Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Hydrogen diffusion in ceria: solid state NMR, combined scattering and spectroscopic studies, and ab initio calculations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quasi-elastic neutron scattering gives the first direct evidence that hydrogen moves through bulk ceria by Chudley–Elliott jumps of about 3.98 Å, with a room-temperature self-diffusion coefficient near 2.7 × 10⁻⁹ m²/s.

desk verdict The QENS data are new and the multi-technique framing is sensible, but the central jump-diffusion claim is not yet supported: the fit is at the resolution limit and the run temperature is missing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08789 v1 pith:SL6IDOP2 submitted 2025-06-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zhichao Zhu , Xin Li , Ziru Ma , Yuanhua Xia , Ruizhi Qiu , Baijiang Lv , Guanyun Yan , Jianrong Zeng
show 4 more authors
Long Yang Jianbo Ma Benqiong Liu Guangai Sun
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 61.05.F61.05.C66.30.-h
keywords ceriahydrogendiffusionquasi-elasticneutronscatteringChudley–ElliottmodelNMRtransverserelaxationDFT+UcalculationsAIMDpairdistributionfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Hydrogen transport in ceria has remained unclear because microscopic mobility data were scarce. Using $^1$H NMR $T_2$ relaxation, neutron powder diffraction, quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS), X-ray total scattering with PDF analysis, and DFT+U plus AIMD calculations, the authors claim the first direct evidence that hydrogen in bulk ceria moves by Chudley–Elliott-type jump diffusion: discrete hops with a jump length of roughly $3.98$ Å and a room-temperature self-diffusion coefficient $D_s=(2.7\pm0.8)\times10^{-9}$ m$^2$/s. Their calculated barriers ($<0.1$ eV) support the picture of hydroxyl-bound hydrogen hopping between oxygen neighbors, while NMR $T_2$ gives a larger barrier ($\sim0.2$ eV) and much slower diffusion, indicating that the two techniques see dynamics on different time scales. If true, this gives a concrete microscopic mechanism for hydrogen mobility in a material used for catalysis, fuel cells, and hydrogen-barrier coatings.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Chudley–Elliott (CE) jump-diffusion model, which assumes hydrogen performs instantaneous, uncorrelated hops of fixed length $l$ between equivalent sites and predicts the half-width at half-maximum of the quasielastic line, $\Gamma(Q)=(\hbar/\tau)\left(1-\frac{\sin(Ql)}{Ql}\right)=\frac{6\hbar D_s}{l^2}\left(1-\frac{\sin(Ql)}{Ql}\right)$. Fitting the measured $Q$-dependence of $\Gamma$ yields both the jump length and the self-diffusion coefficient; this $Q$-dependence is what makes the evidence geometric rather than merely a rate. Supporting machinery includes $^1$H NMR $T_2$ with the BPP formula and Einstein–Smoluchowski relation to extract an activation energy and prefactor, CI-NEB calculations for the OH$\to$O–H···O reorientation and hop barriers, and AIMD trajectories for the Arrhenius diffusivity.

