pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31558 · v1 · pith:SK5KPG3Ynew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Design Principles for Quasi-Isotropic Exchange in Rare-Earth Quantum Magnets

Kotaro Shimizu , Esteban Agustin Ghioldi , Filip Ronning , Cristian D. Batista This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 03:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords rare-earth magnetssuperexchangeKramers doubletquasi-isotropic exchangespin-orbit couplingquantum spin liquidsYb3+Ce3+
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasi-isotropic exchange in rare-earth magnets arises when the ground-state Kramers doublet carries strong maximal-angular-momentum character perpendicular to the ligand plane.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines superexchange in Ce3+- and Yb3+-based edge-sharing insulators using degenerate perturbation theory on a multiorbital Hubbard model. It separates the exchange into isotropic terms that come mostly from virtual hopping inside the ground-state Kramers doublet and anisotropic terms that come mostly from processes involving excited multiplets. This separation produces an orbital design rule: materials whose ground doublet maximizes angular momentum along the axis normal to the rare-earth–ligand plane should show reduced anisotropy. If the separation is accurate, the rule supplies a concrete way to select or design compounds that realize nearly Heisenberg interactions despite strong spin-orbit coupling. Such interactions are required for many of the quantum spin liquids and topological textures that motivate study of rare-earth magnets.

Core claim

Isotropic exchange originates predominantly from virtual hopping within the ground-state Kramers doublet, whereas anisotropic interactions arise primarily from processes involving excited multiplets. This leads to a simple orbital design principle: quasi-isotropic exchange is promoted when the ground-state doublet has a strong maximal-angular-momentum character with respect to the quantization axis perpendicular to the superexchange plane spanned by rare-earth and ligand ions. The mechanism holds for both ideal and distorted edge-sharing octahedral geometries and matches trends in known Yb-based insulators.

What carries the argument

Degenerate perturbation theory applied to the multiorbital Hubbard model, which isolates virtual-hopping contributions inside the ground-state Kramers doublet from those involving excited multiplets.

If this is right

  • Quasi-isotropic exchange is promoted in both ideal and distorted edge-sharing geometries when the stated orbital condition is met.
  • The same orbital criterion is broadly consistent with exchange parameters measured in experimentally studied Yb-based insulators.
  • The separation supplies a practical framework for selecting or modifying rare-earth compounds to achieve nearly Heisenberg magnetism.
  • Materials engineered under this rule should support longer-range entanglement and topological magnetic textures that anisotropic exchange otherwise suppresses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The orbital criterion could be checked by first-principles calculations of the ground doublet wavefunction before attempting synthesis of new compounds.
  • If ligand-field distortions rotate the quantization axis, the design principle would require reorientation of the superexchange plane to restore maximal character.
  • Extension to other rare-earth ions would first require verifying that their multiplet energy ordering preserves the same separation of hopping channels.

Load-bearing premise

The energy hierarchy and orbital mixing assumed in the multiorbital Hubbard model for edge-sharing Ce3+ and Yb3+ geometries cleanly separate isotropic and anisotropic channels without higher-order mixing of multiplets.

What would settle it

Observation of strong exchange anisotropy in a compound whose ground-state doublet exhibits maximal angular momentum character perpendicular to the superexchange plane would falsify the design principle.

