Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 8 minor 255 references

Perspective: Practical Atom-Based Quantum Sensors

T0 review · 1 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Practical atom-based quantum sensors are best built through staged, breadboard-driven development that deliberately trades raw sensitivity for reliability and simplicity, and the enabling technology to build them has arrived.

desk verdict A solid, useful Perspective that argues convincingly for staged breadboard-based development of practical atom sensors, though the central prescription is experience-based rather than systematically proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13111 v1 pith:SW5EPUIZ submitted 2025-07-17 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Justin M. Brown , Thad G. Walker This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords atom-basedquantumsensorssensingbreadboarddevelopmentstandardlimitopticallypumpedmagnetometryatominterferometryphotonicintegratedcircuitsminiaturevaporcells
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Atom-based sensors inherit four properties that make them attractive outside the laboratory: atoms are identical, isolatable, interfaceable, and intelligible, so a sensor built from them can be reproducible, accurate, optically interrogated, and modeled from first principles. This Perspective's central claim is that turning such laboratory-grade 'quantum sensing' into a fieldable 'quantum sensor' is best done in stages, with a fully instrumented breadboard kept as the permanent benchmark while prototypes freeze degrees of freedom and trade away sensitivity the application does not need. The paper supports the prescription with the large gap between quantum projection noise and real-world backgrounds, roughly $10\,\text{aT}/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$ for a cubic-centimeter SERF magnetometer and orders of magnitude below ambient noise, which makes simplification nearly free until technical noise reaches the quantum floor. It concludes that current technology, from warm vapor cells and photonic integrated circuits to passively pumped vacuum packages and wafer-scale vapor cells, is positioned to enable such sensors, and that treating the translation from sensing to sensor as 'just an engineering problem' will lead to underperformance.

What carries the argument

The carrying machinery is 'Equation One' for quantum sensing, the standard quantum limit written as a spectral density, $\delta S \sim (\partial S/\partial E)\,\hbar/\sqrt{N T_2}$, which the paper uses as a benchmark of how much performance can be given away. Because the tabulated quantum projection noise for centimeter-scale atom packages, roughly $10\,\text{aT}/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$ for a potassium SERF magnetometer and $10^{-13}/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$ for a microwave clock, sits orders of magnitude below ambient technical noise, the SQL margin tells the designer where simplification is free and when further simplification would begin to cost accuracy. The second carrying element is the four-'I' characterization of atoms (identical, isolatable, interfaceable, intelligible), which underwrites the claim that sensor behavior is predictable from first principles, making the breadboard-to-prototype iteration a guided search rather than trial and error. The third is the breadboard itself: a well-instrumented version of the sensor that serves as benchmark, diagnostic host, and testbed for systematic effects, preserved through the entire development cycle.

What would settle it

Watch the compact cold-atom accelerometer through its next development cycle: the paper reports its prototype reached $2.0\times10^{-6}$ statistical precision in gravity but carried a $1.6\ \text{mm/s}^2$ offset from the surveyed value, which the authors attribute to a systematic effect the breadboard had not revealed. If breadboard-guided iteration identifies and removes that offset, the process claim is supported; if a parallel program that skips breadboarding and goes straight from specifications to a packaged unit fields a sensor with comparable or better accuracy in less time, the central prescription is falsified. A sharper check of the 'simplification is free' claim: find a practical sensor where technical noise was driven down to its quantum projection noise yet accuracy still collapsed through a systematic effect that scales with the simplifications, which would break the assumption that SQL margins are the right design currency.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is a prescription for how practical atomic quantum sensors should be built. A practical sensor is an apparatus stripped to its bare essentials, namely a light source, an atomic vapor, and a detector, that a non-specialist operates reliably in an uncontrolled environment. The authors argue that the translation from sensing to sensor is best accomplished in stages: prototypes are built and tested against a fully instrumented breadboard, and the breadboard retains its value throughout development because it exposes the systematic errors and noise sources that a stripped-down package hides. The claim is grounded in the standard quantum limit used as a benchmark rather than a goal: because the SQL for centimeter-scale atom packages sits far below environmental noise, a practical sensor can deliberately operate away from the quantum limit and still exploit atoms' sensitivity, stability, and reproducibility, so each simplification step is essentially free until technical noise is the floor. The paper reads its two worked examples, namely the multi-group, two-decade evolution of the SERF magnetometer into a 128-channel sensor array for brain imaging and a compact cold-atom accelerometer whose residual $1.6\ \text{mm/s}^2$ gravity offset is cited as evidence that breadboard diagnostics remain necessary, as demonstrations that this staged process, not a single heroic engineering push, is what fields sensors.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that staged, breadboard-driven development is the generally best route to field a practical atomic sensor, a process prescription the paper supports with selected historical examples rather than a demonstrated law; if more direct, specification-driven engineering fields comparable sensors faster, the paper's central recommendation is weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A practical atom sensor can run orders of magnitude above its quantum projection noise floor without losing the atomic advantage, because ambient electromagnetic and technical backgrounds dominate and the SQL margin quantifies how much complexity can be shed.
  • Cold-atom accelerometers are approaching fieldable form as grating magneto-optical traps, fiber-delivered light, and photonic-integrated-circuit laser systems shrink the sensor head while retaining high-rate measurement capability.
  • Warm vapor cells remain the platform of choice for magnetometry, modest clocks, and Rydberg electric-field sensing, where atom number and simplicity outweigh the longer coherence times of cold atoms.
  • Metrologically useful squeezing and entanglement will appear in practical sensors only as their complexity cost falls, with short-term-sensitivity electromagnetic sensors the most promising early application.
  • The rate-limiting inputs for fielding atom sensors are now enabling technologies such as high-power narrow-linewidth VCSELs, passively pumped compact vacuum packages, and wafer-scale vapor cells, rather than atomic physics itself.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A quantitative design rule follows from the paper's margin argument, though the paper does not state it explicitly: simplify a sensor until its dominant technical noise is comparable to its quantum projection noise, and stop there, since the SQL margin identifies how much simplification is free.
  • The breadboarding prescription is argued from selected retrospectives rather than demonstrated by controlled comparison; a testable extension would track time-to-field and field performance for breadboard-driven versus specification-driven programs developing the same sensor class.
  • The paper's treatment of the accelerometer's unexplained offset implies that development schedules should budget for systematic effects that only appear in prototypes, treating them as expected discoveries rather than failures, which would change how sensor programs are planned and funded.
  • The paper raises whether quantum error correction techniques could generalize from logical qubits to metrological sensors; if that generalization works, error correction could protect sensors against systematic errors rather than only decoherence, a consequence the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 8 minor

Summary. This Perspective argues that practical, field-deployable atom-based quantum sensors—distinct from laboratory quantum-sensing experiments—are best realized through a staged development process in which breadboard systems remain central even as prototypes approach final form. The paper reviews the physics of quantum state preparation, coherent evolution, decoherence, and readout; introduces the standard quantum limit as a benchmark; discusses implementation trade-offs such as complexity cost, platform choice, pulsed versus continuous operation, SWaP, and arrays; surveys environmental challenges and emerging enabling technologies (photonic integrated circuits, advanced VCSELs, compact vacuum systems, miniature vapor cells); and illustrates the argument with two case studies: a 128-channel commercial SERF magnetometer array and a compact cold-atom accelerometer using a photonic-integrated-circuit laser system. It concludes with open challenges and a resource appendix.

Significance. The paper is a high-quality synthesis rather than a new experimental result. Its strengths include a correct and pedagogically clear treatment of the standard quantum limit and Allan-deviation noise model, a useful discussion of complexity cost, current and concrete illustrative case studies, and an extensive, well-organized reference list. The authors are explicit that technical noise, not quantum projection noise, dominates real devices, and they credit the community-wide, incremental development path for both the SERF magnetometer and the cold-atom accelerometer. If its process prescription is accepted as a scope-conditioned perspective, the article will be a valuable guide for researchers, program managers, and funding agencies. The principal limitation is that the central normative claim—that staged breadboard-driven development is the best route—is supported by selected retrospective examples rather than by a systematic comparison or counterfactual analysis.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. III J, IV B, IX A] The paper's central development-process claim is asserted more strongly than the evidence supports. Section III J states that breadboarding is 'nearly always' required and Section IX A asserts that translation from sensing to sensor 'is best accomplished in stages,' but the support consists of two successful retrospective cases (the SERF magnetometer lineage in Sec. IV A and the compact cold-atom accelerometer in Sec. VII B) plus a contrast with a 'rigid process' in Sec. IV B. There is no comparison set of programs that used direct engineering or model-based development, no documented case where breadboarding failed or delayed deployment, and no discussion of survivorship bias. The concession in Sec. III J that a direct leap from breadboard to finished design 'may be possible' further narrows the universal claim. Because this prescription is load-bearing for the Perspective's advice, the authors should either soften the claim to an experience-based recommendation with explicit scope conditions, or add a brief structured retrospective (or at least a discussion of boundary conditions and alternative development models) that would test the generalization.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Sec. II B 3] The text reads 'it not capable of predicting important quantities'; this should be 'it is not capable of predicting important quantities,' and 'digestable' should be 'digestible'.
  2. [Sec. III K] The commercial software package is misspelled as 'Anysys'; it should be 'ANSYS'.
  3. [Sec. III J] The phrase 'The number of these of iterations' should be 'The number of these iterations'.
  4. [Sec. VI A 1] The word 'electo-optics' should be 'electro-optics,' and '≫3 dB losses per interface' would be clearer as 'more than 3 dB loss per interface'.
  5. [Sec. VII A] The citation 'Alemet al.' should be 'Alem et al.'.
  6. [Sec. VII B e] The sentence reporting R=50–330 Hz with sensitivities 0.57 μg/√Hz and 36.7 μg/√Hz is ambiguous; please state explicitly which repetition rate corresponds to which sensitivity and, if the higher rate gives the worse sensitivity, explain the trade-off.
  7. [Table I and Sec. II D] Please provide the derivation of the 4 ng/√Hz acceleration estimate or define the relationship between T2, T, and the measurement cycle rate, since a reader using Eq. (2) with the stated parameters may not reproduce the entry.
  8. [Sec. VII B and Eq. (4)] The text uses both δϕ and δφ for phase uncertainty; please use a single symbol for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Perspective's recommendations are supported by external examples and standard physics, with self-citations used only as background.

