Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-qubit doilies: enumeration for all ranks and classification for ranks four and five

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.03599 v2 pith:SQY23X6P submitted 2022-06-07 quant-ph cs.DMmath.CO

classification quant-phcs.DMmath.CO
keywords doiliesqubitalgorithmclassificationdoilylinearnumberranks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

For $N \geq 2$, an $N$-qubit doily is a doily living in the $N$-qubit symplectic polar space. These doilies are related to operator-based proofs of quantum contextuality. Following and extending the strategy of Saniga et al. (Mathematics 9 (2021) 2272) that focused exclusively on three-qubit doilies, we first bring forth several formulas giving the number of both linear and quadratic doilies for any $N > 2$. Then we present an effective algorithm for the generation of all $N$-qubit doilies. Using this algorithm for $N=4$ and $N=5$, we provide a classification of $N$-qubit doilies in terms of types of observables they feature and number of negative lines they are endowed with. We also list several distinguished findings about $N$-qubit doilies that are absent in the three-qubit case, point out a couple of specific features exhibited by linear doilies and outline some prospective extensions of our approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Empirical Demonstration of Quantum Contextuality on NISQ Computers

    quant-ph 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The Rio Negro results violate noncontextual bounds on IBM Heron R2, but the paper's own Table 2 shows Mermin game success rates at or below the classical limits.

Pith tools