Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

On the Role of Internal Degrees of Freedom in Structural Relaxation of Ring-Tail Structured Liquids Across Temperature Regimes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In 1-phenylalkanes, the fast relaxation seen in light scattering is phenyl-ring rotation, and its influence fades as the liquid supercools, merging the ring and whole-molecule timescales.

desk verdict Fast DDLS component in 1-phenylalkanes is convincingly assigned to phenyl-ring rotation; the supercooled merging is credible but relies on an untested NMR shape assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.19863 v1 pith:SJEASGU4 submitted 2025-12-22 cond-mat.soft

Rolf Zei{ss}ler , Sandra Krüger , Robin Horstmann , Till Böhmer , Michael Vogel , Thomas Blochowicz This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords 1-phenylalkanesrelaxationspectrainternalrotationdepolarizeddynamiclightscattering2HNMRmoleculardynamicssimulationsupercooledliquidsglasstransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the fast relaxation process in depolarized light scattering of liquid 1-phenylalkanes originates from internal rotation of the phenyl ring, not from anisotropic tumbling of the whole molecule. By combining three techniques, the authors show that the ring-rotation timescale matches the fast process and that the separation between ring and whole-molecule rotation grows with chain length. Upon supercooling, this separation shrinks and eventually vanishes near T/Tg ≈ 1.2, where the relaxation spectrum adopts the generic shape found across many molecular glass formers. This suggests that in the supercooled regime, cooperative dynamics erase the influence of internal molecular flexibility on structural relaxation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the bimodal relaxation spectrum of the depolarized light scattering susceptibility, decomposed into a slow whole-molecule rotation and a fast process. The identification relies on three independent probes: DDLS (sensitive to overall polarizability anisotropy), 2H NMR on ring-deuterated molecules (selective to C–D bond reorientation on the ring), and MD simulations that compute rotational correlation functions for different intramolecular vectors, including artificially stiffened molecules to isolate internal flexibility. The timescale ratio τ_DDLS/τ_NMR as a function of T_g/T tracks the merging.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to measure 2H NMR spin-lattice relaxation at several Larmor frequencies (e.g., 46 MHz, 23 MHz, and 12 MHz) across the supercooled regime, reconstructing the spectral density without the FTS assumption. If the resulting NMR susceptibility peak at 155 K does not match the DDLS peak and the generic shape, the merging claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We demonstrate that the fast relaxation process in DDLS of 1-phenylalkanes can be assigned to the rotational dynamics of the phenyl ring. Using 2H NMR on ring-deuterated molecules and MD simulations, we show that the timescale separation between ring rotation and whole-molecule reorientation increases with alkyl chain length. Upon supercooling, the influence of anisotropic rotation and internal degrees of freedom diminishes, resulting in a merging of the timescales of molecular rotation observed by DDLS and NMR as well as a convergence of susceptibility peak shapes toward the generic relaxation shape.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes frequency-temperature superposition (FTS) holds when converting single-frequency 2H NMR T1 data into a full susceptibility spectrum; if FTS fails, the claimed convergence of NMR and DDLS peak shapes at low temperature is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fast relaxation process in DDLS spectra of aromatic liquids can be reliably interpreted as internal ring rotation, enabling decomposition of structural relaxation spectra.
  • In supercooled liquids near the glass transition, intramolecular flexibility ceases to affect the shape of the main relaxation peak, so the generic spectral shape has a universal origin.
  • NMR can serve as a site-specific probe to uncover hidden bimodality in spectra where DDLS alone shows only a shoulder.
  • Other molecular liquids with flexible side groups should show the same merging of internal and whole-molecule timescales upon cooling.
  • The merging temperature T/Tg ≈ 1.2 may mark a general crossover where cooperative rotational dynamics dominate over single-molecule anisotropy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editor's inference: If the mechanism is general, dielectric spectroscopy of molecules with a dipole on the flexible group should reproduce the same merging, giving an independent test.
  • Editor's inference: The same physical picture might extend to polymer segmental relaxation, where local flexibility could be washed out near the glass transition.
  • Editor's inference: The stiffened-molecule MD results predict that rigid anisotropic molecules should show a smaller but still present bimodality; measuring such a rigid analog would directly test the internal-rotation explanation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the molecular origin of bimodal structural-relaxation peaks in 1-phenylalkanes by combining depolarized dynamic light scattering (DDLS), site-specific 2H NMR on ring-deuterated molecules, and MD simulations. At high temperatures, the authors assign the fast DDLS process to phenyl-ring internal rotation, based on agreement of its timescale with ring-deuteron NMR correlation times and with the MD CH-ring/end-to-end vector separation, and on a stiffened-molecule control in which the ring–chain relative orientation ceases to decay. In the supercooled regime, the paper claims that the timescale separation between ring and whole-molecule motion diminishes and that DDLS and NMR susceptibility peaks converge toward a generic relaxation shape, with the DDLS and NMR timescales merging near T/Tg ≈ 1.2 for n = 4.

