Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 82 references

HIP 61637 b: a TESS Brown Dwarf in a Near-circular Orbit around a Massive A-type Star

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read HIP 61637 b is a 47.8-Jupiter-mass brown dwarf transiting the most massive star known to host one, with its evolved host pinning the system age to 396 ± 46 Myr.

desk verdict Solid new transiting brown dwarf around the most massive host known, but the tidal circularization claim in the abstract contradicts the paper's own Table 4 timescale. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03094 v1 pith:T323BMIW submitted 2026-08-04 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Nino Ephremidze , David W. Latham , Perry Berlind , Allyson Bieryla , Michael L. Calkins , Gilbert A. Esquerdo , Samuel N. Quinn , Joseph E. Rodriguez
show 3 more authors
Noah Vowell Jack Schulte Hugh P. Osborn
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords browndwarfsdwarfdeserttransitingA-typestarsTESSradialvelocitystellaragestidalcircularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the discovery and full characterization of HIP 61637 b (TOI-5401 b), a brown dwarf transiting an A-type star. The authors find a radius $R_{\mathrm{BD}} = 1.149^{+0.049}_{-0.038}\,R_J$, a mass $M_{\mathrm{BD}} = 47.8^{+1.5}_{-1.4}\,M_J$, and a $6.829104 \pm 0.000011$ day near-circular orbit with eccentricity $e = 0.054 \pm 0.013$. Because the host star is near the end of its main-sequence life, its position on stellar evolutionary tracks gives a precise system age of $396 \pm 46$ Myr. A sympathetic reader would care because this adds a benchmark object in the sparsely populated brown-dwarf desert, where substellar cooling models and tidal circularization theory can be tested against a well-determined age.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the joint global fit: transit shapes, radial velocities, the spectral energy distribution, Gaia parallax, and stellar evolutionary tracks are modeled together in one MCMC solution, so the brown dwarf's mass and radius and the star's age are derived consistently rather than piecewise. The evolved position of the host near the main-sequence turnoff is what makes the age precise. The secondary mechanism is the tidal circularization timescale formula, which combines the stellar and brown dwarf tidal quality factors and predicts that a 6.8-day orbit around this star should have been damped toward $e = 0$; the measured $e = 0.054 \pm 0.013$ is read as the expected asymptotic tail of that process.

What would settle it

Measure an independent age for the brown dwarf, for example from its cooling luminosity or atmospheric lithium, and compare it with $396 \pm 46$ Myr; a disagreement larger than the quoted uncertainties would falsify the coeval assumption. Alternatively, resolve the companion responsible for the $0.426 \pm 0.054$ m/s/day radial-velocity drift and check whether its orbit changes the inferred $47.8\,M_J$ mass or period enough to shift the mass–radius–age comparison.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that HIP 61637 b is a precisely characterized transiting brown dwarf in the middle of the brown-dwarf desert, orbiting a $2.86\pm 0.12\,M_\odot$, $9180^{+240}_{-230}$ K A-type star that is just starting to evolve off the main sequence. The joint analysis of transit photometry, radial velocities, spectral energy distribution, parallax, and stellar isochrones yields the brown dwarf's radius, mass, period, eccentricity, and a coeval age of $396 \pm 46$ Myr. At that age the companion's radius falls where COND03 models predict an age of 120–500 Myr, in rough agreement, while Sonora (2021) models predict 150–200 Myr, an inconsistency the authors attribute to irradiation inflating the brown dwarf. Tidal evolution theory, with the adopted stellar quality factor $Q_\ast < 10^7$, predicts the orbit should have been circularized, which the near-zero eccentricity supports.

