Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 40 references

Smoothing Calabi-Yau toric hypersurfaces using the Gross-Siebert algorithm

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows how to smooth the boundary of a class of four-dimensional reflexive polytopes to obtain new Calabi-Yau threefolds, including 14 topological types with second Betti number one that are absent from previous lists.

desk verdict A careful, honest construction of candidate new Calabi-Yau threefolds via Gross-Siebert; the new examples are real but the existence claim is explicitly conditional on a long-standing homotopy conjecture. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02140 v3 pith:SRN3WHVO submitted 2019-09-04 math.AG hep-th

Thomas Prince This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGhep-th MSC 14J3214J3314M2514J81
keywords Calabi-YauthreefoldsGross-SiebertalgorithmtoricdegenerationsreflexivepolytopesMinkowskidecompositionstropicalmanifoldsKato-NakayamaspaceBettinumbers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a systematic construction of new Calabi-Yau threefolds by `smoothing the boundary' of four-dimensional reflexive polytopes through the Gross-Siebert algorithm. For a simply decomposable polytope together with a standard Minkowski decomposition of each two-dimensional face, and when the data satisfy a combinatorial regularity condition, the paper establishes that the input determines a polarized tropical manifold and a smoothing of an associated toric log Calabi-Yau space. It then computes the topology of the smoothed fibre from a compactified torus fibration model, giving explicit formulas for the Euler number and the second Betti number. Applied to products of reflexive polygons, the method yields 14 topological types with $b_2=1$ that do not appear in existing lists of rank-one Calabi-Yau threefolds; if the paper's bridge conjecture is true, these are genuinely new Calabi-Yau threefold topological types.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair $(P,D)$: a four-dimensional simply decomposable reflexive polytope $P$ together with a standard Minkowski decomposition $D$ of each two-dimensional face into standard simplices. From this pair the paper constructs a polarized tropical manifold $(B,\mathcal{P},\phi)$ by introducing an integral affine structure on the boundary of $P$ via fan structures and a strictly convex piecewise-linear function built from slope data; regularity of $(P,D)$ is exactly the existence of a consistent strictly convex slope function whose empty cells are standard triangles, and regularity is what makes the Gross-Siebert smoothing applicable. Topology is read off from Gross's compactified torus fibration $X(P,D)$ over $B$: the paper proves $\chi(X(P,D)) = \sum_{\rho\in\mathrm{Faces}(P,2)}\#\{Q\in D(\rho):\dim Q=2\} - \sum_{\sigma\in\mathrm{Faces}(P^\circ,2)}\ell(\sigma^\star)^2\mathrm{Vol}(\sigma)$ and $b_2(X(P,D)) = \gamma(P,D)-3$, where $\gamma(P,D)$ is the dimension of an inverse-limit vector space built from the edges of $P$ and the summands in $D$.

What would settle it

For one of the explicit hexagon-product examples, compute the cohomology of the Kato-Nakayama space with fixed phase and compare with the model space: a mismatch in $b_2$ or in the Euler number would disprove the bridge conjecture and remove the claim that the 14 types are Calabi-Yau threefolds. As a second check, if a simultaneous smoothing of the 12 del Pezzo cone singularities in $P_6\times P_6$ exists when exactly five of the six local smoothing components coincide on one side, the paper's Conjecture 5.7 would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that sufficiently nice boundary data on a four-dimensional reflexive polytope—a simply decomposable polytope together with a standard Minkowski decomposition of each two-dimensional face—determines, through the Gross-Siebert algorithm, a smoothing of a toric log Calabi-Yau space whose general fibre is a smooth Calabi-Yau threefold. For regular data this is made precise by constructing a polarized tropical manifold and applying the Gross-Siebert reconstruction theorems. The paper then identifies the topology of the general fibre with that of a compactified torus fibration $X(P,D)$, proving that $X(P,D)$ is simply connected, that its Euler characteristic equals a combinatorial count involving two-dimensional Minkowski summands and polar-polytope volumes, and that its second Betti number is $\gamma(P,D)-3$, where $\gamma(P,D)$ is the dimension of an inverse limit of vector spaces attached to the polytope and its decomposition. Among products of reflexive polygons, the paper reports 14 topological types with $b_2=1$ absent from existing lists; for the single polytope $P_6\times P_6$ it finds five such rank-one types, and one of the global examples matches a previously predicted differential operator with integral monodromy.

