Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Extension of Second-Principles Density Functional Theory into the time domain

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Extending second-principles DFT to real-time density-matrix propagation, this paper computes optical and transport spectra for insulators and metals alike, including the Drude peak in lithium and Bloch oscillations, on systems of tens of…

desk verdict Good formal extension of SPDFT to time domain, but the metallic benchmark is not converged and the central claim about metals needs stronger evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13824 v1 pith:SXLMD25Z submitted 2025-07-18 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.other

Toraya Fernández-Ruiz , Jorge Íñiguez , Javier Junquera , Pablo García-Fernández This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other
keywords time-dependentdensityfunctionaltheorysecond-principlesDFTmatrixpropagationLiouville–vonNeumannequationopticalpropertiesmetalliclithiumlinear-scalingmethodsBlochoscillations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends second-principles DFT (SPDFT), a method that builds cheap interatomic models from DFT data, into the time domain. Instead of evolving wavefunctions, it propagates the density matrix in real space and real time through the Liouville–von Neumann equation, so that optical and transport responses are obtained at all orders from a short electric-field pulse. The authors show that the approach works for insulators and metals alike, reproducing spectra of SrTiO$_3$, diamond, and lithium that are competitive with linear-response DFT, Bethe-Salpeter results, and experiment. On a single workstation it handles nearly 100,000 atoms, opening large-scale out-of-equilibrium studies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the one-electron reduced density matrix $\hat n(t)$, expanded in a basis of localized Wannier-like functions $\chi_a$, and evolved by the Liouville–von Neumann equation $\dot d_{ab} = \frac{1}{i\hbar} [h, d]_{ab}$. The working implementation represents the Hamiltonian and density as sparse periodic matrices in real space, with cutoff radii $\delta r_h$ and $\delta r_d$, so storage and cost grow linearly with system size. A homogeneous electric field enters through the non-periodic position operator; the Zassenhaus expansion separates the non-periodic diagonal part from the periodic part of the evolution operator, and time-dependent electrostatics is included by letting local charges and dipoles adapt to the instantaneous density matrix.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to recompute the lithium optical conductivity with the reference density matrix updated self-consistently at each time step (or with a full real-time TDDFT reference on the same supercell) and compare to the fixed-$d^{(0)}$ TD-SPDFT curve; if the Drude peak or the interband onset shifts by more than the reported converged differences, the fixed-reference approximation is the collapse point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a static second-principles Hamiltonian built from ground-state DFT, expressed in localized Wannier functions and truncated in real space, can be propagated in time with the Liouville–von Neumann equation to deliver accurate optical and transport properties of very large systems. In diamond the inclusion of electron–electron interactions during propagation yields a spectrum closer to Bethe-Salpeter equation results than to DFT perturbation theory. In lithium the same real-time scheme produces both interband transitions and the Drude peak, and under a constant field it shows Bloch oscillations. The paper therefore asserts that TD-SPDFT applies to a wide variety of materials, including metals, which large-scale localized-basis methods usually struggle with.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation rests on assuming that a Hamiltonian built once from a ground-state DFT calculation, with the reference density matrix held fixed in time, still describes how electrons actually move when an electric field is applied; if that static picture is wrong for the material or field strength in question, the predicted spectra, Drude peak, and Bloch oscillations would not be reliable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Optical spectra of large systems (tens of thousands of atoms) can be computed on desktops or small clusters, with linear scaling in time and memory.
  • For insulators like diamond, TD-SPDFT captures features in the spectrum that linear-response DFT misses, approaching Bethe-Salpeter quality.
  • For metals like lithium, the real-time approach naturally yields the Drude peak, making transport properties accessible beyond interband-only approximations.
  • A constant electric field applied to lithium produces Bloch oscillations, demonstrating that transport under static fields can be simulated.
  • Because propagation is real-time and all-order, the same code can address nonlinear responses without deriving new perturbation formulas for each observable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the density-matrix cutoff must grow with the range of correlations, the linear-scaling advantage could degrade for strongly driven or correlated systems; the paper's convergence tests only probe modest field strengths.
  • The fixed reference density matrix may become the limiting approximation in metals under stronger fields, where the ground-state occupation should readjust; a self-consistent update would test the robustness of the reported spectra.
  • With higher-order Zassenhaus terms, the constant-field propagation could move from a proof of concept to a practical transport tool, and nonlinear optical effects such as harmonic generation become natural next tests.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends second-principles DFT (SPDFT) to real-time dynamics by propagating the one-particle density matrix with the Liouville-von Neumann equation in a localized Wannier basis. It introduces a sparse real-space representation for periodic solids, a Zassenhaus-based decoupling for homogeneous electric fields, and expressions for current and polarization. The method is demonstrated on a scalable tight-binding model (up to about 78,000 atoms on one workstation) and on optical spectra for SrTiO3, diamond, and metallic lithium, with comparisons to DFT perturbation theory, BSE calculations, and experiment. A proof-of-concept Bloch oscillation under a constant field is also reported. The central claim is that TD-SPDFT provides an accurate, large-scale, real-time approach applicable to both insulators and metals.