What would settle it

Repeat QENS on CeO2H0.036 at several controlled temperatures spanning, say, 300–650 K and fit each spectrum's width with the Chudley–Elliott form. If the fitted jump length drifts with temperature, or if a single Lorentzian cannot reproduce the data (so a second component or different model is needed), the single-jump-length claim fails. A direct measurement at a verified room temperature would also confirm whether $D_s$ is genuinely $(2.7\pm0.8)\times10^{-9}$ m$^2$/s.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the quasielastic neutron scattering spectrum of CeO$_2$H$_{0.036}$ contains a Lorentzian broadening whose $Q$-dependence follows the Chudley–Elliott form $\Gamma(Q)=(\hbar/\tau)(1-\sin(Ql)/(Ql))$. From that fit the authors extract a jump length $l=(3.98\pm0.56)$ Å, close to the next-nearest-neighbor O–O distance of $3.8$ Å, and a self-diffusion coefficient $D_s=(2.7\pm0.8)\times10^{-9}$ m$^2$/s quoted at room temperature. They take this as the first direct experimental observation of jump diffusion of hydrogen in bulk ceria, consistent with the low DFT+U barriers ($0.044$–$0.08$ eV) and with AIMD diffusivities of the same order of magnitude. The proposed microscopic mechanism is a sequence of hydroxyl reorientation, jump to an adjacent oxygen, and reorientation. The NMR $T_2$ analysis, using the BPP formula with assumed proton–proton distances $r_H=2.75$ or $3.8$ Å, gives a higher activation energy around $0.2$ eV and pre-exponential factors $D_0\sim10^{-11}$–$10^{-12}$ m$^2$/s, i.e., a second, slower proton dynamics component.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that all the measured quasielastic broadening comes from a single hydrogen self-diffusion process with one fixed jump length, and that the QENS spectrum was taken at the room temperature stated in the conclusions; the manuscript reports no QENS measurement temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the QENS assignment holds, bulk hydrogen transport in ceria proceeds by discrete oxygen-to-oxygen hops with a length set by the anion sublattice, pinning the microscopic jump geometry rather than an averaged continuum.
  • The room-temperature bulk diffusivity near $10^{-9}$ m$^2$/s implies hydrogen redistributes within micrometer grains on microsecond time scales, orders of magnitude faster than the $>10^{-18}$ m$^2$/s measured in pulsed-laser-deposited ceria films at 773–973 K; the bottleneck must lie at surfaces, interfaces, or defects.
  • Two distinct motions, the fast CE jump and the slower NMR-detected process with $E_a\sim0.2$ eV, would need to coexist in the same material; explaining both becomes a required test for any model of the CeO$_2$–H$_2$ interaction.
  • The low calculated barriers (<0.1 eV) imply that once hydrogen is incorporated, lattice mobility is not rate-limiting for reduction, so kinetics are controlled by dissociation and/or surface penetration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The manuscript never states the QENS measurement temperature; the conclusion labels the quoted $D_s$ as room temperature. Controlled-temperature QENS runs would tell whether the 3.98 Å jump length and the inferred $D_s$ are really temperature-independent or whether room temperature has been assumed.
  • The factor of roughly $10^6$ between QENS and NMR diffusivities suggests two hydrogen populations rather than one; a two-component QENS/NMR analysis could separate mobile bulk hydrogen from protons trapped at defects or sub-phases.
  • If bulk diffusion is genuinely this fast, ceria coatings meant as hydrogen barriers should be re-evaluated: their effectiveness would depend almost entirely on the surface dissociation/penetration step, and an isotope-tracer experiment on coated alloys could test whether deuterium spreads quickly through the ceria layer once it enters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-technique study of hydrogen dynamics in bulk ceria, combining 1H NMR transverse relaxation (T2) measurements, neutron powder diffraction, quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS), X-ray total scattering with pair distribution function analysis, and DFT+U/AIMD calculations. The central claim is that QENS data on CeO2H0.036 provide the first direct evidence for Chudley-Elliott (CE) type hydrogen jump diffusion in bulk ceria, yielding a jump distance of approximately 3.98 Å and a self-diffusion coefficient D_s = (2.7 ± 0.8) × 10^-9 m2/s. The DFT calculations find low activation barriers (about 0.07–0.08 eV from CI-NEB and 0.044 eV from AIMD), while the NMR data give a larger activation energy of about 0.2 eV and lower pre-exponential factors, interpreted as slower proton dynamics. The paper concludes that hydrogen transport in ceria proceeds by discrete jumps between oxygen neighbors, with the QENS and AIMD results in order-of-magnitude agreement.