read the original abstract

Rare-earth quantum materials provide a promising platform for emergent phenomena ranging from quantum spin liquids with long-range entanglement to topological magnetic textures. However, the strong spin-orbit coupling that stabilizes their low-energy pseudospin degrees of freedom also tends to generate strongly anisotropic exchange interactions, complicating the realization of quasi-isotropic Heisenberg magnetism. Here we investigate the microscopic origin of superexchange in $\mathrm{Ce}^{3+}$- and $\mathrm{Yb}^{3+}$-based insulators with edge-sharing octahedral geometry. Using degenerate perturbation theory for a multiorbital Hubbard model, we show that isotropic exchange originates predominantly from virtual hopping within the ground-state Kramers doublet, whereas anisotropic interactions arise primarily from processes involving excited multiplets. This leads to a simple orbital design principle: quasi-isotropic exchange is promoted when the ground-state doublet has a strong maximal-angular-momentum character with respect to the quantization axis perpendicular to the superexchange plane spanned by rare-earth and ligand ions. We demonstrate this mechanism for both ideal and distorted geometries and show that it is broadly consistent with experimentally studied Yb-based insulators. Our results establish a practical framework for engineering quasi-isotropic interactions in rare-earth quantum materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the microscopic origin of superexchange in Ce^{3+}- and Yb^{3+}-based insulators with edge-sharing octahedral geometry. Using degenerate perturbation theory applied to a multiorbital Hubbard model, it claims that isotropic exchange originates predominantly from virtual hopping within the ground-state Kramers doublet, while anisotropic interactions arise primarily from processes involving excited multiplets. This separation yields an orbital design principle: quasi-isotropic exchange is promoted when the ground-state doublet has strong maximal-angular-momentum (|m_J|) character with respect to the quantization axis perpendicular to the superexchange plane. The mechanism is demonstrated for ideal and distorted geometries and stated to be consistent with experimentally studied Yb-based insulators.

Significance. If the central separation and design principle hold under the assumed energy hierarchy, the work supplies a concrete, orbital-based rule for engineering quasi-isotropic Heisenberg-like interactions in rare-earth quantum magnets despite strong spin-orbit coupling. This is potentially useful for realizing quantum spin liquids or other emergent phenomena in these materials. The approach employs standard degenerate perturbation theory on a multiorbital Hubbard model without fitted parameters, which is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on perturbation theory analysis): The claimed clean separation of isotropic (intra-doublet virtual hopping) versus anisotropic (excited-multiplet) contributions rests on an assumed energy hierarchy and limited orbital mixing in the multiorbital Hubbard model for edge-sharing Ce/Yb geometries. No explicit error estimates, higher-order process bounds, or sensitivity analysis to ligand-field splittings comparable to multiplet separations are provided, leaving the load-bearing assumption unquantified.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript does not supply the full degenerate perturbation theory derivation, explicit matrix elements, or direct numerical comparison of the predicted isotropic J versus measured exchange constants in the cited Yb insulators, so the quantitative support for the design principle remains qualitative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful comments and for recognizing the potential utility of our orbital design principle. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on perturbation theory analysis): The claimed clean separation of isotropic (intra-doublet virtual hopping) versus anisotropic (excited-multiplet) contributions rests on an assumed energy hierarchy and limited orbital mixing in the multiorbital Hubbard model for edge-sharing Ce/Yb geometries. No explicit error estimates, higher-order process bounds, or sensitivity analysis to ligand-field splittings comparable to multiplet separations are provided, leaving the load-bearing assumption unquantified.

    Authors: We agree that the load-bearing assumption of the energy hierarchy merits more explicit justification. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing the typical energy scales in Ce^{3+} and Yb^{3+} compounds, bounds on higher-order perturbation terms, and sensitivity to variations in ligand-field splittings within the range where the hierarchy holds. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript does not supply the full degenerate perturbation theory derivation, explicit matrix elements, or direct numerical comparison of the predicted isotropic J versus measured exchange constants in the cited Yb insulators, so the quantitative support for the design principle remains qualitative.

    Authors: The full derivation of the degenerate perturbation theory, including the separation into intra-doublet and excited-multiplet channels, is presented in the main text (Section II) and expanded in the Supplementary Material with explicit expressions for the exchange parameters. The matrix elements are derived there for the edge-sharing geometry. We note that our focus is on the microscopic mechanism and the resulting design rule rather than quantitative fitting to specific materials. The consistency with Yb-based insulators is demonstrated through the orbital character of the ground-state doublet. However, we will include in the revision a comparison of the predicted dominant isotropic J with the range of experimentally reported exchange constants to make the support more concrete. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from standard perturbation theory.