Significance. The paper addresses an important gap: real-time, large-scale optical and transport simulations built on a second-principles Hamiltonian. The formal core, especially Eq. (12) derived from the Liouville-von Neumann equation and the real-space periodic storage scheme, is presented coherently, and the model parameters come from first-principles Wannier/DFT calculations rather than from fitting the target spectra. The scalability test and the diamond comparison with BSE are genuinely useful evidence in favor of the method. However, the metallic benchmark, which carries the paper's broadest claim, is not converged with respect to the density-matrix cutoff, and the Drude response is shown only after an ad hoc lifetime broadening. These gaps currently limit the strength of the conclusions, but they appear fixable with additional numerical evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV D, Fig. 7] The lithium results do not demonstrate convergence with the density-matrix cutoff δr_d. The text reports that δr_d = 8.0, 10.0, and 12.0 Å give "some shifts and a better resolution" of the conductivity, but no plateau is shown; the peak positions and low-energy conductivity still move with δr_d. This matters because Sec. II B 2 identifies δr_d as the key convergence parameter for metals, where the one-particle density matrix decays algebraically rather than exponentially, so a hard cutoff is not guaranteed to converge. Since the abstract's load-bearing claim is applicability to metals, the current evidence is insufficient. In addition, all TD-SPDFT curves in Fig. 7 are shown after convolution with a lifetime τ = 1.5 fs, so the Drude-peak line shape and zero-frequency weight are not shown to be intrinsic to the real-time dynamics; the raw or unconvolved low-frequency spectrum should be reported as well.
  2. [Sec. II B 3, Eq. (23), Sec. IV D] The Zassenhaus decoupling is truncated at the leading exponentials, and the commutator [h_NP, h_P] is dropped without an explicit error estimate. The authors note that higher-order terms are periodic matrices, but periodicity does not imply smallness. The numerical consequence appears in the Bloch-oscillation simulation, which requires δt = 10^-4 fs to avoid instabilities; this is about four orders of magnitude smaller than the 0.01 fs step used in the optical runs. The transport capability claim is therefore supported only by a proof-of-concept at a very small time step. The manuscript should either quantify the truncation error or show convergence with respect to the order of the expansion.
  3. [Sec. II A, after Eq. (5)] The reference density matrix d0 is assumed constant in time. The authors correctly note that for metals the ground-state density matrix changes with geometry, but this limitation is not revisited when the lithium results are used to support the general claim that the method applies to metals. The optical and Bloch-oscillation runs freeze the geometry, so they do not test the regime where this approximation is most severe. A brief statement restricting the metal claim to fixed-geometry dynamics, or a test including a simple lattice response, would make the scope of the central claim clearer.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II B, after Eq. (12)] "Lioville" should be "Liouville".
  2. [Sec. I, Introduction] "thousand of hundreds of atoms" should be "tens of thousands of atoms".
  3. [Sec. IV D, final paragraph] "ohmnic-transport" should be "ohmic transport".
  4. [References] References 40 and 41 are the same publication (Junquera et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 235111 (2001)); the duplicate should be removed.
  5. [Eq. (46)] The expression ε2 = 4π σ1/ω assumes Gaussian units; the unit system used throughout should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: TD-SPDFT derivation is self-contained, with model parameters from first-principles Wannierization and benchmarks against external DFT, BSE, and experiment.