Significance. If established, the paper would provide a concrete molecular mechanism for non-Debye spectral shapes in flexible, anisotropically shaped small-molecule liquids and a methodological template for identifying internal-rotation contributions. The high-temperature assignment is convincing and well supported: the three-way consistency among DDLS, site-specific 2H NMR, and MD, plus the stiffened-molecule control, gives independent anchors for the fast-process identification. The authors are also transparent about the reused fit model and about the FTS assumption in the NMR analysis. However, the supercooled-regime conclusions—particularly the shape convergence at 155 K and the quantitative merging at T/Tg ≈ 1.2—rest on model-dependent conversions of single-frequency T1 data. The shape comparison is partly circular, and the merging temperature has no stated uncertainty. These concerns affect the paper's central supercooled-regime claim, so the manuscript needs revision before it can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Fig. 7(b), Eq. (8)] The χ''_NMR curve in Fig. 7(b) is not an independent measurement; it is generated from Eq. (8) together with the Cole–Davidson spectral density of Eq. (4) under the FTS assumption stated in the text. Since the DDLS data in the same panel are fitted with a CD function of the same width parameter β_CD = 0.5, the claimed agreement of the NMR and DDLS peak shapes is essentially built into the analysis. The statement that 'the NMR susceptibility is close to identical in peak shape' is therefore not empirical evidence for a convergence of spectral shapes. Please provide an independent test of FTS and of the temperature independence of β_CD (e.g., multi-frequency 2H T1 data or a second probe), or explicitly reframe the shape-convergence claim as a consequence of the assumed spectral-density model.
  2. [§III, Fig. 6] The quantitative merging of τ_DDLS and τ_NMR near T/Tg ≈ 1.2 rests on τ_NMR values obtained in the regime ω_Lτ ≫ 1, where the fast-limit formula Eq. (5) is not valid. The inversion from T1 to τ uses the CD ansatz (Eq. 4) with a single β_CD determined at the T1 minimum. If β_CD is temperature dependent, the inferred τ_NMR(T) can approach τ_DDLS artificially, making the merging temperature an artifact. Please provide a sensitivity analysis over the plausible range of β_CD (or using a different spectral-density form), or an experimental constraint from a well-separated second Larmor frequency. In addition, the n = 6 data are incomplete due to crystallization, so the quantitative merging claim currently rests on n = 4 alone.
  3. [§III, Fig. 6(c)] The ratio τ_DDLS/τ_NMR uses DDLS times obtained from VFT fits because the DDLS and NMR temperature grids do not coincide, and the DDLS data have an uncovered frequency gap between the PCS and TFPI ranges (∼10^7–10^8 Hz). The manuscript does not report uncertainties in the VFT parameters or in the interpolated DDLS times. Since the ratio's maximum and subsequent decrease are used to define the merging temperature, error bars on the VFT fits (or on the ratio) are needed to establish that the merging is significant rather than an interpolation artifact.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§II C] The text switches between 'mean correlation times' (Eq. 5) and 'peak correlation times' without defining the latter. Please specify the relation between τ_CD, mean time, and peak time, and ensure that Fig. 6 and Fig. 3(b) use consistent definitions.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'mildly shifted in frequency' is vague. Please specify the shift convention or state that the shifts are only for visual comparison.
  3. [§III, Fig. 7] The construction of the NMR susceptibility in Fig. 7 should be described in the caption, including the FTS assumption and the normalization to peak amplitude. Currently the reader must infer this from the main text.
  4. [§II D] The description of the stiffening procedure ('dihedral potentials involving four carbon atoms, of which at least two belong to the alkyl chain, were multiplied by a factor of ten') would benefit from more specificity about which dihedrals are affected, e.g., ring–chain and chain–chain dihedrals.
  5. [General] In a few places, reference to the authors' earlier work (ref. 60) is used as the source of the DDLS fit model and even the fitting results. This is transparent, but it would be helpful to state explicitly which parameters are newly determined in this work and which are taken unchanged from ref. 60.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