full rationale

The paper applies degenerate perturbation theory to a multiorbital Hubbard model to separate isotropic exchange (intra-ground-doublet virtual hopping) from anisotropic terms (excited-multiplet processes), yielding an orbital design rule based on maximal |m_J| character. This follows directly from the model's stated energy hierarchy and orbital mixing assumptions without any fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The central result is an output of the calculation under explicit assumptions rather than a reduction to its inputs by construction. No steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of degenerate perturbation theory to separate ground-state and excited-multiplet contributions in the Hubbard model for the stated geometries; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Degenerate perturbation theory correctly captures the leading virtual hopping processes in the multiorbital Hubbard model for Ce3+ and Yb3+ edge-sharing octahedra
    Invoked to attribute isotropic exchange to the ground-state Kramers doublet and anisotropy to excited multiplets.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5748 in / 1462 out tokens · 53251 ms · 2026-07-01T03:06:12.998276+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Wen, Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with finite energy gap and topological orders

    X.G. Wen, Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with finite energy gap and topological orders. Phys. Rev. B44, 2664–2672 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.44.2664. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.2664

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.2664 1991

  2. [2]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets. Nature464(7286), 199–208 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08917. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature08917

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08917 2010

  3. [3]

    Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator? Mater

    P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator? Mater. Res. Bull.8(2), 153 – 160 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(73)90167-0. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0025540873901670

    work page doi:10.1016/0025-5408(73)90167-0 1973

  4. [4]

    Savary, L

    L. Savary, L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys.80(1), 016502 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016502 17

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016502 2016

  5. [5]

    Broholm, R.J

    C. Broholm, R.J. Cava, S.A. Kivelson, D.G. Nocera, M.R. Norman, T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids. Science367(6475) (2020). https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.aay0668. URL https://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6475/ eaay0668

    2020

  6. [6]

    Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons

    A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys.303(1), 2– 30 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0. URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491602000180

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 2003

  7. [7]

    Nayak, S.H

    C. Nayak, S.H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083–1159 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1083 2008

  8. [8]

    vortices

    A.N. Bogdanov, D. Yablonskii, Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnet- ically ordered crystals. The mixed state of magnets. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz95(1), 178 (1989)

    1989

  9. [9]

    Bogdanov, A

    A. Bogdanov, A. Hubert, Thermodynamically stable magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.138(3), 255–269 (1994). https://doi. org/10.1016/0304-8853(94)90046-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0304-8853(94)90046-9 1994

  10. [10]

    R¨ oßler, A.N

    U.K. R¨ oßler, A.N. Bogdanov, C. Pfleiderer, Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature442(7104), 797–801 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature05056

    2006

  11. [11]

    S.D. Yi, S. Onoda, N. Nagaosa, J.H. Han, Skyrmions and anomalous hall effect in a dzyaloshinskii-moriya spiral magnet. Phys. Rev. B80, 054416 (2009). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.054416. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.80.054416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.054416 2009

  12. [12]

    Nanotechnol., 2013,8, No

    N. Nagaosa, Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol.8(12), 899–911 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ nnano.2013.243. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.243

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.243 2013

  13. [13]

    Butenko, A.A

    A.B. Butenko, A.A. Leonov, U.K. R¨ oßler, A.N. Bogdanov, Stabilization of skyrmion textures by uniaxial distortions in noncentrosymmetric cubic helimag- nets. Phys. Rev. B82, 052403 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82. 052403. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.052403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82 2010

  14. [14]

    Wilson, A.B

    M.N. Wilson, A.B. Butenko, A.N. Bogdanov, T.L. Monchesky, Chiral skyrmions in cubic helimagnet films: The role of uniaxial anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B89, 094411 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.094411. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.094411

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.094411 2014

  15. [15]

    S.Z. Lin, S. Hayami, Ginzburg-Landau theory for skyrmions in inversion- symmetric magnets with competing interactions. Phys. Rev. B93, 064430 (2016). 18 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.064430. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.93.064430

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.064430 2016

  16. [16]

    Leonov, T.L

    A.O. Leonov, T.L. Monchesky, N. Romming, A. Kubetzka, A.N. Bogdanov, R. Wiesendanger, The properties of isolated chiral skyrmions in thin magnetic films. New J. Phys.18(6), 065003 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ 18/6/065003. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/6/065003

