Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimal Closeness Testing of Discrete Distributions Made (Complex) Simple

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.12640 v1 pith:STU3QJAS submitted 2022-04-27 cs.DS cs.DMmath.PRmath.STstat.TH

classification cs.DScs.DMmath.PRmath.STstat.TH
keywords argumentfracmathbbrandomtestingabsoluteadditionalalternative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this note, we revisit the recent work of Diakonikolas, Gouleakis, Kane, Peebles, and Price (2021), and provide an alternative proof of their main result. Our argument does not rely on any specific property of Poisson random variables (such as stability and divisibility) nor on any "clever trick," but instead on an identity relating the expectation of the absolute value of any random variable to the integral of its characteristic function: \[ \mathbb{E}[|X|] = \frac{2}{\pi}\int_0^\infty \frac{1-\Re(\mathbb{E}[e^{i tX}])}{t^2}\, dt \] Our argument, while not devoid of technical aspects, is arguably conceptually simpler and more general; and we hope this technique can find additional applications in distribution testing.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Sharp Minimax Rates for Smooth Two-Sample Testing under Central Differential Privacy

    math.ST 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under central differential privacy, the sharp L1 separation radius for two-sample testing of Hölder-smooth densities is the maximum of the classical rate and three privacy barriers, and adapting to unknown smoothness ...

Pith tools