NMR peak-shape convergence at 155 K is imposed by the assumed Cole-Davidson/FTS construction; core ring-rotation assignment is independently anchored.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. II C (Eq. 4) and Sec. III, Fig. 7 (n=4 at 155 K)]
    "To account for a distribution of correlation times, we assume that the spectral density J2(ω) has a Cole-Davidson (CD) shape ... The CD width parameter β_CD is obtained from the height of the T1 minimum and is used to determine correlation times τ_CD(T) from T1(T). ... To get the frequency dependence of χ''NMR(ν) we utilize the known relation between τNMR and temperature, shown in Fig. 6 a) under the assumption that frequency-temperature superposition (FTS) holds in the considered temperature range. ... Interestingly, the NMR susceptibility is close to identical in peak shape."

    The χ''NMR(ν) curve is not a directly measured spectrum: it is a master curve assembled from single-frequency T1 points using the assumed CD spectral density (Eq. 4) plus FTS. Hence its peak shape is CD with the β_CD fitted at the T1 minimum by construction. At 155 K the DDLS peak is fit with CD β_CD=0.5, so the claimed 'convergence of susceptibility peak shapes' ('NMR susceptibility is close to identical in peak shape') reduces to the model input rather than being an independent observation. The single T1 datum at 155 K fixes only one point on that master curve.

