473A 31, 473

    arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    Aquino-Ort \' z E., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aba94e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...900..109A 900, 109

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba94e 2020

  5. [5]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130766 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B 93, 5

    doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  6. [6]

    L., Monaco P., Ragone-Figueroa C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1389 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.1548B 461, 1548

    Barai P., Murante G., Borgani S., Gaspari M., Granato G. L., Monaco P., Ragone-Figueroa C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1389 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.1548B 461, 1548

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1389 2016

  7. [7]

    N., Auger M

    Bennert V. N., Auger M. W., Treu T., Woo J.-H., Malkan M. A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...742..107B 742, 107

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/107 2011

  8. [8]

    N., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac151a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...921...36B 921, 36

    Bennert V. N., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac151a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...921...36B 921, 36

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac151a 2021

Show all 123 references
  1. [9]

    S., Haehnelt M

    Bolton J. S., Haehnelt M. G., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11176.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.374..493B 374, 493

    2007

  2. [10]

    A., Dultzin D., del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., Mart \' nez-Aldama M

    Bon N., Marziani P., Bon E., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A.151B 635, A151

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    A., Dunlop J

    Bruce V. A., Dunlop J. S., Mortlock A., Kocevski D. D., McGrath E. J., Rosario D. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw467 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.2391B 458, 2391

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    R., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature00857 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002Natur.418..301B 418, 301

    Br \"u ggen M., Kaiser C. R., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature00857 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002Natur.418..301B 418, 301

    2002 doi

  5. [13]

    Bundy K., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...798....7B 798, 7

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    Burud I., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311450 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...501L...5B 501, L5

    1998 doi

  7. [15]

    Camps-Fari \ n a A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6cea , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...933...44C 933, 44

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    Cano-D \' az M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/821/2/L26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821L..26C 821, L26

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    Cano-D \' az M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac8549 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....164..127C 164, 127

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Cappellari M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18174.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.413..813C 413, 813

    2011

  11. [19]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

    1989 doi

  12. [20]

    Chen J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2183 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489..855C 489, 855

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    F., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065318 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...459..717C 459, 717

    Christensen L., Jahnke K., Wisotzki L., S \'a nchez S. F., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065318 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...459..717C 459, 717

    2006 doi

  14. [22]

    Chung H., Park C., Park Y.-S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac2828 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..257...66C 257, 66

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08752.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.358..363C 358, 363

    Cid Fernandes R., Mateus A., Sodr \'e L., Stasi \'n ska G., Gomes J. M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08752.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.358..363C 358, 363

    2005

  16. [24]

    M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb2ae , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...901..159C 901, 159

    Comerford J. M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb2ae , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...901..159C 901, 159

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    A., Hern \'a ndez-Toledo H

    Cortes-Su \'a rez E., Negrete C. A., Hern \'a ndez-Toledo H. M., Ibarra-Medel H., Lacerna I., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1505 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.3626C 514, 3626

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    R., Kochanek C

    Courbin F., Magain P., Keeton C. R., Kochanek C. S., Vanderriest C., Jaunsen A. O., Hjorth J., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9705093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&A...324L...1C 324, L1

    1997 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    L., Magain P., Broadhurst T

    Courbin F., Lidman C., Frye B. L., Magain P., Broadhurst T. J., Pahre M. A., Djorgovski S. G., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311376 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...499L.119C 499, L119

    1998 doi

  20. [28]

    Courbin F., Magain P., Kirkove M., Sohy S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...529.1136C 529, 1136

    2000 doi

  21. [29]

    M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20365.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421..872C 421, 872

    Croom S. M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20365.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421..872C 421, 872

    2012

  22. [30]

    B., Hennawi J

    Eilers A.-C., Davies F. B., Hennawi J. F., Prochaska J. X., Luki \'c Z., Mazzucchelli C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c60 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...840...24E 840, 24

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    P., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191856 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJS...90....1E 90, 1

