Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Methods for Averaging Spectral Line Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.09076 v3 pith:SN3IV6MM submitted 2023-10-13 astro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords weightingaveragingdataspectralaverageintensity-noisemethodsnoise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The ideal spectral averaging method depends on one's science goals and the available information about one's data. Including low-quality data in the average can decrease the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which may necessitate an optimization method or a consideration of different weighting schemes. Here, we explore a variety of spectral averaging methods. We investigate the use of three weighting schemes during averaging: weighting by the signal divided by the variance ("intensity-noise weighting"), weighting by the inverse of the variance ("noise weighting"), and uniform weighting. Whereas for intensity-noise weighting the SNR is maximized when all spectra are averaged, for noise and uniform weighting we find that averaging the 35-45% of spectra with the highest SNR results in the highest SNR average spectrum. With this intensity cutoff, the average spectrum with noise or uniform weighting has ~95% of the intensity of the spectrum created from intensity-noise weighting. We apply our spectral averaging methods to GBT Diffuse Ionized Gas (GDIGS) hydrogen radio recombination line (RRL) data to determine the ionic abundance ratio, y+, and discuss future applications of the methodology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools