REVIEW 2 cited by
Political DEBATE: Efficient Zero-shot and Few-shot Classifiers for Political Text
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Social scientists quickly adopted large language models due to their ability to annotate documents without supervised training, an ability known as zero-shot learning. However, due to their compute demands, cost, and often proprietary nature, these models are often at odds with replication and open science standards. This paper introduces the Political DEBATE (DeBERTa Algorithm for Textual Entailment) language models for zero-shot and few-shot classification of political documents. These models are not only as good, or better than, state-of-the art large language models at zero and few-shot classification, but are orders of magnitude more efficient and completely open source. By training the models on a simple random sample of 10-25 documents, they can outperform supervised classifiers trained on hundreds or thousands of documents and state-of-the-art generative models with complex, engineered prompts. Additionally, we release the PolNLI dataset used to train these models -- a corpus of over 200,000 political documents with highly accurate labels across over 800 classification tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Political Leaning and Politicalness Classification of Texts
The authors compile large multi-dataset benchmarks for political leaning and politicalness classification, show that single-dataset models fail out-of-distribution, and release new models with improved cross-domain F1 scores.
-
Generative Exaggeration in LLM Social Agents: Consistency, Bias, and Toxicity
When LLMs are given more context about a real social media user, they become more ideologically consistent but also more extreme, toxic, and stereotyped than the user actually is.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.