Significance. If the QENS analysis is correct, the result would be a valuable microscopic characterization of hydrogen mobility in bulk ceria, with implications for hydrogen embrittlement, catalysis, and solid-oxide applications. The study integrates several independent experimental probes and a reasonably standard DFT+U framework with CI-NEB and AIMD, which is a strength. The NMR activation energy derived from the slope of ln(1/T2) versus 1/T is a relatively model-light result and appears robust. However, the central 'first direct evidence' claim rests on the QENS analysis, which currently has two load-bearing gaps: the measurement temperature is not reported, and the fit model is a single resolution-convolved Lorentzian with no elastic component or discussion of multiple hydrogen populations. The expected QENS broadening is of the same order as the instrument resolution, so these gaps materially affect the reliability of the extracted jump length and diffusion coefficient. The significance is therefore real but conditional on resolving these issues.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III C and Methods (QENS)] The temperature at which the QENS spectra were collected is never stated. The Methods section describes the instrument and resolution but gives no sample temperature, and Section III C presents only Q values. The Conclusion nevertheless refers to 'the diffusion coefficient at room temperature' (D_QENS = (2.7 ± 0.8) × 10^-9 m2/s). This is load-bearing because D_s from the Chudley-Elliott model is strongly temperature-dependent, and the comparison with the AIMD room-temperature diffusivity in Section III E depends on this temperature. The authors must report the actual sample temperature during the QENS experiment; if it is not room temperature, the comparison and the 'first direct evidence' framing must be revised accordingly.
  2. [Eq. (3) and Section III C] The fit function in Eq. (3) contains only a resolution-convolved Lorentzian with a Debye-Waller prefactor; there is no elastic component, no background, and no allowance for multiple hydrogen populations. This is a major concern because the sample is multiphase: the Rietveld refinement in Section III B gives 97.37% CeO2, 0.59% CeO2H, and 2.04% CeO1.34, and the total hydrogen content is only y = 0.036. A fraction of the hydrogen could be immobile, surface-bound, or located in the sub-phases, all of which would contribute a resolution-limited line. Using the reported D_s and l, the expected QENS broadening is about 0.07 meV (ℏ/τ), and its variation over Q = 0.85–2.2 Å^-1 is only about 0.01–0.02 meV, while the instrument resolution FWHM is 0.16 meV. An unmodeled elastic component can therefore substantially bias the fitted Γ(Q) and the derived D_s and l. The authors should include an elastic term in the fit, or provide a quantitative upper bound on its contribution from the data.
  3. [Section III C (CE-model assignment)] The uniqueness of the Chudley-Elliott interpretation is not established. The Q range is narrow (0.85–2.2 Å^-1) with only a few points, and no fit residuals, chi-squared values, or confidence intervals are provided. The reported uncertainties on D_s (±0.8 × 10^-9 m2/s) and l (±0.56 Å) apparently come from the CE fit, but the fit's ability to distinguish a CE model from a simple Fickian broadening (Γ = 2ℏD_s Q^2) or a distribution of jump lengths is not shown. Please provide residual plots and goodness-of-fit metrics, and discuss the model selection explicitly.
  4. [Section III E (AIMD vs CI-NEB)] The text states that the AIMD activation energy E_a = 0.044 eV 'shows good consistency' with the CI-NEB barriers of about 0.07 and 0.08 eV, but the difference is a factor of roughly two. While this discrepancy does not overturn the qualitative conclusion of low-barrier diffusion, the authors should either explain the origin of the difference (for example, thermal expansion, finite-size effects, or anharmonicity) or soften the consistency claim. In addition, the comparison of the room-temperature D_AIMD with D_QENS relies on the unstated QENS temperature identified in the first major comment.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Table I] The abstract states a pre-exponential factor D0 of about 10^-11 m2/s, but Table I with the physically motivated r_H = 3.80 Å gives D0 values in the range of (0.26–0.78) × 10^-11 m2/s, i.e., about 10^-12 m2/s. Please make the quoted values consistent.
  2. [Table III and Section III E] The formation energy for H_Int is reported as 2.73 eV in this work versus -2.41 eV in Ref. [32], which is not 'good agreement' as claimed. The authors should explain the discrepancy (e.g., different reference states, supercell sizes, or Hubbard U values) or revise the wording.