Load-bearing premise

The host star and the brown dwarf formed at the same time, so the $396 \pm 46$ Myr stellar isochrone age is used as the brown dwarf's age; if the brown dwarf formed later or was captured, the substellar-model comparison and the tidal-circularization argument lose their anchor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • HIP 61637 b joins the small set of transiting brown dwarfs with reliable ages, so it can be placed directly on mass–radius diagrams of substellar evolution models.
  • The COND03 age estimate of 120–500 Myr brackets the isochrone age, while the Sonora (2021) prediction of 150–200 Myr does not; the gap is a concrete target for models that include irradiation of brown dwarfs at 0.1 AU.
  • The near-zero eccentricity, combined with the theoretical tidal quality factor estimate, supports the picture that short-period brown dwarfs around intermediate-mass stars have their orbits circularized during the main-sequence phase.
  • The measured 0.426 m/s/day radial-velocity drift indicates another bound companion too faint and close to be resolved, making this system a candidate multi-object hierarchy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If irradiation is the cause of the Sonora discrepancy, the offset between the observed radius and the non-irradiated 396-Myr model radius can be converted into a quantitative inflation test for irradiated brown dwarfs, something the paper leaves as future work.
  • The HIP 61637 versus HIP 33609 contrast suggests a demographic test: at similar masses and host types, a 6.8-day orbit is circular while a 39.4-day orbit is eccentric, so measuring obliquities in both systems could distinguish disk-aligned formation from high-eccentricity migration.
  • The unresolved companion implied by the radial-velocity drift could be sought with astrometric or high-contrast observations; if found, its orbit would test whether the brown dwarf formed in a disk aligned with the outer binary.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery and characterization of HIP 61637 b (TOI-5401 b), a transiting brown dwarf around a bright, massive A-type star, using seven TESS transits from three sectors, 46 TRES radial velocities spanning about three years, SED photometry, and a Gaia parallax in a global EXOFASTv2 analysis with MIST isochrones. The derived parameters are M_BD = 47.8+1.5-1.4 M_J, R_BD = 1.149+0.049-0.038 R_J, P = 6.829104 +/- 0.000011 d, e = 0.054 +/- 0.013, host M* = 2.86 +/- 0.12 M_sun, R* = 4.33 +/- 0.17 R_sun, and age = 396 +/- 46 Myr. The authors argue that the object lies in the brown-dwarf desert, makes the host the most massive and brightest known host of a transiting BD, allows tests of substellar evolution models, and that tidal dissipation has circularized the orbit.

Significance. If the measurements are taken at face value, HIP 61637 b is an important addition to the small sample of well-characterized transiting brown dwarfs around intermediate-mass stars, and the evolved state of the host provides a relatively tight stellar age. The joint fit rests on good-quality photometry and a long RV baseline, and the paper makes explicit, falsifiable comparisons with COND03 and Sonora substellar models; the discussion of irradiation-driven radius inflation is useful. However, the tidal circularization argument is internally inconsistent between Section 3.3 and Table 4, and because this claim appears in the abstract and in the discussion, it must be corrected before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3 / Table 4 / Abstract] The tidal circularization analysis is internally inconsistent. Using the Table 4 parameters in Eq. (1), the stellar-tide term alone gives tau_circ ~ 0.5 (Q*/10^7) Gyr; the tabulated value tau_circ = 600 +/- 110 Gyr therefore corresponds to Q* ~ 10^10, but no Q* is stated in Table 4 or derived in the text. Section 3.3 instead concludes that circularization has occurred if Q* < 10^7 and adopts <Q*> ~ 10^2-10^6 from Esseldeurs et al. (2024), which would give tau_circ well below the 396 Myr age. Thus the abstract's and Section 4.2's claim that tidal dissipation has circularized the orbit is not supported by the paper's own tabulated timescale: either the table value is wrong, or the adopted Q* is wrong, and in the latter case the measured e = 0.054 +/- 0.013 would require an ongoing eccentricity-excitation mechanism that is not modeled. The authors should state the assumed Q*, make Table 4 follow from Eqs. (1)-(3), and revise the tidal claims accordingly.
  2. [Section 3.3, Eq. (1)] The circularization timescale is evaluated at the present-day stellar radius R* = 4.33 R_sun, but the star has reached this radius only recently, at an isochronal age of 396 Myr. Since tau_circ scales as R*^(-5), applying the current radius to the entire main-sequence lifetime overestimates the tidal dissipation integrated over the system's history; for example, with a typical main-sequence radius of 2.5-3 R_sun, the threshold Q* for circularization within the system age shifts by roughly an order of magnitude. The statement that the calculation accounts for the 'long main-sequence phase' does not follow from Eqs. (1)-(3), which use present-day values. The authors should integrate the tidal evolution over the stellar track or at least quantify the sensitivity to the adopted R* history.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1] The coeval-formation assumption is stated explicitly, but its potential failure modes are not discussed; a sentence on why dynamical capture of a 6.8-day transiting companion is implausible, and on what would change in the substellar-model comparison if the BD were not coeval, would strengthen the age-based conclusions.
  2. [Abstract / Section 4.2] The claim that HIP 61637 is the most massive and brightest star known to host a transiting BD should be accompanied by the date and the specific compilation used, since the sample of TESS-discovered transiting BDs is growing rapidly.
  3. [Figure 9] The four curves in Figure 9 are distinguished only by caption description; adding a legend or distinct linestyles would improve readability.
  4. [Table 4] The parameter tau_circ is listed under Planetary Parameters even though it is a system property; moving it or clearly labeling its assumptions would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the joint fit and external-model comparisons are self-contained, with only a non-circular internal inconsistency in the tidal timescale.