full rationale

The central assignment of the fast DDLS process to phenyl-ring rotation is not circular: it is anchored by site-specific 2H NMR on ring-deuterated molecules (Eq. 5 applies in the fast-limit regime) and by MD correlation functions for CH-ring vs end-to-end vectors; the MD time-scale ratio is not fitted (only a global frequency shift is applied for force-field time-scale calibration). Reuse of the DDLS fit from ref. 60 is disclosed and is independently corroborated. The 'generic shape' comparison uses refs. 4/28 from the same group, but that shape was established on other liquids and is therefore external support, not a uniqueness theorem. The partial circularity is confined to the supercooled-regime shape comparison: the NMR susceptibility shown in Fig. 7 is generated from single-frequency T1 data under an assumed CD spectral density and FTS, so its apparent identity to the CD fit of the DDLS peak at 155 K is partly a consequence of those assumptions. The timescale-merging conclusion is model-dependent but not definitionally forced; still, the claimed 'convergence of susceptibility peak shapes' is partially constructed from the assumed input, warranting a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central argument leans on a global MD time-scale calibration, fixed CD and VFT shape/trend parameters, and the FTS assumption for NMR susceptibility. No genuinely new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • MD global frequency/time shift factor a (and b) = a=2.3; b=2.6
    MD susceptibilities shifted along frequency axis so that the end-to-end vector peak matches the DDLS slow process at 300 K (a) or 240 K (b); a single global shift preserves the ratio between moiety timescales, but the absolute prediction of the fast-process position is tied to this fit.
  • DDLS Cole-Davidson width parameters beta_CD,slow and beta_CD,fast = 0.71 and 0.79
    Fixed to values from ref. 60 obtained at 360 K; reused for n=8 at 300 K fit. These shape parameters determine the decomposition into slow and fast contributions.
  • VFT parameters for DDLS peak times = not reported in text
    VFT fits to DDLS correlation times are used to interpolate tau_DDLS at NMR temperatures to compute the ratio tau_DDLS/tau_NMR in Fig. 6c; the merging at T/Tg~1.2 depends on this fit.
  • 2H NMR spectral-density width beta_CD = obtained from T1 minimum
    Cole-Davidson spectral density assumed for J2(omega) in Eq. (4); beta_CD from the T1 minimum height is used to convert T1 values into correlation times.
  • Dihedral stiffening factor = 10
    For stiffened molecules, dihedral potentials involving two or more alkyl-chain carbons were multiplied by ten to suppress internal flexibility; the comparison in Fig. 4b rests on this arbitrary factor.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Frequency-temperature superposition holds for the alpha-relaxation of 1-phenylalkanes in the studied range
    Used to construct the frequency-dependent NMR susceptibility from single-frequency T1 data (Sec. III, Fig. 7). If FTS fails, the NMR shape comparison is invalid.
  • domain assumption The Cole-Davidson spectral density describes the 2H NMR relaxation of ring deuterons
    Eq. (4) assumes a CD shape for J2(omega) to extract correlation times; a different spectral density would alter tau(T).
  • domain assumption The generic relaxation shape of refs. [4,28] is the appropriate benchmark for supercooled 1-phenylalkanes
    The claim that the DDLS peak converges to the generic shape is made by visual comparison to that curve (Fig. 7b); no quantitative distance metric is given.
  • domain assumption GAFF2 + AM1-BCC force field reproduces the relative reorientation dynamics of phenyl ring vs. end-to-end vector
    The MD assignment of the fast process to phenyl-ring rotation presumes that the force-field-based ratio of moiety timescales is trustworthy; the global shift removes only absolute timescale errors.
  • ad hoc to paper Multiplying dihedral potentials by ten effectively removes internal flexibility without changing other properties
    The stiffened-molecule comparison (Fig. 4b) underpins the claim that internal rotation is essential for the timescale separation; the stiffening procedure is an artificial modification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Role of Internal Degrees of Freedom in Structural Relaxation of Ring-Tail Structured Liquids Across Temperature Regimes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SJEASGU4

@misc{pith2026251219863,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Role of Internal Degrees of Freedom in Structural Relaxation of Ring-Tail Structured Liquids Across Temperature Regimes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SJEASGU4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.19863}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate how anisotropic molecular rotation and internal molecular flexibility influence liquid dynamics in 1-phenylalkanes. To this end, we combine depolarized dynamic light scattering, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations. Our results show that anisotropic rotations and internal molecular flexibility substantially contribute to structural relaxation in the liquid state. However, their influence diminishes on entering the supercooled-liquid regime, where the relaxation behavior develops towards the previously identified generic relaxation shape, likely due to the increasing cooperativity of rotational dynamics. Because 1-phenylalkanes are simple model systems with similarities to many other molecular liquids, this study suggests that effects of anisotropic rotation and internal flexibility are relevant in various liquids with similar molecular complexity, and provides a proof of concept for how these effects can be identified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.19863 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Structural formula of 1-phenyloctane ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. DDLS spectra of 1-phenylalkanes of varying length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In panel (a), the vertical dashed line indicates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. a) Second rank orientational correlation functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: that 1-phenylalkanes with n ≤ 6 do not exhibit a clearly visible bimodality in their DDLS relaxation peaks. However, at sufficiently high temperatures, a slight shoul￾10 3 10 1 10 1 10 3 10 5 10 7 10 9 10 11 10 13 / Hz 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 00 / 00 p e a k 132K 137.…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) shows the DDLS spectrum for n = 4 at 240 K, i.e., at T ≫ 1.2 Tg, together with the MD susceptibilities again shifted by a constant factor b = 2.6 and shifted in amplitude for visualization purposes. The vertical dashed line corresponds to the 2H NMR correlation tim…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Peak correlation times of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-exponential relaxation without dynamic heterogeneity in van der Waals liquids above the melting point

    cond-mat.soft 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Probe-molecule dilution leaves the non-exponential relaxation shape of DEP, TBP, and n-tridecane unchanged above their melting points, indicating dynamic heterogeneity is not the cause of stretching in these liquids.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    We see that the CH- ring and CH-chain-1 correlation functions decay on a very similar timescale, while C–H bonds close to the tail end show significantly faster reorientation

    and seventh (CH-chain-7) methylene groups, where we start counting at the phenyl ring. We see that the CH- ring and CH-chain-1 correlation functions decay on a very similar timescale, while C–H bonds close to the tail end show significantly faster reorientation. This result could potentially be interpreted in two ways. First, we may as- sume that an aniso...

