Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 41 references

Liouville Brownian motion and quantum cones in dimension $d > 2$

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For $d \geq 2$, the spectral dimension of the Liouville Brownian motion is $2 + 2(d-2)/(2 + \alpha^2/2 - \alpha\beta)$, and even-dimensional quantum cones are constructed and shown to be LBM-stationary.

desk verdict A serious technical paper whose abstract overstates Theorem B: the proved spectral-dimension result is a Laplace-transform threshold, not short-time heat-kernel asymptotics, though the gap is clearly flagged in the text. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15936 v2 pith:SJDIBL26 submitted 2025-01-27 math.PR math-phmath.MP

Federico Bertacco , Ewain Gwynne This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60J6560G6060J6060G57
keywords LiouvilleBrownianmotionspectraldimensionGaussianmultiplicativechaoslog-correlatedfieldquantumconewhole-spaceLGFeven-dimensionalLangevinrepresentationheatkernel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper works out the short-time behaviour of the heat kernel of Liouville Brownian motion (LBM) in dimension $d > 2$, the diffusion obtained by time-changing a Brownian motion by the Gaussian multiplicative chaos measure of a log-correlated Gaussian field. It proves that the spectral dimension\u2014the exponent in the diagonal decay of the heat kernel\u2014is no longer always 2, as in $d = 2$, but is given explicitly by $2 + 2(d-2)/(2 + \alpha^2/2 - \alpha\beta)$, where $\alpha = Q - \sqrt{Q^2-4}$ is the coupling parameter of the Brownian clock and $\beta$ is the local thickness of the starting point. If correct, this says that in high dimensions the local geometry of the random metric remembers both the strength of the field and how \u201cthick\u201d the starting point is. The paper also identifies the spherical average of the field in even dimensions with the integral of a stationary Gaussian Markov process, and uses this to construct higher-dimensional analogues of $\beta$-quantum cones and to prove a stationarity property of the associated diffusion.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on two objects. First, the GMC measure $\mu_{h,\gamma}(dx) = \lim_{\varepsilon\to0} \varepsilon^{\gamma^2/2} e^{\gamma h_\varepsilon(x)} dx$, used to define the clock process $F_{h,\alpha}(t) = \lim_{\varepsilon\to0}\int_0^t \varepsilon^{\alpha^2/2}e^{\alpha h_\varepsilon(B_s)}ds$; the LBM is the Brownian motion time-changed by the inverse of this clock. The spectral-dimension computation converts the diagonal heat kernel into Laplace transforms of bridge moments $m_{h,\alpha,\chi}(0) = \int_0^\infty \mathbb{E}^{0,0,t}[(F_{h,\alpha}(t))^{\chi} e^{-F_{h,\alpha}(t)}] p_t(0,0)\,dt$, so the problem reduces to locating the finiteness threshold in $\chi$, which is controlled by multifractal small-ball estimates for GMC measures near thick points. Second, for even $d>2$, the spherical average process $(h_{e^{-t}}(0))_{t\in\mathbb{R}}$ is shown to be the integral of the unique stationary solution of a $(d-2)/2$-dimensional Langevin equation whose drift is a Frobenius companion matrix with characteristic roots $-(d-2k)$; this \u201csmoothed Brownian motion\u201d representation powers the construction of quantum cones, whose radial part is built by recentring the spherical average at a hitting time and letting the recentring level tend to infinity.

