Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 285 references

The L(Hβ)–σ relation holds from the local Universe to z≈14, letting compact star-forming galaxies serve as standard candles across 98% of cosmic time.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:38 UTC pith:SKLJD4CU

load-bearing objection Solid low/intermediate-z distance-ladder work, but the z~14 extension rests on two objects whose [O III] 88 μm to Balmer scaling and Hβ fluxes are not demonstrated. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14254 v1 pith:SKLJD4CU submitted 2026-07-15 astro-ph.CO

Charting the expansion of the Universe from zsim0 to zsim14 with HII galaxies

classification astro-ph.CO MSC 85A40
keywords HII galaxiesL-σ relationstandard candlescosmological parametersdark energyHubble diagramhigh redshift galaxiesvelocity dispersion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the luminosity–velocity-dispersion relation of HII galaxies and giant HII regions works as a standardizable distance indicator at every epoch from z≈0 to z≈14, with no detectable evolution in its slope or intercept. Using a homogenised sample of 243 objects, including new space- and ground-based spectroscopic measurements of the most distant star-forming galaxies known, the authors derive cosmological constraints—h=0.725±0.040 and Ωm=0.308(+0.043/-0.053) under flat ΛCDM, with dark-energy equation-of-state parameters consistent with a cosmological constant. If correct, this gives an independent probe of the expansion history spanning essentially the whole age of the Universe, complementary to supernovae and other distance indicators. The paper's central novelty is the extension to z~14, where the relation is anchored by two objects whose velocity dispersions come from [O III] 88 μm emission and whose Hβ fluxes come from infrared photometry/spectra.

Core claim

The authors claim that the L(Hβ)–σ relation remains a standard candle without significant evolution all the way to redshift ~14. The joint fit of 243 anchor and HII galaxies gives log L(Hβ) = (5.00±0.11) log σ + (33.27±0.14) in cgs units, with sub-sample fits (z<0.16, z>3) consistent at 1σ. Using this relation as a distance estimator, the combined sample under flat ΛCDM yields h=0.725±0.040 and Ωm=0.308(+0.043/-0.053); allowing a constant dark-energy equation of state gives w0=-0.96(+0.53/-0.21), and a CPL parametrisation gives w0=-0.92(+0.57/-0.34), wa=-0.48(+0.60/-1.50), all compatible with concordance cosmology. The claim is that HII galaxies provide a fully independent tracer of the expa

What carries the argument

The L–σ relation, a tight empirical correlation between the Balmer-line luminosity of an HII galaxy or giant HII region and the non-thermal velocity dispersion of its ionized gas, first proposed for HII regions and here extended to z~14. The paper homogenises measurements across 243 objects, applying corrections for instrumental and thermal broadening, extinction, aperture effects, and transforming [O III]-based velocity dispersions to the Balmer-line scale where needed. It also marginalises over a log-normal lensing magnification prior to account for weak gravitational lensing of high-redshift sources. This machinery converts measured fluxes and line widths into distance moduli, which are t

Load-bearing premise

The two most distant objects (z≈12 and z≈14) rest on the assumption that the [O III] 88 μm velocity dispersion measured by the millimetre interferometer and the Hβ flux inferred from infrared photometry/spectra lie on the same L–σ relation as the Balmer-based measurements at lower redshift—an assumption the paper does not directly demonstrate.