  2. [2]

    Lunkenheimer, U

    P. Lunkenheimer, U. Schneider, R. Brand, and A. Loid, Glassy dynamics, Contemp. Phys.41, 15 (2000)

    2000

  3. [3]

    C. A. Angell, K. L. Ngai, G. B. McKenna, P. F. McMil- lan, and S. W. Martin, Relaxation in glassforming liquids and amorphous solids, J. Appl. Phys.88, 3113 (2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    B¨ ohmer, F

    T. B¨ ohmer, F. Pabst, J. P. Gabriel, R. Zeißler, and T. Blochowicz, On the spectral shape of the structural relaxation in supercooled liquids, J. Chem. Phys.162, 120902 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    B¨ ohmer, G

    R. B¨ ohmer, G. Diezemann, G. Hinze, and E. R¨ ossler, Dynamics of supercooled liquids and glassy solids, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.39, 191 (2001)

    2001

  6. [6]

    B¨ ohmer and G

    R. B¨ ohmer and G. Hinze, Reorientations in super- cooled glycerol studied by two-dimensional time-domain deuteron nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, J. Chem. Phys.108, 241 (1998)

    1998

  7. [7]

    Hinze, Geometry and time scale of the rotational dy- namics in supercooled toluene, Phys

    G. Hinze, Geometry and time scale of the rotational dy- namics in supercooled toluene, Phys. Rev. E57, 2010 (1998)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Paluch, S

    M. Paluch, S. Pawlus, A. P. Sokolov, and K. Ngai, Sub- rouse modes in polymers observed by dielectric spec- troscopy, Macromolecules43, 3103 (2010)

    2010

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Sch¨ onhals, Molecular dynamics in polymer model systems, inBroadband dielectric spectroscopy(Springer,

    A. Sch¨ onhals, Molecular dynamics in polymer model systems, inBroadband dielectric spectroscopy(Springer,

  2. [10]

    Hintermeyer, A

    J. Hintermeyer, A. Herrmann, R. Kahlau, C. Goiceanu, and E. R¨ ossler, Molecular weight dependence of glassy dynamics in linear polymers revisited, Macromolecules 41, 9335 (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    Abou Elfadl, R

    A. Abou Elfadl, R. Kahlau, A. Herrmann, V. Novikov, and E. R¨ ossler, From rouse to fully established entan- glement dynamics: a study of polyisoprene by dielectric 9 spectroscopy, Macromolecules43, 3340 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Rams-Baron, B

    M. Rams-Baron, B. Yao, S. Cheng, M. Dulski, and M. Paluch, Complex reorientation dynamics of sizable glass-formers with polar rotors revealed by dielectric spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 11303 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Rams-Baron, A

    M. Rams-Baron, A. Jedrzejowska, K. Jurkiewicz, M. Ma- tussek, K. Ngai, and M. Paluch, Broadband dielectric study of sizable molecular glass formers: Relationship between local structure and dynamics, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 245 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    A. Raj, M. Rams-Baron, K. Koperwas, Z. Wojnarowska, and M. Paluch, Dual nature of large and anisotropic glass-forming molecules in terms of debye–stokes–einstein relation revealed, J. Phys. Chem. B128, 12154 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    B la˙ zytko, M

    A. B la˙ zytko, M. Rams-Baron, and M. Paluch, The influ- ence of molecular shape on reorientation dynamics of siz- able glass-forming isomers at ambient and elevated pres- sure, Sci. Rep.14, 887 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    M. D. Ediger, C. A. Angell, and S. R. Nagel, Supercooled liquids and glasses, J. Phys. Chem.100, 13200 (1996)