What would settle it

Compute, by simulation of Brownian bridges in $d=4$ with a fixed $\beta$ and $\alpha$, the threshold $\chi$ at which $\mathbb{E}^{0,0,t}[(F_{h-\beta \log|\cdot|,\alpha}(t))^\chi]$ switches from diverging to converging as $t\to 0$; if the threshold is not $\chi(\beta) = (d-2)/(2+\alpha^2/2-\alpha\beta)$, the formula fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem B: for $d \ge 2$, $Q > \sqrt{2d}$, and $\beta \in (-\infty, Q)$, the spectral dimension at the origin of the Liouville Brownian motion driven by the field $h - \beta \log|\cdot|$ is $$d_{h-\$\beta$\log|\cdot|,\$\alpha$}(0) = 2 + \frac{2(d-2)}{2 + \$alpha^{2}$/2 - \$\alpha$\$\beta$},$$ with $\alpha = Q - \sqrt{Q^2-4}$ and $Q = d/\gamma + \gamma/2$. The exponent comes from a sharp threshold in the moments of the clock process over Brownian bridges: quantities $\mathbb{E}[F_{h,\alpha}(t)^{\chi}]$ are infinite below $\chi = (d-2)/(2 + \alpha^2/2 - \alpha\beta)$ and finite above it. In dimension 2 the formula collapses to 2, independent of $\alpha$ and $\beta$; in dimensions $d>2$ it varies with both, equalling $d$ when $\beta = \alpha/2$ and increasing in $\beta$. The paper also constructs the $d$-dimensional quantum cone for even $d>2$ as a local limit of recentred fields, and proves that for $\alpha = Q - \sqrt{Q^2-4}$ the law of the $\alpha$-quantum cone is invariant under shifts along the trajectories of the corresponding Liouville Brownian motion.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that the Gaussian multiplicative chaos measure of a small ball near a point of thickness $\beta$ scales exactly as $r^{d + \gamma^2/2 - \beta\gamma \pm \epsilon}$, with no hidden logarithmic corrections, on the very small scales that control the diagonal heat kernel.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In $d>2$ the spectral dimension of the Liouville heat kernel is a genuinely local quantity: starting the diffusion at points of different thickness $\beta$ gives different short-time decay exponents, with thicker points having larger spectral dimension.
  • At $\beta = \alpha/2$ the spectral dimension equals the Euclidean dimension $d$, and in the limit $\alpha\to0$ the formula returns $d$ for every $\beta$; the heat kernel therefore interpolates between Brownian and genuinely random-metric behaviour.
  • The even-dimensional quantum cone construction gives a concrete local-limit object for higher-dimensional Liouville quantum gravity, with a radial law built from the stationary Langevin solution rather than from a Brownian motion as in $d=2$.
  • For $\alpha = Q-\sqrt{Q^2-4}$, the law of the quantum cone seen from the Liouville particle is stationary up to spatial rescaling, which identifies a natural diffusion to study on these random geometries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the spectral-dimension formula uses only multifractal small-ball exponents that are dimension-independent in form, the same explicit value probably holds in odd dimensions too, even though the quantum-cone construction here is restricted to even $d$.
  • Editorial inference: if the small-ball power laws acquire $\log$ corrections at the boundary value $\beta = Q$, the threshold in $\chi$ could shift; checking the rate of divergence at the boundary would test the robustness of the formula.
  • Editorial inference: the stationarity modulo scaling proved for the $\alpha$-quantum cone suggests that a higher-dimensional analogue of the mated-CRT scaling limit, if it exists, would converge to this LBM; the Voronoi random-walk problem listed in the paper is a concrete instance where the clock exponent $\alpha$ should appear.
  • Editorial inference: the spectral dimension at a thick point should equal the formula for every $x\in T_\beta$, not just at the origin for $h-\beta\log|\cdot|$; the paper states this as a plausible stronger version, and it would follow if a uniform-in-space version of the bridge-moment estimates could be proved.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies analogues of two-dimensional Liouville quantum gravity in dimensions d>2. The authors construct the Liouville Brownian motion (LBM) associated with the whole-space log-correlated Gaussian field, using a clock process defined by Gaussian multiplicative chaos (GMC). Their main result (Theorem B) computes the spectral dimension of this LBM at the origin for the field h - beta log|.|, in the sense of Definition 2.8, obtaining d_{h-beta log|.|,alpha}(0) = 2 + 2(d-2)/(2 + alpha^2/2 - alpha beta). They also prove Theorem A, which identifies the spherical average process of the field in even dimensions as the integral of a stationary Gaussian Markov process satisfying a Langevin equation; Theorems C and D, which construct the beta-quantum cone in even dimensions as a total-variation limiting object; and Theorem E, which proves that the law of the alpha-quantum cone is invariant under shifts along its LBM trajectories. The proofs use GMC estimates, stochastic calculus, and Markov process theory, and the paper is transparent about the distinction between the proved statements and the conjectural thick-point extension.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a significant step in extending LQG-type results beyond two dimensions. The spectral dimension formula is explicit and parameter-free, and the identification of the spherical average process in even dimensions opens the door to constructions (quantum cones, invariance properties) previously available only for d=2. The paper also provides a precise statement of what is proved, leaving the thick-point version of the spectral dimension as a conjecture. The proofs are detailed and follow established techniques, and the paper credits its reliance on standard GMC multifractal results. The main weakness is that the advertised interpretation of the spectral dimension as the short-time heat-kernel asymptotics is not directly proved.