  3. [Eq. (3) and Fig. 5 caption] The text calls Γ(Q) the FWHM of the Lorentzian, but the Lorentzian in Eq. (3) has Γ as the half-width at half-maximum (HWHM) since S(ω) = (Γ/π)/(ω^2 + Γ^2). The Fig. 5 caption correctly says HWHM. This inconsistency should be corrected, as it affects the quantitative comparison with the 160 μeV resolution.
  4. [Section II (NMR)] The sampling frequency is written as '5000 KHz'; the correct unit symbol is kHz (lowercase k).
  5. [Reference [42]] The reference to Abragam's book contains a typo: 'Princeples' should be 'Principles'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction in the claimed derivation chain; QENS, NMR, and DFT are independent fits/calculations with stated model assumptions.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the central QENS claim follows from fitting Eq. (3) (resolution-convolved Lorentzian) and Eq. (4) (Chudley-Elliott model) to constant-Q spectra, yielding D_s=(2.7±0.8)e-9 m2/s and l=(3.98±0.56) Å. Neither D_s nor l is predefined from the O-O distance or from DFT; the agreement with d_OO=3.8 Å is a fitted-output comparison, not an input. The NMR E_a is obtained from the slope of ln(1/T2) vs 1/T via Eq. (1), independent of the assumed r_H; the BPP-derived D0 values depend explicitly on assumed r_H and l_NMR taken from DFT, but the paper states these assumptions and does not present D0 as a parameter-free ab initio prediction. The DFT calculations are independent electronic-structure calculations; they cite a self-authored method [38] to avoid metastable DFT+U states, but that citation is a technical method with stated assumptions, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or a definition of the target result. There is no step in which an equation reduces by construction to its own input, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The missing QENS temperature and marginal resolution are experimental/correctness concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard scattering models (Chudley-Elliott, BPP), DFT+U with a chosen Hubbard U, and two assumed proton-proton distances used to convert NMR relaxation data into diffusion coefficients. The QENS and DFT results are mutually consistent, while the NMR result depends on assumptions about r_H and the jump length. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • r_H (proton-proton distance) = 2.75 Å and 3.80 Å
    Two assumed H-H distances taken from DFT calculations on CeO2(111) are used in the BPP formula (Eq. 2) to convert T2 into pre-exponential factors and D0; the resulting D0 values differ by a factor of about 7 between the two choices.
  • l_NMR (NMR jump distance) = 3.80 Å
    Used in the Einstein-Smoluchowski relation D_NMR = l²/(6τ_NMR); the value is taken from DFT prediction of OH hopping between neighbor oxygen sites, not measured.
  • Hubbard U = 4 eV
    Dudarev DFT+U parameter chosen following prior studies; the authors cite work showing that 3-5 eV has negligible effect on relative H stability.
  • Debye-Waller factor prefactor <u²> = fitted
    The mean-square displacement of protons in Eq. 3 is fitted together with the Lorentzian widths in the QENS analysis.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Chudley-Elliott model: diffusion proceeds by instantaneous, uncorrelated jumps between adjacent vacant sites (Eq. 4)
    Used to extract jump length and self-diffusion coefficient from the Q-width dependence; a standard model for jump diffusion but an assumption about the mechanism.
  • standard math BPP dipolar relaxation formula (Eq. 2) with only homonuclear 1H-1H coupling
    NMR T2 analysis assumes the relaxation is dominated by 1H-1H dipolar interactions; justified by the low natural abundance of 17O and non-spin 58Ce and 16O.
  • domain assumption DFT+U with U = 4 eV and ferromagnetic ordering
    The Hubbard parameter is chosen from the literature; the authors claim 3-5 eV has negligible effect on H relative stability and that the magnetic state does not alter relative energies.
  • domain assumption Linear relation 2πΔν = 2/T2 in the middle temperature region (253 K < T < 293 K)
    Basis for extracting activation energies from the slope of ln(1/T2) vs 1/T; this is an approximate relation that limits the fit range.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hydrogen diffusion in ceria: solid state NMR, combined scattering and spectroscopic studies, and ab initio calculations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SL6IDOP2