    1996

  9. [17]

    Rams-Baron, A

    M. Rams-Baron, A. B la˙ zytko, R. Casalini, and M. Paluch, Insight into properties of sizable glass for- mer from volumetric measurements, J. Chem. Phys.161, 064502 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Sillescu, Heterogeneity at the glass transition: a re- view, J

    H. Sillescu, Heterogeneity at the glass transition: a re- view, J. Non-Cryst. Solids243, 81 (1999)

    1999

  11. [19]

    The chemical purities of the liq- uids were specified as>98 % by the suppliers

    from TCI America. The chemical purities of the liq- uids were specified as>98 % by the suppliers. Forn= 4, n= 6, andn= 8, 1-phenylalkanes with selective 2H la- beling of the phenyl ring were obtained from CDN Iso- topes at chemical purities of>99 % and>99 % isotopic enrichment...

    2023

  12. [20]

    B¨ ohmer, R

    R. B¨ ohmer, R. Chamberlin, G. Diezemann, B. Geil, A. Heuer, G. Hinze, S. Kuebler, R. Richert, B. Schiener, H. Sillescu,et al., Nature of the non-exponential primary relaxation in structural glass-formers probed by dynam- ically selective experiments, J. Non-Cryst. Solids235, 1 (1998)

    1998

  13. [21]

    M. D. Ediger, Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in super- cooled liquids, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.51, 99 (2000)

    2000

  14. [22]

    Richert, Heterogeneous dynamics in liquids: fluctu- ations inspace and time, J

    R. Richert, Heterogeneous dynamics in liquids: fluctu- ations inspace and time, J. Phys. Condens. Matter14, R703 (2002)

    2002

  15. [23]

    Cavagna, Supercooled liquids for pedestrians, Phys

    A. Cavagna, Supercooled liquids for pedestrians, Phys. Rep.476, 51 (2009)

    2009

  16. [24]

    Lunkenheimer, L

    P. Lunkenheimer, L. Pardo, M. K¨ ohler, and A. Loidl, Broadband dielectric spectroscopy on benzophenone:α relaxation,βrelaxation, and mode coupling theory, Phys. Rev. E77, 031506 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    Schneider, R

    U. Schneider, R. Brand, P. Lunkenheimer, and A. Loidl, Scaling of broadband dielectric data of glass-forming liq- uids and plastic crystals, Eur. Phys. J. E2, 67 (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    Schmidtke, N

    B. Schmidtke, N. Petzold, B. Potzschner, H. Weingart- ner, and E. R¨ ossler, Relaxation stretching, fast dynamics, and activation energy: a comparison of molecular and ionic liquids as revealed by depolarized light scattering, J. Phys. Chem. B118, 7108 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Schmidtke, N

    B. Schmidtke, N. Petzold, R. Kahlau, and E. R¨ ossler, Re- orientational dynamics in molecular liquids as revealed by dynamic light scattering: From boiling point to glass transition temperature, J. Chem. Phys.139, 084504 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    E. A. R¨ ossler and M. Becher, Glass spectrum, excess wing phenomenon, and master curves in molecular glass for- mers: A multi-method approach, J. Chem. Phys.160, 084504 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    E. A. R¨ ossler and M. Becher, Relaxation spectra of molecular glass formers probed by tandem fabry–perot interferometry and photon correlation spectroscopy: A critical re-assessment, J. Chem. Phys.163, 054510 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Pabst, J

    F. Pabst, J. P. Gabriel, T. B¨ ohmer, P. Weigl, A. Helbling, T. Richter, P. Zourchang, T. Walther, and T. Blochowicz, Generic structural relaxation in supercooled liquids, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 3685 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Suchanski, E

    W. Suchanski, E. Szczesniak, and S. Jurga, Nuclearmag- netic relaxation study of carbon-13 in di-pentyl phtha- late, J. Phys. Condens. Matter11, 3907 (1999)

    1999

  24. [32]