major comments (2)
  1. [2.2 and Abstract] The spectral dimension is defined in Definition 2.8 via the finiteness threshold of m_{h,alpha,chi}(x) in (2.13), not via the short-time heat-kernel asymptotic (2.9). The abstract states that the paper computes 'the spectral dimension, i.e., the short-time asymptotics of the heat kernel along the diagonal,' but no Tauberian theorem or two-sided heat-kernel bounds are provided to show that the threshold in (2.13) determines the exponent of p_{h,alpha,t}(0,0) as t tends to 0. This is a load-bearing gap: without such a step, the headline claim that the short-time heat-kernel decay depends on both gamma and beta is not established; what is computed is the abscissa of a Laplace-type integral. Please add a Tauberian argument or revise the abstract and introduction to describe exactly the quantity that is proved.
  2. [2.2, Remark 2.10] The abstract's claim that the spectral dimension depends on 'the thickness of the starting point' is not proved for the original field h. Theorem B is stated for the field h - beta log|.| at the origin, and the transfer to beta-thick points of h is explicitly left as a conjecture in Remark 2.10. The abstract and Section 1 should be rephrased to distinguish between the proved statement and the conjectural extension, e.g., by saying that the spectral dimension for h - beta log|.| is computed and that the thick-point version is expected to hold.
minor comments (6)
  1. [6.2, proof of Theorem C] In the sentence 'By choosing b >0 sufficiently large (depending on u but not on b)', the symbol b appears to be used for two different parameters; the intended meaning is likely 'not on \tilde{b}'. Please fix the notation.
  2. [5.3] The notation \mathbf{h} = h - beta log|.| is introduced and used in Proposition 5.17 and the lemmas, but Theorem B and the abstract use the notation h - beta log|.|; please ensure the notation is defined at first use and used consistently.
  3. [5.3, Lemma 5.18] In the proof of Lemma 5.18, the notation 'ot(1)' is used without definition; please define o_t(1) or use standard Landau notation.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract contains a missing space in 'dimensiond >2'; please correct the typo.
  5. [Appendix A, Lemma A.4] The proof of Lemma A.4 relies on the multifractal spectrum of GMC measures at q = sqrt(2d)/gamma, citing [BP24, Theorem 3.26]. Since this estimate is load-bearing for the finiteness proof in Section 5.3, please state this specific external input explicitly in the main text or in the appendix.
  6. [Figure 1] The caption of Figure 1 would benefit from a description of the simulation parameters (e.g., time step and finite horizon) for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem B is derived from standard GMC multifractal inputs and the conformal-invariance relation, with no parameter fitted to the target quantity.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained against external inputs. Theorem B's exponent chi is obtained from Proposition 5.17, whose proof uses only the conformal-invariance relation alpha*Q = 2 + alpha^2/2, the standard Brownian heat-kernel weight t^{-d/2}, and power-law small-ball estimates for GMC measures (Lemmas A.1, A.3, A.4) that are either proved in the appendices or quoted from the external GMC literature ([BP24], [RV14a]). No parameter is fitted to the spectral dimension itself; the threshold chi emerges from the integrability condition on t^{chi(2+alpha^2/2-alpha*beta)/2 - d/2}, so the result is not equivalent to its input by construction. The paper's Definition 2.8 does define 'spectral dimension' via a Laplace-transform threshold rather than proving a Tauberian equivalence with the literal short-time heat-kernel diagonal exponent; that is a definitional convention inherited from [RV14b] and a potential interpretation/correctness gap, but it is not circularity because the theorem proves exactly the quantity defined. Self-citations such as [Gwy20], [BG22], and [DGZ24b] appear in contextual remarks or open problems and are not load-bearing for Theorems A, B, or E. Remark 2.10 explicitly leaves the thick-point version as a conjecture, so the paper does not silently assume its advertised strongest interpretation. Overall, the derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper contains no fitted free parameters; alpha is fixed by the conformal-invariance relation alpha*Q = 2 + alpha^2/2, and the spectral dimension exponent emerges from the GMC multifractal scaling. The main imported inputs are the standard GMC estimates, the spherical-average covariance formula, and the even-dimension assumption.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Whole-space LGF has covariance -log|x-y| and is conformally invariant (Lemma 3.3).
    This is the starting definition; conformal invariance is cited from [DRSV17, Proposition 1.2].
  • domain assumption Subcritical GMC measure mu_{h,gamma} exists, is conformally covariant, and has the standard multifractal spectrum xi_gamma(q) = (d+gamma^2/2)q - gamma^2 q^2/2 (Lemmas A.1-A.4).
    These are standard results in GMC, cited from [Kah85], [RV14a], [BP24]; they are used to prove Lemmas 5.19 and B.3.
  • domain assumption The spherical average process of the LGF has covariance (3.6) and is cd-times differentiable, from [LSSW16, Section 11].
    Used in Theorem A and Proposition 3.7.
  • domain assumption For even d, (-Delta)^{d/2} is a local operator, so H_d = H_{d,rad} direct sum H_{d,sph} (Lemma 3.5).
    This decomposition is needed to construct the quantum cone and restricts the results to even dimensions.
  • standard math Stationary Gaussian Markov solutions to Langevin SDEs with negative eigenvalues exist and have power spectra given by Lemma 3.13.
    These are textbook results from [KS91, PP02].
invented entities (2)
  • d-dimensional beta-quantum cone field h*
    purpose: Higher-dimensional analogue of the 2D quantum cone; local limit of h - beta log|. - z| and stationary along LBM (Theorems D, E).
    Defined via the radial limit S^{infinity,s} plus the spherical part; no explicit law is given (Problem 2.15) and no externally testable prediction is provided.
  • Limiting recentred process S^{infinity,s}
    purpose: Radial part of the quantum cone; limit of the recentred spherical average process.
    Only characterized as a total-variation limit in Theorem C; Problem 2.15 leaves its explicit representation open.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Liouville Brownian motion and quantum cones in dimension $d > 2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SJDIBL26