What would settle it

Measure the [O III] 88 μm and Hβ line widths for a sample of z≈2–3 galaxies with both millimetre interferometry and near-infrared spectroscopy; if the resulting σ values differ systematically by more than the ~2 km s^-1 correction factor assumed, or if the Hβ fluxes inferred from photometry are biased, the z>10 points would shift off the L–σ relation and the no-evolution claim would weaken. Additionally, a future sample of 20+ high-z HII galaxies with purely Balmer-based measurements would reveal whether the slope remains 5.0.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the relation is indeed non-evolving, the Hubble diagram can be pushed to z>10 with a single indicator, giving a handle on expansion during matter domination and the cosmic dawn.
  • The reported h≈0.725 falls between the local distance-ladder value and the CMB-inferred value, so an independent low-redshift anchor may help clarify the Hubble tension.
  • The consistency of slopes and intercepts across 13 billion years implies the physical processes governing giant HII regions—massive young stellar clusters ionizing their surroundings—have been essentially unchanged since the first galaxies.
  • Each additional high-z HII galaxy found by future spectroscopic surveys will tighten the w0–wa constraints, potentially detecting dark-energy evolution or confirming Λ.
  • Systematic checks, such as comparing [O III]- and Balmer-based dispersions, will become essential as the sample grows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the z>10 proxies are faithful, the technique could eventually map the expansion rate during the epoch when the universe was decelerating, providing a direct test of the timing of acceleration.
  • The paper's treatment of lensing as a latent variable marginalised over a log-normal prior is a template that could be applied to other high-z standard candles, such as superluminous supernovae or gamma-ray bursts.
  • A direct observational test—measuring both millimetre interferometer [O III] 88 μm line widths and near-infrared Balmer line widths for the same z≈2–3 galaxies—would validate the cross-instrument calibration and could be done with existing data.
  • If the no-evolution claim holds, the same galaxies could be used as tracers of the dark-energy equation of state at redshifts where supernovae cannot reach, complementing the supernova Hubble diagram.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper extends the L(Hβ)-σ relation for giant H II regions and H II galaxies to redshifts z~14, using a compiled sample of 243 objects including 36 local anchors, previous HIIG samples, and 12 new JWST/ALMA objects. The authors derive distance moduli, fit cosmological parameters with nested sampling, and report h=0.725±0.040 and Ωm=0.308+0.043−0.053 under flat ΛCDM, with w0 consistent with −1. They also conclude that the L−σ relation shows no evidence for evolution out to z~14.

Significance. If the high-redshift measurements are robust, this work establishes HIIGs/GEHRs as a genuinely independent distance indicator spanning ~98% of cosmic time, with the potential to cross-check SN Ia, BAO, and CMB results. The paper is commendable for its detailed error propagation, joint nuisance sampling, and public code release, as well as for making the low- and intermediate-redshift analysis reproducible. However, the headline z~14 result rests on two objects whose velocity dispersions come from the [O III] 88 μm line and whose Hβ fluxes are inferred rather than directly measured. The calibration of these proxies is not demonstrated, so the strongest claim in the paper is not yet supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Table 1 notes f/g] The velocity dispersions for GHZ2/GLASS-z12 and JADES-GS-z14-01 are measured from the ALMA [O III] 88 μm line, yet the 2.1 km/s correction described in §2 is stated for [O III] λ5007. No local or literature calibration of 88-μm σ onto the Balmer-line scale is given. Because these two points carry the z>10 endpoint, and because Δlogσ≈0.1–0.13 would shift log L by ≈0.5–0.65 dex (β≈5), the systematic error in this transformation alone can exceed the quoted rms scatter of the L−σ relation. The no-evolution claim in §4.2 must be re-examined, either with a demonstrated calibration or with these objects excluded.
  2. [Table 1 notes k/l and §2] The Hβ fluxes for the two z>10 objects are not direct Balmer-line measurements. For GHZ2 the flux is an EW(Hβ+[O III]) estimate from MIRI photometry and F444W continuum; for JADES-GS-z14-01 a MIRI measurement is cited, but no decomposition of the blended Hβ+[O III] feature or extinction correction is presented. Since μ_o ∝ 2.5 log f, a 0.2 dex uncertainty in f corresponds to 0.5 mag, comparable to the distance-modulus errors at these redshifts. Without a demonstrated transformation to the Hβ scale, the two points cannot anchor the z>10 end of the Hubble diagram.
  3. [§4.2, Eqs. (29)–(31)] The comparison of L−σ slopes at low and high redshift uses L(Hβ) values that must be computed from an assumed distance scale. If the distances are taken from the same cosmological model being tested, the slope comparison is partly circular: a wrong cosmology would shift the high-z luminosities and could either create or mask evolution in the L−σ relation. I recommend presenting the test in a cosmology-independent way (e.g., fitting in the (log f, log σ) plane with redshift as an additional variable) or stating explicitly which distances are used.
  4. [§4.2 and Figure 4] The high-redshift subsample (z>3) contains only 21 objects, and the two z>10 points have log σ uncertainties of 0.13–0.15 dex and log f uncertainties of 0.5–0.7 dex. The fitted slope for this subsample is 5.14±0.40, which is consistent with the local slope but also with a wide range of slopes. The claim of 'no evidence for significant evolution' is therefore weak; the current data cannot yet discriminate between no evolution and moderate evolution at z>10. This limitation should be reflected in the abstract and conclusions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table 1] The redshift listed for JADES-GS-z14-01 is '4.1793±0.0007', which conflicts with the object name and the text (z≈14.18). Please correct this typo.
  2. [§4.2 / Figure 4 caption] The text says the complete-sample fit 'is not included in figure 4 because it coincides with the result of the fit to the anchor sample', while the figure caption says it 'coincides with the result of the fit to the 21 high redshift HIIG'. These statements are inconsistent; the complete-sample fit (5.00, 33.27) is closer to the anchor fit, so the text appears correct. Please align the caption.
  3. [§2] The sentence 'when only [OIII]λ5007Å based velocity dispersions are available, we apply a 2.1 km s−1 correction' should explicitly mention that the [O III] 88 μm measurements do not use this correction, or clarify how they are homogenized. As written, a reader could assume the correction applies to all [O III] lines.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Anchored distance-ladder inference is non-circular; the z>10 'no evolution' L–σ comparison is under-specified and potentially self-constructed.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [§4.2 Eq. (31), Figs. 3–4; cf. §3 Eq. (3)]
    "The observed distance modulus μ_o is obtained from the L−σ relation as μ_o =2.5(βlogσ+α−logf−40.08). ... log L(Hβ)=(5.14±0.40)logσ+(32.95±0.70) for the high redshift sample in this paper, z>3.0."