    Eracleous M., Halpern J. P., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191856 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJS...90....1E 90, 1

    1994 doi

  24. [32]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    Forman W., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1057F 665, 1057

    2007 doi

  26. [34]

    F., Mediavilla E., Gonz \'a lez-Serrano J

    Garc \' a-Lorenzo B., S \'a nchez S. F., Mediavilla E., Gonz \'a lez-Serrano J. I., Christensen L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/427429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...621..146G 621, 146

    2005 doi

  27. [35]

    Gaspari M., Tombesi F., Cappi M., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs...4...10G 4, 10

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    A., Wyckoff S., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161763 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...278...11G 278, 11

    Gehren T., Fried J., Wehinger P. A., Wyckoff S., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161763 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...278...11G 278, 11

    1984 doi

  29. [37]

    M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525938 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A.103G 581, A103

    Gonz \'a lez Delgado R. M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525938 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A.103G 581, A103

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628174 , 590, A44

    Gonz \'a lez Delgado R. M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628174 , 590, A44

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730883 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...607A.128G 607, A128

    Gonz \'a lez Delgado R. M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730883 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...607A.128G 607, A128

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    M., Lehnert M

    Heckman T. M., Lehnert M. D., Miley G. K., van Breugel W., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170660 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...381..373H 381, 373

    1991 doi

  33. [41]

    M., Cortes-Su \'a rez E., V \'a zquez-Mata J

    Hern \'a ndez-Toledo H. M., Cortes-Su \'a rez E., V \'a zquez-Mata J. A., Nevin R., \'A vila-Reese V., Ibarra-Medel H., Negrete C. A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.4164H 523, 4164

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    C., Mullaney J

    Hickox R. C., Mullaney J. R., Alexander D. M., Chen C.-T. J., Civano F. M., Goulding A. D., Hainline K. N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782....9H 782, 9

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    F., Jahnke K., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810276 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...488..145H 488, 145

    Husemann B., Wisotzki L., S \'a nchez S. F., Jahnke K., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810276 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...488..145H 488, 145

    2008 doi

  36. [44]

    F., Jahnke K., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220076 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..43H 549, A43

    Husemann B., Wisotzki L., S \'a nchez S. F., Jahnke K., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220076 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..43H 549, A43

    2013 doi

  37. [45]

    F., Wisotzki L., Nugroho D., Kupko D., Schramm M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443..755H 443, 755

    Husemann B., Jahnke K., S \'a nchez S. F., Wisotzki L., Nugroho D., Kupko D., Schramm M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443..755H 443, 755

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    Husemann B., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141312 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...659A.124H 659, A124

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    B., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...320..122H 320, 122

    Hutchings J. B., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...320..122H 320, 122

    1987 doi

  40. [48]

    Ibarra-Medel H., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2095 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.6032I 515, 6032

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.2799I 463, 2799

    Ibarra-Medel H. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.2799I 463, 2799

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    J., Avila-Reese V., S \'a nchez S

    Ibarra-Medel H. J., Avila-Reese V., S \'a nchez S. F., Gonz \'a lez-Samaniego A. r., Rodr \' guez-Puebla A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.4525I 483, 4525

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    S., 2023, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230201948J p

    Jalan P., Rakshit S., Woo J.-H., Kotilainen J., Stalin C. S., 2023, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230201948J p. arXiv:2302.01948

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341...33K 341, 33

    2003

  45. [53]

    J., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Heisler C. A., Trevena J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...556..121K 556, 121

    2001 doi

  46. [54]

    C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab11cf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876...35K 876, 35

    Kim M., Ho L. C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab11cf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876...35K 876, 35

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    C., Peng C

    Kim M., Ho L. C., Peng C. Y., Barth A. J., Im M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591796 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..179..283K 179, 283

    2008 doi

  48. [56]

    C ., Dimitrijevi \'c M

    Kova c evi \'c J., Popovi \'c L. C ., Dimitrijevi \'c M. S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJS..189...15K 189, 15