@misc{pith2026250115936,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Liouville Brownian motion and quantum cones in dimension $d > 2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SJDIBL26}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15936}
}
abstract

For $d > 2$ and $\gamma \in (0, \sqrt{2d})$, we study the Liouville Brownian motion associated with the whole-space log-correlated Gaussian field in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We compute its spectral dimension, i.e., the short-time asymptotics of the heat kernel along the diagonal, which, in contrast to the two-dimensional case, depends on both $\gamma$ and on the thickness of the starting point. Furthermore, for even dimensions $d > 2$, we show that the spherical average process of the whole-space log-correlated Gaussian field in $\mathbb{R}^d$ can be identified with the integral of a stationary Gaussian Markov process of order $(d-2)/2$. Exploiting this representation, we construct the higher-dimensional analogue of the $\beta$-quantum cone for $\beta \in (-\infty, Q)$, with $Q = d/\gamma + \gamma/2$. Lastly, for $\alpha = Q - \sqrt{Q^2-4}$, we prove that the law of the $d$-dimensional $\alpha$-quantum cone is invariant under shifts along the trajectories of the associated Liouville Brownian motion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.15936 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The blue (resp. green) curve represents a simulation of the process (St)t∈R in dimension d = 4 (resp. d = 10), generated according to the representation given in (2.4). The black curve corresponds to the driving two-sided Brownian motion (Bt)t∈R. Remark 2.2. We emphasise that if d = 4, then (2.3) reduces to a one-dimensional SDE whose solution is the stationary Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) process introduced in [UO30]. F… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Subdivision of the ball B(0, r) into four different regions. The first region consists in the blue ball B(0, |x|/2). The second region consists in the pink ball B(x, |x|/2). The third region consists in the green set B(mid(0, x), 2|x|)\B(0, |x|/2)\B(x, |x|/2). The fourth region consists in the grey set B(0, r)\B(mid(0, x), 2|x|). Region 2: The second region consists in the pink ball B(x, |x|/2). In this case, using … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andres and N

    S. Andres and N. Kajino . Continuity and estimates of the L iouville heat kernel with applications to spectral dimensions. Probab. Theory Related Fields 166, no. 3-4, (2016), 713--752. doi:10.1007/s00440-015-0670-4 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-015-0670-4

    doi:10.1007/s00440-015-0670-4 2016

  2. [2]

    J. Aru . Gaussian multiplicative chaos through the lens of the 2 D G aussian free field. Markov Process. Related Fields 26, no. 1, (2020), 17--56