full rationale

The central characterization is self-contained: M_BD, R_BD, P, and e are derived from a single EXOFASTv2 joint MCMC fit to TESS photometry, TRES radial velocities, SED, Gaia parallax, and MIST isochrones. The age of 396 +/- 46 Myr comes from stellar evolutionary tracks fitted to the host star, and the coeval assumption for the brown dwarf is explicitly stated in Section 4.1 rather than derived from the substellar models. The substellar-model comparison uses independent COND03 and Sonora (2021) models as a consistency test against the fitted radius and mass; those model ages are not inputs to the fit. The tidal analysis in Section 3.3 uses the standard Jackson et al. (2008) equations and external Esseldeurs et al. (2024) Love-number theory; the observed eccentricity is compared with the predicted circularization state, not fitted to produce it. Self-citations to Carmichael et al. (2020, 2021) and Vowell et al. (2023, 2026) are contextual population comparisons and are not load-bearing. The paper does contain an internal inconsistency worth noting but it is not circularity: Table 4 lists tau_circ = 600 +/- 110 Gyr, while Section 3.3 claims the 396 Myr system age exceeds tau_circ for Q* < 1e7; the tabulated value implies a much larger Q* and is unreconciled with the adopted Q* ~ 1e2-1e6. That is a numerical/consistency problem in the tidal argument, not a reduction of a prediction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central parameter estimates carry no ad hoc free parameters beyond the nuisance parameters of the global fit; the load-bearing assumptions are the co-eval formation of star and BD, the fidelity of MIST isochrones, and the applicability of the chosen tidal dissipation theory. The inferred unseen companion is an invented entity with no independent detection yet.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption HIP 61637 and HIP 61637 b formed at the same time, making the stellar isochrone age the BD age.
    Section 4.1 states this assumption directly; the age estimate is then used to test substellar evolution models and tidal circularization.
  • domain assumption MIST stellar models accurately describe the evolution of a 2.86 solar mass star at the fitted metallicity and rotation.
    The age estimate in Section 3.2 relies on MIST tracks; model uncertainties from rotation and convective overshoot are not quantified.
  • domain assumption Jackson et al. (2008) tidal equations and Esseldeurs et al. (2024) dissipation rates apply to this star and BD.
    Section 3.3 uses these to derive Q* < 10^7 and conclude the orbit has been circularized; the quality factors are not measured directly.
invented entities (1)
  • Unseen long-period companion responsible for the measured RV drift
    purpose: Explains the 0.426 m/s/day linear drift after excluding the resolved 2-arcsec stellar companion
    No direct detection or orbital solution is presented; its existence is inferred solely from the linear radial velocity trend.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HIP 61637 b: a TESS Brown Dwarf in a Near-circular Orbit around a Massive A-type Star." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T323BMIW

@misc{pith2026260803094,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HIP 61637 b: a TESS Brown Dwarf in a Near-circular Orbit around a Massive A-type Star},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T323BMIW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03094}
}
abstract

