Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Improving Adversarial Data Collection by Supporting Annotators: Lessons from GAHD, a German Hate Speech Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.19559 v1 pith:SKAFSK47 submitted 2024-03-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords adversarialgahddatahatespeechannotatorscollectiondataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Hate speech detection models are only as good as the data they are trained on. Datasets sourced from social media suffer from systematic gaps and biases, leading to unreliable models with simplistic decision boundaries. Adversarial datasets, collected by exploiting model weaknesses, promise to fix this problem. However, adversarial data collection can be slow and costly, and individual annotators have limited creativity. In this paper, we introduce GAHD, a new German Adversarial Hate speech Dataset comprising ca.\ 11k examples. During data collection, we explore new strategies for supporting annotators, to create more diverse adversarial examples more efficiently and provide a manual analysis of annotator disagreements for each strategy. Our experiments show that the resulting dataset is challenging even for state-of-the-art hate speech detection models, and that training on GAHD clearly improves model robustness. Further, we find that mixing multiple support strategies is most advantageous. We make GAHD publicly available at https://github.com/jagol/gahd.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mapping Toxic Comments Across Demographics: A Dataset from German Public Broadcasting

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new German toxic-comment dataset with channel-level age estimates reveals age differences in toxic speech, but age is inferred from channel audience profiles, not individual users.

  2. Leveraging the Potential of Prompt Engineering for Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Relabeling hate speech as metaphor pairs (red/green, summer/winter) in prompts raises Llama2's F1 on a 500-item Bengali subsample to 95.89, though the gain is reported without matched test-set comparisons or error bars.

Pith tools