    2010 doi

  49. [57]

    R., Hanisch R

    Kriss G., 1994, in Crabtree D. R., Hanisch R. J., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 61, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III. p. 437

    1994

  50. [58]

    Kristian J., 1973, @doi [ ] 10.1086/181117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973ApJ...179L..61K 179, L61

    1973 doi

  51. [59]

    Lacerda E. A. D., S \'a nchez S. F., Mej \' a-Narv \'a ez A., Camps-Fari \ n a A., Espinosa-Ponce C., Barrera-Ballesteros J. K., Ibarra-Medel H., Lugo-Aranda A. Z., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2022.101895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NewA...9701895L 97, 101895

    2022

  52. [60]

    G., Ibarra-Medel H., Pacifici C., S \'a nchez S

    Lammers C., Iyer K. G., Ibarra-Medel H., Pacifici C., S \'a nchez S. F., Tacchella S., Woo J., 2022, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2212.00762 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv221200762L p. arXiv:2212.00762

    2022 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152...83L 152, 83

    Law D. R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152...83L 152, 83

    2016 doi

  54. [62]

    Li J. I. H., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc8e6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...906..103L 906, 103

    2021 doi

  55. [63]

    Li J. I. H., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acddda , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954..173L 954, 173

    2023 doi

  56. [64]

    L \'o pez Fern \'a ndez R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...615A..27L 615, A27

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    B., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/111605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974AJ.....79..745L 79, 745

    Lucy L. B., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/111605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974AJ.....79..745L 79, 745

    1974 doi

  58. [66]

    W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aba623 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..250....8L 250, 8

    Lyke B. W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aba623 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..250....8L 250, 8

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    Magain P., Courbin F., Sohy S., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...494..472M 494, 472

    1998 doi

  60. [68]

    A., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/162714 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...287..555M 287, 555

    Malkan M. A., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/162714 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...287..555M 287, 555

    1984 doi

  61. [69]

    A., Margon B., Chanan G

    Malkan M. A., Margon B., Chanan G. A., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161968 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...280...66M 280, 66

    1984 doi

  62. [70]

    W., Stirpe G

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Stirpe G. M., Zamfir S., Calvani M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810764 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...495...83M 495, 83

    2009 doi

  63. [71]

    K., Rieke G

    McLeod K. K., Rieke G. H., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174473 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...431..137M 431, 137

    1994 doi

  64. [72]

    R., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...534L.135M 534, L135

    McNamara B. R., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...534L.135M 534, L135

    2000 doi

  65. [73]

    Mehrgan K., Thomas J., Saglia R., Mazzalay X., Erwin P., Bender R., Kluge M., Fabricius M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5856 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887..195M 887, 195

    2019 doi

  66. [74]

    M \'e ndez-Abreu J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...598A..32M 598, A32

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    F., de Lorenzo-C \'a ceres A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz276 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4298M 484, 4298

    M \'e ndez-Abreu J., S \'a nchez S. F., de Lorenzo-C \'a ceres A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz276 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4298M 484, 4298

    2019 doi

  68. [76]

    Moffat A. F. J., 1969, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969A&A.....3..455M 3, 455

    1969

  69. [77]

    A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.118N 620, A118

    Negrete C. A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.118N 620, A118

    2018 doi

  70. [78]

    M., S \'a nchez F

    Negus J., Comerford J. M., S \'a nchez F. M., Revalski M., Riffel R. A., Bundy K., Nevin R., Rembold S. B., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acb772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...945..127N 945, 127

    2023 doi

  71. [79]

    Netzer H., 2013, The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei

    2013

  72. [80]

    E., Ferland G

    Osterbrock D. E., Ferland G. J., 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  73. [81]

    Y., Ho L

    Peng C. Y., Ho L. C., Impey C. D., Rix H.-W., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340952 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124..266P 124, 266