Load-bearing premise

The paper computes the topological invariants on a model space built from the polytope, and the central unproved assumption is that this model has the same homotopy type as the actual fibre produced by the smoothing construction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the bridge conjecture holds, the 14 reported rank-one topological types become genuinely new simply connected Calabi-Yau threefolds, expanding the known dataset beyond the standard toric and complete-intersection constructions.
  • The same algorithm reproduces several classical families, including (3,3) complete intersections in $\mathbb{P}^5$, $(2,2,3)$ and $(2,2,2,2)$ complete intersections, and Grassmannian complete intersections, so those examples are unified as special cases of one smoothing mechanism.
  • The regularity condition provides a combinatorial obstruction to smoothing the non-isolated Gorenstein singularities of toric Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces; for $P_6\times P_6$ it predicts exactly which local choices of smoothing components can be made simultaneously.
  • The tables of regular pairs supply a concrete list of candidate Calabi-Yau threefolds with $b_2=1$ and Euler numbers between $-56$ and $-204$, many with matching Picard-Fuchs operators, giving explicit targets for future construction and mirror-symmetry checks.
  • Because the topological formulas depend only on $(P,D)$, any further regular input data yields immediate predictions for Euler number and Betti numbers without additional geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: running the same regularity check over the full classification of four-dimensional reflexive polytopes would likely produce many more candidate Calabi-Yau threefolds than the 14 shown here, since the paper only treats products of reflexive polygons.
  • Editorial inference: the failure of regularity when exactly one or five of the six local components coincide on one side of $P_6\times P_6$ suggests a direct test of the paper's Conjecture 5.7, namely that an explicit attempt to smooth the 12 del Pezzo cone singularities in one of the excluded patterns should be obstructed.
  • Editorial inference: the match with a Hadamard-square differential operator suggests that the $\chi=-72$ example admits a free $\mathbb{Z}_2$ quotient of rank one; computing the Hodge numbers of that quotient would test the mirror-symmetric prediction independently of the smoothing construction.
  • Editorial inference: the bridge conjecture could be checked in individual cases by comparing the rational cohomology of the Kato-Nakayama space with that of $X(P,D)$ for one of the explicit hexagon-product examples, rather than waiting for a general proof in dimension three.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a combinatorial algorithm, based on the Gross–Siebert program, that starts from a 4-dimensional reflexive polytope P together with choices of Minkowski decompositions D of its 2-dimensional faces and produces a polarized tropical manifold (B,P,ϕ). Applying Gross–Siebert reconstruction, the pair (P,D) yields a toric log Calabi–Yau space X0(P,D) that, for regular pairs, is the central fibre of a formal degeneration whose general fibre is expected to be a smooth Calabi–Yau threefold. The paper computes topological invariants of the compactified torus fibration X(P,D) — Euler number, second Betti number, and a proxy for H^3 — and, for products of reflexive polygons, reports 14 topological types with b2=1 that do not appear in previously known lists. The main new results are Theorem 1.1 (the smoothing construction), Theorem 1.4 (the topological invariant formulas), and the tables in Appendix A, all conditional on the unproved Conjecture 1.3 that the Kato–Nakayama space of the smoothing is homotopy equivalent to X(P,D).