full rationale

This is a Perspective/review, not a derivation. The central normative claim, that practical atom-based sensors benefit from staged breadboard-driven development, is supported by retrospective examples (SERF magnetometer lineage, cold-atom accelerometer, clocks at sea) and by the paper's own Sec. VII B data on a prototype offset. That is empirical/historical evidence, not a quantity fitted from the conclusion. The quantitative expressions (Eq. 2 SQL, Eq. 3 interferometer phase, Eq. 4 statistical sensitivity) are standard textbook results stated with assumptions, not derived from the paper's conclusions. No parameter is fit to a subset of data and then repackaged as a prediction; Table I values are order-of-magnitude estimates from stated N and T2 values. Self-citations (Walker's magnetometer papers, spin-relaxation measurement, Optically Pumped Atoms monograph) are background citations to published experimental results; they are not used to define the central breadboarding claim, and the claim would stand unchanged if replaced by independent citations. The paper even concedes 'it may be possible to leap from the breadboard demonstration to a finished design' (Sec. III J), so the recommendation is not a tautology. The strongest criticism, that the development-process prescription rests on selected cases and lacks a control set, is a correctness/evidence concern, not circularity. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters or entities are introduced. The axioms listed are the main background assumptions the perspective relies on, ranging from standard physics to a process recommendation that is specific to the paper's argument.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The validity of quantum mechanics as described by the master equation (Eq. 1) and the standard quantum limit (Eq. 2).
    Unproved background of the paper; these are accepted physics.
  • domain assumption Atomic energy levels and interactions are sufficiently well understood to predict sensor response from first principles.
    Invoked in Sec I B ('Intelligible') and Sec II B; the entire perspective relies on this.
  • domain assumption The estimates in Table I of QPN for cm-scale devices are meaningful lower bounds despite technical noise dominating.
    Sec II D states this explicitly; these numbers underpin the discussion of sensor headroom.
  • ad hoc to paper The breadboard-driven staged development process is the most effective route to practical sensors.
    Asserted in Sec III J and IV B; supported by selected examples but not proven as a universal principle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perspective: Practical Atom-Based Quantum Sensors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SW5EPUIZ

@misc{pith2026250713111,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perspective: Practical Atom-Based Quantum Sensors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SW5EPUIZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13111}
}
read the original abstract

Atomic vapors, manipulated and probed by light and other electromagnetic fields, constitute versatile and powerful quantum systems for sensing applications. Atoms are identical, isolatable, interfaceable, and intelligible. These features, coupled with the relative simplicity with which quantum properties can be exploited in state preparation and detection using modern laser and electro-optic tools, make atoms very attractive for sensing applications. This Perspective discusses the potential and process for realizing practical quantum sensors using atoms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13111 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Depiction of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Atomic vapor sensing platforms: a) warm vapor cell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Allan deviations for hypothetical scenarios with dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A) A small-scale UHV vacuum system containing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Single component low-field vector magnetometer. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Atomic magnetometer array, adapted from Ref. [173]. Laser, optics, cell, magnetic field shim coils, and photodiode |1⟩ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. A) Rendering of compact sensor head including optical delivery beams B) Closeup of SSB integrated photonic chip [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Apparatus for enhanced RF magnetometry us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

255 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kim- ball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 25008 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    J. Camparo, Applied Atomic Timekeeping in Space, in2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, PLANS 2023(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2023) pp. 295–310

    2023

  3. [3]

    Lynch, and J

    Dupuis Ryan, T. Lynch, and J. R. Vaccaro,2008 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium, Tech. Rep. (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    Safronova and D

    M. Safronova and D. Budker, Focus on Quantum Sen- sors for New-Physics Discoveries - Quantum Science and Technology - IOPscience (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Demille, J

    D. Demille, J. M. Doyle, and A. O. Sushkov, Probing the frontiers of particle physics with tabletop-scale ex- periments, Science , 990 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Indelicato, QED tests with highly charged ions (2019)

    P. Indelicato, QED tests with highly charged ions (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    A. M. Kaufman and K. K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    M. S. Safronova and D. Budker, Quantum technologies and the elephants, Quantum Science and Technology6, 040401 (2021)

    2021

Show all 255 references
  1. [9]

    D. F. Jackson Kimball, D. Budker, T. E. Chupp, A. A. Geraci, S. Kolkowitz, J. T. Singh, and A. O. Sushkov, Probing fundamental physics with spin-based quantum sensors (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 (2017)

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    Aslam, H

    N. Aslam, H. Zhou, E. K. Urbach, M. J. Turner, R. L. Walsworth, M. D. Lukin, and H. Park, Quantum sensors for biomedical applications (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Wu and T

    Y. Wu and T. Weil, Recent Developments of Nanodi- amond Quantum Sensors for Biological Applications (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    S. E. Crawford, R. A. Shugayev, H. P. Paudel, P. Lu, M. Syamlal, P. R. Ohodnicki, B. Chorpening, R. Gen- try, and Y. Duan, Quantum Sensing for Energy Appli- cations: Review and Perspective (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Pirandola, B

    S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weed- brook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Kutas, B

    M. Kutas, B. E. Haase, F. Riexinger, J. Hennig, P. Bick- ert, T. Pfeiffer, M. Bortz, D. Molter, and G. von Frey- mann, Quantum Sensing with Extreme Light (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Datta, Sensing with quantum light: a perspective, Nanophotonics 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0649 (2025)

    A. Datta, Sensing with quantum light: a perspective, Nanophotonics 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0649 (2025)

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    DeMille, N

    D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevin- sky, Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    C. J. Yu, S. Von Kugelgen, D. W. Laorenza, and D. E. Freedman, A Molecular Approach to Quantum Sensing, ACS Central Science7, 712 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Zhang and Q

    Z. Zhang and Q. Zhuang, Distributed quantum sensing (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    S. D. Bass and M. Doser, Quantum sensing for particle physics, Nature Reviews Physics6, 329 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Feynman,QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter(Princeton University Press, 1985)

    R. Feynman,QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter(Princeton University Press, 1985)

    1985

  14. [22]

    P. A. Dirac, Note on the Doppler principle and Bohr’s frequency condition, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society22, 432 (1924)

    1924

  15. [23]

    William, Y.-Y

    H. William, Y.-Y. Jau, and T. G. Walker,Optically Pumped Atoms(Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., 2010)

    2010

  16. [24]

    C. S. Adams, J. D. Pritchard, and J. P. Shaffer, Ry- dberg atom quantum technologies, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics53, 012002 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    I. I. Ryabtsev, I. I. Beterov, D. B. Tretyakov, V. M. Entin, and E. A. Yakshina, Doppler- and recoil-free laser excitation of Rydberg states via three-photon transi- tions, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Op- tical Physics84, 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.053409 (2011)

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    Maurice, Z

    V. Maurice, Z. L. Newman, S. Dickerson, M. Rivers, J. Hsiao, P. Greene, M. Mescher, J. Kitching, M. T. Hummon, and C. Johnson, Miniaturized optical fre- quency reference for next-generation portable optical clocks, Opt. Express28, 24708 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Schreck and K

    F. Schreck and K. v. Druten, Laser cooling for quantum gases, Nature Physics17, 1296 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Finkelstein, S

    R. Finkelstein, S. Bali, O. Firstenberg, and I. Novikova, A practical guide to electromagnetically induced trans- parency in atomic vapor, New Journal of Physics25, 10.1088/1367-2630/acbc40 (2023)

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    Lutwak, A

    R. Lutwak, A. Rashed, M. Varghese, G. Tepolt, J. Leblanc, M. Mescher, D. K. Serkland, K. M. Geib, and G. M. Peake, CSAC – The Chip-Scale Atomic Clock, inFrequency Standards and Metrology(2009) pp. 454–462

    2009

  22. [30]

    Wynands and S

    R. Wynands and S. Weyers, Atomic fountain clocks, in Metrologia, Vol. 42 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    K. W. Martin, G. Phelps, N. D. Lemke, M. S. Bigelow, B. Stuhl, M. Wojcik, M. Holt, I. Coddington, M. W. Bishop, and J. H. Burke, Compact Optical Atomic Clock Based on a Two-Photon Transition in Rubid- ium, Physical Review Applied9, 10.1103/PHYSRE- V APPLIED.9.014019 (2018)

    2018 doi

  24. [33]

    Bongs, M

    K. Bongs, M. Holynski, J. Vovrosh, P. Bouyer, G. Con- don, E. Rasel, C. Schubert, W. P. Schleich, and A. Roura, Taking atom interferometric quantum sensors from the laboratory to real-world applications, Nature Reviews Physics1, 731 (2019)

    2019

  25. [34]

    Wu, Wall interactions of spin-polarized atoms, Re- views of Modern Physics93, 035006 (2021)

    Z. Wu, Wall interactions of spin-polarized atoms, Re- views of Modern Physics93, 035006 (2021)

    2021

  26. [35]