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Berestycki

    N. Berestycki . Diffusion in planar L iouville quantum gravity. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\' e Probab. Stat. 51, no. 3, (2015), 947--964. doi:10.1214/14-AIHP605 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/14-AIHP605

    doi:10.1214/14-aihp605 2015

  4. [4]

    Berestycki

    N. Berestycki . An elementary approach to G aussian multiplicative chaos. Electron. Commun. Probab. 22, (2017), Paper No. 27, 12. doi:10.1214/17-ECP58 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/17-ECP58

    doi:10.1214/17-ecp58 2017

  5. [5]

    Bertacco

    F. Bertacco . Multifractal analysis of G aussian multiplicative chaos and applications. Electron. J. Probab. 28, (2023), Paper No. 2, 36. doi:10.1214/22-ejp893 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/22-ejp893

    work page doi:10.1214/22-ejp893 2023

  6. [6]

    Berestycki and E

    N. Berestycki and E. Gwynne . Random walks on mated- CRT planar maps and L iouville B rownian motion. Comm. Math. Phys. 395, no. 2, (2022), 773--857. doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04482-y https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-022-04482-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04482-y 2022

  7. [7]

    Area measures and branched polymers in supercritical Liouville quantum gravity

    M. Bhatia , E. Gwynne , and J. Sung . A rea measures and branched polymers in supercritical L iouville quantum gravity. arXiv (2024). arXiv:2410.12693 https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12693

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    R. F. Bass and D. Khoshnevisan . Local times on curves and uniform invariance principles. Probab. Theory Related Fields 92, no. 4, (1992), 465--492. doi:10.1007/BF01274264 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01274264

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01274264 1992

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Berestycki and E

    N. Berestycki and E. Powell . G aussian free field and L iouville quantum gravity, 2024. arXiv:2404.16642 https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16642

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bou-Rabee and E

    A. Bou-Rabee and E. Gwynne . R andom walk on sphere packings and delaunay triangulations in arbitrary dimension. arXiv (2024). arXiv:2405.11673 https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11673

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    G. A. Brosamler . Quadratic variation of potentials and harmonic functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 149, (1970), 243--257. doi:10.2307/1995675 https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1995675

    1970 doi

  4. [12]

    Cercl\'e

    B. Cercl\'e . Liouville conformal field theory on even-dimensional spheres. J. Math. Phys. 63, no. 1, (2022), Paper No. 012301, 25. doi:10.1063/5.0058389 https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0058389

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Chen and M

    Z.-Q. Chen and M. Fukushima . Symmetric M arkov processes, time change, and boundary theory , vol. 35 of London Mathematical Society Monographs Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012, xvi+479

    2012

  6. [14]

    J.-M. Coron . Control and Nonlinearity, vol. 136 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, 2007

    2007

  7. [15]

    Ding and E

    J. Ding and E. Gwynne . Tightness of supercritical L iouville first passage percolation. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 25, no. 10, (2023), 3833--3911. doi:10.4171/jems/1273 https://dx.doi.org/10.4171/jems/1273

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Ding and E

    J. Ding and E. Gwynne . Uniqueness of the critical and supercritical L iouville quantum gravity metrics. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 126, no. 1, (2023), 216--333. doi:10.1112/plms.12492 https://dx.doi.org/10.1112/plms.12492

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Ding , E

    J. Ding , E. Gwynne , and Z. Zhuang . P ercolation of thick points of the log-correlated gaussian field in high dimensions. arXiv (2024). arXiv:2410.22075 https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22075

    2024

  10. [18]

    Ding , E

    J. Ding , E. Gwynne , and Z. Zhuang . T ightness of exponential metrics for log-correlated G aussian fields in arbitrary dimension. arXiv (2024). arXiv:2310.03996 https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03996

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Duplantier , J

    B. Duplantier , J. Miller , and S. Sheffield . Liouville quantum gravity as a mating of trees. Ast\' e risque , no. 427, (2021), viii+257. doi:10.24033/ast https://dx.doi.org/10.24033/ast

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    Duplantier , R

    B. Duplantier , R. Rhodes , S. Sheffield , and V. Vargas . Critical G aussian multiplicative chaos: convergence of the derivative martingale. Ann. Probab. 42, no. 5, (2014), 1769--1808. doi:10.1214/13-AOP890 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/13-AOP890

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    Duplantier , R

    B. Duplantier , R. Rhodes , S. Sheffield , and V. Vargas . Log-correlated G aussian fields: an overview. In Geometry, analysis and probability, vol. 310 of Progr. Math., 191--216. Birkh\" a user/Springer, Cham, 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49638-2\\_9 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007...