    2002 doi

  74. [82]

    Peng Y.-j., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721..193P 721, 193

    2010 doi

  75. [83]

    P \'e rez E., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764L...1P 764, L1

    2013 doi

  76. [84]

    C ., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423555 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...572A..66P 572, A66

    Popovi \'c L. C ., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423555 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...572A..66P 572, A66

    2014 doi

  77. [85]

    H., Flannery B

    Press W. H., Flannery B. P., Teukolsky S. A., 1986, Numerical recipes. The art of scientific computing

    1986

  78. [86]

    B., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2264 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.4382R 472, 4382

    Rembold S. B., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2264 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.4382R 472, 4382

    2017 doi

  79. [87]

    H., 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America (1917-1983), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972JOSA...62...55R 62, 55

    Richardson W. H., 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America (1917-1983), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972JOSA...62...55R 62, 55

    1972

  80. [88]

    Romanishin W., Hintzen P., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167469 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...341...41R 341, 41

    1989 doi

  81. [89]

    E., 1955, @doi [ ] 10.1086/145971 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1955ApJ...121..161S 121, 161

    Salpeter E. E., 1955, @doi [ ] 10.1086/145971 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1955ApJ...121..161S 121, 161

    1955 doi

  82. [90]

    F., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-012120-013326 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58...99S 58, 99

    S \'a nchez S. F., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-012120-013326 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58...99S 58, 99

    2020 doi

  83. [91]

    F., Christensen L., Becker T., Kelz A., Jahnke K., Benn C

    S \'a nchez S. F., Christensen L., Becker T., Kelz A., Jahnke K., Benn C. R., Garc \' a-Lorenzo B., Roth M. M., 2004a, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.200310187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AN....325..112S 325, 112

    doi

  84. [92]

    F., Garcia-Lorenzo B., Mediavilla E., Gonz \'a lez-Serrano J

    S \'a nchez S. F., Garcia-Lorenzo B., Mediavilla E., Gonz \'a lez-Serrano J. I., Christensen L., 2004b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423990 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...615..156S 615, 156

    doi

  85. [93]

    F., Garc \' a-Lorenzo B., Jahnke K., Mediavilla E., Gonz \'a lez-Serrano J

    S \'a nchez S. F., Garc \' a-Lorenzo B., Jahnke K., Mediavilla E., Gonz \'a lez-Serrano J. I., Christensen L., Wisotzki L., 2006a, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2005.10.004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006NewAR..49..501S 49, 501

    2005 doi

  86. [94]

    F., Garc \' a-Lorenzo B., Jahnke K., Mediavilla E., Gonz \'a lez-Serrano J

    S \'a nchez S. F., Garc \' a-Lorenzo B., Jahnke K., Mediavilla E., Gonz \'a lez-Serrano J. I., Christensen L., Wisotzki L., 2006b, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.200510500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AN....327..167S 327, 167

    doi

  87. [95]

    F., Cardiel N., Verheijen M

    S \'a nchez S. F., Cardiel N., Verheijen M. A. W., Pedraz S., Covone G., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11335.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.376..125S 376, 125

    2007

  88. [96]

    F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117353 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117353 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  89. [97]

    F., et al., 2016a, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RMxAA..52...21S 52, 21

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2016a, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RMxAA..52...21S 52, 21

  90. [98]

    F., et al., 2016b, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RMxAA..52..171S 52, 171

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2016b, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RMxAA..52..171S 52, 171

  91. [99]

    F., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2730 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.1557S 482, 1557

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2730 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.1557S 482, 1557

    2019 doi

  92. [100]

    F., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7b8f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..262...36S 262, 36

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7b8f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..262...36S 262, 36

    2022 doi

  93. [101]

    H., Ibarra-Medel H., Pillepich A., S \'a nchez S

    Sarmiento R., Huertas-Company M., Knapen J. H., Ibarra-Medel H., Pillepich A., S \'a nchez S. F., Boecker A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245509 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A..23S 673, A23

