pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29380 · v1 · pith:SUMSPBPQnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · ✦ hep-ph

λ, rho, and σ Regge trajectories for the hexaquark {(bar{u}(cc))(b(bar{b}bar{b}))} in the triquark-antitriquark picture

Xin-Ru Liu , Qi Liu , Jiao-Kai Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 02:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords hexaquarkRegge trajectorytriquarkdiquarkexotic hadronheavy quark
0
0 comments X

The pith

Regge trajectories for the hexaquark (ū(cc))(b(b̄b̄)) in the triquark-antitriquark picture must incorporate internal substructure to derive the ρ and σ series.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives new Regge trajectory relations for this hexaquark by combining existing relations for its diquark and triquark subcomponents. It examines five series of trajectories and shows that only the simplest λ1 series can be built by analogy to ordinary mesons; the ρ1, ρ2, σ1, and σ2 series require explicit use of the hexaquark's layered structure. A reader would care because the relations supply mass estimates for excited states without needing separate fits to data or experiment. The work underscores that composite objects with substructure produce trajectory families that cannot be read off from simpler hadrons.

Core claim

We propose Regge trajectory relations for the hexaquark (ū(cc))(b(b̄b̄)) by using the Regge trajectory relations for diquarks and triquarks. With these newly derived relations, we investigate five series of hexaquark Regge trajectories: the λ-, ρ1-, ρ2-, σ1-, and σ2-trajectories. Apart from the simplest λ1-trajectories, the ρ1-, ρ2-, σ1-, and σ2-trajectories cannot be constructed by merely mimicking the meson Regge trajectories. The ρ1-, ρ2-, σ1-, and σ2-trajectories for the hexaquark do not correspond respectively to the Regge trajectories for the triquark, antitriquark, diquark, and antidiquark, but their behaviors match those of the Regge trajectories for the triquark (ū(cc)), the antitri

What carries the argument

The combined Regge trajectory relations obtained by linking the triquark (ū(cc)), antitriquark (b(b̄b̄)), diquark (cc), and antidiquark (b̄b̄) relations to describe the full hexaquark.

If this is right

  • The ρ1-trajectory behaves like the triquark (ū(cc)) trajectory.
  • The ρ2-trajectory behaves like the antitriquark (b(b̄b̄)) trajectory.
  • The σ1-trajectory behaves like the diquark (cc) trajectory.
  • The σ2-trajectory behaves like the antidiquark (b̄b̄) trajectory.
  • Mass estimates become available for excited hexaquark states along all five series.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same substructure-based combination could be tested on other tetraquark or pentaquark candidates that have identifiable diquark or triquark pieces.
  • Direct experimental searches for the predicted excited states would provide a concrete check on whether the no-extra-correction assumption holds.
  • If the relations work, they offer a parameter-light way to organize the spectrum of heavy exotic hadrons without new global fits.

Load-bearing premise

The hexaquark exists as a bound triquark-antitriquark state whose Regge relations are obtained by direct combination of the subcomponent relations without extra interaction corrections.

What would settle it

Measured masses of excited states on the ρ1, ρ2, σ1, or σ2 trajectories that deviate systematically from the slopes or intercepts predicted by the combined subcomponent relations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29380 by Jiao-Kai Chen, Qi Liu, Xin-Ru Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic diagram of a hexaquark in the triquark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Fitted curves for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose Regge trajectory relations for the hexaquark ${(\bar{u}(cc))(b(\bar{b}\bar{b}))}$ by using the Regge trajectory relations for diquarks and triquarks. With these newly derived relations, we investigate five series of hexaquark Regge trajectories: the $\lambda$-, $\rho_1$-, $\rho_2$-, $\sigma_1$-, and $\sigma_2$-trajectories. We demonstrate that, apart from the simplest $\lambda_1$-trajectories, the $\rho_1$-, $\rho_2$-, $\sigma_1$-, and $\sigma_2$-trajectories cannot be constructed by merely mimicking the meson Regge trajectories, since mesons possess no internal substructures. To derive these trajectories, one must account for the structure and internal substructure of hexaquark. Without this structural information, the $\rho_1$-, $\rho_2$-, $\sigma_1$-, and $\sigma_2$-trajectories could only be obtained through direct fits to available theoretical predictions or future experimental data. We demonstrate that the $\rho_1$-, $\rho_2$-, $\sigma_1$-, and $\sigma_2$-trajectories for the hexaquark do not correspond respectively to the Regge trajectories for the triquark, antitriquark, diquark, and antidiquark. Nevertheless, their behaviors match those of the Regge trajectories for the triquark $(\bar{u}(cc))$, the antitriquark $(b(\bar{b}\bar{b}))$, the diquark $(cc)$, and the antidiquark $(\bar{b}\bar{b})$, in that respective order. Furthermore, we present rough mass estimates for the excited states corresponding to the $\lambda$-, $\rho_1$-, $\rho_2$-, $\sigma_1$-, and $\sigma_2$-trajectories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Regge trajectory relations for the hexaquark (ar{u}(cc))(b(ar{b}ar{b})) by combining previously derived relations for its diquark (cc), antidiquark (ar{b}ar{b}), triquark (ar{u}(cc)), and antitriquark (b(ar{b}ar{b})) subcomponents. It constructs five series of trajectories (λ-, ρ1-, ρ2-, σ1-, and σ2-trajectories), demonstrates that the latter four cannot be obtained by mimicking meson trajectories (due to mesons lacking internal substructure) and must instead incorporate the hexaquark's substructure, shows that these trajectories match the behaviors of the respective subcomponent trajectories, and provides rough mass estimates for the corresponding excited states.

