pith. sign in

arxiv: 2305.06478 · v2 · pith:SSDAX46Cnew · submitted 2023-05-10 · 📡 eess.SP

On the Impossibility of Lossless Waveform Rank Reduction for Certain Redundant Arrays

Robin Rajam\"aki , Piya Pal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 08:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords array redundancywaveform rankparameter identifiabilityMIMO active sensingsum co-arrayredundancy patternactive sensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Certain redundant arrays cannot achieve lossless waveform rank reduction due to their redundancy patterns.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the effects of array redundancy and waveform rank on identifiability in MIMO active sensing systems. It demonstrates that identifiability at reduced waveform rank depends critically on the subspace properties of the array redundancy pattern. Geometries with the same sum co-array can nevertheless display different identifiability at low waveform rank. A new necessary condition is presented that highlights how unfavorable redundancy patterns in some arrays restrict their performance.

Core claim

Array geometries with identical sum co-arrays can exhibit markedly different identifiability properties at low waveform rank because parameter identifiability at reduced waveform rank depends on subspace properties of the array redundancy pattern; a novel necessary condition shows that the unfavorable redundancy patterns of certain redundant arrays fundamentally limit their performance.

What carries the argument

The subspace properties of the array redundancy pattern that control whether identifiability is preserved when waveform rank is reduced.

If this is right

  • Identifiability at reduced WR depends on redundancy pattern subspaces rather than only the sum co-array.
  • Some arrays with identical sum co-arrays have different low-WR identifiability.
  • Maximizing identifiability at reduced WR requires satisfying a new necessary condition on the redundancy pattern.
  • The results motivate redundancy-aware design of arrays and waveforms for efficient sensing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Array design for MIMO systems may need to prioritize specific redundancy patterns to enable low-rank operation.
  • Waveform design could potentially be adapted to mitigate unfavorable redundancy in existing arrays.
  • Simulations comparing identifiability for arrays like nested arrays versus others at reduced WR could test the condition further.

Load-bearing premise

Parameter identifiability at reduced waveform rank is governed by the subspace properties of the array redundancy pattern.

What would settle it

Finding that an array with an unfavorable redundancy pattern still achieves full parameter identifiability at reduced waveform rank would contradict the impossibility claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2305.06478 by Piya Pal, Robin Rajam\"aki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Active sensing signal model. A linear Tx array with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: ULA and NA—two prototypical Tx-Rx array configuratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Minimum waveform rank yielding maximal identifiabil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Tx beampatterns in Examples 3 and 4 (ULA, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Efficient use of spatio-temporal resources, including sensor arrays and transmit waveforms, is a key challenge in modern MIMO active sensing systems. This paper studies the impact of array redundancy and waveform rank (WR) on active sensing performance. Specifically, we show that parameter identifiability at reduced WR critically depends on subspace properties of the so-called array redundancy pattern. We show that array geometries with identical sum co-arrays can exhibit markedly different identifiability properties at low WR. We derive a novel necessary condition for maximizing identifiability at reduced WR, which reveals that the unfavorable redundancy patterns of certain redundant arrays fundamentally limits their performance. The results yield new insights into resource-efficient sensing systems, motivating redundancy-aware array and waveform design.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper examines the effects of array redundancy and waveform rank (WR) on parameter identifiability in MIMO active sensing. It claims that identifiability at reduced WR depends critically on subspace properties of the array redundancy pattern rather than solely on the sum co-array. Geometries sharing identical sum co-arrays are shown to exhibit different identifiability at low WR. A novel necessary condition is derived for maximizing identifiability under WR reduction, indicating that unfavorable redundancy patterns in certain redundant arrays impose fundamental performance limits.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work offers useful insights for resource-efficient MIMO sensing by demonstrating that redundancy patterns affect identifiability beyond standard co-array properties. The emphasis on subspace properties and the necessary condition could guide redundancy-aware array and waveform design. The observation that identical co-arrays yield differing performance is a potentially valuable distinction if supported by the derivations.