    H. Chi, W. Quan, J. Zhang, L. Zhao, and J. Fang, Ad- vances in anti-relaxation coatings of alkali-metal vapor cells, Applied Surface Science501, 143897 (2020)

    2020

  27. [37]

    Solaro, A

    C. Solaro, A. Bonnin, F. Combes, M. Lopez, X. Alauze, J. N. Fuchs, F. Pi´ echon, and F. Pereira Dos Santos, Competition between spin echo and spin self-rephasing in a trapped atom interferometer, Physical Review Let- 29 ters117, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.163003 (2016)

    2016 doi

  28. [38]

    Arditi and T

    M. Arditi and T. R. Carver, Pressure, light, and tem- perature shifts in optical detection of 0-0 hyperfine reso- nance of alkali metals, Physical Review124, 800 (1961)

    1961

  29. [39]

    L. C. Ha, X. Zhang, N. Dao, and K. R. Overstreet, D1 line broadening and hyperfine frequency shift coeffi- cients for Rb 87 and Cs 133 in Ne, Ar, and N2, Physical Review A103, 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.022826 (2021)

    2021 doi

  30. [40]

    Happer and A

    W. Happer and A. C. Tam, Effect of rapid spin exchange on the magnetic-resonance spectrum of alkali vapors, Physical Review A16, 1877 (1977)

    1977

  31. [41]

    J. C. Allred, R. N. Lyman, T. W. Kornack, and M. V. Romalis, High-sensitivity atomic magnetometer unaf- fected by spin-exchange relaxation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 130801 (2002)

    2002

  32. [42]

    Katz and O

    O. Katz and O. Firstenberg, Light storage for one sec- ond in room-temperature alkali vapor, Nature Commu- nications 2018 9:19, 1 (2018)

    2018

  33. [43]

    Y.-Y. Jau, A. B. Post, N. N. Kuzma, A. M. Braun, M. V. Romalis, and W. Happer, Intense, Narrow Atomic- Clock Resonances, Physical Review Letters92, 110801 (2004)

    2004

  34. [44]

    Kiehl, D

    C. Kiehl, D. Wagner, T.-W. Hsu, S. Knappe, C. A. Re- gal, and T. Thiele, Coherence of Rabi oscillations with spin exchange, Physical Review Research5, L012002 (2023)

    2023

  35. [45]

    Belcher, E

    N. Belcher, E. E. Mikhailov, and I. Novikova, Atomic clocks and coherent population trapping: Experiments for undergraduate laboratories, American Journal of Physics77, 988 (2009)

    2009

  36. [46]

    Vanier, Atomic clocks based on coherent population trapping: A review, Applied Physics B: Lasers and Op- tics81, 421 (2005)

    J. Vanier, Atomic clocks based on coherent population trapping: A review, Applied Physics B: Lasers and Op- tics81, 421 (2005)

    2005

  37. [47]

    https://rydiqule.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

  38. [48]

    https://arc-alkali-rydberg- calculator.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

  39. [49]

    https://www.rochesterscientific.com/ADM/

  40. [50]

    L. A. Downes, L. Torralbo-Campo, and K. J. Weather- ill, A practical guide to terahertz imaging using ther- mal atomic vapour, New Journal of Physics25, 035002 (2023)

    2023

  41. [52]

    H. G. Dehmelt, Proposed{$10ˆ{14}$ $\Delta\nu \ll\nu$}laser fluorescence spectroscopy on Tl{$ˆ+$} mono ion oscillator II, Bull.Am.J.Phys.Soc.20(1975)

    1975

  42. [53]

    Nagourney, I

    W. Nagourney, I. Sandberg, and H. Dehmelt, Shelved Optical Electron Amplifier: Observation of Quantum Jumps, Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986)

    1986

  43. [54]

    S. Li, P. Vachaspati, D. Sheng, N. Dural, and M. V. Romalis, Optical rotation in excess of 100 rad generated by Rb vapor in a multipass cell, Phys. Rev. A84, 061403 (2011)

    2011

  44. [55]

    Sheng, S

    D. Sheng, S. Li, N. Dural, and M. V. Romalis, Sub- femtotesla scalar atomic magnetometry using multipass cells, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 160802 (2013)

    2013

  45. [56]

    Kuzmich, N

    A. Kuzmich, N. P. Bigelow, and L. Mandel, Atomic quantum non-demolition measurements and squeezing, Europhysics Letters (EPL)42, 481 (1998)

    1998

  46. [57]

    Budker and M

    D. Budker and M. G. Kozlov, Sensing: Equation One, Optical Memory and Neural Networks (Information Op- tics)32, S409 (2023)

    2023

  47. [58]

    While SWaP is commonly used, the space community prefers to reference an object’s mass over its weight, leading to the size, mass, and power (SMaP) acronym

  48. [59]

    Henderson, C

    K. Henderson, C. Ryu, C. MacCormick, and M. G. Boshier, Experimental demonstration of painting arbi- trary and dynamic potentials for Bose-Einstein con- densates, New Journal of Physics11, 10.1088/1367- 2630/11/4/043030 (2009)

    2009 doi

  49. [60]

    Amico, M

    L. Amico, M. Boshier, G. Birkl, A. Minguzzi, C. Miniatura, L.-C. Kwek, D. Aghamalyan, V. Ahufin- ger, D. Anderson, N. Andrei, A. S. Arnold, M. Baker, T. A. Bell, T. Bland, J. P. Brantut, D. Cassettari, W. J. Chetcuti, F. Chevy, R. Citro, S. D. Palo, R. Dumke, M. Edwards, R. Fo...

    2021

  50. [61]

    Calaprice and F

    A. Calaprice and F. Dyson,The Ultimate Quotable Ein- stein(2019)

    2019

  51. [62]

    https://iontrap.duke.edu/resources/ion-periodic- table/

  52. [63]

    Bauch,Meas

    A. Bauch,Meas. Sci. Technol, Tech. Rep. (2003)

    2003

  53. [64]

    N. F. Ramsey, Thermal Beam Sources, inExperimen- tal Methods in the Physical Sciences, Vol. 29, edited by F. Dunning and R. G. Hulet (Academic Press, 1996) Chap. 1, pp. 1–20

    1996

  54. [65]

    W. C. Campbell and P. Hamilton, Rotation sensing with trapped ions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecu- lar and Optical Physics50, 10.1088/1361-6455/aa5a8f (2017)

    2017 doi

  55. [66]

    R. W. Fox, J. A. Sherman, W. Douglas, J. B. Olson, A. D. Ludlow, and C. W. Oates, A high stability optical frequency reference based on thermal calcium atoms, in 2012 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium Proceedings(IEEE, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2012)

    2012

  56. [67]

    Shang, X

    H. Shang, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, D. Pan, H. Chen, and J. Chen, Miniaturized calcium beam optical frequency standard using fully-sealed vacuum tube with{$10ˆ{- 15}$}instability, Optics Express25, 30459 (2017)

    2017

  57. [70]

    G. D. Martinez, C. Li, A. Staron, J. Kitching, C. Ra- man, and W. R. McGehee, A chip-scale atomic beam clock, Nature Communications14, 10.1038/s41467-023- 39166-1 (2023)

    2023 doi

  58. [72]

    N. F. Ramsey, Experiments with separated oscillatory fields and hydrogen masers, Reviews of Modern Physics 62(1990)

    1990

  59. [73]

    Frequency-doubled fiber lasers are also leveraged to some extent

  60. [74]

    For instance, the detector white noise floor contributes over its full bandwidth, so a detector bandwidth≫mea- surement bandwidth leads to additional rms noise con- tributions in the measurement

  61. [75]

    Jerald Graeme,Photodiode Amplifiers(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996)

    1996

  62. [76]

    Phillip C. D. Hobbs,Building Electro-Optical Systems, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2009)

    2009

  63. [77]

    physics package

    Using common jargon, “physics package” refers to the container for the atomic vapor. As the physics of the measurement requires the light generation, interaction, and readout, here we consider the entire sensor unit to be the package

  64. [78]

    Sta- bility is maintained at all environmental temperatures with feedback engaged and unnecessary power losses are avoided as heating requires less energy than cooling

    A practical advantage occurs when thermal regulation is set above the environmental temperature range. Sta- bility is maintained at all environmental temperatures with feedback engaged and unnecessary power losses are avoided as heating requires less energy than cooling

  65. [79]

    Janvier, V

    C. Janvier, V. M´ enoret, B. Desruelle, S. Merlet, A. Lan- dragin, and F. Pereira Dos Santos, Compact differen- tial gravimeter at the quantum projection-noise limit, Physical Review A105, 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022801 (2022)

    2022 doi

  66. [80]

    Sorrentino, Q

    F. Sorrentino, Q. Bodart, L. Cacciapuoti, Y. H. Lien, M. Prevedelli, G. Rosi, L. Salvi, and G. M. Tino, Sensi- tivity limits of a Raman atom interferometer as a gravity gradiometer, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics89, 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.023607 (2014)

    2014 doi

  67. [81]

    Chu, The manipulation of neutral particles*, Reviews of Modern Physics70(1998)

    S. Chu, The manipulation of neutral particles*, Reviews of Modern Physics70(1998)

    1998

  68. [82]

    Kestler, K

    G. Kestler, K. Ton, and J. T. Barreiro, Optical-atomic system integration and calibration: Pumping from 1 atm to 1×10{$ˆ{-11}$}Torr in 24 h, Review of Sci- entific Instruments95, 10.1063/5.0231241 (2024)

    2024 doi

  69. [83]

    T. W. Kornack, S. J. Smullin, S. K. Lee, and M. V. Romalis, A low-noise ferrite magnetic shield, Applied Physics Letters90, 10.1063/1.2737357 (2007)