Significance. If the proposed superposition holds, the work supplies an explicit framework for extending Regge phenomenology to hexaquarks while emphasizing that internal substructure must be retained for non-λ trajectories. This could aid in organizing theoretical predictions and guiding experimental searches for multiquark states. The demonstration that direct meson analogy fails for most series is a clear conceptual contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [section deriving the ρ- and σ-trajectories] The central construction (derivation of the ρ1-, ρ2-, σ1-, and σ2-trajectories) combines subcomponent Regge relations by direct (additive or averaged) superposition. No explicit argument or calculation is supplied showing that the color-singlet binding potential between the triquark and antitriquark clusters, or the overall six-quark color wave function, generates no additional corrections to the slope and intercept in the Regge limit.
  2. [section presenting rough mass estimates] The rough mass estimates for excited states along all five trajectories are obtained from the same fitted Regge slopes and intercepts of the subcomponents. This makes the estimates dependent on those prior fits rather than independent predictions and weakens the claim that the new relations enable direct construction without external data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [introduction] The distinction between the λ1-trajectories and other λ-trajectories is stated in the abstract but would benefit from an explicit definition of the indexing when first introduced in the main text.
  2. Notation for the combined parameters (e.g., how the intercept of the hexaquark ρ1-trajectory is obtained from the triquark and antitriquark intercepts) could be written out explicitly rather than left implicit in the combination step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [section deriving the ρ- and σ-trajectories] The central construction (derivation of the ρ1-, ρ2-, σ1-, and σ2-trajectories) combines subcomponent Regge relations by direct (additive or averaged) superposition. No explicit argument or calculation is supplied showing that the color-singlet binding potential between the triquark and antitriquark clusters, or the overall six-quark color wave function, generates no additional corrections to the slope and intercept in the Regge limit.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the derivation proceeds via phenomenological superposition of the subcomponent trajectories and does not include an explicit calculation demonstrating the absence of corrections from the inter-cluster binding potential or six-quark color structure. This assumption is motivated by the expectation that, in the Regge limit, the trajectory parameters are dominated by the internal dynamics of the clusters, analogous to treatments of baryons as quark-diquark systems. We will revise the manuscript to add an explicit discussion of this assumption, its phenomenological justification, and the associated limitations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [section presenting rough mass estimates] The rough mass estimates for excited states along all five trajectories are obtained from the same fitted Regge slopes and intercepts of the subcomponents. This makes the estimates dependent on those prior fits rather than independent predictions and weakens the claim that the new relations enable direct construction without external data.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the numerical estimates rely on the fitted parameters of the subcomponent trajectories. The central claim of the work, however, is that the new relations permit construction of the hexaquark trajectories from subcomponent information rather than requiring direct fits to (presently unavailable) hexaquark-specific data or predictions. We will revise the relevant sections to clarify this distinction and to state explicitly that the estimates remain dependent on lower-level fits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; hexaquark trajectories derived as independent extension from subcomponent relations

full rationale

The paper proposes new Regge trajectory relations for the hexaquark by combining established relations for its diquark and triquark subcomponents, explicitly distinguishing the resulting λ-, ρ-, and σ-trajectories from simple meson mimics due to internal structure. This constitutes a self-contained construction with independent content rather than any reduction of outputs to inputs by definition, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains. Rough mass estimates are presented without being framed as first-principles predictions, and no quoted equations or steps exhibit the specific reductions required to flag circularity under the enumerated patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central construction rests on the triquark-antitriquark clustering picture and on the transferability of already-derived Regge relations for diquarks and triquarks; both are domain assumptions without new independent evidence supplied here.