@misc{pith2026250608789,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hydrogen diffusion in ceria: solid state NMR, combined scattering and spectroscopic studies, and ab initio calculations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SL6IDOP2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08789}
}
abstract

Ceria has been extensively studied since it has many applications in diverse research fields. However, the mechanism of the hydrogen dynamics, especially the diffusion kinetics on a microscopic level is still unclear as the experimental data has been very limited. In this work, the CeO$_2$-H interaction has been comprehensively studied by a combination of $^1$H NMR transverse relaxation time ($T_2$) measurement, neutron powder diffraction, quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS), X-ray total scattering, and ab initio calculations. Based on QENS measurements, the first direct evidence for hydrogen jump diffusions of the Chudley-Elliot type in the bulk ceria has been given, with a jump distance of ~3.98 angstrom. The theoretically calculated activation energy barriers $E_a$ for hydrogen diffusion are relatively low (less than 0.1 eV), further supporting that such hopping can readily occur. A larger barrier value of $E_a$ ~0.2 eV is directly estimated by $T_2$ NMR data, suggesting possible slower hydrogen dynamics with the pre-exponential factor $D_0$ of diffusion coefficient ~10$^{-11}$ m$^2/$s.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08789 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (Color online) The MSE-CPMG sequence used in transverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (Color online) Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (Color online) Plots of the H diffusion coefficients derived [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (Color online) Neutron powder diffraction patterns of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (Color online) (a) The dynamic structure factor of CeO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Taking the hydrogen-treated sample at 673 K as an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (Color online) The PDF for three CeO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (Color online) Critical point configurations for OH to O [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: (Color online) Hydrogen diffusivity values (red solid cycles) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Montini, M

    T. Montini, M. Melchionna, M. Monai, P. Fornasiero, Fun- damentals and catalytic applications of CeO 2-based materials, Chem. Rev.2016,116, 5987-6023

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    N. A. M. Fadzil, M. H. AB Rahim, G. P. Maniam, Brief review of ceria and modified ceria: synthesis and application,Mater . Res. Express2018,5, 085019

    work page

  3. [3]

    Vivier, D

    L. Vivier, D. Duprez, Ceria-based solid catalysts for organic chemistry,ChemSusChem2010,3, 654-678

    work page

  4. [4]

    L. He, Y . Su, L. Jiang, S. Shi, Recent advances of cerium oxide nanoparticles in synthesis, luminescence and biomedical stud- ies: a review,J. Rare Earths2015,33(8), 791

    work page

  5. [5]

    Marrocchelli, B

    D. Marrocchelli, B. Yildiz, First-principles assessment of H 2S and H 2O reaction mechanisms and the subsequent hydrogen absorption on the CeO 2 surface,J. Phys. Chem. C2012,116, 2411-2424

    work page

  6. [6]

    Z. Li, K. Werner, K. Qian, R. You, A. Płuienik, A. Jia, L. Wu, L. Zhang, H. Pan, H. Kuhlenbeck, S. Shaikhutdinov, W. Huang, and H.-J. Freund, Oxidation of reduced ceria by incorporation of hydrogen,Angew. Chem.2019,131, 14828-14835

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Z. Li, K. Werner, L. Chen, A. Jia, K. Qian, J.-Q. Zhong, R. You, L. Wu, L. Zhang, H. Pan, X.-P. Wu, Z.-Q. Gong, S. Shaikhutdi- nov, W. Huang, and H.-J. Freund, Interaction of hydrogen with ceria: hydroxylation, reduction, and hydride formation on the surface and in the bulk,Chem. Eur . J.2021,27, 5268-5276

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Werner, X

    K. Werner, X. Weng, F. Calaza, M. Sterrer, T. Kropp, J. Paier, J. Sauer, M. Wilde, K. Fukutani, S. Shaikhutdinov, and H.-J. Fre- und, Toward an understanding of selective alkyne hydrogena- tion on ceria: on the impact of O vacancies on H 2 interaction with CeO2(111),J. Am. Chem. Soc.2017,139, 17608-17616

    work page 2017

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Schweke, L

    D. Schweke, L. Shelly, R. Ben David, A. Danon, N. Kostirya, and S. Hayun, Comprehensive study of the Ceria-H 2 system: 9 FIG. 7: (Color online) Critical point configurations for OH to O−H· · ·O (top row) and O−H· · ·O to OH (bottow row) MEPSs. TABLE III: The total energiesET o...