full rationale

The core derivation is self-contained: starting from the SPDFT energy (Eq. 7) and Hamiltonian (Eq. 8), the paper inserts the density-matrix expansion (Eq. 4) into the Liouville-von Neumann equation (Eq. 9), obtains the equation of motion (Eq. 12), and propagates with Eq. (15). The optical response is obtained by applying a delta-field pulse and Fourier-transforming the current (Eq. 30), not by fitting the target spectra. The Hamiltonian parameters (gamma, U, I) come from first-principles Wannier calculations in prior work (Refs. 7 and 29), and the benchmarks are external: DFT linear response, BSE, and experiment. The self-citations to the original SPDFT method and to the modelmaker package are method references, not load-bearing circular justifications; no uniqueness theorem or result is imported from the authors to force the outcome. The acknowledged limitations (constant reference density for metals, density-cutoff convergence in lithium, Zassenhaus truncation, ad hoc lifetime broadening) concern numerical reliability and interpretation, but they are not cases where a 'prediction' is equivalent to an input by construction. Therefore no circular step is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Liouville-von Neumann evolution, the Wannier localization assumption, the second-principles energy truncation, and several practical approximations: a frozen reference density matrix, truncated Zassenhaus decoupling, and instantaneous charge-dipole electrostatics. No genuinely new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are mainly numerical cutoffs and a post hoc lifetime broadening; the most concerning is tau, because it is adjusted to make spectra agree with experiment.

free parameters (4)
  • Hamiltonian cutoff distance (delta_rh) = 8.0 A for all systems
    Chosen as a balance between accuracy and computational cost; it truncates the Wannier Hamiltonian interactions and is not derived from the target spectra.
  • Density matrix cutoff distance (delta_rd) = 8.0 A (SrTiO3, diamond); 8.0, 10.0, 12.0 A tested for Li
    A convergence parameter; the paper increases it until the current is stable, and for Li the results are still changing with the cutoff.
  • Lifetime broadening tau = 1.0 fs (diamond), 1.5 fs (Li)
    An exponential decay applied to the time-domain current before Fourier transform; chosen post hoc so the broadened spectra resemble experiment.
  • Propagation time step = 0.01 fs for optical spectra; 1e-4 fs for Bloch oscillations
    Numerical parameter chosen for stability; for the Zassenhaus-truncated constant-field propagation it must be extremely small, which limits efficiency.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math The one-electron density operator evolves according to the Liouville-von Neumann equation, i(hbar) d(hat n)/dt = [hat h, hat n].
    Invoked in Sec. II B Eq. (9); this is the standard quantum evolution law for the density operator.
  • domain assumption Wannier functions are localized and decay quickly with distance, allowing sparse representation of the Hamiltonian and density matrix.
    Invoked in Sec. II B 2; underlies the computational feasibility and is standard for Wannier-based methods.
  • domain assumption The second-principles energy expansion to second order around the reference density is accurate for the perturbations considered.
    This is the foundational SPDFT approximation from Ref. 7, used in Sec. II A Eq. (2); it requires invariant bond topology.
  • ad hoc to paper The reference density matrix d0 is constant in time.
    Stated in Sec. II A after Eq. (5); exact for insulators at the reference geometry but an approximation for metals, acknowledged in the text.
  • ad hoc to paper The homogeneous electric field Hamiltonian is -e E r_ab, and its non-periodic part can be decoupled by truncating the Zassenhaus expansion.
    Introduced in Sec. II B 3, Eqs. (18)-(23); the truncation is an approximation that forces very small time steps for constant fields.
  • domain assumption Long-range electrostatic interactions can be represented by point charges and dipoles that respond instantaneously to the full instantaneous density.
    Introduced in Sec. II C, Eqs. (36)-(45); this is a model approximation inherited and extended from SPDFT.
  • domain assumption Nuclear velocities are negligible and the geometry is kept frozen during the electron dynamics.
    Stated in Sec. II B after Eq. (13) and in Sec. IV D for the Bloch oscillation simulation; removes electron-phonon coupling from the scope.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extension of Second-Principles Density Functional Theory into the time domain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SXLMD25Z