Significance. If Conjecture 1.3 holds, the paper provides a genuinely new and systematic source of Calabi–Yau threefolds with small Picard rank, including 14 candidate rank-one types not in existing compilations. The construction is combinatorial and parameter-free: no numerical fitting is involved, the slope-function regularity criterion is algorithmic, and the author supplies Magma code to verify the table entries. The connections to joins of elliptic curves, Hadamard products, and the Tom–Jerry smoothing components are plausible and potentially influential. The main weakness is that the advertised existence claims rest on an unproved homotopy-equivalence conjecture; this is stated honestly in the text but should be reflected in every headline claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 1, Conjecture 1.3; Theorem 1.4; Section 5] The central advertised conclusion — 14 new topological types of Calabi–Yau threefolds with b2=1 — is conditional on Conjecture 1.3. The invariants used in Section 5 are computed on X(P,D), the compactified torus fibration over B(P,D), while the general fibre of the Gross–Siebert smoothing is modelled by the Kato–Nakayama space X_KN. The paper explicitly states that Conjecture 1.3 is not proved, saying only that it is 'not expected to be difficult in dimension three'. Under the reviewing rules I must treat this as a load-bearing gap, not a harmless remark. The abstract and Proposition 1.5 phrase the results as unconditional ('we can construct 14 topological types of Calabi–Yau threefolds'). Please mark all existence claims as conditional on Conjecture 1.3, or supply a proof of the conjecture for the regular pairs used in Tables 3–7.
  2. [Appendix A, Remark A.1; Proposition 1.5; abstract] The paper's headline count of '14 topological types with b2=1' is not accompanied by a precise enumeration, and Remark A.1 explicitly disclaims completeness: 'We have not checked every orbit in every class, so it remains possible that our tables are incomplete.' If the count is meant to be exact, this disclaimer directly undermines it; if it is meant to be a lower bound, that should be stated. Please provide a list of the 14 types with their invariants and the table rows that realize them, and clarify whether the enumeration is exhaustive over regular pairs (P,D) in the family considered.
  3. [Section 4, Lemma 4.14] The proof that the differential d: H1(X'_0,R^1ξ_*Q) → H3(X'_0,ξ_*Q) vanishes is not convincing as written. The text says that the image of ξ* has positive dimension and concludes that the image of d is trivial. Positivity of a map into H3(X,Q) does not by itself force d=0 in the displayed exact sequence. Since the formula b2(X)=γ(P,D)−3 in Theorem 4.9 depends on this vanishing, and all b2=1 examples rely on it, please give the complete spectral sequence argument or cite the exact statement in [19] whose hypotheses are verified here.
  4. [Section 4, Lemma 4.20] The computation of H0(X'_0,G) and H1(X'_0,G) is a load-bearing step in Lemma 4.21, but the proof is too compressed. The duality between the Čech complex (7) and the row E^{p,•}_1 of the spectral sequence is asserted without detail, and the instruction to replace the left-most zero of (7) with MQ is not justified. Please expand this into a verifiable computation, or provide a precise reference with the relevant statement and a check of its hypotheses.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'a polarised tropical manifolds' should read 'polarised tropical manifolds'.
  2. [Section 3.1] In the monodromy computation, the matrix displayed after the formula for T_γ uses entries involving ℓ(σ*) and ℓ(τ), but the basis in which this matrix is written is not specified. Please specify the basis explicitly.
  3. [Theorem 1.4 and Proposition 4.8] The Euler number formula is written with a sum over Faces(P,2) in Theorem 1.4 but over Edges(P°) in Proposition 4.8. The equality presumably follows from face–edge duality under polarity; please state this so the formulas are visibly identical.
  4. [Example 4.22] The symbol H′ is used in the description of the variables but is not defined. Please define it or replace it with standard notation.