    For z>3 objects there are no primary distances, so their plotted L(Hβ) values must be computed from an assumed luminosity distance d_L(z) (or equivalently from a cosmological distance modulus μ_θ). The paper never states which cosmology is used for this step. If the same μ_θ that is fitted in §3 is used to construct L, then Eq. (31) is the inverse of Eq. (3): log L and log σ are connected through the very α,β that define μ_o, so the fit returns the assumed parameters by construction. The 'no evolution' slope comparison in Fig. 4 is then a self-consistency restatement, not an independent test, unless an external cosmology was adopted and documented, which the paper does not do.

full rationale

The main cosmological inference is not circular: the anchor sample (Cepheid/TRGB distances) independently fixes the L−σ intercept and slope, and the high-z HIIG galaxies constrain h, Ωm, and w through the likelihood of Eqs. (1)–(3) without needing a pre-assumed cosmology for the plotted luminosities. The paper does not invoke a uniqueness theorem or a self-citation chain to force the model, and the quoted cosmological parameters are standard anchored distance-ladder estimates. The one genuinely load-bearing circularity concern is the claimed absence of evolution in §4.2. The z>3 points in Figs. 3–4 must be placed on the L−σ plane using some assumed distance scale, but the paper does not specify that scale. If the assumed scale is the same cosmological model being tested (or the same μ_o of Eq. 3 inverted back to L), the high-z fit in Eq. (31) reduces to the input model by construction and the 'no evolution' conclusion is not an independent falsification. Because the main parameter inference does not rely on this plot, the overall circularity is partial rather than total. Separate concerns about ALMA [OIII] 88 μm kinematics and Hβ+[OIII] flux decomposition are calibration/validity issues, not demonstrated circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The inference rests on the universality of L-σ, the equivalence of line-width tracers, and the lensing model; all are assumed rather than independently demonstrated. The free parameters are the standard distance-ladder and cosmological fit parameters.