free parameters (1)
  • Regge slopes and intercepts for subcomponents
    The diquark and triquark relations used as input are known to involve parameters fitted to data or models in the cited literature.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The hexaquark can be treated as a bound state of the triquark (ū(cc)) and antitriquark (b(b̄b̄))
    This clustering picture is adopted as the modeling framework for deriving the new trajectories.
  • domain assumption Regge trajectory relations for diquarks and triquarks extend directly to the composite hexaquark
    Invoked when the λ, ρ, and σ relations are proposed from the subcomponent relations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5919 in / 1354 out tokens · 50515 ms · 2026-06-30T02:32:58.650895+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · 29 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The diquark ( q2q3) is either {q2q3} or [ q2q3], where {q2q3} and [ q2q3] represent the permutation symmetric and antisymmetric flavor wave functions, respectively

    can be abbreviated as |n2s1+1 1 l1j1 , n 2s2+1 2 l2j2, n 2s3+1 3 l3j3 , n 2s4+1 4 l4j4 , N 2S+1LJ ⟩. The diquark ( q2q3) is either {q2q3} or [ q2q3], where {q2q3} and [ q2q3] represent the permutation symmetric and antisymmetric flavor wave functions, respectively. N = Nr + 1, where Nr = 0, 1, · · ·. n1, 2, 3, 4 = nr1, 2, 3, 4 + 1, where nr1, 2, 3, 4 = 0, ...

  2. [2]

    The other reads M = mR + √ β 2x(x + c0x) + κ xm3/ 2 2 (x + c0x)1/ 4 (17) for m2≪ M , where mR = m1 + C′, κ x = 4 3 √ πβ x, (18) where βx is given in ( 10)

    with mR given in ( 10), where m2 is the light constituent’s mass. The other reads M = mR + √ β 2x(x + c0x) + κ xm3/ 2 2 (x + c0x)1/ 4 (17) for m2≪ M , where mR = m1 + C′, κ x = 4 3 √ πβ x, (18) where βx is given in ( 10). Equation ( 14) with ( 10) ex- tends the formula M = m1 + m2 + √ a(nr + αl + b) (19) from Ref. [ 46] and the formula (M − m1 − m2 − C)2 ...

  3. [3]

    Although they give different behavior of m2, Eq

    with ( 16). Although they give different behavior of m2, Eq. ( 14) with ( 10) and Eq. ( 17) with ( 18) produce consistent re- sults for l, n r < 10 and have the same behavior M ∼ x1/ 2 [94]. TABLE I: The coefficients for heavy-heavy systems (HHS) and heavy-light systems (HLS). HHS HLS ν 2/ 3 1 / 2 cc ( σ ′2/µ ) 1/ 3 √ σ ′ cl,L 3/ 2 2 cnr ,N r (3π )2/ 3/ 2 √ ...

  4. [4]

    According to Eqs

    and (23), which can be employed to crudely estimate masses of hexaquark (¯u(cc))(b(¯b¯b)). According to Eqs. ( 22) and ( 23), we have M = Mt1 + Mt2 + C + βxλ (xλ + c0xλ )2/ 3 (24) when the triquark and antitriquark are regarded as con- stituents and the structures of the triquark and antitri- quark are not considered. Correspondingly, we have the binding ...

  5. [5]

    Specifically, |n1l1, n 2l2, n 2s3+1 3 l3j3 , n 2s4+1 4 l4j4 , N L ⟩ represents the spin-averaged states

    is rewritten as |n2s1 +1 1 l1j1 , n 2s2 +1 2 l2j2 , n 2s3 +1 3 l3j3 , n 2s4 +1 4 l4j4 , N 2S+1LJ ⟩. Specifically, |n1l1, n 2l2, n 2s3+1 3 l3j3 , n 2s4+1 4 l4j4 , N L ⟩ represents the spin-averaged states. Eqs. ( 22) and ( 23) or Eqs. ( 25) and ( 23) are used in the calculation. |n1l1, n 2l2, n 2s3 +1 3 l3j3 , n 2s4+1 4 l4j4 , N L ⟩ Mass |1s, 1s, 13s1, 13s1...