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ 2016

  17. [17]

    Hayami, S.Z

    S. Hayami, S.Z. Lin, C.D. Batista, Bubble and skyrmion crystals in frustrated magnets with easy-axis anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B93, 184413 (2016). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.184413. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.93.184413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.184413 2016

  18. [18]

    Leonov, M

    A.O. Leonov, M. Mostovoy, Multiply periodic states and isolated skyrmions in an anisotropic frustrated magnet. Nat. Commun.8, 14394 (2017). https://doi. org/10.1038/ncomms14394

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms14394 2017

  19. [19]

    K. Lea, M. Leask, W. Wolf, The raising of angular momentum degeneracy of f-electron terms by cubic crystal fields. J. Phys. Chem. Solids23(10), 1381– 1405 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(62)90192-0. URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022369762901920

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3697(62)90192-0 1962

  20. [20]

    S.H. Jang, R. Sano, Y. Kato, Y. Motome, Antiferromagnetic Kitaev interaction inf-electron based honeycomb magnets. Phys. Rev. B99, 241106(R) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.241106. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.99.241106

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.241106 2019

  21. [21]

    S.H. Jang, R. Sano, Y. Kato, Y. Motome, Computational design off- electron Kitaev magnets: Honeycomb and hyperhoneycomb compoundsA 2PrO3 (A= alkali metals). Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 104420 (2020). https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.104420. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevMaterials.4.104420

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.104420 2020

  22. [22]

    Motome, R

    Y. Motome, R. Sano, S. Jang, Y. Sugita, Y. Kato, Materials design of Kitaev spin liquids beyond the Jackeli–Khaliullin mechanism. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32(40), 404001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab8525. URL https: //doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab8525

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ab8525 2020

  23. [23]

    S.H. Jang, Y. Motome, Exploring rare-earth Kitaev magnets by massive-scale computational analysis. Commun. Mater.5(1), 192 (2024). https://doi.org/10. 1038/s43246-024-00634-w

    2024

  24. [24]

    Tokura, N

    Y. Tokura, N. Kanazawa, Magnetic Skyrmion Materials. Chem. Rev.121(5), 2857–2897 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00297

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00297 2020

  25. [25]

    6456, 914–918, doi:10.1126/science.aau0968

    T. Kurumaji, T. Nakajima, M. Hirschberger, A. Kikkawa, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, Y. Taguchi, T.h. Arima, Y. Tokura, Skyrmion lattice 19 with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet. Science365(6456), 914–918 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0968

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aau0968 2019

  26. [26]

    Commun., 2019,10, No

    M. Hirschberger, T. Nakajima, S. Gao, L. Peng, A. Kikkawa, T. Kurumaji, M. Kriener, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, et al., Skyrmion phase and competing magnetic orders on a breathing kagom´ e lattice. Nat. Commun.10(1), 5831 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13675-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13675-4 2019

  27. [27]

    Kakihana, D

    M. Kakihana, D. Aoki, A. Nakamura, F. Honda, M. Nakashima, Y. Amako, T. Takeuchi, H. Harima, M. Hedo, T. Nakama, Y.¯Onuki, Unique Magnetic Phases in the Skyrmion Lattice and Fermi Surface Properties in Cubic Chiral Antifer- romagnet EuPtSi. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88(9), 094705 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 7566/JPSJ.88.094705. URL https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.88.094705

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.88.094705 2019

  28. [28]

    Nanotechnol., 2020,15, 444, doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0684-7

    N.D. Khanh, T. Nakajima, X. Yu, S. Gao, K. Shibata, M. Hirschberger, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, L. Peng, K. Nakajima, R. Takagi, T. Arima, Y. Tokura, S. Seki, Nanometric square skyrmion lattice in a cen- trosymmetric tetragonal magnet. Nat. Nanotechnol.15(6), 444–449 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0684-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0684-7 2020

  29. [29]