free parameters (7)
  • α (L-σ intercept) = 33.267±0.140 (joint anchor+HIIG fit)
    Fitted nuisance parameter calibrating the zero-point of the L(Hβ)-σ relation.
  • β (L-σ slope) = 5.003±0.114 (joint anchor+HIIG fit)
    Fitted nuisance parameter setting the luminosity-velocity dispersion slope.
  • h = 0.725±0.040 (flat ΛCDM)
    Reduced Hubble constant derived from the joint sample.
  • Ωm = 0.308(+0.043/-0.053) (flat ΛCDM)
    Matter density parameter fitted jointly with h and nuisance parameters.
  • w0 = -0.96(+0.53/-0.21) (wCDM); -0.92(+0.57/-0.34) (CPL)
    Dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z=0, fitted in extended models.
  • wa = -0.48(+0.60/-1.50) (CPL)
    Dark energy equation-of-state evolution parameter, fitted in CPL model.
  • ΩΛ (non-flat models) = 0.48(+0.26/-0.22) (oΛCDM)
    Dark energy density parameter in non-flat fits; not part of the flat baseline result.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The L(Hβ)-σ relation is a universal standardizable candle for HII galaxies/GEHRs, with constant slope and intercept from z~0 to z~14.
    Used throughout §3-4 as the distance estimator; the paper tests but cannot independently establish universality since the calibration sample and high-z sample are fit jointly.
  • ad hoc to paper Velocity dispersions measured from [O III] lines (including [O III] 88 μm ALMA) can be transformed to the Balmer-line σ scale with a constant correction.
    Invoked in §2 and Table 1 notes; a 2.1 km/s correction is mentioned for [O III] λ5007, but no explicit calibration is shown for the [O III] 88 μm measurements used for z>10 objects.
  • domain assumption Lensing magnification follows a log-normal distribution with σeff=0.088z and unit mean, with no selection bias.
    §3.1 Eqs. 14-16 adopt the Holz & Linder (2005) form; the high-z sample is flux-selected and likely biased toward magnified sources, but no selection model is included.
  • domain assumption SMC Bar extinction law and a mean extinction value are valid for high-z objects where Hα is unavailable.
    Stated in §2; adopted without per-object verification for the z~12-14 objects.
  • domain assumption The background cosmology is described by the Friedmann equations with radiation, matter, curvature, and a CPL dark-energy term.
    Standard cosmological model used in §3; not in question for this analysis.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 17674 in / 14307 out tokens · 155388 ms · 2026-08-02T02:38:19.769630+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present an updated Hubble diagram of giant extragalactic H II regions and H II galaxies spanning the redshift interval $z\sim 0$ to $z\sim 14$, extending the use of the $L(\mathrm{H}\beta)-\sigma$ relation as an independent cosmological probe into the epoch of cosmic dawn. Our sample comprises 243 objects, including local anchor systems with primary distance measurements, previously published low- and intermediate-redshift H II galaxies, recent JWST/NIRSpec observations, and a new subsample of extremely high-redshift H II galaxies observed with JWST and with ALMA+JWST for the highest-redshift cases. We homogenise the measurements across the full sample, applying consistent corrections for instrumental and thermal broadening, extinction, and, where required, the transformation from [O III]-based to Balmer-line velocity dispersions. We model lensing effects of high redshift using a log-normal magnification formalism and infer cosmological parameters via a nested-sampling analysis. The $L-\sigma$ relation remains consistent over the full redshift range, showing no evidence for significant evolution even at the highest redshifts currently accessible. For the joint anchor+H II galaxies sample, under a flat $\Lambda$CDM model, we obtain $h=0.725\pm0.040$ and $\Omega_m=0.308^{+0.043}_{-0.053}$. Allowing a constant dark-energy equation of state yields $w_0=-0.96^{+0.53}_{-0.21}$, while a CPL parametrisation gives $w_0=-0.92^{+0.57}_{-0.34}$ and $w_a=-0.48^{+0.60}_{-1.50}$, all consistent, within the uncertainties, with concordance cosmology. These results demonstrate that H II galaxies offer a viable, fully independent tracer of the expansion history across almost the entire age of the Universe, opening a new avenue for testing $\Lambda$CDM and dark-energy evolution well beyond reionisation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14254 by A. L. Gonz\'alez-Mor\'an, D. Fern\'andez-Arenas, E. Terlevich, F. Bresolin, F. D'Eugenio, J. Rivera, J. Zavala, L. Corral-Bustamante, M. Llerena, M. Plionis, N. G\'omez-Cruz, R. Amor\'in, R. Ch\'avez, R. Terlevich, S. Basilakos, S. Zamora, Xihan Ji.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Observed [O III]𝜆5007Å line profile for the target JADES￾000008013. The blue line is the spectrum, the orange line is the Gaussian fit to the emission line, and the box underneath shows the residuals. The inset at the upper right corner is the Monte Carlo analysis performed to the line where the standard deviation of the resulting distribution is taken as the uncertainty of the measured FWHM of the Gaussia… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The magnification probability density function for a source located at 𝑧 = 1 and for a source located at 𝑧 = 9. 3.1 Gravitational lensing treatment The gravitational potentials of structures intervening between source and receptor affect the propagation of light from high redshifts and thus also the distance modulus of high-𝑧 standard candles (e.g. Holz & Wald 1998; Holz & Linder 2005; Brouzakis & Tetradis… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The 𝐿 − 𝜎 relation for the HIIGs and anchor samples. The anchor sample (36 objects; Fernández Arenas et al. (2018)) is shown in magenta, the local-to-intermediate-𝑧 HIIG sample (181 objects; González-Morán et al. (2021)) in light blue, 9 HIIGs from Llerena et al. (2023) in red, and 5 HIIGs observed with JWST from de Graaff et al. (2024) in green (both the red and green subsets were presented and analysed i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 𝐿 − 𝜎 relation for the 21 HIIG in our sample that have z>3.0. The data points follow the same colour code as in the previous figure. The red line shows the fit to the data. The slope of the fit to the high redshift sample is consistent with the slope of the anchor sample (black line) and also with that of the low redshift HIIG sample (magenta dashed line). The fit for the complete sample presented in figur… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hubble diagram for the HIIG and anchor samples, where 𝑧 is the redshift and 𝜇 the distance modulus. The data points follow the same colour code as in the previous figures. The left inset shows a zoom for 𝑧 ≤ 0.15; the nested inset further zooms to 𝑧 ≤ 0.005, highlighting the anchor sample. The black curve indicates the best-fitting cosmological model; the red shaded band represents the 1𝜎 model uncertainty… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Likelihood contours corresponding to the 1𝜎 and 2𝜎 confidence levels in the {𝛼, 𝛽, ℎ, Ω𝑚 𝑤0 } space for the joint HIIGs and anchor samples. MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2026) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