  5. [Appendix A, table captions] The table captions report orbit counts, but the text does not state which representative in each orbit was tested for regularity. Please identify the tested representative or the method used to select it, and explain how the Magma script can reproduce the tables.
  6. [Section 5.1] In the displayed differential operator D, the coefficients involve powers 2^6 and 2^9 in the t^3 and t^4 terms; please check that these are written consistently with the preceding operator normalization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the construction feeds P,D into external Gross–Siebert theorems; topological invariants are computed, not fitted, and Conjecture 1.3 is an explicit unproved bridge rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (P,D) determines a polarised tropical manifold (B,P,φ) via Constructions 3.2 and 3.3; regularity is checked by an explicit slope-function algorithm (Propositions 2.8 and 5.6); the smoothing is obtained by applying the external Gross–Siebert reconstruction theorem [24, Theorem 1.30] and Ruddat–Siebert [37, Theorem 4.4]. Topological invariants are then computed on Gross's model X(P,D): χ by counting positive and negative vertices (Proposition 4.8), and b2 from a Leray spectral sequence together with the independently defined linear-algebra object γ(P,D) (Definition 4.16, Theorem 4.9). No parameter is fitted to the claimed outputs, and the formulas are derived rather than imposed. The flagged comparison with the author's earlier paper [35] in the proof of Proposition 4.13 and Lemma 4.21 is a stylistic pointer to a similar computation; the relevant statements are proved in the text using [20] and [14], so the self-citation is not load-bearing. Conjecture 1.3, which would identify X(P,D) with the Kato–Nakayama space of the actual general fibre, is explicitly stated as unproved and is a genuine hypothesis bridging the combinatorial model and the smoothing; it is not presented as a theorem and does not reduce the derivation to its own inputs. Remark A.1 also explicitly disclaims completeness of the orbit checks, and the comparison with Kapustka's list and Lee's constructions is an external benchmark, not an internal circular step. Therefore no load-bearing step is equivalent by construction or by self-citation to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted to data. The only choices are combinatorial: the Minkowski decomposition D, orientations of edges and faces, and auxiliary constants (epsilon, K) that do not affect invariants. The load-bearing assumptions are the unproved Conjecture 1.3 and the heavy citation of the Gross-Siebert theorems.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Conjecture 1.3: X_KN with fixed phase is homotopy equivalent to X(P,D).
    This unproved statement transfers the computed topology of the model space X(P,D) to the general fibre of the Gross-Siebert smoothing; the claim of new Calabi-Yau threefolds depends on it.
  • domain assumption The Gross-Siebert reconstruction theorem [24, Theorem 1.30] and [37, Theorem 4.4] apply to the polarised tropical manifold (B,P,phi) constructed from (P,D).
    The paper verifies local rigidity, positivity and simplicity, but the full check is spread over Section 3 and relies on [24, Remark 1.29] and [22, Theorems 5.2 and 5.4]; a reader must trust this citation chain.
  • domain assumption B(P,D) is homeomorphic to S3.
    Used to apply Proposition 4.4 and 4.5 (spin structure, Pontryagin class) and Proposition 4.7 (simple connectivity); it follows from the construction on the boundary of P but is not proved explicitly.
  • domain assumption Regularity of (P,D) is decided by the existence of a consistent strictly convex slope function V, as characterized in Proposition 2.8; the paper's examples use a Magma implementation that is not included in the text.
    The tables in Appendix A depend on this computational check; the code is referenced but not shipped in the arXiv text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Smoothing Calabi-Yau toric hypersurfaces using the Gross-Siebert algorithm." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SRN3WHVO