minor comments (1)
  1. The title emphasizes 'impossibility of lossless waveform rank reduction,' but the abstract uses the milder phrasing 'fundamentally limits their performance'; clarifying this distinction in the introduction would improve consistency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for reviewing our manuscript and for their summary recognizing the potential insights into redundancy patterns and identifiability beyond standard co-array properties. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation grounded in standard subspace analysis

full rationale

The paper's central claim derives a necessary condition for identifiability at reduced waveform rank from subspace properties of the array redundancy pattern, as stated in the abstract. This follows directly from linear-algebraic properties of sum co-arrays without reduction to fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. Array geometries with identical co-arrays yielding different performance is presented as an observation from those properties, not a renaming or ansatz smuggled via prior work. No equations or steps in the provided text equate a prediction to its input by construction. The result is self-contained against external benchmarks of array signal processing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on standard linear-algebra definitions of sum co-arrays and subspace properties; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Parameter identifiability is determined by the dimension or rank of certain subspaces formed by the array manifold and waveform matrix.
    Invoked implicitly when linking redundancy pattern to identifiability at reduced WR.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5648 in / 1197 out tokens · 36497 ms · 2026-05-24T08:45:30.121413+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Radar taking off: New capabilities for UA Vs,

    P . H¨ ugler, F. Roos, M. Schartel, M. Geiger, and C. Waldsc hmidt, “Radar taking off: New capabilities for UA Vs,” IEEE Microwave Magazine , vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 43–53, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Jo int radar- communication strategies for autonomous vehicles: Combin ing two key automotive technologies,

    D. Ma, N. Shlezinger, T. Huang, Y . Liu, and Y . C. Eldar, “Jo int radar- communication strategies for autonomous vehicles: Combin ing two key automotive technologies,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 85–97, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Automotive r adars: A review of signal processing techniques,

    S. M. Patole, M. Torlak, D. Wang, and M. Ali, “Automotive r adars: A review of signal processing techniques,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 22–35, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    The rise of radar for autonomous vehicles: Signal processing solutions and futu re research directions,

    I. Bilik, O. Longman, S. Villeval, and J. Tabrikian, “The rise of radar for autonomous vehicles: Signal processing solutions and futu re research directions,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 20– 31, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    MIMO radar for adv anced driver-assistance systems and autonomous driving: Advant ages and challenges,

    S. Sun, A. P . Petropulu, and H. V . Poor, “MIMO radar for adv anced driver-assistance systems and autonomous driving: Advant ages and challenges,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 98– 117, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Automotive radar signal processing: Researc h directions and practical challenges,

    F. Engels, P . Heidenreich, M. Wintermantel, L. St¨ acker, M. Al Kadi, and A. M. Zoubir, “Automotive radar signal processing: Researc h directions and practical challenges,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 865–878, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    4D automotive radar sensing for au tonomous vehicles: A sparsity-oriented approach,

    S. Sun and Y . D. Zhang, “4D automotive radar sensing for au tonomous vehicles: A sparsity-oriented approach,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 879–891, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Survey of RF com muni- cations and sensing convergence research,

    B. Paul, A. R. Chiriyath, and D. W. Bliss, “Survey of RF com muni- cations and sensing convergence research,” IEEE Access , vol. 5, pp. 252–270, 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Toward millimeter-wave joint radar commun ications: A signal processing perspective,

    K. V . Mishra, M. Bhavani Shankar, V . Koivunen, B. Otterst en, and S. A. V orobyov, “Toward millimeter-wave joint radar commun ications: A signal processing perspective,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 100–114, 2019

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,

    J. A. Zhang, F. Liu, C. Masouros, R. W. Heath, Z. Feng, L. Z heng, and A. Petropulu, “An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1295–1315, 2021

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    A n information-theoretic approach to joint sensing and commu nication,

