Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Many wrong models approach to localize an odor source in turbulence with static sensors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.08343 v3 pith:SVORS3CJ submitted 2024-07-11 physics.flu-dyn physics.ao-phphysics.data-an

classification physics.flu-dynphysics.ao-phphysics.data-an
keywords sourceodorbayesianenvironmentalproblemturbulentwrongaccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The problem of locating an odor source in turbulent flows is central to key applications such as environmental monitoring and disaster response. We address this challenge by designing an algorithm based on Bayesian inference, which uses odor measurements from an ensemble of static sensors to estimate the source position through a stochastic model of the environment. The problem is difficult because of the multiscale and out-of-equilibrium properties of turbulent transport, which lack accurate analytical and phenomenological modeling, thus preventing a guaranteed convergence for Bayesian approaches. To overcome the risk of relying on a single unavoidably wrong model approximation, we propose a method to rank ``many wrong models'' and to blend their predictions. We evaluated our \emph{weighted Bayesian update} algorithm by its ability to estimate the source location with predefined accuracy and/or within a specified time frame and compare it to standard Monte Carlo sampling methods. To demonstrate the robustness and potential applications of both approaches under realistic environmental conditions, we use high-quality direct numerical simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations to mimic the turbulent transport of odors in presence of a strong mean wind. Despite minimal prior information on the source and environmental conditions, our proposed approach consistently proves to be more accurate, reliable, and robust than Monte Carlo methods, thus showing promise as a new tool for addressing the odor source localization problem in real-world scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhanced Gas Source Localization Using Distributed IoT Sensors and Bayesian Inference

    physics.flu-dyn 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A calibrated nine-sensor IoT array with sequential Monte Carlo Bayesian inference localizes a water vapor source to within 10-20 percent of the sensor spacing.

Pith tools