Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

rStar-Coder: Scaling Competitive Code Reasoning with a Large-Scale Verified Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.21297 v1 pith:SNY45MXK submitted 2025-05-27 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords codereasoningdatasetproblemsrstar-codersolutionstestcases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Advancing code reasoning in large language models (LLMs) is fundamentally limited by the scarcity of high-difficulty datasets, especially those with verifiable input-output test cases necessary for rigorous solution validation at scale. We introduce rStar-Coder, which significantly improves LLM code reasoning capabilities by constructing a large-scale, verified dataset of 418K competition-level code problems, 580K long-reasoning solutions along with rich test cases of varying difficulty. This is achieved through three core contributions: (1) we curate competitive programming code problems and oracle solutions to synthesize new, solvable problems; (2) we introduce a reliable input-output test case synthesis pipeline that decouples the generation into a three-step input generation method and a mutual verification mechanism for effective output labeling; (3) we augment problems with high-quality, test-case-verified long-reasoning solutions. Extensive experiments on Qwen models (1.5B-14B) across various code reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of rStar-Coder dataset, achieving leading performance comparable to frontier reasoning LLMs with much smaller model sizes. On LiveCodeBench, rStar-Coder improves Qwen2.5-7B from 17.4% to an impressive 57.3%, and Qwen2.5-14B from 23.3% to 62.5%, surpassing o3-mini (low) by3.1%. On the more challenging USA Computing Olympiad, our 7B model achieves an average pass@1 accuracy of 16.15%, outperforming the frontier-level QWQ-32B. Code and the dataset will be released at https://github.com/microsoft/rStar.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generation

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Simple self-distillation—fine-tuning a code model on its own temperature-sampled, truncated outputs—raises LiveCodeBench pass@1 substantially without verifiers, teachers, or RL.

  2. Toward Training Superintelligent Software Agents through Self-Play SWE-RL

    cs.SE 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Self-play RL on bug injection and repair in sandboxed repositories yields +10.4 and +7.8 point gains on SWE-bench Verified and Pro while outperforming human-data baselines.

  3. Efficiency of turbulence

    physics.flu-dyn 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The efficiency of turbulence, the fraction of input energy stored in the flow, appears bounded and may saturate in a power-law manner across several turbulent flows.

  4. Hermes 4 Technical Report

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Hermes 4 releases three open-weight reasoning models (14B, 70B, 405B) trained with synthetic data and a length-control SFT stage, evaluated on mathematics, code, knowledge, and alignment benchmarks.

  5. Xolver: Multi-Agent Reasoning with Holistic Experience Learning Just Like an Olympiad Team

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-free multi-agent framework with episodic and shared memory reports new best results on GSM8K, AIME 2024/2025, Math-500, and LiveCodeBench.

Pith tools