  2. [10]

    Matsukawa, A

    T. Matsukawa, A. Hoshikawa, E. Niwa, M. Yashima, and T. Ishigaki, Crystal structure of blue-colored ceria during redox reactions in a hydrogen atmosphere,CrystEngComm2018,20, 155

  3. [11]

    Matsukawa, K

    T. Matsukawa, K. Lida, M. Nakamura, and T. Ishigaki, Detec- tion of hydroxyl and hydride functional groups in a ceria crystal under hydrogen reduction,CrystEngComm2021,23, 2355

  4. [12]

    Gr ¨unbacher, L

    M. Gr ¨unbacher, L. Schlicker, M. F. Bekheet, A. Gurlo, B. Kl¨otzer, and S. Penner, H 2 reduction of Gd- and Sm-doped ceria compared to pure CeO 2 at high temperatures: effect on FIG. 9: (Color online) Hydrogen diffusivity values (red solid cycles) for CeO2-H presented as a fu...

    2018

  5. [13]

    W. Mao, W. Gong, Z. Gu, M. Wilde, J. Chen, K. Fukutani, H. Matsuzaki, B. Fugetsu, I. Sakata, T. Terai, Hydrogen diffusion in cerium oxide thin films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy2024,50, 969-978

  6. [14]

    J. L. G. Fierro, S. Mendioroz, and A. M. Olivan, Surface chem- istry of cerium oxide prepared by an isobaric thermal proce- dure,J. Colloid Interface Sci.1985,107, 60-69

    1985

  7. [15]

    Badri, C

    A. Badri, C. Binet, and J.-C. Lavalley, An FTIR study of surface ceria hydroxy groups during a redox process with H2,J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.1996,92(23), 4669-4673

    1996

  8. [16]

    P. C. H. Mitchell, S. F. Parker, A. J. Ramirez-Cuesta, J. Tomkin- son,Vibrational Spectroscopy with Neutrons with Applications in Chemistry, Biology, Materials Science and Catalysis, World 10 Scientific Publishing, Singapore,2005

    2005

  9. [17]

    Ju ´arez, S

    R. Ju ´arez, S. F. Parker, P. Concepci´on, A. Corma, and H. Garc´ıa, Heterolytic and heterotopic dissociation of hydrogen on ceria- supported gold nanoparticles. Combined inelastic neutron scat- tering and FT-IR spectroscopic study on the nature and reactiv- ity of surface hyd...

    2010

  10. [18]

    Z. Wu, Y . Cheng, F. Tao, L. Daemen, G. S. Foo, L. Nguyen, X. Zhang, A. Beste, A. J. Ramirez-Cuesta, Direct neutron spec- troscopy observation of cerium hydride species on a cerium ox- ide catalyst,J. Am. Chem. Soc.2017,139, 9721-9727

    2017

  11. [19]

    Bernal, J

    S. Bernal, J. J. Calvino, G. A. Cifredo, J. M. Gatica, J. A. P. Omil, and J. M. Pintado, Hydrogen chemisorption on ceria: in- fluence of the oxide surface area and degree of reduction,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.1993,89(18), 3499-3505

    1993

  12. [20]

    Sohlberg, S

    K. Sohlberg, S. T. Pantelides, and S. J. Pennycook, Interactions of hydrogen with CeO 2,J. Am. Chem. Soc.2001,123, 6609- 6611

    2001

  13. [21]

    Garc ´ıa-Melchor, N

    M. Garc ´ıa-Melchor, N. L ´opez, Homolytic products from het- erolytic paths in H 2 dissociation on metal oxides: the example of CeO2,J. Phys. Chem. C2014,118, 10921-10926