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Duplantier and S

    B. Duplantier and S. Sheffield . Liouville quantum gravity and KPZ . Invent. Math. 185, no. 2, (2011), 333--393. doi:10.1007/s00222-010-0308-1 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00222-010-0308-1

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    Ding , O

    J. Ding , O. Zeitouni , and F. Zhang . Heat kernel for L iouville B rownian motion and L iouville graph distance. Comm. Math. Phys. 371, no. 2, (2019), 561--618. doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03467-8 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03467-8

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Garban , R

    C. Garban , R. Rhodes , and V. Vargas . On the heat kernel and the D irichlet form of L iouville B rownian motion. Electron. J. Probab. 19, (2014), no. 96, 25. doi:10.1214/ejp.v19-2950 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/ejp.v19-2950

    2014 doi

  17. [25]

    Garban , R

    C. Garban , R. Rhodes , and V. Vargas . Liouville B rownian motion. Ann. Probab. 44, no. 4, (2016), 3076--3110. doi:10.1214/15-AOP1042 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/15-AOP1042

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    E. Gwynne . R andom S urfaces and L iouville Q uantum G ravity. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 67, no. 4(2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    J.-P. Kahane . Sur le chaos multiplicatif. Ann. Sci. Math. Qu\' e bec 9, no. 2, (1985), 105--150

    1985

  20. [28]

    Karatzas and S

    I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve . Brownian motion and stochastic calculus, vol. 113 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, second ed., 1991, xxiv+470. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0949-2 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0949-2

    1991 doi

  21. [29]

    Lodhia , S

    A. Lodhia , S. Sheffield , X. Sun , and S. S. Watson . Fractional G aussian fields: a survey. Probab. Surv. 13, (2016), 1--56. doi:10.1214/14-PS243 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/14-PS243

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    M\"orters and Y

    P. M\"orters and Y. Peres . Brownian motion, vol. 30 of Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010, xii+403. With an appendix by Oded Schramm and Wendelin Werner. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511750489 https://dx.doi.org/10...

    2010 doi

  23. [31]

    Papoulis and S

    A. Papoulis and S. U. Pillai . Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York, 4 ed., 2002

    2002

  24. [32]

    Rhodes and V

    R. Rhodes and V. Vargas . Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: a review. Probab. Surv. 11, (2014), 315--392. doi:10.1214/13-PS218 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/13-PS218

    2014 doi

  25. [33]

    Rhodes and V

    R. Rhodes and V. Vargas . Spectral dimension of L iouville quantum gravity. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e 15, no. 12, (2014), 2281--2298. doi:10.1007/s00023-013-0308-y https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-013-0308-y

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    Sheffield

    S. Sheffield . What is a random surface? In International Congress of Mathematicians, 1202--1258. EMS Press, 2023. doi:10.4171/icm2022/187 https://dx.doi.org/10.4171/icm2022/187

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    L. D. Schiavo , R. Herry , E. Kopfer , and K.-T. Sturm . P olyharmonic F ields and L iouville Q uantum G ravity M easures on T ori of A rbitrary D imension: from D iscrete to C ontinuous. arXiv (2023). arXiv:2302.02963 https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02963

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    L. D. Schiavo , R. Herry , E. Kopfer , and K.-T. Sturm . Conformally invariant random fields, L iouville quantum gravity measures, and random P aneitz operators on R iemannian manifolds of even dimension. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 110, no. 5, (2024), Paper No. e70003. doi:10.111...

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    A. B. Tsybakov . Introduction to Nonparametric Estimation. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, 2009. doi:10.1007/b13794 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b13794

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    G. E. Uhlenbeck and L. S. Ornstein . On the theory of the brownian motion. Physical Review 36, no. 5, (1930), 823--841. doi:10.1103/physrev.36.823 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrev.36.823

    1930 doi

  31. [39]

    Voutilainen , L

    M. Voutilainen , L. Viitasaari , P. Ilmonen , S. Torres , and C. Tudor . Vector-valued generalized O rnstein- U hlenbeck processes: properties and parameter estimation. Scand. J. Stat. 49, no. 3, (2022), 992--1022. doi:10.1111/sjos.12552 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12552

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url doi eprint volume year label extra.label sort.label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.senten...

  33. [41]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.