    Takagi, N

    R. Takagi, N. Matsuyama, V. Ukleev, L. Yu, J.S. White, S. Francoual, J.R. Mardegan, S. Hayami, H. Saito, K. Kaneko, et al., Square and rhombic lattices of magnetic skyrmions in a centrosymmetric binary compound. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 1472 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29131-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29131-9 2022

  30. [30]

    Mironov, Superexchange interaction between lanthanide ions

    V.S. Mironov, Superexchange interaction between lanthanide ions. Spin- Hamiltonian calculations for the and superexchange. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8(49), 10551 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/8/49/042

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/8/49/042 1996

  31. [31]

    Palii, B.S

    A.V. Palii, B.S. Tsukerblat, J.M. Clemente-Juan, E. Coronado, Isotropic mag- netic exchange between anisotropic Yb (III) ions. Study of Cs 3Yb2Cl9 and Cs3Yb2Br9 crystals. Inorg. chem.44(11), 3984–3992 (2005). https://doi.org/10. 1021/ic0482382. URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0482382

    work page doi:10.1021/ic0482382 2005

  32. [33]

    Pourovskii, 5d-mediated indirect exchange and effective spin Hamiltonians in Ce triangular-lattice delafossites

    L.V. Pourovskii, 5d-mediated indirect exchange and effective spin Hamiltonians in Ce triangular-lattice delafossites. Phys. Rev. B113, L201109 (2026). https:// doi.org/10.1103/mxcs-9dd7. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/mxcs-9dd7

    work page doi:10.1103/mxcs-9dd7 2026

  33. [34]

    Pourovskii, R.D

    L.V. Pourovskii, R.D. Soares, A. Wietek, Ab initio spin Hamiltonians and mag- netism of Ce and Yb triangular-lattice compounds. Phys. Rev. B113, L060401 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1103/95x5-3fnn. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 20 1103/95x5-3fnn

    work page doi:10.1103/95x5-3fnn 2026

  34. [37]

    Villanova, A.O

    J.W. Villanova, A.O. Scheie, D.A. Tennant, S. Okamoto, T. Berlijn, First- principles derivation of magnetic interactions in the triangular quantum spin liquid candidates KYbCh 2(Ch= S,Se,Te) andAYbSe 2(A= Na,Rb). Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033050 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033050. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033050

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.033050 2023

  35. [38]

    Bordelon, X

    M.M. Bordelon, X. Wang, D.M. Pajerowski, A. Banerjee, M. Sherwin, C.M. Brown, M.S. Eldeeb, T. Petersen, L. Hozoi, U.K. R¨ oßler, M. Mourigal, S.D. Wilson, Magnetic properties and signatures of moment ordering in the triangu- lar lattice antiferromagnet kceo 2. Phys. Rev. B104, 094421 (2021). https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.094421. URL https://link.a...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.094421 2021

  36. [39]

    T. Xie, S. Gozel, J. Xing, N. Zhao, S.M. Avdoshenko, L. Wu, A.S. Sefat, A.L. Chernyshev, A.M. L¨ auchli, A. Podlesnyak, S.E. Nikitin, Quantum spin dynamics due to strong kitaev interactions in the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet cscese2. Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096703 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133. 096703. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133 2024

  37. [41]

    M. Xie, Z. Zhang, W. Zhuo, W. Xu, J. Zhu, J. Embs, L. Wang, Z. Li, H. Bu, A. Zhang, F. Jin, J. Ji, Z. Ouyang, L. Wu, J. Ma, Q. Zhang, Dominant kitaev interaction and field-induced quantum phase transitions in triangular-lattice kcese 2. Phys. Rev. Research7, 023198 (2025). https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023198. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10....