@misc{pith2026190902140,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Smoothing Calabi-Yau toric hypersurfaces using the Gross-Siebert algorithm},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SRN3WHVO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02140}
}
abstract

We explain how to form a novel dataset of simply connected Calabi-Yau threefolds via the Gross-Siebert algorithm. We expect these to degenerate to Calabi-Yau toric hypersurfaces with certain Gorenstein (not necessarily isolated) singularities. In particular, we explain how to `smooth the boundary' of a class of $4$-dimensional reflexive polytopes to obtain a polarised tropical manifolds. We compute topological invariants of a compactified torus fibration over each such tropical manifold, expected to be homotopy equivalent to the general fibre of the Gross-Siebert smoothing. We consider a family of examples related to the joins of elliptic curves. Among these we find $14$ topological types with $b_2=1$ which do not appear in existing lists of known rank one Calabi-Yau threefolds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02140 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example of a non-lattice Minkowski decomposition. 2. Simply decomposable polytopes We construct smoothings of Calabi–Yau toric hypersurfaces with singularities belonging to a certain class. The following definition provides a combinatorial description of this class of toric singularities. Recall that we say that two lattice polytopes are equivalent if they differ by the composition of an integral linear map and a tr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Irregular strictly convex slope function. affine manifold; P is a polyhedral decomposition; and ϕ is a multi-valued piecewise linear function, see [22, Definition 1.45]. In this section we show how to assign such discrete data to a 4-dimensional s.d. polytopes, together with choices of Minkowski decompositions of its two-dimensional faces. We also describe the algebraic input in §3.4; in fact, using the main results… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The triangulation of a face σ induced by ψσ. Given an edge τ of P ◦ , subdivide τ into |D(τ ? )| + 2 intervals. The ordering of D(τ ? ) determines a bijection between the |D(τ ? )| intervals which do not meet a vertex of τ , and D(τ ? ). Let ψ|τ be linear on each segment with slope equal to V (m) along the segment corresponding to m ∈ D(τ ? ). We insist that ψ(v) = 0 at each vertex v of τ ; in particular ψ|τ is a no… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The discriminant locus in a 2-dimensional face. Proof of Theorem 1.1. As explained in §3.2 and §3.3, we can construct a polarised tropical manifold (B,P, ϕ) from the pair (P, D). Following [24, §1.2] we can form the underlying variety of a toric log CY space X0(B,P, s)…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: List of s.d. reflexive polygons. equations of the form yi,j = yi−1,j − xi yi,j = yi,j−1 + x j for i, j ∈ {1, 2, 3}. First eliminate the variables xi = yi−1,i − yi,i and x i = yi,i − yi,i−1. The remaining 12 equations are equivalent to a subset of 6 equations. Solutions…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [20]

    Topological mirror symmetry

    Mark Gross. Topological mirror symmetry. Invent. Math., 144(1):75–137, 2001

    work page 2001

  2. [35]

    Lagrangian torus fibration models of Fano threefolds

    Thomas Prince. Lagrangian torus fibration models of Fano threefolds. arXiv:1801.02997 [math.GT] , 2018

    arXiv 2018

  3. [19]

    Special Lagrangian fibrations

    Mark Gross. Special Lagrangian fibrations. I. Topology [ MR1672120 (2000e:14066)]. In Winter School on Mirror Symmetry, Vector Bundles and Lagrangian Submanifolds (Cambridge, MA, 1999) , volume 23 of AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. , pages 65–93. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2001

    work page 1999

  4. [1]

    Almkvist, C

    G. Almkvist, C. van Enckevort, D. van Straten, and W. Zudilin. Tables of Calabi–Yau equations. arXiv:0507430 [math.AG] , 2005

    work page 2005

  5. [2]

    Differential equations, mirror maps and zeta values

    Gert Almkvist and Wadim Zudilin. Differential equations, mirror maps and zeta values. In Mirror sym- metry. V , volume 38 of AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. , pages 481–515. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2006

    work page 2006

  6. [3]

    The versal deformation of an isolated toric Gorenstein singularity

    Klaus Altmann. The versal deformation of an isolated toric Gorenstein singularity. Invent. Math. , 128(3):443–479, 1997

    work page 1997

  7. [4]

    Real loci in (log-) Calabi-Yau manifolds via Kato-Nakayama spaces of toric degenerations

    H¨ ulya Arg¨ uz and Bernd Siebert. On the real locus in the Kato-Nakayama space of logarithmic spaces with a view toward toric degenerations. arXiv:1610.07195 [math.AG] , 2016

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  8. [5]

    Aspinwall, Tom Bridgeland, Alastair Craw, Michael R

    Paul S. Aspinwall, Tom Bridgeland, Alastair Craw, Michael R. Douglas, Anton Kapustin, Gregory W. Moore, Mark Gross, Graeme Segal, Bal´ azs Szendr¨ oi, and P. M. H. Wilson.Dirichlet branes and mirror symmetry, volume 4 of Clay Mathematics Monographs. AMS, Providence, RI, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 40 references
  1. [6]

