REVIEW 2 cited by
Improving Adversarial Data Collection by Supporting Annotators: Lessons from GAHD, a German Hate Speech Dataset
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Hate speech detection models are only as good as the data they are trained on. Datasets sourced from social media suffer from systematic gaps and biases, leading to unreliable models with simplistic decision boundaries. Adversarial datasets, collected by exploiting model weaknesses, promise to fix this problem. However, adversarial data collection can be slow and costly, and individual annotators have limited creativity. In this paper, we introduce GAHD, a new German Adversarial Hate speech Dataset comprising ca.\ 11k examples. During data collection, we explore new strategies for supporting annotators, to create more diverse adversarial examples more efficiently and provide a manual analysis of annotator disagreements for each strategy. Our experiments show that the resulting dataset is challenging even for state-of-the-art hate speech detection models, and that training on GAHD clearly improves model robustness. Further, we find that mixing multiple support strategies is most advantageous. We make GAHD publicly available at https://github.com/jagol/gahd.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Mapping Toxic Comments Across Demographics: A Dataset from German Public Broadcasting
A new German toxic-comment dataset with channel-level age estimates reveals age differences in toxic speech, but age is inferred from channel audience profiles, not individual users.
-
Leveraging the Potential of Prompt Engineering for Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages
Relabeling hate speech as metaphor pairs (red/green, summer/winter) in prompts raises Llama2's F1 on a 500-item Bengali subsample to 95.89, though the gain is reported without matched test-set comparisons or error bars.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.