Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Human-in-the-loop: Towards Label Embeddings for Measuring Classification Difficulty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08874 v2 pith:STYVVI3T submitted 2023-11-15 cs.LG stat.APstat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.APstat.ML
keywords labelannotationannotationsapproachclassificationdatasetsembeddingsground
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Uncertainty in machine learning models is a timely and vast field of research. In supervised learning, uncertainty can already occur in the first stage of the training process, the annotation phase. This scenario is particularly evident when some instances cannot be definitively classified. In other words, there is inevitable ambiguity in the annotation step and hence, not necessarily a "ground truth" associated with each instance. The main idea of this work is to drop the assumption of a ground truth label and instead embed the annotations into a multidimensional space. This embedding is derived from the empirical distribution of annotations in a Bayesian setup, modeled via a Dirichlet-Multinomial framework. We estimate the model parameters and posteriors using a stochastic Expectation Maximization algorithm with Markov Chain Monte Carlo steps. The methods developed in this paper readily extend to various situations where multiple annotators independently label instances. To showcase the generality of the proposed approach, we apply our approach to three benchmark datasets for image classification and Natural Language Inference. Besides the embeddings, we can investigate the resulting correlation matrices, which reflect the semantic similarities of the original classes very well for all three exemplary datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Revisiting Active Learning under (Human) Label Variation

    cs.CL 2025-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper that surveys and systematizes how active learning should change when human label variation is treated as a signal rather than noise.

Pith tools