    Constructing new Calabi-Yau 3-folds and their mirrors via coni- fold transitions

    Victor Batyrev and Maximilian Kreuzer. Constructing new Calabi-Yau 3-folds and their mirrors via coni- fold transitions. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 14(3):879–898, 2010

    2010

  2. [7]

    Victor V. Batyrev. Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties. J. Algebraic Geom., 3(3):493–535, 1994

    1994

  3. [8]

    Batyrev and Lev A

    Victor V. Batyrev and Lev A. Borisov. On Calabi-Yau complete intersections in toric varieties. In Higher- dimensional complex varieties (Trento, 1994) , pages 39–65. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996

    1994

  4. [9]

    Fano 3-folds in codimension 4, Tom and Jerry

    Gavin Brown, Michael Kerber, and Miles Reid. Fano 3-folds in codimension 4, Tom and Jerry. Part I. Compos. Math., 148(4):1171–1194, 2012

    2012

  5. [10]

    Candelas, C

    P. Candelas, C. A. L¨ utken, and R. Schimmrigk. Complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds. II. Three generation manifolds [Nuclear Phys. B306 (1988), no. 1, 113–136; MR0952965 (89g:53102)]. InProceedings of the Fourth Seminar on Quantum Gravity (Moscow, 1987) , pages 435–468....

    1988

  6. [11]

    Candelas, M

    P. Candelas, M. Lynker, and R. Schimmrigk. Calabi-Yau manifolds in weighted P4. Nuclear Phys. B , 341(2):383–402, 1990

    1990

  7. [12]

    Calabi-Yau threefolds with small Hodge numbers

    Philip Candelas, Andrei Constantin, and Challenger Mishra. Calabi-Yau threefolds with small Hodge numbers. Fortschr. Phys., 66(6):1800029, 21, 2018

    2018

  8. [13]

    Lagrangian 3-torus fibrations

    Ricardo Castano Bernard and Diego Matessi. Lagrangian 3-torus fibrations. J. Differential Geom. , 81(3):483–573, 03 2009

    2009

  9. [14]

    Cox, John B

    David A. Cox, John B. Little, and Henry K. Schenck. Toric varieties, volume 124 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011

    2011

  10. [15]

    Smoothing toroidal crossing spaces

    Simon Felten, Matej Filip, and Helge Ruddat. Smoothing toroidal crossing spaces. arXiv:1908.11235 [math.AG], 2019

    1908 arXiv

  11. [16]

    On threefolds with trivial canonical bundle

    Robert Friedman. On threefolds with trivial canonical bundle. In Complex geometry and Lie theory (Sun- dance, UT, 1989), volume 53 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., pages 103–134. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1991

    1989

  12. [17]

    S. Galkin. Joins and Hadamard products. talk at Steklov Mathematical Institute, during the conference ‘Categorical and analytic invariants in algebraic geometry’, 2019

    2019

  13. [18]

    Examples of special Lagrangian fibrations

    Mark Gross. Examples of special Lagrangian fibrations. In Symplectic geometry and mirror symmetry (Seoul, 2000), pages 81–109. World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 2001

    2000

  14. [21]

    Toric degenerations and Batyrev-Borisov duality

    Mark Gross. Toric degenerations and Batyrev-Borisov duality. Math. Ann., 333(3):645–688, 2005

    2005

  15. [22]

    Mirror symmetry via logarithmic degeneration data

    Mark Gross and Bernd Siebert. Mirror symmetry via logarithmic degeneration data. I. J. Differential Geom., 72(2):169–338, 2006

    2006

  16. [23]

    Mirror symmetry via logarithmic degeneration data, II.J

    Mark Gross and Bernd Siebert. Mirror symmetry via logarithmic degeneration data, II.J. Algebraic Geom., 19(4):679–780, 2010