    2023 doi

  94. [102]

    L., 1963, Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963BAAA....6...41S 6, 41

    S \'e rsic J. L., 1963, Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963BAAA....6...41S 6, 41

    1963

  95. [103]

    K., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/211.1.111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984MNRAS.211..111S 211, 111

    Skilling J., Bryan R. K., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/211.1.111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984MNRAS.211..111S 211, 111

    1984 doi

  96. [104]

    P., Heckman T

    Smith E. P., Heckman T. M., Bothun G. D., Romanishin W., Balick B., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164321 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...306...64S 306, 64

    1986 doi

  97. [105]

    W., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1038/305678a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983Natur.305..678S 305, 678

    Stockton A., MacKenty J. W., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1038/305678a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983Natur.305..678S 305, 678

    1983 doi

  98. [106]

    S., Peterson B

    Storchi-Bergmann T., Schimoia J. S., Peterson B. M., Elvis M., Denney K. D., Eracleous M., Nemmen R. S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835..236S 835, 236

    2017 doi

  99. [107]

    B., Machado R

    Tissera P. B., Machado R. E. G., Sanchez-Blazquez P., Pedrosa S. E., S \'a nchez S. F., Snaith O., Vilchez J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628188 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...592A..93T 592, A93

    2016 doi

  100. [108]

    Trujillo I., Aguerri J. A. L., Cepa J., Guti \'e rrez C. M., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04937.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.328..977T 328, 977

    2001

  101. [109]

    W., Pedlar A., Axon D

    Unger S. W., Pedlar A., Axon D. J., Whittle M., Meurs E. J. A., Ward M. J., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/228.3.671 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987MNRAS.228..671U 228, 671

    1987 doi

  102. [110]

    E., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..549V 122, 549

    Vanden Berk D. E., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..549V 122, 549

    2001 doi

  103. [111]

    Vayner A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace784 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955...92V 955, 92

    2023 doi

  104. [112]

    E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJS...63..295V 63, 295

    Veilleux S., Osterbrock D. E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJS...63..295V 63, 295

    1987 doi

  105. [113]

    Veilleux S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace10f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953...56V 953, 56

    2023 doi

  106. [114]

    P., Woltjer L., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A&A...236...69V 236, 69

    Veron-Cetty M. P., Woltjer L., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A&A...236...69V 236, 69

    1990

  107. [115]

    Villar-Mart \' n M., Cabrera-Lavers A., Humphrey A., Silva M., Ramos Almeida C., Piqueras-L \'o pez J., Emonts B., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2911 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.2302V 474, 2302

    2018 doi

  108. [116]

    J., 2014, @doi [Nature Physics] 10.1038/nphys2951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014NatPh..10..417V 10, 417

    Villarroel B., Korn A. J., 2014, @doi [Nature Physics] 10.1038/nphys2951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014NatPh..10..417V 10, 417

    2014 doi

  109. [117]

    B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab44a2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..231W 158, 231

    Westfall K. B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab44a2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..231W 158, 231

    2019 doi

  110. [118]

    M., Sanchez S

    Wisotzki L., Becker T., Christensen L., Helms A., Jahnke K., Kelz A., Roth M. M., Sanchez S. F., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...408..455W 408, 455

    2003 doi

  111. [119]

    L., Greene J

    Wylezalek D., Zakamska N. L., Greene J. E., Riffel R. A., Drory N., Andrews B. H., Merloni A., Thomas D., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2784 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1499W 474, 1499

    2018 doi

  112. [120]

    M., Zakamska N

    Wylezalek D., Flores A. M., Zakamska N. L., Greene J. E., Riffel R. A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa062 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.4680W 492, 4680

    2020 doi

  113. [121]

    Wylezalek D., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac98c3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L...7W 940, L7

    2022 doi

  114. [122]

    Yan R., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3ebc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883..175Y 883, 175

    2019 doi

  115. [123]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.