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023198 2025

  38. [42]

    Bordelon, E

    M.M. Bordelon, E. Kenney, C. Liu, T. Hogan, L. Posthuma, M. Kavand, Y. Lyu, M. Sherwin, N.P. Butch, C. Brown, M.J. Graf, L. Balents, S.D. Wilson, 21 Field-tunable quantum disordered ground state in the triangular-lattice antifer- romagnet NaYbO2. Nat. Phys.15, 1058–1064 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-019-0594-5. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0594-5 2019

  39. [43]

    Bordelon, C

    M.M. Bordelon, C. Liu, L. Posthuma, P.M. Sarte, N.P. Butch, D.M. Pajerowski, A. Banerjee, L. Balents, S.D. Wilson, Spin excitations in the frustrated tri- angular lattice antiferromagnet naybo 2. Phys. Rev. B101, 224427 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.224427. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.224427

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.224427 2020

  40. [44]

    L. Ding, P. Manuel, S. Bachus, F. Grußler, P. Gegenwart, J. Singleton, R.D. Johnson, H.C. Walker, D.T. Adroja, A.D. Hillier, A.A. Tsirlin, Gapless spin-liquid state in the structurally disorder-free triangular antiferromagnet NaYbO 2. Phys. Rev. B100, 144432 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144432. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.144432 2019

  41. [45]

    Gray, B.R

    A.K. Gray, B.R. Martin, P.K. Dorhout, Crystal structure of potassium ytter- bium(III) selenide, KYbSe2. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie - New Crystal Structures218(1), 20–20 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1524/ncrs.2003.218.1.20

    work page doi:10.1524/ncrs.2003.218.1.20 2003

  42. [46]

    Scheie, Y

    A.O. Scheie, Y. Kamiya, H. Zhang, S. Lee, A.J. Woods, M.O. Ajeesh, M.G. Gonzalez, B. Bernu, J.W. Villanova, J. Xing, Q. Huang, Q. Zhang, J. Ma, E.S. Choi, D.M. Pajerowski, H. Zhou, A.S. Sefat, S. Okamoto, T. Berlijn, L. Messio, R. Movshovich, C.D. Batista, D.A. Tennant, Nonlinear magnons and exchange Hamiltonians of the delafossite proximate quantum spin ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.014425 2024

  43. [47]

    Scheie, E.A

    A.O. Scheie, E.A. Ghioldi, J. Xing, J.A.M. Paddison, N.E. Sherman, M. Dupont, L.D. Sanjeewa, S. Lee, A.J. Woods, D. Abernathy, D.M. Pajerowski, T.J. Williams, S.S. Zhang, L.O. Manuel, A.E. Trumper, C.D. Pemmaraju, A.S. Sefat, D.S. Parker, T.P. Devereaux, R. Movshovich, J.E. Moore, C.D. Batista, D.A. Tennant, Proximate spin liquid and fractionalization in ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02259-1 2024

  44. [49]

    R., Du, Mao-Hua, Reboredo, Fernando A., Custelcean, Radu, Sefat, Athena S

    Xing, Jie, Sanjeewa, Liurukara D., Kim, Jungsoo, Stewart, G. R., Du, Mao-Hua, Reboredo, Fernando A., Custelcean, Radu, Sefat, Athena S. CSD 1952075: Exper- imental Crystal Structure Determination. https://doi.org/10.25505/FIZ.ICSD. CC23J954 22

    work page doi:10.25505/fiz.icsd

  45. [50]

    Pocs, P.E

    C.A. Pocs, P.E. Siegfried, J. Xing, A.S. Sefat, M. Hermele, B. Normand, M. Lee, Systematic extraction of crystal electric-field effects and quantum magnetic model parameters in triangular rare-earth magnets. Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043202 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043202. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043202 2021

  46. [51]

    Xie, A.A

    T. Xie, A.A. Eberharter, J. Xing, S. Nishimoto, M. Brando, P. Khanenko, J. Sichelschmidt, A.A. Turrini, D.G. Mazzone, P.G. Naumov, L.D. Sanjeewa, N. Harrison, A.S. Sefat, B. Normand, A.M. L¨ auchli, A. Podlesnyak, S.E. Nikitin, Complete field-induced spectral response of the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice anti- ferromagnet CsYbSe 2. npj Quantum Mater.8, 48 (...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-023-00580-9 2023

  47. [53]