    2007 doi

  70. [84]

    Mhaskar, S

    R. Mhaskar, S. Knappe, and J. Kitching, A low-power, high-sensitivity micromachined optical magnetometer, Applied Physics Letters101, 10.1063/1.4770361 (2012)

    2012 doi

  71. [85]

    S. J. Smullin, T. W. Kornack, G. Vasilakis, and M. V. Romalis, A Second-Generation Co-Magnetometer for Testing Fundamental Symmetries, inCPT and Lorentz Symmetry - Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting, edited by Kostelecky (World Scientific, 2008)

    2008

  72. [86]

    Z. Li, R. T. Wakai, and T. G. Walker, Parametric mod- ulation of an atomic magnetometer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 134105 (2006)

    2006

  73. [87]

    http://www.twinleaf.com; http://www.quspin.com

  74. [88]

    I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V. Romalis, A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magne- tometer., Nature422, 596 (2003)

    2003

  75. [89]

    H. Xia, A. Ben-Amar Baranga, D. Hoffman, and M. V. Romalis, Magnetoencephalography with an atomic magnetometer, Appl. Phys. Lett.89, 211104 (2006)

    2006

  76. [90]

    Wyllie, M

    R. Wyllie, M. Kauer, R. T. Wakai, and T. G. Walker, Optical magnetometer array for fetal magnetocardiog- raphy, Optics Letters37(2012)

    2012

  77. [91]

    Wyllie, M

    R. Wyllie, M. Kauer, G. S. Smetana, R. T. Wakai, and T. G. Walker, Magnetocardiography with a modular spin-exchange relaxation-free atomic magnetometer ar- ray, Physics in Medicine and Biology57, 2619 (2012)

    2012

  78. [92]

    P. D. Schwindt, S. Knappe, V. Shah, L. Hollberg, J. Kitching, L. A. Liew, and J. Moreland, Chip-scale atomic magnetometer, Applied Physics Letters85, 6409 (2004)

    2004

  79. [93]

    P. D. Schwindt, B. Lindseth, S. Knappe, V. Shah, J. Kitching, and L. A. Liew, Chip-scale atomic magne- tometer with improved sensitivity by use of the Mx tech- nique, Applied Physics Letters90, 10.1063/1.2709532 (2007)

    2007 doi

  80. [94]

    V. Shah, S. Knappe, P. D. Schwindt, and J. Kitching, Subpicotesla atomic magnetometry with a microfabri- cated vapour cell, Nat. Photonics1, 649 (2007)

    2007

  81. [95]

    M. P. Ledbetter, I. M. Savukov, D. Budker, V. Shah, S. Knappe, J. Kitching, D. J. Michalak, S. Xu, and A. Pines, Zero-field remote detection of NMR with a mi- crofabricated atomic magnetometer, PNAS105, 2286 (2008)

    2008

  82. [96]

    Shah and M

    V. Shah and M. V. Romalis, Spin-exchange relaxation- free magnetometry using elliptically polarized light, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics80, 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.013416 (2009)

    2009 doi

  83. [97]

    Johnson, P

    C. Johnson, P. D. Schwindt, and M. Weisend, Magne- toencephalography with a two-color pump-probe, fiber- coupled atomic magnetometer, Applied Physics Letters 97, 10.1063/1.3522648 (2010)

    2010 doi

  84. [98]

    W. E. Avera, P. C. Gallacher, W. J. Teague, R. Liang, and J. B. Nelson, Magnetic Noise Associated with Ocean Internal Waves, inOCEANS 2009(IEEE, Biloxi, MS, 2009)

    2009

  85. [99]

    Constable, Earth’s Electromagnetic Environment (2016)

    C. Constable, Earth’s Electromagnetic Environment (2016)

    2016

  86. [100]

    Gelb,Applied Optimal Analysis(The M.I.T

    A. Gelb,Applied Optimal Analysis(The M.I.T. Press, 1974)

    1974

  87. [101]

    Kohler et

    J. Kohler et. al., Development of a STRAP-DOWN, Ab- solute Atomic Gravimeter for MAP-Matching Naviga- tion, inIEEE International Symposium on Inertial Sen- sors & Systems(Kaua’i, Hawaii, 2023)

    2023

  88. [102]

    Canciani and J

    A. Canciani and J. Raquet, Airborne Magnetic Anomaly Navigation, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems53, 67 (2017)

    2017

  89. [103]

    A. J. Canciani, Magnetic Navigation on an F-16 Air- craft Using Online Calibration, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems58, 420 (2022)

    2022

  90. [104]

    M¨ untinga, H

    H. M¨ untinga, H. Ahlers, M. Krutzik, A. Wenzlawski, S. Arnold, D. Becker, K. Bongs, H. Dittus, H. Duncker, N. Gaaloul, C. Gherasim, E. Giese, C. Grzeschik, T. W. H¨ ansch, O. Hellmig, W. Herr, S. Herrmann, E. Kajari, S. Kleinert, C. L¨ ammerzahl, W. Lewoczko-Adamczyk, J. Malc...

    2013

  91. [105]

    M. D. Lachmann, H. Ahlers, D. Becker, A. N. Dinke- laker, J. Grosse, O. Hellmig, H. M¨ untinga, V. Schkol- nik, S. T. Seidel, T. Wendrich, A. Wenzlawski, B. Car- 31 rick, N. Gaaloul, D. L¨ udtke, C. Braxmaier, W. Ertmer, M. Krutzik, C. L¨ ammerzahl, A. Peters, W. P. Schleich, ...

    2021 doi

  92. [106]

    Raudonis, Microgravity facilities for cold atom experiments, Quantum Science and Technology8, 10.1088/2058-9565/ace1a3 (2023)

    M. Raudonis, Microgravity facilities for cold atom experiments, Quantum Science and Technology8, 10.1088/2058-9565/ace1a3 (2023)

    2023 doi

  93. [107]

    D. C. Aveline, J. R. Williams, E. R. Elliott, C. Duten- hoffer, J. R. Kellogg, J. M. Kohel, N. E. Lay, K. Oudrhiri, R. F. Shotwell, N. Yu, and R. J. Thomp- son, Observation of Bose–Einstein condensates in an Earth-orbiting research lab, Nature582, 193 (2020)

    2020

  94. [108]

    Fryeet al., The Bose-Einstein Condensate and Cold Atom Laboratory, EPJ Quantum Technology8, 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-020-00090-8 (2021)

    K. Fryeet al., The Bose-Einstein Condensate and Cold Atom Laboratory, EPJ Quantum Technology8, 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-020-00090-8 (2021)

    2021 doi

  95. [109]

    Zheng, J

    X. Zheng, J. Dolde, V. Lochab, B. N. Merriman, H. Li, and S. Kolkowitz, Differential clock comparisons with a multiplexed optical lattice clock, Nature602, 425 (2022)

    2022

  96. [110]

    Bothwell, C

    T. Bothwell, C. J. Kennedy, A. Aeppli, D. Kedar, J. M. Robinson, E. Oelker, A. Staron, and J. Ye, Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample, Nature602, 420 (2022)

    2022

  97. [111]

    Takamoto, Y

    M. Takamoto, Y. Tanaka, and H. Katori, A perspective on the future of transportable optical lattice clocks, Ap- plied Physics Letters120, 10.1063/5.0087894 (2022)

    2022 doi

  98. [112]

    S. B. Koller, J. Grotti, S. Vogt, A. Al-Masoudi, S. D¨ orscher, S. H¨ afner, U. Sterr, and C. Lisdat, Transportable Optical Lattice Clock with 7×10{$- ˆ{17}$}Uncertainty, Physical Review Letters118, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.073601 (2017)

    2017 doi

  99. [113]

    W. F. McGrew, X. Zhang, R. J. Fasano, S. A. Sch¨ affer, K. Beloy, D. Nicolodi, R. C. Brown, N. Hinkley, G. Mi- lani, M. Schioppo, T. H. Yoon, and A. D. Ludlow, Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level, Nature564, 87 (2018)

    2018

  100. [114]

    Grotti, S

    J. Grotti, S. Koller, S. Vogt, S. H¨ afner, U. Sterr, C. Lis- dat, H. Denker, C. Voigt, L. Timmen, A. Rolland, F. N. Baynes, H. S. Margolis, M. Zampaolo, P. Thoumany, M. Pizzocaro, B. Rauf, F. Bregolin, A. Tampellini, P. Barbieri, M. Zucco, G. A. Costanzo, C. Clivati, F. Levi,...

    2018

  101. [115]

    Grotti, I

    J. Grotti, I. Nosske, S. B. Koller, S. Herbers, H. Denker, L. Timmen, G. Vishnyakova, G. Grosche, T. Water- holter, A. Kuhl, S. Koke, E. Benkler, M. Giunta, L. Maisenbacher, A. Matveev, S. D¨ orscher, R. Schwarz, A. Al-Masoudi, T. W. H¨ ansch, T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and C. Lis...