    Suchanski, E

    W. Suchanski, E. Szczesiak, and S. Jurga, Nmr relaxation in supercooled di-methyl phthalate, J. Phys. Condens. Matter10, 6243 (1998)

    1998

  25. [33]

    Szcze´ sniak, S

    E. Szcze´ sniak, S. G lowinkowski, W. Sucha´ nski, and S. Ju- rga, Dynamics of glass-forming di-n-butyl phthalate as studied by nmr, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson.8, 73 (1997)

    1997

  26. [34]

    Min and J

    B. Min and J. W. Lee, 13c nmr relaxation study of in- tramolecular local dynamics of n-alkane, J. Mol. Liq.80, 33 (1999)

    1999

  27. [35]

    F. Qi, G. Hinze, R. B¨ ohmer, H. Sillescu, and H. Zimmer- mann, Slow and fast methyl group rotations in fragile glass-formers studied by nmr, Chem. Phys. Lett.328, 257 (2000)

    2000

  28. [36]

    Y. J. Kim and J. Jonas, High pressure 13c nmr study of the motional dynamics of liquid bis (2-ethylhexyl) phtha- late, J. Phys. Chem.99, 6777 (1995)

    1995

  29. [37]

    Becher, T

    M. Becher, T. K¨ orber, A. D¨ oß, G. Hinze, C. Gainaru, R. B¨ ohmer, M. Vogel, and E. R¨ ossler, Nuclear spin relax- ation in viscous liquids: Relaxation stretching of single- particle probes, J. Phys. Chem. B125, 13519 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Hinze, H

    G. Hinze, H. Sillescu, and F. Fujara, Anisotropic motion of toluene above and below the glass transition studied by 2h nmr, Chem. Phys. Lett.232, 154 (1995)

    1995

  31. [39]

    B¨ ohmer, J

    T. B¨ ohmer, J. P. Gabriel, R. Zeißler, T. Richter, and T. Blochowicz, Glassy dynamics in polyalcohols: inter- molecular simplicity vs. intramolecular complexity, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.24, 18272 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    B¨ ohmer, T

    T. B¨ ohmer, T. Richter, J. P. Gabriel, R. Zeißler, P. Weigl, F. Pabst, and T. Blochowicz, Revealing complex relax- ation behavior of monohydroxy alcohols in a series of octanol isomers, J. Chem. Phys.159(2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Cheng, S

    S. Cheng, S. Patil, and S. Cheng, Hydrogen bonding ex- change and supramolecular dynamics of monohydroxy al- cohols, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 058201 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Arrese-Igor, ´A

    S. Arrese-Igor, ´A. Alegr ´ ıa, and J. Colmenero, On the non- exponentiality of the dielectric debye-like relaxation of monoalcohols, J. Chem. Phys.146(2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Schmidt-Rohr and H

    K. Schmidt-Rohr and H. W. Spiess,Multidimensional solid-state NMR and polymers(Elsevier, 2012)

    2012

  36. [44]

    R¨ ossler and H

    E. R¨ ossler and H. Sillescu, 2H NMR Study of supercooled toluene, Chem. Phys. Lett.112, 94 (1984)

    1984

  37. [45]

    Bloembergen, E

    N. Bloembergen, E. M. Purcell, and R. V. Pound, Relax- ation effects in nuclear magnetic resonance absorption, Phys. Rev.73, 679 (1948)

    1948

  38. [46]

    P. A. Beckmann, Spectral densities and nuclear spin re- laxation in solids, Phys. Rep.171, 85 (1988)

    1988

  39. [47]

    H. J. C. Berendsen, D. van der Spoel, and R. van Drunen, Gromacs: A message-passing parallel molecular dynam- ics implementation, Comput. Phys. Commun.91, 43 (1995). 10

    1995

  40. [48]

    Lindahl, B

    E. Lindahl, B. Hess, and D. van der Spoel, Gromacs 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis, J. Mol. Model.7, 306 (2001)

    2001

  41. [49]