@misc{pith2026250713824,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extension of Second-Principles Density Functional Theory into the time domain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SXLMD25Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13824}
}
abstract

We present an extension of the second-principles density functional theory (SPDFT) method to perform time-dependent simulations. Our approach, which calculates the evolution of the density matrix in real time and real space using the Liouville-von Neumann equation of motion, allows determining optical and transport properties for very large systems, involving tens of thousands of atoms, using very modest computational platforms. In contrast with other methods, we show that SPDFT can be applied to a wide variety of materials including both metals and insulators. In particular, we illustrate its capabilities by obtaining the spectra of SrTiO$_3$, diamond and metallic lithium. We find that, while SPDFT results in SrTiO$_3$ are quite similar to those obtained from DFT using linear perturbation theory, we observe significant improvements over this method in both diamond and metallic lithium. The inclusion of electron-electron interactions during the evolution of the density matrix in diamond allows the spectra to more closely resemble those obtained with the Bethe-Salpeter equation than from perturbation theory. In lithium time-dependent SPDFT not only predicts interband transitions but also the Drude peak, opening the possibility of detailed ab initio studies of transport properties beyond many of the usual approximations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13824 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) Cartoon illustrating the way operators [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) Illustration of the effect of the electric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) Evolution of the computational time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Complex-part of the dielectric constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) Complex-part of the dielectric constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) Real-part of the optical conductiv [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (Color online) Representation of the variation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author V. G. \ Kravets , author A. V. \ Kabashin , author W. L. \ Barnes , \ and\ author A. N. \ Grigorenko ,\ 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00243 journal journal Chem. Rev. \ volume 118 ,\ pages 5912 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00243 2018

  2. [2]

    Huang \ and\ author M

    author author X. Huang \ and\ author M. A. \ El-Sayed ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2010.02.002 journal journal J. Adv. Res. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 13 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jare.2010.02.002 2010

  3. [3]

    Natsuki , author T

    author author J. Natsuki , author T. Natsuki , \ and\ author Y. Hashimoto ,\ 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150405.17 journal journal Int. J. Mat. Sci. Appl. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 325 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150405.17 2015

  4. [4]

    Meier \ and\ author S

    author author D. Meier \ and\ author S. M. \ Selbach ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Rev. Mat. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 157 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Das , author Y

    author author S. Das , author Y. L. \ Tang , \ and\ author Z. H. \ et al. ,\ 10.1038/s41586-019-1092-8 journal journal Nature \ volume 568 ,\ pages 368 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1092-8 2019

  6. [6]

    Fert , author N

    author author A. Fert , author N. Reyren , \ and\ author V. Cros ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Rev. Mat. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 17031 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Garcia-Fernandez , author J

    author author P. Garcia-Fernandez , author J. Wojde , author J. \'I\ niguez , \ and\ author J. Junquera ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 195137 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    author author J. C. \ Wojde , author P. Hermet , author M. P. \ Ljungberg , author P. Ghosez , \ and\ author J. \'I\ niguez ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys.: Cond. Matter \ volume 25 ,\ pages 305401 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page 2013

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    author author A. K. \ Yadav , author K. X. \ Nguyen , \ and\ author Z. H. \ et al. ,\ 10.1038/s41586-018-0855-y journal journal Nature \ volume 565 ,\ pages 468 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    Moreno , author J

    author author I.Sánchez-Movellán , author M. Moreno , author J. A. \ Aramburu-Zabala , \ and\ author P. García-Fernández ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Chem. C \ volume 127 ,\ pages 8332 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  3. [11]

    Cavalleri , author C

    author author A. Cavalleri , author C. Tóth , author C. W. \ Siders , author J. A. \ Squier , author F. Ráksi , author P. Forget , \ and\ author J. C. \ Kieffer ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 237401 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  4. [12]