  6. [6]

    141µ λ , cf Nr = 1

    540 − 0. 141µ λ , cf Nr = 1 . 008 + 0 . 008µ λ , and c0Nr = 0 . 334 −

  7. [7]

    In the present work, we correct this and introduce m0 into Eq

    087µ λ . In the present work, we correct this and introduce m0 into Eq. ( 30). 6 17.6 17.8 18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2 0 1 2 3 4 λ Nr M (GeV) (a) 17.6 17.8 18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2 0 1 2 3 4 λ L M (GeV) (b) FIG. 2: The λ -trajectories for the hexaquark (¯ u(cc))(b(¯b¯b)). Nr and L are the radial and orbital quantum numbers for the λ -mode, respec...

  8. [8]

    292339 (

    246694 + nr1 + 0. 292339 (

  9. [9]

    25273 (3

    334 − 1. 25273 (3. 29958 + 0. 741618√ 0. 246694 + nr1)

  10. [10]

    741618√ 0

    6988 + 0. 741618√ 0. 246694 + nr1 ) 2/ 3 × (

  11. [11]

    115194 (3

    008 + 0. 115194 (3. 29958 + 0. 741618√ 0. 246694 + nr1)

  12. [12]

    741618√ 0

    6988 + 0. 741618√ 0. 246694 + nr1 ) ( 3. 29958 + 0. 741618√ 0. 246694 + nr1

  13. [13]

    741618√ 0

    6988 + 0. 741618√ 0. 246694 + nr1 ) − 1/ 3 . (31) By fitting the data calculated from the complete form of the ρ1-trajectory [Eq. ( 31)], we obtain a simple fitted formula (listed in Table IV) M = 17. 521 + 0. 700 √

  14. [14]

    (32) 7 TABLE V: Same as Table III except for the ρ1- and ρ2-excited states

    236 + nr1 . (32) 7 TABLE V: Same as Table III except for the ρ1- and ρ2-excited states. |n1l1, n 2l2, n 2s3 +1 3 l3j3 , n 2s4 +1 4 l4j4 , N L ⟩ Mass |n1l1, n 2l2, n 2s3 +1 3 l3j3 , n 2s4+1 4 l4j4 , N L ⟩ Mass |1s, 1s, 13s1, 13s1, 1S⟩ 17.86 |1s, 1s, 13s1, 13s1, 1S⟩ 17.86 |2s, 1s, 13s1, 13s1, 1S⟩ 18.30 |1s, 2s, 13s1, 13s1, 1S⟩ 18.14 |3s, 1s, 13s1, 13s1, 1S⟩...

  15. [15]

    (33) Comparing Eqs

    246694 + nr1. (33) Comparing Eqs. ( 31) and ( 33) reveals that the radial ρ1-trajectory [( 31)] for the hexaquark (¯ u(cc))(b(¯b¯b)) is distinct from the radial triquark (¯ u(cc)) Regge trajec- tory. Nevertheless, both have the same Regge trajectory behavior, M ∼ √ nr1, see Eqs. ( 31), ( 32), and ( 33). Using Eq. ( 31), masses of the radially ρ1-excited s...

  16. [16]

    is applied to fit the Regge trajectories for heavy-light mesons and the λ-modes of doubly heavy baryons, which are composed of one doubly heavy diquark and one light quark. The quality of a fit 9 is measured by the quantity χ 2, defined as χ 2 = 1 N − 1 N∑ i=1 ( Mf i − Mei Mei ) 2 , (A1) where N is the number of points on a trajectory, Mf i stands for the fit...

  17. [17]

    95 GeV, respectively

    63 GeV, and 9 . 95 GeV, respectively. The masses of diquarks ( QQ′) ( Q, Q ′ = b, c ) are taken from Ref. [ 72]; these diquark masses can be calculated using the param- eters in Table II along with Eqs. ( 22) and ( 23). Using Eq. ( 21) with σ ′ = C, the coefficients for heavy- light systems given in Table I, Eq. ( A1), and data listed in Tables VII and VIII...