    M. Ahmadipour, M. Kobayashi, M. Wigger, and G. Caire, “A n information-theoretic approach to joint sensing and commu nication,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , pp. 1–1, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Levanon and E

    N. Levanon and E. Mozeson, Radar Signals. John Wiley & Sons, 2004

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    Pillai, K

    U. Pillai, K. Y . Li, I. Selesnick, and B. Himed, W aveform Diversity: Theory & Applications . McGraw-Hill Professional, 2011

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    F. Gini, A. D. Maio, and L. Patton, Eds., W aveform Design and Di- versity for Advanced Radar Systems , ser. Radar, Sonar and Navigation. Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2012

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    H. He, J. Li, and P . Stoica, W aveform Design for Active Sensing Systems: A Computational Approach . Cambridge University Press, 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Waveform div ersity in radar signal processing,

    R. Calderbank, S. D. Howard, and B. Moran, “Waveform div ersity in radar signal processing,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2009

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    Overview of radar waveform diversity,

    S. D. Blunt and E. L. Mokole, “Overview of radar waveform diversity,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine , vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2–42, 2016

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Spatial diversity in radars—models and detection p erformance,

    E. Fishler, A. Haimovich, R. Blum, L. Cimini, D. Chizhik , and R. V alen- zuela, “Spatial diversity in radars—models and detection p erformance,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 823–838, 2006

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Multiple-input multipl e-output (MIMO) radar and imaging: degrees of freedom and resolution ,

    D. W. Bliss and K. W. Forsythe, “Multiple-input multipl e-output (MIMO) radar and imaging: degrees of freedom and resolution ,” in 37th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers , vol. 1, 2003, pp. 54–59 V ol.1

    work page 2003

  20. [20]

    MIMO radar with colocated antennas ,

    J. Li and P . Stoica, “MIMO radar with colocated antennas ,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 106–114, Sept 2007. 13

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    The unifying role of the co array in aperture synthesis for coherent and incoherent imaging,

    R. T. Hoctor and S. A. Kassam, “The unifying role of the co array in aperture synthesis for coherent and incoherent imaging,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 735–752, Apr 1990

    work page 1990

  22. [22]

    Linear imaging with senso r arrays on convex polygonal boundaries,

    R. J. Kozick and S. A. Kassam, “Linear imaging with senso r arrays on convex polygonal boundaries,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics , vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1155–1166, Sep 1991

    work page 1991

  23. [23]

    Hybrid be amforming for active sensing using sparse arrays,

    R. Rajam¨ aki, S. P . Chepuri, and V . Koivunen, “Hybrid be amforming for active sensing using sparse arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 68, pp. 6402–6417, 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Transmit beamformin g for MIMO radar systems using signal cross-correlation,

    D. R. Fuhrmann and G. San Antonio, “Transmit beamformin g for MIMO radar systems using signal cross-correlation,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 171–186, 2008

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Phased-MIMO radar: A t radeoff between phased-array and MIMO radars,

    A. Hassanien and S. A. V orobyov, “Phased-MIMO radar: A t radeoff between phased-array and MIMO radars,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 3137–3151, 2010

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Time-divisi on beam- forming for MIMO radar waveform design,

    A. J. Duly, D. J. Love, and J. V . Krogmeier, “Time-divisi on beam- forming for MIMO radar waveform design,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 1210–1223, 2013

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    To- ward dual-functional radar-communication systems: Optim al waveform design,

    F. Liu, L. Zhou, C. Masouros, A. Li, W. Luo, and A. Petropu lu, “To- ward dual-functional radar-communication systems: Optim al waveform design,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 66, no. 16, pp. 4264–4279, 2018

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Joint transmit beamforming for multiuser MIMO communicat ions and MIMO radar,

    X. Liu, T. Huang, N. Shlezinger, Y . Liu, J. Zhou, and Y . C. Eldar, “Joint transmit beamforming for multiuser MIMO communicat ions and MIMO radar,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 68, pp. 3929–3944, 2020