285 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    ALMA Detection of [O III] 88 m at z = 12.33: Exploring the Nature and Evolution of GHZ2 as a Massive Compact Stellar System. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad8f38 , archivePrefix =. 2411.03593 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    JWST NIRSpec Spectroscopy of the Remarkable Bright Galaxy GHZ2/GLASS-z12 at Redshift 12.34. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88 , archivePrefix =. 2403.10238 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    Physics Letters B , keywords =

    Analytical estimate of the effect of spherical inhomogeneities on luminosity distance and redshift. Physics Letters B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.06.032 , archivePrefix =. 0802.0859 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.33232/001c.156033 , archivePrefix =. 2505.11263 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    JADES Initial Data Release for the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Revealing the Faint Infrared Sky with Deep JWST NIRCam Imaging. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acf44d , archivePrefix =. 2306.02466 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES). , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163 , archivePrefix =. 2306.02465 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    The Mid-Infrared Instrument for the James Webb Space Telescope, I: Introduction. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/682252 , archivePrefix =. 1508.02294 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Detection of [O III] _ 88 m in JADES-GS-z14-0 at z = 14.1793. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbf1b , archivePrefix =. 2409.20549 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Distance measures in cosmology. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9905116 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9905116 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    Accurate weak lensing of standard candles. I. Flexible cosmological fits. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.063004 , archivePrefix =. 1304.7689 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Probability Distribution Functions of Cosmological Lensing: Convergence, Shear, and Magnification. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/15 , archivePrefix =. 1106.3823 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Safety in Numbers: Gravitational Lensing Degradation of the Luminosity Distance-Redshift Relation. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/432085 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0412173 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    and Carniani, S