  18. [18]

    2835 mB m0 +0

    4115 − 0. 2835 mB m0 +0. 03927 ( mB m0 ) 2 − 0. 00192 ( mB m0 ) 3) . (A3) By fitting the scaled function ˜c0Nr , we have ˜c0Nr = − 3. 2445 + 3. 3231 mB m0 − 1. 0442 ( mB m0 ) 2 + 0. 1333 ( mB m0 ) 3 − 0. 005737 ( mB m0 ) 4 , (A4) where ˜c0Nr = c0Nr mB(mc + mu)− 1. Then, we have c0Nr = mc + mu mB ( − 3. 2445 + 3. 3231 mB m0 − 1. 0442 ( mB m0 ) 2 + 0. 1333 (...

  19. [19]

    3188 mB m0 +0

    4697 − 0. 3188 mB m0 +0. 04506 ( mB m0 ) 2 − 0. 002205 ( mB m0 ) 3) . (A7) Fitting the scaled function ˜c0L gives ˜c0L = − 5. 1878 + 5. 2976 mB m0 − 1. 6633 ( mB m0 ) 2 + 0. 2127 ( mB m0 ) 3 − 0. 009171 ( mB m0 ) 4 , (A8) where ˜c0L = c0LmB(mc + mu)− 1. Then, we have c0L = mc + mu mB ( − 5. 1878 + 5. 2976 mB m0 − 1. 6633 ( mB m0 ) 2 +0. 2127 ( mB m0 ) 3 −...

  20. [20]

    Dyson and N

    F. Dyson and N. H. Xuong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, no.26, 815-817 (1964) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.815

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.815 1964

  21. [21]

    R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 195-198 (1977) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 617 (1977)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.195

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.195 1977

  22. [22]

    Double-Pionic Fusion of Nuclear Systems and the ABCEffect -- Aproaching a Puzzle by Exclusive and Kinematically Complete Measurements

    M. Bashkanov, C. Bargholtz, M. Berlowski, D. Bo- goslawsky, H. Calen, H. Clement, L. Demiroers, E. Doroshkevich, D. Duniec and C. Ekstrom, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 052301 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.052301 [arXiv:0806.4942 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.052301 2009

  23. [23]

    ABC Effect in Basic Double-Pionic Fusion --- Observation of a new resonance?

    P. Adlarson et al. [W ASA-at-COSY], Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 242302 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.242302 [arXiv:1104.0123 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.242302 2011

  24. [24]

    Evidence for a New Resonance from Polarized Neutron-Proton Scattering

    P. Adlarson et al. [W ASA-at-COSY], Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, no.20, 202301 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.202301 [arXiv:1402.6844 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.202301 2014

  25. [25]

    Measurement of the $np \to np\pi^0\pi^0$ Reaction in Search for the Recently Observed $d^*(2380)$ Resonance

    P. Adlarson et al. [W ASA-at-COSY], Phys. Lett. B 743, 325-332 (2015) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.067 [arXiv:1409.2659 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.067 2015

  26. [26]

    Bashkanov et al

    M. Bashkanov et al. [A2], Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, no.13, 132001 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.132001 [arXiv:1911.08309 [nucl-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.132001 2020

  27. [27]

    C. K. Chow, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6327-6331 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.6327 [arXiv:hep-ph/9412242 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.6327 1995

  28. [28]

    Quark States near a Threshold and the Unstable H-dibaryon

    S. Bashinsky and R. L. Jaffe, Nucl. Phys. A 625, 167-191 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(97)81459- 5 [arXiv:hep-ph/9705407 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(97)81459- 1997

  29. [29]

    Is $d^*$ a candidate of hexaquark-dominated exotic state?

    F. Huang, Z. Y. Zhang, P. N. Shen and W. L. Wang, Chin. Phys. C 39, no.7, 071001 (2015) doi:10.1088/1674-1137/39/7/071001 [arXiv:1408.0458 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1674-1137/39/7/071001 2015

  30. [30]

    S. A. Yost and C. R. Nappi, Phys. Rev. D 32, 816 (1985) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.32.816

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.32.816 1985

  31. [31]

    G. R. Farrar and N. Wintergerst, JHEP 12, 099 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)099 [arXiv:2310.05194 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)099 2023

  32. [32]

    M. Abud, F. Buccella and F. Tramontano, Phys. Rev. D 81, 074018 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.074018 [arXiv:0912.4299 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.074018 2010

  33. [33]

    J. Z. Bai et al. [BES], Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 022001 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.022001 [arXiv:hep- ex/0303006 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.022001 2003