    J. Xing, E. Feng, Y. Liu, E. Emmanouilidou, C. Hu, J. Liu, D. Graf, A.P. Ramirez, G. Chen, H. Cao, N. Ni, N’eel-type antiferromagnetic order and magnetic field–temperature phase diagram in the spin- 1 2 rare-earth honeycomb compound YbCl3. Phys. Rev. B102, 014427 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB. 102.014427. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Ph...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 2020

  48. [54]

    Sala, M.B

    G. Sala, M.B. Stone, G.B. Hal´ asz, M.D. Lumsden, A.F. May, D.M. Pajerowski, S. Ohira-Kawamura, K. Kaneko, D.G. Mazzone, G. Simutis, J. Lass, Y. Kato, S.H. Do, J.Y.Y. Lin, A.D. Christianson, Field-tuned quantum renormalization of spin dynamics in the honeycomb lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet YbCl3. Commun. Phys.6, 234 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4...

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01333-7 2023

  49. [55]

    Y. Hao, H. Wo, Y. Gu, X. Zhang, Y. Gu, S. Zheng, Y. Zhao, G. Xu, J.W. Lynn, K. Nakajima, N. Murai, W. Wang, J. Zhao, Field-tuned magnetic structure and phase diagram of the honeycomb magnet YbCl3. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64, 237411 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-020-1626-3. URL https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11433-020-1626-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-020-1626-3 2020

  50. [56]

    Matsumoto, S

    Y. Matsumoto, S. Schnierer, J.A.N. Bruin, J. Nuss, P. Reiss, G. Jackeli, K. Kitagawa, H. Takagi, A quantum critical Bose gas of magnons in the quasi- two-dimensional antiferromagnet YbCl3 under magnetic fields. Nat. Phys.20(7), 1131–1138 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02498-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02498-w 2024

  51. [57]

    Wessler, B

    C. Wessler, B. Roessli, K.W. Kr¨ amer, B. Delley, O. Waldmann, L. Keller, D. Cheptiakov, H.B. Braun, M. Kenzelmann, Observation of plaquette fluc- tuations in the spin-1/2 honeycomb lattice. npj Quantum Mater.5, 85 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-020-00287-1. URL https://doi.org/10. 23 1038/s41535-020-00287-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-020-00287-1 2020

  52. [58]

    Hern´ andez, A.A

    J.A. Hern´ andez, A.A. Eberharter, M. Schuler, J. Lass, D.G. Mazzone, R. Sibille, S. Raymond, K.W. Kr¨ amer, B. Normand, B. Roessli, A.M. L¨ auchli, M. Kenzel- mann, Field-induced magnon decay, magnon shadows, and rotonlike excitations in the honeycomb antiferromagnet YbBr 3. Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 146701 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/q29r-8x1m. URL https...

    work page doi:10.1103/q29r-8x1m 2025

  53. [59]

    L.S. Wu, S.E. Nikitin, M. Brando, L. Vasylechko, G. Ehlers, M. Frontzek, A.T. Savici, G. Sala, A.D. Christianson, M.D. Lumsden, A. Podlesnyak, Antiferromag- netic ordering and dipolar interactions of YbAlO 3. Phys. Rev. B99, 195117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195117. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195117

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.195117 2019

  54. [60]

    L.S. Wu, S.E. Nikitin, Z. Wang, W. Zhu, C.D. Batista, A.M. Tsvelik, A.M. Samarakoon, D.A. Tennant, M. Brando, L. Vasylechko, M. Frontzek, A.T. Savici, G. Sala, G. Ehlers, A.D. Christianson, M.D. Lumsden, A. Podlesnyak, Tomonaga–Luttinger liquid behavior and spinon confinement in YbAlO 3. Nat. Commun.10, 698 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08485...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08485-7 2019

  55. [61]

    Buryy, Y

    O. Buryy, Y. Zhydachevskii, L. Vasylechko, D. Sugak, N. Martynyuk, S. Ubizskii, K.D. Becker, Thermal Changes of the Crystal Structure and the Influence of Thermo-Chemical Annealing on the Optical Properties of YbAlO3 Crystals. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter22, 055902 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/ 22/5/055902. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/...