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Further results on th e Cram´ er–Rao bound for sparse linear arrays,

    M. Wang, Z. Zhang, and A. Nehorai, “Further results on th e Cram´ er–Rao bound for sparse linear arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1493–1507, 2019

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Super-resolution with sparse arrays: A non-asymptotic an alysis of spatio-temporal trade-offs,

    P . Sarangi, M. C. H¨ uc¨ umeno˘ glu, R. Rajam¨ aki, and P . P al, “Super-resolution with sparse arrays: A non-asymptotic an alysis of spatio-temporal trade-offs,” 2023. [Online]. Availabl e: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01734

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    A bandwidth efficient dual-func tion radar communication system based on a MIMO radar using OFDM wave- forms,

    Z. Xu and A. Petropulu, “A bandwidth efficient dual-func tion radar communication system based on a MIMO radar using OFDM wave- forms,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 71, pp. 401–416, 2023

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    On the number of signals res olvable by a uniform linear array,

    Y . Bresler and A. Macovski, “On the number of signals res olvable by a uniform linear array,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1361–1375, 1986

    work page 1986

  33. [33]

    On unique localization of multip le sources by passive sensor arrays,

    M. Wax and I. Ziskind, “On unique localization of multip le sources by passive sensor arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 996–1000, 1989

    work page 1989

  34. [34]

    Direction-of-ar rival estimation in applications with multipath and few snapshots,

    A. Nehorai, D. Starer, and P . Stoica, “Direction-of-ar rival estimation in applications with multipath and few snapshots,” Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 327–342, 1991

    work page 1991

  35. [35]

    Resolving manifold ambiguities in direction-of-arrival estimation for nonun iform linear antenna arrays,

    Y . Abramovich, N. Spencer, and A. Gorokhov, “Resolving manifold ambiguities in direction-of-arrival estimation for nonun iform linear antenna arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 2629–2643, 1999

    work page 1999

  36. [36]

    On parameter ide ntifiability of MIMO radar,

    J. Li, P . Stoica, L. Xu, and W. Roberts, “On parameter ide ntifiability of MIMO radar,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters , vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 968–971, 2007

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    On parameter ident ifiability of MIMO radar with waveform diversity,

    H. Wang, G. Liao, Y . Wang, and X. Liu, “On parameter ident ifiability of MIMO radar with waveform diversity,” Signal Processing , vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 2057–2063, 2011

    work page 2057

  38. [38]

    Direction o f arrival estimation in MIMO radar systems with nonlinear reflectors,

    G. Shulkind, G. W. Wornell, and Y . Kochman, “Direction o f arrival estimation in MIMO radar systems with nonlinear reflectors, ” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal P rocessing (ICASSP), 2016, pp. 3016–3020

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    Parameter identifia bility of space- time MIMO radar,

    Z. Hu, J. Peng, K. Luo, and T. Jiang, “Parameter identifia bility of space- time MIMO radar,” Digital Signal Processing, vol. 90, pp. 10–17, 2019

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    On parameter identifiabilit y of diversity- smoothing-based MIMO radar,

    J. Shi, Z. Y ang, and Y . Liu, “On parameter identifiabilit y of diversity- smoothing-based MIMO radar,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1660–1675, 2022

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Three-way arrays: rank and uniqueness o f trilinear de- compositions, with application to arithmetic complexity a nd statistics,

    J. B. Kruskal, “Three-way arrays: rank and uniqueness o f trilinear de- compositions, with application to arithmetic complexity a nd statistics,” Linear Algebra and its Applications , vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 95–138, 1977

    work page 1977

  42. [42]

    Optimally sparse representat ion in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization,

    D. L. Donoho and M. Elad, “Optimally sparse representat ion in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 2197–2202, 2003

    work page 2003

  43. [43]