    Curtis-Lake, E. and Carniani, S. and Cameron, A. and others , title =. Nature Astronomy , year =

  14. [14]

    and Madau, Piero , date =

    Gnedin, Nickolay Y. and Madau, Piero , date =. Modeling cosmic reionization , url =. Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics , number =. 2022 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1007/s41115-022-00015-5 , id =

  15. [15]

    and Fujimoto, S

    Wang, B. and Fujimoto, S. and Labb. UNCOVER: Illuminating the Early Universe---JWST/NIRSpec Confirmation of z > 12 Galaxies , journal =. 2023 , volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acfe07 , archivePrefix=

  16. [16]

    and Hainline, K

    Carniani, S. and Hainline, K. and D'Eugenio, F. and others , title =. Nature , year =. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9 , archivePrefix=

  17. [17]

    and Ferruit, P

    Jakobsen, P. and Ferruit, P. and Giardino, G. and others , title =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142663 , archivePrefix=

  18. [18]

    2025 , howpublished =

  19. [19]

    Hsiao, T. Y.-Y. and Coe, D. and Brammer, G. and others , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  20. [20]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    A luminous and young galaxy at z = 12.33 revealed by a JWST/MIRI detection of H and [O III]. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02397-3 , archivePrefix =. 2403.10491 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , journal =. 2020 , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , archivePrefix=

  22. [22]

    and Aubert, M

    Alam, S. and Aubert, M. and Avila, S. and others , title =. Physical Review D , year =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083533 , archivePrefix=

  23. [23]

    and Amati, L

    Moresco, M. and Amati, L. and Amendola, L. and others , title =. Living Reviews in Relativity , year =. doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00040-z , archivePrefix=

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Mapping the Hubble flow from z -0.5ex 0 to z -0.5ex 7.5 with H II Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf386 , archivePrefix =. 2404.16261 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    IV.—A note on Karl pearson's selection formul

    Lawley, DN , journal=. IV.—A note on Karl pearson's selection formul. 1944 , publisher=

  26. [26]

    Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , author=

    Note on Selection from a Multivariate Normal Population , volume=. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , author=. 1935 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0013091500008063 , number=

  27. [27]

    Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—XI

    I. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs , author=. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character , volume=. 1903 , publisher=

  28. [28]

    , author=

    Correction for range restriction: an expanded typology. , author=. Journal of Applied Psychology , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

  29. [29]

    Carretta and Malcolm James Ree , title =

    Thomas R. Carretta and Malcolm James Ree , title =. Military Psychology , volume =. 2022 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/08995605.2021.2022067 , URL =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Low- and high-redshift H II starburst galaxies obey different luminosity-velocity dispersion relations. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123527 , archivePrefix =. 2310.15812 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Direct measurement of lensing amplification in Abell S1063 using a strongly lensed high redshift HII galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628772 , archivePrefix =. 1607.03457 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    arXiv , Author =:1801.01120 , Journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaadb7 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:1801.01120 , Journal =

  33. [33]

    arXiv , Author =:1502.01589 , Journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:1502.01589 , Journal =

  34. [34]

    arXiv , Author =:1303.5076 , Journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:1303.5076 , Journal =

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 , archivePrefix =. 1402.0004 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    arXiv , Author =:1307.6212 , Journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:1307.6212 , Journal =

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , archivePrefix =. 2206.14220 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    A Universal Stellar Initial Mass Function? A Critical Look at Variations. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101642 , archivePrefix =. 1001.2965 , primaryClass =