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/ 2010

  56. [62]

    Simeth, Z

    W. Simeth, Z. Wang, E.A. Ghioldi, D.M. Fobes, A. Podlesnyak, N.H. Sung, E.D. Bauer, J. Lass, S. Flury, J. Vonka, D.G. Mazzone, C. Niedermayer, Y. Nomura, R. Arita, C.D. Batista, F. Ronning, M. Janoschek, A microscopic Kondo lattice model for the heavy fermion antiferromagnet CeIn 3. Nat. Commun.14, 8239 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43947-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43947-z 2023

  57. [63]

    Takegahara, Y

    K. Takegahara, Y. Aoki, A. Yanase, Slater-Koster tables for f electrons. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13(4), 583 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0022-3719/13/4/016. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/13/4/016

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3719/13/4/016 1980

  58. [64]

    Slater, G.F

    J.C. Slater, G.F. Koster, Simplified LCAO Method for the Periodic Potential Problem. Phys. Rev.94, 1498–1524 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev. 94.1498. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.94.1498

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev 1954

  59. [65]

    Condon, G.H

    E.U. Condon, G.H. Shortley, The Theory of Complex Spectra II. Phys. Rev. 37, 1025–1043 (1931). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.1025. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.37.1025 24

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.37.1025 1931

  60. [66]

    Tinkham,Group theory and quantum mechanics / Michael Tinkham.Inter- national series in pure and applied physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964)

    M. Tinkham,Group theory and quantum mechanics / Michael Tinkham.Inter- national series in pure and applied physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964)

    1964

  61. [67]

    Racah, Theory of Complex Spectra

    G. Racah, Theory of Complex Spectra. II. Phys. Rev.62, 438–462 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.62.438. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRev.62.438

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.62.438 1942

  62. [68]

    Yeung, P.A

    Y.Y. Yeung, P.A. Tanner, Parametrization of free ion levels of four isoelectronic 4f2 systems: Insights into configuration interaction parameters. Chem. Phys. Lett.590, 46–51 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2013.10.070

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2013.10.070 2013

  63. [69]

    Meftah, J.F

    A. Meftah, J.F. Wyart, W. ¨U.L. Tchang-Brillet, C. Blaess, N. Champion, Spec- trum and energy levels of the Yb 4+ free ion (Yb V). Phys. Scr.88(4), 045305 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/88/04/045305. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0031-8949/88/04/045305 25 Supplementary Information Supplementary Note 1 Ionic Hamiltonian and multiplet structure In...

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/88/04/045305 2013

  64. [70]

    Kusunose, Description of multipole in f-electron systems

    H. Kusunose, Description of multipole in f-electron systems. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77(6), 064710 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.77.064710. URL https://doi. org/10.1143/JPSJ.77.064710

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.77.064710 2008

  65. [71]

    Harrison,Electronic Structure and the Properties of Solids: The Physics of the Chemical Bond(W

    W.A. Harrison,Electronic Structure and the Properties of Solids: The Physics of the Chemical Bond(W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1980)

    1980

  66. [72]

    Lindgren, The Rayleigh-Schrodinger perturbation and the linked-diagram theorem for a multi-configurational model space

    I. Lindgren, The Rayleigh-Schrodinger perturbation and the linked-diagram theorem for a multi-configurational model space. J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Phys.7, 2441 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/7/18/010

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/7/18/010 1974

  67. [73]

    Ghioldi, Z

    E.A. Ghioldi, Z. Wang, L.M. Chinellato, J.X. Zhu, Y. Nomura, R. Arita, W. Simeth, M. Janoschek, F. Ronning, C.D. Batista, Derivation of low-energy hamiltonians for heavy-fermion materials. Phys. Rev. B110, 195123 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.195123. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.110.195123

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.195123 2024

  68. [74]

    Rau, M.J.P

    J.G. Rau, M.J.P. Gingras, Frustration and anisotropic exchange in ytterbium magnets with edge-shared octahedra. Phys. Rev. B98, 054408 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.054408. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.98.054408 S43

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.054408 2018