  14. [22]

    Fern ´andez-Torre, J

    D. Fern ´andez-Torre, J. Carrasco, M. Ver ´onica Ganduglia- Pirovano, and R. P ´erez, Hydrogen activation, diffusion, and clustering on CeO 2(111): a DFT+Ustudy,J. Chem. Phys. 2014,141, 014703

    2014

  15. [23]

    F. R. Negreiros, M. F. Camellone, and S. Fabris, Effects of ther- mal fluctuations on the hydroxylation and redution of ceria sur- faces by molecular H 2,J. Phys. Chem. C2015,119, 21567- 21573

  16. [24]

    Chafi, N

    Z. Chafi, N. Keghouche, C. Minot, Density function theoretical study of interaction of hydrogen with ceria,Physics Procedia 2009,2, 673-676

    2009

  17. [25]

    Wu, X.-Q

    X.-P. Wu, X.-Q. Gong, G. Lu, Role of oxygen vacancies in the surface evolution of H at CeO 2 (111): a charge modification effect,Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2015,17, 3544

    2015

  18. [26]

    J. C. Stimac, N. Goldman, Quantum calculations of hydrogen absorption and diffusivity in bulk CeO2,ACS Omega2025,10, 12385-12392

  19. [27]

    Y . Xia, H. Li, X. Cao, X. Chen, C. Zhang, Y . Wang, C. Huang, Z. Wu, C. Xie, D. Sun, J. Zang, G. Sun, Upgrade of Xuanwu: a dual-mode neutron powder diffractometer at CMRR,Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A2022,1042, 167452

  20. [28]

    Meiboom, D

    S. Meiboom, D. Gill, Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times,Rev. Sci. Instrum.1958,29, 688-691

    1958

  21. [29]

    P. J. Chupas, X. Qiu, J. C. Hanson, P. L. Lee, C. P. Grey, S. J. L. Billinge, Rapid-Acquisition pair distribution function (RA- PDF) analysis,J. Appl. Cryst.200336, 1342-1347

  22. [30]

    Prescher, V

    C. Prescher, V . B. Prakapenka, Dioptas: a program for reduc- tion of two-dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data explo- ration,High Press. Res.2015,35, 223-230

    2015

  23. [31]

    Juh ´as, T

    P. Juh ´as, T. Davis, C. L. Farrow, S. J. L. Billinge, PDFgetX3: A rapid and highly automatable program for processing powder diffraction data into total scattering pair distribution functions, J. Appl. Cryst.2013,46, 560C566

    2013

  24. [32]

    Ao, Scaling the existence state of hydrogen in metal binary oxides,Acta Mater .2021,203, 116463

    B. Ao, Scaling the existence state of hydrogen in metal binary oxides,Acta Mater .2021,203, 116463

    2021

  25. [33]

    H. Chen, Z. Guo, Q. Jin, S. Shi, D. Zhou, D. Ding, An NMR study on 1H in HfV2·Hx hydrides,Chin. J. Chem. Phys.1989, 2, 202-208

    1989

  26. [34]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthm ¨uller, Efficient iterative schemes forab ini- tiototal-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,Phys. Rev. B1996,54, 11169-11186

  27. [35]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett.1996,77, 3865- 3868

    1996

  28. [36]

    P. E. Bl ¨ochl, Projector augmented-wave method,Phys. Rev. B 1994,50, 17953-17979

    1994

  29. [37]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y . Savrasov, and C. J. Humphreys, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural sta- bility of nickel oxide: an LSDA+Ustudy,Phys. Rev. B1998, 57, 1505-1509

  30. [38]

    Qiu, Circumventing the metastable states within DFT+U through random orbital-dependent loccal perturbation,J

    R. Qiu, Circumventing the metastable states within DFT+U through random orbital-dependent loccal perturbation,J. Chem. Theory Comput.2025,21, 1360-1368

    2025

  31. [39]