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Non-universal stellar initial mass functions: large uncertainties in star formation rates at z 2-4 and other astrophysical probes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2748 , archivePrefix =. 2205.07845 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    A core in a star-forming disc as evidence of inside-out growth in the early Universe. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02384-8 , archivePrefix =. 2306.02472 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    JADES NIRSpec initial data release for the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Redshifts and line fluxes of distant galaxies from the deepest JWST Cycle 1 NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347094 , archivePrefix =. 2306.02467 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 , archivePrefix =. 2202.04077 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    arXiv , Author =:0803.4295 , Journal =

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123525 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:0803.4295 , Journal =

  45. [45]

    Nuclear Physics B , keywords =

    Cosmology and the fate of dilatation symmetry. Nuclear Physics B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90193-9 , archivePrefix =. 1711.03844 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1988 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406 , url =

  47. [49]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.21105/astro.1306.2144 , archivePrefix =. 1306.2144 , primaryClass =

  48. [50]

    Ionised gas kinematics and dynamical masses of z 6 galaxies from JADES/NIRSpec high-resolution spectroscopy

    de Graaff, Anna and. Ionised gas kinematics and dynamical masses of z 6 galaxies from JADES/NIRSpec high-resolution spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347755 , archivePrefix =. 2308.09742 , primaryClass =

  49. [51]

    , keywords =

    Ionized gas kinematics and chemical abundances of low-mass star-forming galaxies at z 3. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346232 , archivePrefix =. 2303.01536 , primaryClass =

  50. [52]

    , keywords =

    Independent cosmological constraints from high-z H II galaxies: new results from VLT-KMOS data. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1385 , archivePrefix =. 2105.04025 , primaryClass =

  51. [53]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , Keywords =

  52. [54]

    arXiv , Author =:1104.4719 , Journal =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/52 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:1104.4719 , Journal =

  53. [55]

    , keywords =

    A model-based approach to the spatial and spectral calibration of NIRSpec onboard JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628263 , archivePrefix =. 1606.05640 , primaryClass =

  54. [56]

    doi:10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7 , Eprint =

    , Keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7 , Eprint =

  55. [57]

    doi:10.1086/185100 , Journal =

  56. [58]

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90193-9 , Eprint =

    Nuclear Physics B , Keywords =. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90193-9 , Eprint =

  57. [59]

    , keywords =

    Observational probes of cosmic acceleration. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 , archivePrefix =. 1201.2434 , primaryClass =

  58. [60]

    , keywords =

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s ^ -1 Mpc ^ -1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b , archivePrefix =. 2112.04510 , primaryClass =

  59. [61]

    The Swift UVOT Stars Survey. I. Methods and Test Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/6/131 , archivePrefix =. 1408.4676 , primaryClass =

  60. [62]

    Christopher Martin and James Fanson and David Schiminovich and Patrick Morrissey and Peter G

    D. Christopher Martin and James Fanson and David Schiminovich and Patrick Morrissey and Peter G. Friedman and Tom A. Barlow and Tim Conrow and Robert Grange and Patrick N. Jelinsky and Bruno Milliard and Oswald H. W. Siegmund and Luciana Bianchi and Yong-Ik Byun and Jose Donas and Karl Forster and Timothy M. Heckman and Young-Wook Lee and Barry F. Madore ...

  61. [63]

    The ultraviolet view of the Magellanic Clouds from GALEX: A first look at the LMC source catalog , journal =

    Raymond Simons and David Thilker and Luciana Bianchi and Ted Wyder , keywords =. The ultraviolet view of the Magellanic Clouds from GALEX: A first look at the LMC source catalog , journal =. 2014 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.07.016 , url =

  62. [64]

    , keywords =

    SMASH: Survey of the MAgellanic Stellar History. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa8d1c , archivePrefix =. 1701.00502 , primaryClass =

  63. [65]

    G. H. Rieke and E. T. Young and C. W. Engelbracht and D. M. Kelly and F. J. Low and E. E. Haller and J. W. Beeman and K. D. Gordon and J. A. Stansberry and K. A. Misselt and J. Cadien and J. E. Morrison and G. Rivlis and W. B. Latter and A. Noriega-Crespo and D. L. Padgett and K. R. Stapelfeldt and D. C. Hines and E. Egami and J. Muzerolle and A. Alonso-H...