  34. [34]

    Gabyshev et al

    N. Gabyshev et al. [Belle], Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 242001 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.242001 [arXiv:hep- ex/0409005 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.242001 2006

  35. [35]

    Observation of a near-threshold enhancement in the e+e- -->Lambda_c+Lambda_c- cross section using initial-state radiation

    G. Pakhlova et al. [Belle], Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 172001 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.172001 [arXiv:0807.4458 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.172001 2008

  36. [36]

    B. D. Wan, L. Tang and C. F. Qiao, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, no.2, 121 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7701- 8 [arXiv:1912.12046 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7701- 2020

  37. [37]

    J. B. Cheng, D. x. Zheng, Z. Y. Lin and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 107, no.5, 054018 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054018 [arXiv:2211.05050 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.054018 2023

  38. [38]

    Z. G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no.9, 642 (2017) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5207-9 [arXiv:1707.09767 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5207-9 2017

  39. [39]

    Azizi, S

    K. Azizi, S. S. Agaev and H. Sundu, J. Phys. G 47, no.9, 095001 (2020) doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab9a0e [arXiv:1904.09913 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab9a0e 2020

  40. [40]

    H. Kim, K. S. Kim and M. Oka, Phys. Rev. D 102, no.7, 074023 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.074023 [arXiv:2009.11983 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.074023 2020

  41. [41]

    Z. G. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, no.6, 065201 (2021) doi:10.1088/1572-9494/abee0d 11 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 mB (GeV) ˜cf Nr (a) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 2 4 6 8 10 12 mB (GeV) ˜c0Nr (b) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 mB (GeV) ˜cf L (c) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 2 4 6 8 10 12 mB (GeV) ˜c0L (d) FIG. 5: Fitted curves fo...

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/abee0d 2021

  42. [42]

    M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 98, no.3, 034017 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.034017 [arXiv:1805.10584 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.034017 2018

  43. [43]

    J. M. Dias, V. R. Debastiani, L. Roca, S. Sakai and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 96, no.9, 094007 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.094007 [arXiv:1709.01372 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.094007 2017

  44. [44]

    T. W. Wu, Y. W. Pan, M. Z. Liu, S. Q. Luo, L. S. Geng and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 105, no.3, L031505 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L031505 [arXiv:2108.00923 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.l031505 2022

  45. [45]

    H. Liu, J. He, L. Liu, P. Sun, W. Wang, Y. B. Yang and Q. A. Zhang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, no.1, 211011 (2024) doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2205-0 [arXiv:2207.00183 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2205-0 2024

  46. [46]

    X. H. Zhang, S. Q. Zhang and C. F. Qiao, Phys. Rev. D 113, no.3, 3 (2026) doi:10.1103/csnt-5mkc [arXiv:2509.20711 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/csnt-5mkc 2026

  47. [47]

    Q. F. L¨ u, D. Y. Chen and Y. B. Dong, [arXiv:2208.03041 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    M. Pan, X. Zhu and J. Ping, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, no.7, 645 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11814-2 [arXiv:2301.03483 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11814-2 2023

  49. [49]

    Pepin and F

    S. Pepin and F. Stancu, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4475- 4478 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.4475 [arXiv:hep- ph/9710528 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.4475 1998

  50. [50]

    M. C. Gordillo, [arXiv:2604.18174 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Regge, Nuovo Cim

    T. Regge, Nuovo Cim. 14, 951 (1959) doi:10.1007/BF02728177

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02728177 1959

  52. [52]

    G. F. Chew and S. C. Frautschi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 41-44 (1962) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.8.41

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.8.41 1962

  53. [53]

    P. D. B. Collins, Phys. Rept. 1, 103-234 (1971) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(71)90007-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(71)90007-x 1971

  54. [54]

    A. C. Irving and R. P. Worden, Phys. Rept. 34, 117-231 (1977) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(77)90010-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(77)90010-2 1977

  55. [55]

    Nambu, Phys

    Y. Nambu, Phys. Lett. B 80, 372-376 (1979) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)91193-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)91193-6 1979

  56. [56]

    Gross, E

    F. Gross, E. Klempt, S. J. Brodsky, A. J. Buras, V. D. Burkert, G. Heinrich, K. Jakobs, C. A. Meyer, K. Orginos and M. Strickland, et al. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2 [arXiv:2212.11107 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2 2023