    2024 doi

  102. [116]

    J. D. Roslund, A. Cing¨ oz, W. D. Lunden, G. B. Par- tridge, A. S. Kowligy, F. Roller, D. B. Sheredy, G. E. Skulason, J. P. Song, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, and M. M. Boyd, Optical clocks at sea, Nature628, 736 (2024)

    2024

  103. [117]

    Lutwak, A

    R. Lutwak, A. Rashed, M. Varghese, G. Tepolt, J. Leblanc, M. Mescher, D. K. Serkland, K. M. Geib, G. M. Peake, and S. Romisch, The Chip-Scale Atomic Clock - Prototype Evaluation, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval Meeting , 269 (2007)

    2007

  104. [118]

    L. C. Ha, J. Noble, B. Newell, and R. Lutwak, High- Temperature Chip-Scale Atomic Clock, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 2889 (Institute of Physics, 2024)

    2024

  105. [119]

    Schmidt, M

    M. Schmidt, M. Prevedelli, A. Giorgini, G. M. Tino, and A. Peters, A portable laser system for high-precision atom interferometry experiments, Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics102, 11 (2011)

    2011

  106. [120]

    J. Pahl, A. N. Dinkelaker, C. Grzeschik, J. Kluge, M. Schiemangk, A. Wicht, A. Peters, and M. Krutzik, Compact and robust diode laser system technology for dual-species ultracold atom experiments with rubidium and potassium in microgravity, Applied Optics58, 5456 (2019)

    2019

  107. [121]

    Schkolnik, O

    V. Schkolnik, O. Hellmig, A. Wenzlawski, J. Grosse, A. Kohfeldt, K. D¨ oringshoff, A. Wicht, P. Wind- passinger, K. Sengstock, C. Braxmaier, M. Krutzik, and A. Peters, A compact and robust diode laser system for atom interferometry on a sounding rocket, Applied Physics B: Lase...

    2016 doi

  108. [122]

    Diboune, N

    C. Diboune, N. Zahzam, Y. Bidel, M. Cadoret, and A. Bresson, Multi-line fiber laser system for cesium and rubidium atom interferometry, Optics Express25, 16898 (2017)

    2017

  109. [123]

    B. N. Jiang, Low noise phase-locked laser system for atom interferometry, Applied Physics B: Lasers and Op- tics128, 10.1007/s00340-022-07792-0 (2022)

    2022 doi

  110. [124]

    QED-C - Photonic Integrated Circuits for Quantum Ap- plications (2023)

    2023

  111. [125]

    C. P. Dietrich, A. Fiore, M. G. Thompson, M. Kamp, and S. H¨ ofling, GaAs integrated quantum photonics: Towards compact and multi-functional quantum pho- tonic integrated circuits (2016)

    2016

  112. [126]

    D. J. Blumenthal, R. Heideman, D. Geuzebroek, A. Leinse, and C. Roeloffzen, Silicon Nitride in Silicon Photonics, Proceedings of the IEEE106, 2209 (2018)

    2018

  113. [127]

    D. Zhu, L. Shao, M. Yu, R. Cheng, B. Desiatov, C. J. Xin, Y. Hu, J. Holzgrafe, S. Ghosh, A. Shams- Ansari, E. Puma, N. Sinclair, C. Reimer, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇ car, Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate, Advances in Optics and Photonics13, 242 (2021)

    2021

  114. [128]

    P. L. McMahon, The physics of optical computing, Na- ture Reviews Physics5, 717 (2023)

    2023

  115. [129]

    H. Tian, J. Liu, A. Siddharth, R. N. Wang, T. Bl´ esin, J. He, T. J. Kippenberg, and S. A. Bhave, Magnetic- free silicon nitride integrated optical isolator, Nature Photonics15, 828 (2021)

    2021

  116. [130]

    D. B. Sohn, O. E. ¨Orsel, and G. Bahl, Electrically driven optical isolation through phonon-mediated pho- tonic Autler–Townes splitting, Nature Photonics15, 822 (2021)

    2021

  117. [131]

    A. D. White, G. H. Ahn, K. V. Gasse, K. Y. Yang, L. Chang, J. E. Bowers, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Integrated passive nonlinear optical isolators, Nature Photonics17, 143 (2023)

    2023

  118. [132]

    Arafin, A

    S. Arafin, A. Simsek, M. Lu, M. J. Rodwell, and L. A. Coldren, Heterodyne locking of a fully integrated opti- cal phase-locked loop with on-chip modulators, Optics Letters42, 3745 (2017)

    2017

  119. [133]

    W. Loh, A. A. S. Green, F. N. Baynes, D. C. Cole, F. J. Quinlan, H. Lee, K. J. Vahala, S. B. Papp, and S. A. 32 Diddams, Dual-microcavity narrow-linewidth Brillouin laser, Optica2, 225 (2015)

    2015

  120. [134]

    Gundavarapu, G

    S. Gundavarapu, G. M. Brodnik, M. Puckett, T. Huff- man, D. Bose, R. Behunin, J. Wu, T. Qiu, C. Pinho, N. Chauhan, J. Nohava, P. T. Rakich, K. D. Nelson, M. Salit, and D. J. Blumenthal, Sub-hertz fundamen- tal linewidth photonic integrated Brillouin laser, Nature Photonics13, ...

    2019

  121. [135]

    M. T. Hummon, S. Kang, D. G. Bopp, Q. Li, D. A. Westly, S. Kim, C. Fredrick, S. A. Diddams, K. Srini- vasan, V. Aksyuk, and J. E. Kitching, Photonic chip for laser stabilization to an atomic vapor with 10–11 instability, Optica5, 443 (2018)

    2018

  122. [136]

    Chauhan, C

    N. Chauhan, C. Caron, J. Wang, A. Isichenko, N. Helaly, K. Liu, R. J. Niffenegger, and D. J. Blu- menthal,Trapped ion qubit and clock operations with a visible wavelength photonic coil resonator stabilized in- tegrated Brillouin laser, Tech. Rep. (2024)

    2024

  123. [137]

    X. Wu, F. Zi, J. Dudley, R. J. Bilotta, P. Canoza, and H. M¨ uller, Multiaxis atom interferometry with a single- diode laser and a pyramidal magneto-optical trap, Op- tica4, 1545 (2017)

    2017

  124. [138]

    L´ opez-V´ azquez, M

    A. L´ opez-V´ azquez, M. A. Maldonado, E. Gomez, N. V. Corzo, E. de Carlos-L´ opez, J. A. Franco Villafa˜ ne, K. Jim´ enez-Garc ´ ıa, J. Jim´ enez-Mier, J. L. L´ opez- Gonz´ alez, C. J. L´ opez-Monjaraz, J. M. L´ opez-Romero, A. Medina Herrera, R. M´ endez-Fragoso, C. A. Ortiz...

    2023

  125. [139]

    Theron, O

    F. Theron, O. Carraz, G. Renon, N. Zahzam, Y. Bidel, M. Cadoret, and A. Bresson, Narrow linewidth single laser source system for onboard atom interferometry, Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics118, 1 (2014)

    2014

  126. [140]

    P. Zhou, W. Quan, K. Wei, Z. Liang, J. Hu, L. Liu, G. Hu, A. Wang, and M. Ye, Application of VCSEL in Bio-Sensing Atomic Magnetometers (2022)

    2022

  127. [141]

    C. Ropp, W. Zhu, A. Yulaev, D. Westly, G. Simel- gor, A. Rakholia, W. Lunden, D. Sheredy, M. M. Boyd, S. Papp, A. Agrawal, and V. Aksyuk, Integrating planar photonics for multi-beam generation and atomic clock packaging on chip, Light: Science and Applications12, 10.1038/s4137...

    2023 doi

  128. [142]

    Huang, D

    M. Huang, D. K. Serkland, and J. Camparo, A narrow- linewidth three-mirror VCSEL for atomic devices, Ap- plied Physics Letters121, 10.1063/5.0101810 (2022)

    2022 doi

  129. [143]

    H. J. Lewandowski, D. M. Harber, D. L. Whitaker, and E. A. Cornell, Simplified System for Creating a Bose-Einstein Condensate, Journal of Low Temperature Physics132(2003)

    2003

  130. [144]

    D. M. Farkas, K. M. Hudek, E. A. Salim, S. R. Se- gal, M. B. Squires, and D. Z. Anderson, A compact, transportable, microchip-based system for high repeti- tion rate production of Bose-Einstein condensates, Ap- plied Physics Letters96, 10.1063/1.3327812 (2010)

    2010 doi

  131. [145]

    B. J. Little, G. W. Hoth, J. Christensen, C. Walker, D. J. De Smet, G. W. Biedermann, J. Lee, and P. D. D. Schwindt, A passively pumped vacuum package sustain- ing cold atoms for more than 200 days, A VS Quantum Science3, 35001 (2021)

    2021

  132. [146]

    A. T. Dellis, E. A. Donley, J. Kitching, S. Knappe, and V. Shah, Low helium permeation cells for atomic mi- crosystems technology, Optics Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 12, pp. 2775-277841, 2775 (2016)

    2016

  133. [147]

    O. S. Burrow, P. F. Osborn, E. Boughton, F. Mirando, D. P. Burt, P. F. Griffin, A. S. Arnold, and E. Riis, Stand-alone vacuum cell for compact ultracold quan- tum technologies, Applied Physics Letters119, 124002 (2021)

    2021

  134. [148]

    Y. Y. Jau, H. Partner, P. D. Schwindt, J. D. Prestage, J. R. Kellogg, and N. Yu, Low-power, miniature 171Yb ion clock using an ultra-small vacuum package, Applied Physics Letters101, 10.1063/1.4767454 (2012)

    2012 doi

  135. [149]

    P. D. Schwindt, Y. Y. Jau, H. Partner, A. Casias, A. R. Wagner, M. Moorman, R. P. Manginell, J. R. Kellogg, and J. D. Prestage, A highly miniaturized vacuum pack- age for a trapped ion atomic clock, Review of Scientific Instruments87, 10.1063/1.4948739 (2016)

    2016 doi

  136. [150]

    D. R. Scherer, C. D. Boschen, J. Noble, M. Silveira, D. Taylor, J. Tallant, K. R. Overstreet, and S. R. Stein, Analysis of Short-Term Stability of Miniature 171Yb+ Buffer Gas Cooled Trapped Ion Clock, arXiv:1802.04832 10.33012/2018.15609 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  137. [151]