    2010

  17. [24]

    From real affine geometry to complex geometry

    Mark Gross and Bernd Siebert. From real affine geometry to complex geometry. Ann. of Math. (2) , 174(3):1301–1428, 2011

    2011

  18. [25]

    Integral affine structures on spheres: complete intersections

    Christian Haase and Ilia Zharkov. Integral affine structures on spheres: complete intersections. Int. Math. Res. Not., (51):3153–3167, 2005. 34 T. PRINCE

    2005

  19. [26]

    Calabi–Yau 3-folds from projective joins of del Pezzo manifolds

    Daisuke Inoue. Calabi–Yau 3-folds from projective joins of del Pezzo manifolds. arXiv:1902.10040 [math.AG], 2019

    1902 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Projections of del Pezzo surfaces and Calabi-Yau threefolds

    Grzegorz Kapustka. Projections of del Pezzo surfaces and Calabi-Yau threefolds. Adv. Geom., 15(2):143– 158, 2015

    2015

  21. [28]

    Glsms, joins, and nonperturbatively-realized geometries

    Johanna Knapp and Eric Sharpe. Glsms, joins, and nonperturbatively-realized geometries. arXiv:1907.04350 [hep-th] , 2019

    1907 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Affine structures and non-Archimedean analytic spaces

    Maxim Kontsevich and Yan Soibelman. Affine structures and non-Archimedean analytic spaces. In The unity of mathematics , volume 244 of Progr. Math., pages 321–385. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 2006

    2006

  23. [30]

    Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions

    Maximilian Kreuzer and Harald Skarke. Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 4(6):1209–1230, 2000

    2000

  24. [31]

    Calabi-Yau threefolds with small h1,1’s from Fano threefolds

    Nam-Hoon Lee. Calabi-Yau threefolds with small h1,1’s from Fano threefolds. Nuclear Phys. B , 922:384– 400, 2017

    2017

  25. [32]

    d-Semistable Calabi–Yau threefolds of type III

    Nam-Hoon Lee. d-Semistable Calabi–Yau threefolds of type III. manuscripta mathematica, 12 2018

    2018

  26. [33]

    Benjamin Nill and G¨ unter M. Ziegler. Projecting lattice polytopes without interior lattice points. Math. Oper. Res., 36(3):462–467, 2011

    2011

  27. [34]

    An integral affine view on joins

    Thomas Prince. An integral affine view on joins. In preparation

  28. [36]

    Generalized special Lagrangian torus fibration for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties

    Wei-Dong Ruan. Generalized special Lagrangian torus fibration for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties. I. Commun. Contemp. Math. , 9(2):201–216, 2007

    2007

  29. [37]

    Period integrals from wall structures via tropical cycles, canonical coordinates in mirror symmetry and analyticity of toric degenerations

    Helge Ruddat and Bernd Siebert. Period integrals from wall structures via tropical cycles, canonical coordinates in mirror symmetry and analyticity of toric degenerations. arXiv:1907.03794 [math.AG]

    1907 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Smoothing 3-folds with trivial canonical bundle and ordinary double points

    Gang Tian. Smoothing 3-folds with trivial canonical bundle and ordinary double points. In Essays on mirror manifolds, pages 458–479. Int. Press, Hong Kong, 1992

    1992

  31. [39]

    Monodromy calculations of fourth order equations of Calabi-Yau type

    Christian van Enckevort and Duco van Straten. Monodromy calculations of fourth order equations of Calabi-Yau type. In Calabi-Yau varieties and mirror symmetry. Proceedings, Workshop, Mirror Symmetry 5, Banff, Canada, December 6-11, 2003 , pages 539–559, 2003

    2003

  32. [40]

    Calabi-Yau Operators Database

    Duco van Straten. Calabi-Yau Operators Database. online. access via http://www.mathematik.uni-mainz.de/CYequations/db/. Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK E-mail address: thomas.prince@magd.ox.ac.uk

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.