    D. Zhou, L. Hou, Q. Jin, Z. Guo, D. Ding, An NMR study of hydrogen motion in LaNi 5, LaNi 4Cu and LaNi 4Fe lattices, Acta Metallurgica Sinica1988,24, B121-B125

  32. [40]

    H.-T. Chen, Y . M. Choi, M. Liu, and M. C. Lin, A theoretical study of surface reduction mechanisms of CeO2 (111) and (110) by H2,Chem. Phys. Chem.2007,8, 849

    2007

  33. [41]

    Abragam,The Princeples of Nuclear Magnetism, The Clarendon Press, Oxford,1961, p.300

    A. Abragam,The Princeples of Nuclear Magnetism, The Clarendon Press, Oxford,1961, p.300

    1961

  34. [42]

    Besghini, M

    D. Besghini, M. Mauri, and R. Simonutti, Time domain NMR in polymer science: from the laboratory to the industry,Appl. Sci.2019,9, 1801

    2019

  35. [43]

    M. Kofu, O. Yamamuro, Dynamics of atomic hydrogen in palla- dium probed by neutron spectroscopy,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.2020, 89, 051002

    2020

  36. [44]

    C. T. Chudley, and R. J. Elliott, neutron scattering from a liquid on a jump diffusion model,Proc. Phys. Soc.1961,77, 353

    1961

  37. [45]

    Furrer,Neutron scattering from hyddrogen in materials, Pro- ceedings of the second summer school on neutron scattering, World Scientific, Switzerland,1995, p.201-224

    A. Furrer,Neutron scattering from hyddrogen in materials, Pro- ceedings of the second summer school on neutron scattering, World Scientific, Switzerland,1995, p.201-224

    1995

  38. [46]

    Ishikawa, H

    A. Ishikawa, H. Maekawa, T. Yamamura, Y . Kawakita, K. Shibata, M. Kawai, Proton dynamics of CsH 2PO4 studied by quasi-elastic neutron scattering and PFG-NMR,Solid State Ion- ics2008,179, 2345-2349

  39. [47]

    Egami, S

    T. Egami, S. J. L. Billinge,Underneath the Bragg Peaks: Struc- tural Analysis of Complex Materials, 2nd edition, Pergamon materials series, Press Elsevier, Amsterdam,2012, p.56

    2012

  40. [48]

    C. L. Farrow, P. Juhas, J. W. Liu, D. Bryndin, E. S. Bo ˇzin, J. Bloch, Th Proffen, S. J. L. Billinge, PDFfit2 and PDFgui: com- puter programs for studying nanostructure in crystals,J. Phys.: Condens. Matter2007,19, 335219

  41. [49]

    Gerward, J

    L. Gerward, J. S. Olsen, L. Petit, G. Vaitheeswaran, V . Kan- chana, A. Svane, Bulk modulus of CeO 2 and PrO2-An experi- mental and theoretical study,J. Alloys Comp.2005,400, 56-61

    2005

  42. [50]

    Nakayama, M

    M. Nakayama, M. Martin, First-principles study on defect chemistry and migration of oxide ions in ceria doped with rare- earth cations,Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2009,11, 3241-3249

    2009

  43. [51]

    P. R. L. Keating, D. O. Scanlon, B. J. Morgan, N. M. Galea, and G. W. Watson, Analysis of intrinsic defets in CeO 2 using a Koopmans-like GGA+Uapproach,J. Phys. Chem. C2012, 116, 2443-2452

  44. [52]

    J. L. F. Da Silva, M. V . Ganduglia-Pirovano, and J. Sauer, Hy- drid functionals applied to rare-earth oxides: The example of ceria,Phys. Rev. B2007,75, 045121

  45. [53]

    Henkelman, and H

    G. Henkelman, and H. J ´onsson, A climbing image nudged elas- tic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths,J. Chem. Phys.2000,113, 9901-9904

    2000

  46. [54]

    Momma, F

    K. Momma, F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visual- ization of crystal, volumeteric and morphology data,J. Appl. Crystallogr .2011,44, 1272-1276

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.