    J. P. McGilligan, K. R. Moore, A. Dellis, G. D. Mar- tinez, E. De Clercq, P. F. Griffin, A. S. Arnold, E. Riis, R. Boudot, and J. Kitching, Laser cooling in a chip-scale platform, Applied Physics Letters117, 10.1063/5.0014658 (2020)

    2020 doi

  138. [152]

    D. A. Thrasher and P. D. D. Schwindt,{Performance of 3 cm$ˆ3$ion trap vacuum package sealed for 10 years}, Applied Physics Letters126, 10.1063/5.0243517 (2025)

    2025 doi

  139. [153]

    Fortagh, A

    J. Fortagh, A. Grossmann, T. W. H¨ ansch, and C. Zim- mermann, Fast loading of a magneto-optical trap from a pulsed thermal source, Journal of Applied Physics84, 6499 (1998)

    1998

  140. [154]

    F. Gong, Y. Y. Jau, K. Jensen, and W. Happer, Elec- trolytic fabrication of atomic clock cells, Review of Sci- entific Instruments77, 10.1063/1.2219730 (2006)

    2006 doi

  141. [155]

    D. R. Scherer, D. B. Fenner, and J. M. Hensley, Characterization of alkali metal dispensers and non- evaporable getter pumps in ultrahigh vacuum systems for cold atomic sensors, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films30, 10.1116/1.4757950 (2012)

    2012 doi

  142. [156]

    J. J. Bernstein, A. Whale, J. Brown, C. Johnson, E. Cook, L. Calvez, X. Zhang, and S. W. Martin, Solid State Electrochemical Alkali Sources for Cold Atom Sensing, Proceedings of the Solid-State Sensors, Acu- tators, and Microsystems Workshop (2016)

    2016

  143. [157]

    S. Kang, R. P. Mott, K. A. Gilmore, L. D. Sorenson, M. T. Rakher, E. A. Donley, J. Kitching, and C. S. Roper, A low-power reversible alkali atom source, Ap- plied Physics Letters110, 244101 (2017)

    2017

  144. [158]

    S. Kang, K. R. Moore, J. P. McGilligan, R. Mott, A. Mis, C. Roper, E. A. Donley, and J. Kitching, Magneto-optic trap using a reversible, solid-state alkali- metal source, Optics Letters44, 3002 (2019)

    2019

  145. [159]

    K. R. Rusimova, D. Slavov, F. Pradaux-Caggiano, J. T. Collins, S. N. Gordeev, D. R. Carbery, W. J. Wadsworth, P. J. Mosley, and V. K. Valev, Atomic dispensers for thermoplasmonic control of alkali vapor pressure in quantum optical applications, Nature Com- munications10, 10.10...

    2019 doi

  146. [160]

    R. N. Kohn, M. S. Bigelow, M. Spanjers, B. K. Stuhl, B. L. Kasch, S. E. Olson, E. A. Imhof, D. A. Hostut- ler, and M. B. Squires, Clean, robust alkali sources by intercalation within highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, 33 Review of Scientific Instruments91, 10.1063/1.5128120 (2020)

    2020 doi

  147. [161]

    J. P. McGilligan, K. R. Moore, S. Kang, R. Mott, A. Mis, C. Roper, E. A. Donley, and J. Kitching, Dy- namic Characterization of an Alkali-Ion Battery as a Source for Laser-Cooled Atoms, Physical Review Ap- plied13, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.044038 (2020)

    2020 doi

  148. [162]

    Ishikawa, Vapor pressure of alkali-metal binary alloys in glass cells, Calphad: Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry59, 40 (2017)

    K. Ishikawa, Vapor pressure of alkali-metal binary alloys in glass cells, Calphad: Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry59, 40 (2017)

    2017

  149. [163]

    J. P. McGilligan, K. Gallacher, P. F. Griffin, D. J. Paul, A. S. Arnold, and E. Riis, Micro-fabricated components for cold atom sensors (2022)

    2022

  150. [164]

    Skljarow, N

    A. Skljarow, N. Gruhler, W. Pernice, H. Kuebler, T. Pfau, R. Loew, and H. Alaeian, Integrating two- photon nonlinear spectroscopy of rubidium atoms with silicon photonics, Optics Express28, 19593 (2020)

    2020

  151. [165]

    R. M. Noor, M. H. Asadian, and A. M. Shkel, Design Considerations for micro-glassblown atomic vapor cells, J. Microelectromech. Syst.29, 25 (2020)

    2020

  152. [166]

    Laliotis, Santiago Villalba, and H

    A. Laliotis, Santiago Villalba, and H. Failache, Simple fabrication of miniaturized glass cells for atomic vapor spectroscopy, Applied Physics A128, 433 (2022)

    2022

  153. [167]

    Karlen, J

    S. Karlen, J. Haesler, T. Overstolz, G. Bergonzi, and S. Lecomte, Sealing of MEMS Atomic Va- por Cells Using Cu-Cu Thermocompression Bond- ing, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems29, 10.1109/JMEMS.2019.2949349 (2020)

    2020

  154. [168]

    J. M. Pate, J. Kitching, and M. T. Hummon, Microfab- ricated strontium atomic vapor cells, Optics Letters48, 383 (2023)

    2023

  155. [169]

    D. G. Bopp, V. M. Maurice, and J. E. Kitching, Wafer- level fabrication of alkali vapor cells using in-situ atomic deposition, Journal of Physics: Photonics3, 015002 (2020)

    2020

  156. [170]

    https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/csac-sa65

  157. [171]

    https://www.infleqtion.com/tiqker

  158. [172]

    Kadlecek, L

    S. Kadlecek, L. Anderson, and T. Walker, Field Depen- dence of Spin Relaxation in a Dense Rb Vapor, Physical Review Letters80, 5512 (1998)

    1998

  159. [173]

    O. Alem, K. J. Hughes, I. Buard, T. P. Cheung, T. Maydew, A. Griesshammer, K. Holloway, A. Park, V. Lechuga, C. Coolidge, M. Gerginov, E. Quigg, A. Seames, E. Kronberg, P. Teale, and S. Knappe, An integrated full-head OPM-MEG system based on 128 zero-field sensors, Frontiers i...

    2023

  160. [174]

    O. Alem, R. Mhaskar, R. Jim´ enez-Mart ´ ınez, D. Sheng, J. LeBlanc, L. Trahms, T. Sander, J. Kitching, and S. Knappe, Magnetic field imaging with microfabricated optically-pumped magnetometers, Optics Express25, 7849 (2017)

    2017

  161. [175]

    Kitching, Chip-scale atomic devices, Applied Physics Reviews5, 31302 (2018)

    J. Kitching, Chip-scale atomic devices, Applied Physics Reviews5, 31302 (2018)

    2018

  162. [176]

    For example, the de Broglie wavelength of room tem- perature thermal atomsλ dB ∼20 pm can be extended toλ dB ∼20 nm for laser-cooled atoms following the in- verse proportionality to the momentum (square root of the kinetic energy)λ dB =h/p=h/ √ 2mE

  163. [177]

    Overstreet, P

    C. Overstreet, P. Asenbaum, and M. A. Kasevich, Phys- ically significant phase shifts in matter-wave interferom- etry, American Journal of Physics89, 324 (2021)

    2021

  164. [179]

    Two simultaneous, counter-propagating interferometers with overlapping trajectories can separate the accel- eration and rotation by computing ∆ϕ 1 + ∆ϕ 2 and ∆ϕ1 −∆ϕ 2

  165. [180]

    Lautier, L

    J. Lautier, L. Volodimer, T. Hardin, S. Merlet, M. Lours, F. Pereira Dos Santos, and A. Landragin, Hybridizing matter-wave and classical accelerometers, Applied Physics Letters105, 10.1063/1.4897358 (2014)

    2014 doi

  166. [181]

    H. J. McGuinness, A. V. Rakholia, and G. W. Biedermann, High data-rate atom interferometer for measuring acceleration, Applied Physics Letters100, 10.1063/1.3673845 (2012)

    2012 doi

  167. [182]

    J. Lee, R. Ding, J. Christensen, R. R. Rosenthal, A. Ison, D. P. Gillund, D. Bossert, K. H. Fuer- schbach, W. Kindel, P. S. Finnegan, J. R. Wendt, M. Gehl, A. Kodigala, H. McGuinness, C. A. Walker, S. A. Kemme, A. Lentine, G. Biedermann, and P. D. Schwindt, A compact cold-atom...

    2022 doi

  168. [183]

    Kodigala, M

    A. Kodigala, M. Gehl, G. W. Hoth, J. Lee, C. T. Derose, A. Pomerene, C. Dallo, D. Trotter, A. L. Starbuck, G. Biedermann, P. D. D. Schwindt, and A. L. Lentine, High-performance silicon photonic single-sideband mod- ulators for cold-atom interferometry, Sci. Adv10, 4454 (2024)

    2024

  169. [184]

    Zhu, Y.-H

    L. Zhu, Y.-H. Lien, A. Hinton, A. Niggebaum, C. Ram- meloo, K. Bongs, and M. Holynski, Application of opti- cal single-sideband laser in Raman atom interferometry, Optics Express26, 6542 (2018)

    2018

  170. [185]

    Rammeloo, L

    C. Rammeloo, L. Zhu, Y.-H. Lien, K. Bongs, and M. Holynski, Performance of an optical single-sideband laser system for atom interferometry, Journal of the Op- tical Society of America B37, 1485 (2020)

    2020

  171. [186]

    Carraz, R

    O. Carraz, R. Charri` ere, M. Cadoret, N. Zahzam, Y. Bidel, and A. Bresson, Phase shift in an atom in- terferometer induced by the additional laser lines of a Raman laser generated by modulation, Physical Re- view A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics86, 10.1103/PhysRevA....

