pith. sign in

arxiv: 1502.01114 · v3 · pith:SSM6CY5Knew · submitted 2015-02-04 · 🧮 math-ph · math.MP

Region-of-Interest reconstruction from truncated cone-beam projections

classification 🧮 math-ph math.MP
keywords projectionsreconstructionacquisitioncone-beamepsilononlyregionroi-truncated
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Region-of-Interest (ROI) tomography aims at reconstructing a region of interest $C$ inside a body using only x-ray projections intersecting $C$ with the goal to reduce overall radiation exposure when only a small specific region of the body needs to be examined. We consider x-ray acquisition from sources located on a smooth curve $\Gamma$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$ verifying classical Tuy's condition. In this situation, the {\it non-trucated} cone-beam transform $D f$ of smooth densities $f$ admits an explicit inverse $Z$; however $Z$ cannot directly reconstruct $f$ from ROI-truncated projections. To deal with the ROI tomography problem, we introduce a novel reconstruction approach. For densities $f$ in $L^{\infty}(B)$ where $B$ is a bounded ball in $\mathbb{R}^3$, our method iterates an operator $U$ combining ROI-truncated projections, inversion by the operator $Z$ and appropriate regularization operators. Assuming only knowledge of projections corresponding to a spherical ROI $C \subset B$, given $\epsilon >0$, we prove that if $C$ is sufficiently large our iterative reconstruction algorithm converges uniformly to an $\epsilon$-accurate approximation of $f$, where the accuracy depends on the regularity of $f$ quantified in the Sobolev norm $W^5(B)$. This result shows the existence of a critical ROI radius ensuring the convergence of the ROI reconstruction algorithm to $\epsilon$-accurate approximations of $f$. We numerically verified these theoretical results using simulated acquisition of ROI-truncated cone-beam projection data for multiple acquisition geometries. Numerical experiments indicate that the critical ROI radius is fairly small with respect to the support region~$B$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.