  64. [66]

    G. G. Fazio and J. L. Hora and L. E. Allen and M. L. N. Ashby and P. Barmby and L. K. Deutsch and J.-S. Huang and S. Kleiner and M. Marengo and S. T. Megeath and G. J. Melnick and M. A. Pahre and B. M. Patten and J. Polizotti and H. A. Smith and R. S. Taylor and Z. Wang and S. P. Willner and W. F. Hoffmann and J. L. Pipher and W. J. Forrest and C. W. McMu...

  65. [67]

    Gordon and Remy Indebetouw and Joseph L

    Margaret Meixner and Karl D. Gordon and Remy Indebetouw and Joseph L. Hora and Barbara Whitney and Robert Blum and William Reach and Jean-Philippe Bernard and Marilyn Meade and Brian Babler and Charles W. Engelbracht and Bi-Qing For and Karl Misselt and Uma Vijh and Claus Leitherer and Martin Cohen and Ed B. Churchwell and Francois Boulanger and Jay A. Fr...

  66. [68]

    The Second Survey of the Molecular Clouds in the Large Magellanic Cloud by NANTEN. I. Catalog of Molecular Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/589833 , archivePrefix =. 0804.1458 , primaryClass =

  67. [69]

    , keywords =

    ALMA Observations of a Quiescent Molecular Cloud in the Large Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9333 , archivePrefix =. 1708.08890 , primaryClass =

  68. [70]

    The Magellanic Mopra Assessment (MAGMA). I. The Molecular Cloud Population of the Large Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/16 , archivePrefix =. 1108.5715 , primaryClass =

  69. [71]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201424946

    ASteCA: Automated Stellar Cluster Analysis , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201424946", url= "http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424946", journal =

  70. [72]

    Nature Reviews Physics , keywords =

    The expansion of the Universe is faster than expected. Nature Reviews Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0137-0 , archivePrefix =. 2001.03624 , primaryClass =

  71. [73]

    Nature Astronomy , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    A universal route for the formation of massive star clusters in giant molecular clouds. Nature Astronomy , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0506-0 , adsurl =

  72. [74]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    From Giant H II regions and H II galaxies to globular clusters and compact dwarf ellipticals. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2325 , adsurl =

  73. [75]

    , keywords =

    The Distribution and Ages of Star Clusters in the Small Magellanic Cloud: Constraints on the Interaction History of the Magellanic Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa244 , archivePrefix =. 1712.04974 , primaryClass =

  74. [76]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb , adsurl =

  75. [77]

    , keywords =

    Independent cosmological constraints from high-z H II galaxies. , keywords =. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1577 , archivePrefix =. 1906.02195 , primaryClass =

  76. [78]

    , keywords =

    CHIANTI - an atomic database for emission lines. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:1997368 , adsurl =

  77. [79]

    , keywords =

    Ionization state of inter-stellar medium in galaxies: evolution, SFR-M _ * -Z dependence, and ionizing photon escape. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu902 , archivePrefix =. 1309.0207 , primaryClass =

  78. [80]

    , keywords =

    On the Oxygen and Nitrogen Chemical Abundances and the Evolution of the ``Green Pea'' Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L128 , archivePrefix =. 1004.4910 , primaryClass =

  79. [82]

    , keywords =

    X-rays from Green Pea analogues. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1286 , archivePrefix =. 1705.07958 , primaryClass =

  80. [83]

    astropy/photutils: v0.6 , month = jan, year = 2019, doi =

    Larry Bradley and Brigitta Sip. astropy/photutils: v0.6 , month = jan, year = 2019, doi =

Showing first 80 references.