    2012 doi

  172. [187]

    Templier, J

    S. Templier, J. Hauden, P. Cheiney, F. Napolitano, H. Porte, P. Bouyer, B. Barrett, and B. Batte- lier, Carrier-Suppressed Multiple-Single-Sideband Laser Source for Atom Cooling and Interferometry, Physical Review Applied16, 10.1103/PhysRevAp- plied.16.044018 (2021)

    2021 doi

  173. [188]

    G. M. Tino, L. Cacciapuoti, S. Capozziello, G. Lambi- ase, and F. Sorrentino, Precision gravity tests and the Einstein Equivalence Principle (2020)

    2020

  174. [189]

    Perrin, J

    I. Perrin, J. Bernard, Y. Bidel, A. Bonnin, N. Za- hzam, C. Blanchard, A. Bresson, and M. Cadoret, Zero-velocity atom interferometry using a retrore- flected frequency-chirped laser, Physical Review A100, 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.053618 (2019)

    2019 doi

  175. [190]

    Bernard, Y

    J. Bernard, Y. Bidel, M. Cadoret, C. Salducci, N. Zahzam, S. Schwartz, A. Bonnin, C. Blan- chard, and A. Bresson, Atom interferometry using{$\sigmaˆ+–\sigmaˆ-$}Raman transi- 34 tions between{$—F=1,m F=\mp1\rangle$}and {$—F=2,m F=\pm1\rangle$}, Physical Review A 105, 10.1103/Ph...

    2022 doi

  176. [192]

    Mielec, M

    N. Mielec, M. Altorio, R. Sapam, D. Horville, D. Holleville, L. A. Sidorenkov, A. Landragin, and R. Geiger, Atom interferometry with top-hat laser beams, Applied Physics Letters113, 10.1063/1.5051663 (2018)

    2018 doi

  177. [193]

    Templier, P

    S. Templier, P. Cheiney, Q. D’armagnac De Castanet, B. Gouraud, H. Porte, F. Napolitano, P. Bouyer, B. Bat- telier, and B. Barrett, Tracking the vector acceleration with a hybrid quantum accelerometer triad, Sci. Adv8, 3854 (2022)

    2022

  178. [194]

    M. J. Holland and K. Burnett, Interferometric Detection of Optical Phase Shifts at the Heisenberg Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993)

    1993

  179. [196]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Heinzen, Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A50(1994)

    1994

  180. [197]

    S. S. Szigeti, O. Hosten, and S. A. Haine, Improv- ing cold-atom sensors with quantum entanglement: Prospects and challenges (2021)

    2021

  181. [198]

    Schulte, C

    M. Schulte, C. Lisdat, P. O. Schmidt, U. Sterr, and K. Hammerer, Prospects and challenges for squeezing- enhanced optical atomic clocks, Nature Communica- tions11, 10.1038/s41467-020-19403-7 (2020)

    2020 doi

  182. [199]

    Huang, M

    J. Huang, M. Zhuang, and C. Lee, Entanglement- enhanced quantum metrology: From standard quantum limit to Heisenberg limit (2024)

    2024

  183. [200]

    Ganapathy{\it et

    D. Ganapathy{\it et. al}, Broadband Quan- tum Enhancement of the LIGO Detectors with Frequency-Dependent Squeezing, Physical Review X 13, 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041021 (2023)

    2023 doi

  184. [201]

    K. M. Backes, D. A. Palken, S. A. Kenany, B. M. Brubaker, S. B. Cahn, A. Droster, G. C. Hilton, S. Ghosh, H. Jackson, S. K. Lamoreaux, A. F. Leder, K. W. Lehnert, S. M. Lewis, M. Malnou, R. H. Maruyama, N. M. Rapidis, M. Simanovskaia, S. Singh, D. H. Speller, I. Urdinaran, L. ...

    2021

  185. [202]

    J. G. Bohnet, K. C. Cox, M. A. Norcia, J. M. Weiner, Z. Chen, and J. K. Thompson, Reduced spin measure- ment back-action for a phase sensitivity ten times be- yond the standard quantum limit, Nature Photonics8, 731 (2014)

    2014

  186. [203]

    Hosten, N

    O. Hosten, N. J. Engelsen, R. Krishnakumar, and M. A. Kasevich, Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms, Na- ture529, 505 (2016)

    2016

  187. [204]

    Pedrozo-Pe˜ nafiel, S

    E. Pedrozo-Pe˜ nafiel, S. Colombo, C. Shu, A. F. Adiy- atullin, Z. Li, E. Mendez, B. Braverman, A. Kawasaki, D. Akamatsu, Y. Xiao, and V. Vuleti´ c, Entanglement on an optical atomic-clock transition, Nature588, 414 (2020)

    2020

  188. [205]

    W. J. Eckner, N. Darkwah Oppong, A. Cao, A. W. Young, W. R. Milner, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Realizing spin squeezing with Rydberg inter- actions in an optical clock, Nature621, 734 (2023)

    2023

  189. [207]

    practical

    is shown in Fig. 10. The 4.6 dB of squeezing is acheived using a stroboscopic probing scheme with a pair of QND spin-detections. The complexity cost of this im- plementation of spin squeezing is notably small and with PIC technology could be readily incorporated into arrays. T...

  190. [208]

    Zheng, H

    W. Zheng, H. Wang, R. Schmieg, A. Oesterle, and E. S. Polzik, Entanglement-Enhanced Magnetic In- duction Tomography, Physical Review Letters130, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.203602 (2023)

    2023 doi

  191. [209]

    Anders, A

    F. Anders, A. Idel, P. Feldmann, D. Bondarenko, S. Lo- riani, K. Lange, J. Peise, M. Gersemann, B. Meyer- Hoppe, S. Abend, N. Gaaloul, C. Schubert, D. Schlip- pert, L. Santos, E. Rasel, and C. Klempt, Momen- tum Entanglement for Atom Interferometry, Physical Review Letters127,...

    2021 doi

  192. [211]

    Graner, Y

    B. Graner, Y. Chen, E. G. Lindahl, and B. R. Heckel, Reduced Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of Hg 199, Physical Review Letters116, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.161601 (2016)

    2016 doi

  193. [212]

    J. J. Hudson, D. M. Kara, I. J. Smallman, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt, and E. A. Hinds, Improved measurement of the shape of the electron, Nature473, 493 (2011)

    2011

  194. [213]

    Andreev, D

    V. Andreev, D. G. Ang, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, J. Haefner, N. R. Hutzler, Z. Lasner, C. Meisenhelder, B. R. O’Leary, C. D. Panda, A. D. West, E. P. West, and X. Wu, Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Nature562, 355 (2018)

    2018

  195. [214]

    W. B. Cairncross, D. N. Gresh, M. Grau, K. C. Cossel, T. S. Roussy, Y. Ni, Y. Zhou, J. Ye, and E. A. Cor- nell, Precision Measurement of the Electron’s Electric Dipole Moment Using Trapped Molecular Ions, Physical Review Letters119, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.153001 (2017)

    2017 doi

  196. [215]

    ACMEIII Collaboration: https://cfp.physics.northwestern.edu/gabrielse- group/acme-electron-edm.html

  197. [216]

    K. Wei, T. Zhao, X. Fang, Z. Xu, C. Liu, Q. Cao, A. Wickenbrock, Y. Hu, W. Ji, J. Fang, and D. Budker, Ultrasensitive Atomic Comagnetometer with Enhanced Nuclear Spin Coherence, Physical Review Letters130, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.063201 (2023)

    2023 doi

  198. [217]

    F. A. Narducci, A. T. Black, and J. H. Burke, Advances toward fieldable atom interferometers (2022)

    2022

  199. [218]

    R. R. Allen, F. Machado, I. L. Chuang, H.-Y. Huang, and S. Choi,Quantum Computing Enhanced Sensing, Tech. Rep. (2025)

    2025

  200. [219]

    C. C. Chen, R. Gonz´ alez Escudero, J. Min´ aˇ r, B. Pasquiou, S. Bennetts, and F. Schreck, Continuous Bose–Einstein condensation, Nature606, 683 (2022)

    2022

  201. [220]

    S. J. Li, C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, Blue- Detuned Magneto-optical Trap of CaF Molecules, Phys- ical Review Letters132, 233402 (2024)

    2024

  202. [221]

    Kitching, S

    J. Kitching, S. Knappe, and E. A. Donley, Atomic Sen- sors – A Review, IEEE Sensors Journal11, 1749 (2011). 35

    2011

  203. [222]

    H. Yu, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Wu, L. Jiao, K. Li, and W. Zheng, Key Technologies in Developing Chip-Scale Hot Atomic Devices for Precision Quantum Metrology, Micromachines15, 1095 (2024)

    2024

  204. [223]

    G. D. Metcalfe, B. Tabakov, T. Nguyen, J. Lu, and A. Sayir, Basic Research Perspective on Quantum In- formation Science for the Aerospace Community, AIAA Journal61, 5191 (2023)

    2023

  205. [224]

    E. Oh, M. D. Gregoire, A. T. Black, K. Jeramy Hughes, P. D. Kunz, M. Larsen, J. Lautier-Gaud, J. Lee, P. D. D. Schwindt, S. L. Mouradian, F. A. Narducci, and C. A. Sackett, Perspective on Quantum Sensors from Basic Research to Commercial Applications, AIAA Journal 62, 4029 (2024)