    Appavoo , author B

    author author K. Appavoo , author B. Wang , author N. F. \ Brady , author M. Seo , author J. Nag , author R. P. \ Prasankumar , author D. J. \ Hilton , author S. T. \ Pantelides , \ and\ author R. F. J. \ Haglund ,\ 10.1021/nl4044828 journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 14 ,\ p...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Vanderbilt \ and\ author R

    author author D. Vanderbilt \ and\ author R. Resta ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-0934(06)02005-1 booktitle Conceptual Foundations of Materials ,\ series Contemporary Concepts of Condensed Matter Science , Vol. volume 2 ,\ editor edited by\ editor S. G. \ Louie \ and\ ed...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Runge \ and\ author E

    author author E. Runge \ and\ author E. K. U. \ Gross ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.997 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 997 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984 doi

  7. [15]

    Marques \ and\ author E

    author author M. Marques \ and\ author E. Gross ,\ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094449 journal journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. \ volume 55 ,\ pages 427 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  8. [16]

    author author A. D. \ Laurent \ and\ author D. Jacquemin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.24438 journal journal Int. J. Quan. Chem. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 2019 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Casida \ and\ author M

    author author M. Casida \ and\ author M. Huix-Rotllant ,\ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143803 journal journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. \ volume 63 ,\ pages 287 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    Aarons , author M

    author author J. Aarons , author M. Sarwar , author D. Thompsett , \ and\ author C. Skylaris ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 145 ,\ pages 220901 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  11. [19]

    Cohen-Tannoudji , author B

    author author C. Cohen-Tannoudji , author B. Diu , \ and\ author F. Laloë ,\ https://cds.cern.ch/record/101367 title Quantum mechanics \ ( publisher Wiley ,\ address New York, NY ,\ year 1977 )\ note trans. of : Mécanique quantique. Paris : Hermann, 1973 NoStop

    1977

  12. [20]

    author author C. Y. \ Yam , author S. Yokojima , \ and\ author G. Chen ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 68 ,\ pages 153105 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  13. [21]

    Wang , author C

    author author F. Wang , author C. Yam , author G. Chen , \ and\ author K. Fan ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Chem. \ volume 126 ,\ pages 134104 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  14. [22]

    Souza , author J

    author author I. Souza , author J. \'I\ niguez , \ and\ author D. Vanderbilt ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 69 ,\ pages 085106 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  15. [23]

    Zheng , author F

    author author X. Zheng , author F. Wang , author C. Y. \ Yam , author Y. Mo , \ and\ author G. Chen ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 75 ,\ pages 195127 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  16. [24]

    Wang , author D

    author author R. Wang , author D. Hou , \ and\ author X. Zheng ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 205126 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  17. [25]

    Castro , author M

    author author A. Castro , author M. A. L. \ Marques , \ and\ author A. Rubio ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 3425 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  18. [26]

    Gómez-Pueyo , author M

    author author A. Gómez-Pueyo , author M. A. L. \ Marques , author A. Rubio , \ and\ author A. Castro ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Theor. Comput. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 3040 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  19. [27]

    Marzari , author A

    author author N. Marzari , author A. A. \ Mostofi , author J. R. \ Yates , author I. Souza , \ and\ author D. Vanderbilt ,\ @noop journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 1419 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  20. [28]

    author author A. A. \ Mostofi , author J. R. \ Yates , author Y.-S. \ Lee , author I. Souza , author D. Vanderbilt , \ and\ author N. Marzari ,\ @noop journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 178 ,\ pages 685 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  21. [29]

    Carral-Sainz , author T

    author author N. Carral-Sainz , author T. Fernández-Ruiz , author J. Íñiguez , author J. Junquera , \ and\ author P. Garcia-Fernandez ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22056 ( year 2025 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22056 arXiv:2505.22056 NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    author author G. P. \ Arrighini , author N. L. \ Durante , \ and\ author C. Guidotti ,\ @noop journal journal Am. J. Phys. \ volume 64 ,\ pages 1036 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  23. [31]