    Pushing the limits of spa rse support recovery using correlation information,

    P . Pal and P . P . V aidyanathan, “Pushing the limits of spa rse support recovery using correlation information,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 711–726, Feb 2015

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Target detection and lo calization using MIMO radars and sonars,

    I. Bekkerman and J. Tabrikian, “Target detection and lo calization using MIMO radars and sonars,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 3873–3883, 2006

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    On signal models for MIMO radar,

    B. Friedlander, “On signal models for MIMO radar,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 3655–3660, 2012

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    Hadamard, Khatri-Rao, Kroneck er and other matrix products,

    S. Liu and G. Trenkler, “Hadamard, Khatri-Rao, Kroneck er and other matrix products,” International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 160–177, 2008

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    On probing signal design fo r MIMO radar,

    P . Stoica, J. Li, and Y . Xie, “On probing signal design fo r MIMO radar,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 4151–4161, 2007

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    Skolnik, Introduction to radar systems , 2nd ed

    M. Skolnik, Introduction to radar systems , 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1981

    work page 1981

  49. [49]

    Signal covariance matr ix optimization for transmit beamforming in MIMO radars,

    T. Aittom¨ aki and V . Koivunen, “Signal covariance matr ix optimization for transmit beamforming in MIMO radars,” in F orty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers , 2007, pp. 182–186

    work page 2007

  50. [50]

    Sign aling strategies for the hybrid MIMO phased-array radar,

    D. R. Fuhrmann, J. P . Browning, and M. Rangaswamy, “Sign aling strategies for the hybrid MIMO phased-array radar,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 66–78, 2010

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    Coarrays, MUSIC, and the Cram´ e r-Rao bound,

    M. Wang and A. Nehorai, “Coarrays, MUSIC, and the Cram´ e r-Rao bound,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 933–946, Feb 2017

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Tao and V

    T. Tao and V . H. Vu, Additive Combinatorics , ser. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2006

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    MIMO radar space–ti me adaptive processing using prolate spheroidal wave functions,

    C.-Y . Chen and P . P . V aidyanathan, “MIMO radar space–ti me adaptive processing using prolate spheroidal wave functions,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 623–635, 2008

    work page 2008

  54. [54]

    Towards a mathe matical theory of super-resolution,

    E. J. Cand` es and C. Fernandez-Granda, “Towards a mathe matical theory of super-resolution,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 906–956, 2014

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    Superresolution via sparsity constrain ts,

    D. L. Donoho, “Superresolution via sparsity constrain ts,” SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1309–1331, 1992

    work page 1992

  56. [56]

    Tse and P

    D. Tse and P . Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication . Cambridge University Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  57. [57]

    Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems,

    E. G. Larsson, O. Edfors, F. Tufvesson, and T. L. Marzett a, “Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 186–195, 2014

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Robustness of differ ence coarrays of sparse arrays to sensor failures—Part I: A theory motivated by coarray MUSIC,

    C.-L. Liu and P . P . V aidyanathan, “Robustness of differ ence coarrays of sparse arrays to sensor failures—Part I: A theory motivated by coarray MUSIC,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 3213–3226, 2019

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Dual-function MI MO radar communications system design via sparse array optimizatio n,

    X. Wang, A. Hassanien, and M. G. Amin, “Dual-function MI MO radar communications system design via sparse array optimizatio n,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1213–1226, 2019

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Adaptive and fas t com- bined waveform-beamforming design for mmwave automotive j oint communication-radar,

    P . Kumari, N. J. Myers, and R. W. Heath, “Adaptive and fas t com- bined waveform-beamforming design for mmwave automotive j oint communication-radar,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Pro- cessing, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 996–1012, 2021

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Jafarkhani, Space-Time Coding: Theory and Practice

    H. Jafarkhani, Space-Time Coding: Theory and Practice . Cambridge University Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  62. [62]

    Stoica and R

    P . Stoica and R. L. Moses, Spectral analysis of signals . Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2005

    work page 2005