    2024

  206. [225]

    Bongs, S

    K. Bongs, S. Bennett, and A. Lohmann, Quantum sen- sors will start a revolution — if we deploy them right, Nature617, 672 (2023). [225]Applications of Quantum Technologies, Tech. Rep. (De- fense Science Board, 2019)

    2023

  207. [226]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  208. [227]

    Godone, F

    A. Godone, F. Levi, C. E. Calosso, and S. Micalizio, High-performing vapor-cell frequency standards, Riv- ista del Nuovo Cimento38, 133 (2015)

    2015

  209. [228]

    S. A. Diddams, K. Vahala, and T. Udem, Optical fre- quency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum (2020)

    2020

  210. [229]

    B. L. Marlow and D. R. Scherer, A review of commercial and emerging atomic frequency standards, IEEE Trans- actions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control68, 2007 (2021)

    2021

  211. [230]

    Vanier and C

    J. Vanier and C. Tomescu,The Quantum Physics of Atomic Frequency Standards, 1st ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2016). [231]1193-2022 - IEEE Guide for Measurement of Environ- mental Sensitivities of Standard Frequency Generators (IEEE, 2023)

    2016

  212. [232]

    Gellesch, J

    M. Gellesch, J. Jones, R. Barron, A. Singh, Q. Sun, K. Bongs, and Y. Singh, Transportable optical atomic clocks for use in out-of-the-lab environments (2020)

    2020

  213. [233]

    T. E. Mehlst¨ aubler, G. Grosche, C. Lisdat, P. O. Schmidt, and H. Denker, Atomic clocks for geodesy, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 10.1088/1361- 6633/aab409 (2018)

    2018 doi

  214. [234]

    Budker and M

    D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Nat. Physics3, 227 (2007)

    2007

  215. [235]

    Budker and D

    D. Budker and D. F. Jackson Kimball, eds.,Optical Magnetometry(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  216. [236]

    Fabricant, I

    A. Fabricant, I. Novikova, and G. Bison, How to build a magnetometer with thermal atomic vapor: a tutorial, New Journal of Physics25, 025001 (2023)

    2023

  217. [237]

    X. Bai, K. Wen, D. Peng, S. Liu, and L. Luo, Atomic magnetometers and their application in industry (2023)

    2023

  218. [238]

    K. M. C. Fu, G. Z. Iwata, A. Wickenbrock, and D. Bud- ker, Sensitive magnetometry in challenging environ- ments (2020)

    2020

  219. [239]

    M. W. Mitchell and S. Palacios Alvarez, Colloquium: Quantum limits to the energy resolution of magnetic field sensors, Reviews of Modern Physics92, 021001 (2020)

    2020

  220. [240]

    B. Liu, L. Zhang, Z. Liu, Z. Deng, D. Ding, B. Shi, and G. Guo, Electric Field Measurement and Application Based on Rydberg Atoms, Electromagnetic Science1, 1 (2023)

    2023

  221. [241]

    C. L. Holloway, M. T. Simons, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, J. A. Gordon, G. Marconi, Y. J. Guo, and R. W. Ziolkowski, Overview of Rydberg Atom-Based Sen- sors/Receivers for the Measurement of Electric Fields, Power, Voltage, and Modulated Signals, inAntenna and Array Technologies fo...

    2022

  222. [242]

    Artusio-Glimpse, M

    A. Artusio-Glimpse, M. T. Simons, N. Prajapati, and C. L. Holloway, Modern RF Measurements with Hot Atoms: A Technology Review of Rydberg Atom-Based Radio Frequency Field Sensors, IEEE Microwave Mag- azine23, 44 (2022)

    2022

  223. [243]

    Santamaria-Botello, S

    G. Santamaria-Botello, S. Verploegh, E. Bot- tomley, and Z. Popovic, Comparison of Noise Temperature of Rydberg-Atom and Elec- tronic Microwave Receivers, arXiv:2209.00908v2 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.00908 (2022)

    2022 doi arXiv

  224. [244]

    P. B. Weichman, Doppler sensitivity and resonant tuning of Rydberg atom-based antennas, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics57, 10.1088/1361-6455/ad6385 (2024)

    2024 doi

  225. [245]

    F. B. Dunning, T. C. Killian, S. Yoshida, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Recent advances in Rydberg physics us- ing alkaline-earth atoms (2016)

    2016

  226. [246]

    Dixon, K

    K. Dixon, K. Nickerson, D. W. Booth, and J. P. Shaf- fer, Rydberg-Atom-Based Electrometry Using a Self- Heterodyne Frequency-Comb Readout and Preparation Scheme, Physical Review Applied19, 034078 (2023)

    2023

  227. [247]

    M. V. Romalis, J. Wiedemann, S. Zhang, and N. Du- ral,Vapor cell Rydberg atom electrometry with time- separated fields, Tech. Rep. (2024)

    2024

  228. [248]

    De Angelis, A

    M. De Angelis, A. Bertoldi, L. Cacciapuoti, A. Giorgini, G. Lamporesi, M. Prevedelli, G. Saccorotti, F. Sor- rentino, and G. M. Tino, Precision gravimetry with atomic sensors, Measurement Science and Technology 20, 10.1088/0957-0233/20/2/022001 (2009)

    2009 doi

  229. [249]

    A. D. Cronin, J. Schmiedmayer, and D. E. Pritchard, Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 1051 (2009)

    2009

  230. [250]

    Storey and C

    P. Storey and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, The Feynman path integral approach to atomic interferometry. A tutorial, Journal de Physique II4, 1999 (1994)

    1994

  231. [251]

    Geiger, A

    R. Geiger, A. Landragin, S. Merlet, and F. Pereira Dos Santos, High-accuracy inertial measurements with cold-atom sensors (2020)

    2020

  232. [252]

    C. L. Garrido Alzar, Compact chip-scale guided cold atom gyrometers for inertial navigation: Enabling tech- nologies and design study (2019)

    2019

  233. [253]

    T. G. Walker and M. S. Larsen, Spin-Exchange-Pumped NMR Gyros, Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Op- tical Physics65, 373 (2016)

    2016

  234. [254]

    T. W. Kornack, R. K. Ghosh, and M. V. Romalis, Nuclear spin gyroscope based on an atomic comag- netometer, Physical Review Letters95, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.95.230801 (2005)

    2005 doi

  235. [255]

    Bogdanov, M

    S. Bogdanov, M. Y. Shalaginov, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, Material platforms for integrated quan- tum photonics, Optical Materials Express7, 111 (2017)

    2017

  236. [256]

    Moody, V

    G. Moody, V. J. Sorger, D. J. Blumenthal, P. W. Juodawlkis, W. Loh, C. Sorace-Agaskar, A. E. Jones, K. C. Balram, J. C. Matthews, A. Laing, M. Da- vanco, L. Chang, J. E. Bowers, N. Quack, C. Gal- 36 land, I. Aharonovich, M. A. Wolff, C. Schuck, N. Sin- clair, M. Lonˇ car, T. K...

    2022

  237. [257]

    Giordani, F

    T. Giordani, F. Hoch, G. Carvacho, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Integrated photonics in quantum technolo- gies (2023)

    2023

  238. [258]

    D. J. Blumenthal, A. Isichenko, and N. Chauhan, En- abling photonic integrated 3D magneto-optical traps for quantum sciences and applications, Optica Quantum2, 444 (2024)

    2024

  239. [259]

    J. A. Rushton, M. Aldous, and M. D. Himsworth, Con- tributed Review: The feasibility of a fully miniatur- ized magneto-optical trap for portable ultracold quan- tum technology, Review of Scientific Instruments85, 10.1063/1.4904066 (2014)

    2014 doi

  240. [260]

    Knapkiewicz, Technological assessment of MEMS al- kali vapor cells for atomic references, Micromachines10, 10.3390/MI10010025 (2019)

    P. Knapkiewicz, Technological assessment of MEMS al- kali vapor cells for atomic references, Micromachines10, 10.3390/MI10010025 (2019)

    2019 doi

  241. [261]

    Gorecki, N

    C. Gorecki, N. Passilly, V. Maurice, S. Bargiel, R. Chutani, R. Boudot, R. Vicarini, and S. Gal- liou, Advanced microfabrication technologies for miniature caesium vapor cells for atomic clocks, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.250622510934, 258 (2019)

    2019 doi

  242. [262]

    G. Pan, M. Xun, X. Zhou, Y. Sun, Y. Dong, and D. Wu, Harnessing the capabilities of VCSELs: unlocking the potential for advanced integrated photonic devices and systems (2024)

    2024

  243. [263]

    I. H. Deutsch, Harnessing the Power of the Sec- ond Quantum Revolution, PRX Quantum1, 10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020101 (2020)

    2020 doi

  244. [264]

    Ye and P

    J. Ye and P. Zoller, Essay: Quantum Sensing with Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Platforms for Fundamental Physics, Physical Review Letters132, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.190001 (2024)

    2024 doi

  245. [265]

    M. W. Mitchell, Number-unconstrained quantum sens- ing, Quantum Science and Technology2, 10.1088/2058- 9565/aa80c0 (2017)

    2017 doi

  246. [266]

    S. Zhou, M. Zhang, J. Preskill, and L. Jiang, Achiev- ing the Heisenberg limit in quantum metrology using quantum error correction, Nature Communications9, 10.1038/s41467-017-02510-3 (2018)

    2018 doi

  247. [267]

    Braun, G

    D. Braun, G. Adesso, F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, U. Marzolino, M. W. Mitchell, and S. Pirandola, Quantum-enhanced measurements without entangle- ment, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 10.1103/RevMod- Phys.90.035006 (2018)

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.