    Magnus ,\ @noop journal journal Commun

    author author W. Magnus ,\ @noop journal journal Commun. Pure Appl. Math. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 649 ( year 1954 ) NoStop

    1954

  24. [32]

    author author J. D. \ Jackson ,\ @noop title Classical Electrodynamics \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 1962 ) NoStop

    1962

  25. [33]

    Resta \ and\ author D

    author author R. Resta \ and\ author D. Vanderbilt \ ( publisher Springer-Verlag ,\ address New York ,\ year 2007 )\ pp.\ pages 31--68 NoStop

    2007

  26. [34]

    Vanderbilt \ and\ author R

    author author D. Vanderbilt \ and\ author R. D. \ King-Smith ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 48 ,\ pages 4442 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993

  27. [35]

    Resta ,\ @noop journal journal J

    author author R. Resta ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matt. \ volume 22 ,\ pages 123201 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  28. [36]

    author author P. T. \ Mahon \ and\ author J. E. \ Sipe ,\ @noop journal journal SciPost. Phys. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 058 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  29. [37]

    Kaxiras ,\ @noop title Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2003 ) NoStop

    author author E. Kaxiras ,\ @noop title Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  30. [38]

    Pizzi , author V

    author author G. Pizzi , author V. Vitale , author R. Arita , author S. Bl \"u gel , author F. Freimuth , author G. G \'e ranton , author M. Gibertini , author D. Gresch , author C. Johnson , author T. Koretsune , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Cond. Matt. \ volume 3...

    2020

  31. [39]

    author author J. M. \ Soler , author E. Artacho , author J. D. \ Gale , author A. Garc \' a , author J. Junquera , author P. Ordej \'o n , \ and\ author D. S \'a nchez-Portal ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Cond. Matt. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 2745 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  32. [40]

    Junquera , author O

    author author J. Junquera , author O. Paz , author D. S\'anchez-Portal , \ and\ author E. Artacho ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.235111 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 64 ,\ pages 235111 ( year 2001 a ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  33. [41]

    Junquera , author \'O

    author author J. Junquera , author \'O . Paz , author D. S \'a nchez-Portal , \ and\ author E. Artacho ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 64 ,\ pages 235111 ( year 2001 b ) NoStop

    2001

  34. [42]

    Junquera , author M

    author author J. Junquera , author M. Zimmer , author P. Ordej \'o n , \ and\ author P. Ghosez ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 67 ,\ pages 155327 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  35. [43]

    van Benthem , author C

    author author K. van Benthem , author C. Elsässer , \ and\ author R. H. \ French ,\ 10.1063/1.1415766 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 6156 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  36. [44]

    Saslow , author T

    author author W. Saslow , author T. K. \ Bergstresser , \ and\ author M. L. \ Cohen ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 354 ( year 1966 ) NoStop

    1966

  37. [45]

    Tal , author P

    author author A. Tal , author P. Liu , author G. Kresse , \ and\ author A. Pasquarello ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 032019(R) ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  38. [46]

    author author E. D. \ Palik ,\ @noop title Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Vol. 1) \ ( publisher Academic, New York ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

  39. [47]

    Rasigni \ and\ author G

    author author M. Rasigni \ and\ author G. Rasini ,\ @noop journal journal J. Ops. Soc. Am. \ volume 67 ,\ pages 54 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    1977

  40. [48]

    author author A. G. \ Mathewson \ and\ author H. P. \ Myers ,\ @noop journal journal Phil. Mag. \ volume 25 ,\ pages 853 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972

  41. [49]

    Helgaker , author H

    author author T. Helgaker , author H. Larsen , author J. Olsen , \ and\ author P. J rgensen ,\ @noop journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 327 ,\ pages 397 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000

  42. [50]

    Shao , author C

    author author Y. Shao , author C. Saravanan , author M. Head-Gordon , \ and\ author C. A. \ White ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 118 ,\ pages 6144 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  43. [51]

    Pulay ,\ @noop journal journal Mol

    author author P. Pulay ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Phys. \ volume 17 ,\ pages 197 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    1969

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.