  57. [57]

    Inopin and G

    A. Inopin and G. S. Sharov, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054023 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.054023 [arXiv:hep- ph/9905499 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.054023 2001

  58. [58]

    M. M. Brisudova, L. Burakovsky and J. T. Gold- man, Phys. Rev. D 61, 054013 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.054013 [arXiv:hep- ph/9906293 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.054013 2000

  59. [59]

    Brau, Phys

    F. Brau, Phys. Rev. D 62, 014005 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.014005 [arXiv:hep- ph/0412170 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.014005 2000

  60. [60]

    S. J. Brodsky, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 638-644 (2007) doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-10221-7 [arXiv:hep-ph/0610115 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-10221-7 2007

  61. [61]

    Hadronic Superpartners from Superconformal and Supersymmetric Algebra

    M. Nielsen and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 97, no.11, 114001 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.114001 [arXiv:1802.09652 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.114001 2018

  62. [62]

    X. H. Guo, K. W. Wei and X. H. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 78, 056005 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.056005 [arXiv:0809.1702 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.056005 2008

  63. [63]

    Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of light mesons in the relativistic quark model

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D 79, 114029 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.114029 [arXiv:0903.5183 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.114029 2009

  64. [64]

    A. E. Inopin, [arXiv:hep-ph/0110160 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    S. S. Afonin and I. V. Pusenkov, Phys. Rev. D 90, no.9, 094020 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.094020 [arXiv:1411.2390 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.094020 2014

  66. [66]

    Oudichhya and A

    J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39, no.28, 2443004 (2024) doi:10.1142/S0217751X24430048 [arXiv:2401.02082 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x24430048 2024

  67. [67]

    Excited mesons, baryons, glueballs and tetraquarks: Predictions of the Holography Inspired Stringy Hadron model

    J. Sonnenschein and D. Weissman, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.4, 326 (2019) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6828- y [arXiv:1812.01619 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6828- 2019

  68. [68]

    M. A. Martin Contreras and A. Vega, Phys. Rev. D 102, no.4, 046007 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.046007 [arXiv:2004.10286 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.046007 2020

  69. [69]

    M. A. Martin Contreras and A. Vega, Phys. Rev. D 108, no.12, 126024 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.126024 [arXiv:2309.02905 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.126024 2023

  70. [70]

    L. D. Roper and I. Strakovsky, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, no.5, 102 (2025) doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01577-7 [arXiv:2410.11196 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01577-7 2025

  71. [71]

    M. N. Sergeenko, Z. Phys. C 64, 315-322 (1994) doi:10.1007/BF01557404

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01557404 1994

  72. [72]

    Veseli and M

    S. Veseli and M. G. Olsson, Phys. Lett. B 383, 109-115 (1996) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00721-6 [arXiv:hep- ph/9606257 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00721-6 1996

  73. [73]

    Diquarks as Inspiration and as Objects

    F. Wilczek, doi:10.1142/9789812775344 0007 [arXiv:hep-ph/0409168 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789812775344

  74. [74]

    Selem and F

    A. Selem and F. Wilczek, doi:10.1142/9789812773524 0030 [arXiv:hep- ph/0602128 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812773524

  75. [75]

    T. J. Burns, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa and 12 C. Sabelli, Phys. Rev. D 82, 074003 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074003 [arXiv:1008.0018 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.074003 2010

  76. [76]

    S. D. G, A. Ranjan, H. Nandan and V. Sharma, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 39, no.06, 2450008 (2024) doi:10.1142/S0217732324500081 [arXiv:2401.03732 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732324500081 2024

  77. [77]

    Ghaderi, N

    M. Ghaderi, N. Tazimi and M. Monemzadeh, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, no.4, 336 (2026) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025- 15240-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025- 2026

  78. [78]

    Furuichi and H

    S. Furuichi and H. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 57, 1803 (1977) doi:10.1143/PTP.57.1803

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.57.1803 1977

  79. [79]

    Gao, PLoS One 21, no.4, e0346334 (2026) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346334

    J. Gao, PLoS One 21, no.4, e0346334 (2026) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346334

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346334 2026

  80. [80]

    Mass spectrum, magnetic moments and Regge trajectories of $\Omega_{ccb}$ and $\Omega_{cbb}$ baryons in the nonrelativistic quark--diquark model

    ¨O. C ¸ akır and H. Mutuk, [arXiv:2604.18796 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.