    Van Der Spoel, E

    D. Van Der Spoel, E. Lindahl, B. Hess, G. Groenhof, A. E. Mark, and H. J. C. Berendsen, Gromacs: Fast, flexible, and free, J. Comput. Chem.26, 1701 (2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    B. Hess, C. Kutzner, D. van der Spoel, and E. Lin- dahl, Gromacs 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load- balanced, and scalable molecular simulation, J. Chem. Theory Comput.4, 435 (2008)

    2008

  43. [51]

    M. J. Abraham, T. Murtola, R. Schulz, S. Pall, J. Smith, B. Hess, and E. Lindahl, Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX1-2, 19 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Lundborg and E

    M. Lundborg and E. Lindahl, Automatic gro- macs topology generation and comparisons of force fields for solvation free energy calculations, J. Phys. Chem. B119, 810 (2015), pMID: 25343332, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp505332p

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    Katouda, Stage3: A python fork of the stage small-molecule topology generator,https://github

    M. Katouda, Stage3: A python fork of the stage small-molecule topology generator,https://github. com/mkatouda/stage3(2024), accessed May 8, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    J. Wang, R. M. Wolf, J. W. Caldwell, P. A. Kollman, and D. A. Case, Development and testing of a general amber force field, J. Comput. Chem.25, 1157 (2004)

    2004

  47. [55]

    D. A. Case, H. M. Aktulga, K. Belfon, D. S. Cerutti, G. A. Cisneros, V. W. D. Cruzeiro, N. Forouzesh, T. J. Giese, A. W. G¨ otz, H. Gohlke, S. Izadi, K. Kasava- jhala, M. C. Kaymak, E. King, T. Kurtzman, T.-S. Lee, P. Li, J. Liu, T. Luchko, R. Luo, M. Manathunga, M. R. Machado...

    2023

  48. [56]

    Jakalian, B

    A. Jakalian, B. L. Bush, D. B. Jack, and C. I. Bayly, Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. am1-bcc model: I. method, J. Comput. Chem.21, 132 (2000)

    2000

  49. [57]

    Jakalian, D

    A. Jakalian, D. B. Jack, and C. I. Bayly, Fast, effi- cient generation of high-quality atomic charges. am1-bcc model: Ii. parameterization and validation, J. Comput. Chem.23, 1623 (2002)

    2002

  50. [58]

    B. Hess, H. Bekker, H. J. Berendsen, and J. G. Fraaije, Lincs: A linear constraint solver for molecular simula- tions, J. Comput. Chem.18, 1463 (1997)

    1997

  51. [59]

    Bussi, D

    G. Bussi, D. Donadio, and M. Parrinello, Canonical sam- pling through velocity rescaling, J. Chem. Phys.126, 014101 (2007)

    2007

  52. [60]

    Bernetti and G

    M. Bernetti and G. Bussi, Pressure control using stochas- tic cell rescaling, J. Chem. Phys.153, 114107 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Darden, D

    T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pederson, Particle mesh ewald: An n log (n) method for ewald sums in large sys- tems, J. Chem. Phys.98, 10089 (1993)

    1993

  54. [62]

    Zeißler, F

    R. Zeißler, F. Pabst, T. B¨ ohmer, and T. Blochowicz, Influence of intramolecular dynamics on the relaxation spectra of simple liquids, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25, 16380 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Zeißler, J

    R. Zeißler, J. P. Gabriel, D. Posselt, and T. Blochowicz, On the relation of structure and dynamics in aromatic ring-tail structured liquids, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 27, 7258 (2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    R¨ ossler, Indications for a change of diffusion mecha- nism in supercooled liquids, Phys

    E. R¨ ossler, Indications for a change of diffusion mecha- nism in supercooled liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 1595 (1990)

    1990

  57. [65]

    Chang and H

    I. Chang and H. Sillescu, Heterogeneity at the glass transition: Translational and rotational self-diffusion, J. Phys. Chem. B101, 8794 (1997)

    1997

  58. [66]

    S. F. Swallen, P. A. Bonvallet, R. J. McMahon, and M. Ediger, Self-diffusion of tris-naphthylbenzene near the glass transition temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 015901 (2003)

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.