We present the characterization of HIP 61637 b (TOI-5401 b), a brown dwarf discovered by TESS to transit an A-type star. HIP 61637 is the most massive and the brightest star known to host a transiting brown dwarf to date. The companion lies in the middle of the "brown dwarf desert". We perform a joint analysis of light curves from NASA's TESS mission and our high-resolution spectroscopy from the Tillinghast Reflector Echelle Spectrograph. We determine that HIP 61637 b has a radius of $R_{BD} = 1.149^{+0.049}_{-0.038}$ $R_J$, a mass of $M_{BD} = 47.8^{+1.5}_{-1.4}$ $M_J$, and transits its host star every $6.829104 \pm 0.000011$ days in a near-circular orbit ($e = 0.054 \pm 0.013$). The host star has a mass of $2.86\pm 0.12\,M_\odot$, a radius of $4.33 \pm 0.17\, R_\odot$, and an effective temperature of $T_{\text{eff}} = 9180^{+240}_{-230}$ K. We find that the host is nearing the end of its time on the main sequence and has begun to evolve, allowing for a precise age estimation of $396 \pm 46$ Myr for the system using stellar evolution models. This adds an important data point to the handful of well-characterized transiting brown dwarfs with reliable age estimates, allowing us to test the latest substellar evolution models. Theory of tidal evolution predicts that tidal dissipation mechanisms have circularized the orbit, consistent with the observed near-zero eccentricity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03094 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Raw light curves of HIP 61637 from TESS, ob￾served in sectors 23, 46, and 50. The flux has been nor￾malized by median deviation. Transit mid-times are marked with dashed vertical lines and triangles. Green triangles in￾dicate complete transit events that were used in our analysis. software (Vanderburg 2024). We independently pro￾cessed sections of the light curve data between momen￾tum dumps of each TESS sector to p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. All 7 full transits (labeled a-g), extracted from the 3 sectors of TESS observations. Turquoise plots show the raw light curve data, with the best-fit Keplerspline fits shown with the orange lines. Dark blue plots show the detrended light curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (Top): Best-fit radial velocity model showing full time domain of observations and a clear long-term ve￾locity drift in the RVs. (Bottom): Relative multi-order RVs are plotted in green, phase-folded on the orbital period with the linear drift removed. The black line shows the best-fit RV curve from our analysis with EXOFASTv2. The orbital ec￾centricity is very close to zero (e = 0.054 ± 0.013). We initially obtained… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: High-Resolution Imaging sensitivity curve ob￾tained by Ciardi (2024) using the Palomar 5-meter telescope. The curve shows evidence of a nearby faint stellar compan￾ion within a 2-arcsecond separation from HIP 61637. ± 0.026, respectively. Given that the infrared bright…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Luminosity-Temperature MIST evolutionary tracks with a constant mass of 2.86 M⊙. Blue and red circles mark equal timestamps of 50 and 1 Myr, respectively, along the evolutionary tracks. HIP 61637 is indicated with an or￾ange circle. is evolving fast enough in the lumin…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Tidal Circularization timescales for possible ranges of stellar and BD quality factors. The timescale is plotted as a function of Q∗, with the four different lines show￾ing QBD values of 103 , 104 , 105 , and 106 . the QBD starts to influence the circularization timesc…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Magnitude-RV-offset distribution of all stars within 50 pc separation and within 20 km s−1 radial ve￾locity offset from HIP 61637. The symbol sizes represent 3D distance from HIP 61637. The random distribution shows no sign of a comoving group [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Mass-radius diagram of all known transiting BDs (Carmichael 2023). The (a) COND03 and (b) Sonora (2021) substellar evolutionary models are overplotted for different ages of BDs. HIP 61637 is shown with a red square. (e = 0.56 ± 0.03). According to the tidal circulariz…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011638

    Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., et al.\ 2002, , 382, 563. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011638

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011638 2002

  2. [2]

    S., et al.\ 2003, , 402, 701

    Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T. S., et al.\ 2003, , 402, 701. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030252

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030252 2003

  3. [3]

    A., Latham, D

    Buchhave, L. A., Latham, D. W., Johansen, A., et al.\ 2012, , 486, 375. doi:10.1038/nature11121

    doi:10.1038/nature11121 2012

  4. [4]

    B., Lunine, J

    Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., et al.\ 2001, Reviews of Modern Physics, 73, 719. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.73.719

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.719 2001

  5. [5]

    Carmichael, T. 2023. https://www.theroncarmichael.com/browndwarfs

    2023

  6. [6]

    W., Latham, D

    Carmichael, T. W., Latham, D. W., & Vanderburg, A. M.\ 2019, , 158, 38. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab245e

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab245e 2019

  7. [7]

    W., Quinn, S

    Carmichael, T. W., Quinn, S. N., Mustill, A. J., et al.\ 2020, , 160, 53. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9b84

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9b84 2020

  8. [8]

    W., Quinn, S

    Carmichael, T. W., Quinn, S. N., Zhou, G., et al.\ 2021, , 161, 97. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd4e1

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd4e1 2021

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al.\ 2016, , 823, 102. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    R., Beichman, C

    Ciardi, D. R., Beichman, C. A., Horch, E. P., et al.\ 2015, , 805, 16. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/16

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    R.\ 2024, EXOFOP-TESS Observations - TOI 438312

    Ciardi, D. R.\ 2024, EXOFOP-TESS Observations - TOI 438312. Retrieved from https://exofop.ipac.caltech.edu/tess/view_tag.php?tag=438312

    2024

  4. [12]

    J., Hillenbrand, L

    David, T. J., Hillenbrand, L. A., Gillen, E., et al.\ 2019, , 872, 161. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafe09

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    doi:10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter, A.\ 2016, , 222, 8. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    D., Rodriguez, J

    Eastman, J. D., Rodriguez, J. E., Agol, E., et al.\ 2019, arXiv:1907.09480. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1907.09480

    2019 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449648

    Esseldeurs, M., Mathis, S., & Decin, L.\ 2024, , 690, A266. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449648

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Thesis, University of Szeged, Hungary

    F u r\'esz, G.\ 2008, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Szeged, Hungary

    2008

  9. [17]

    Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al.\ 2023, , 674, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    A., David, T

    Gillen, E., Hillenbrand, L. A., David, T. J., et al.\ 2017, , 849, 11. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa84b3

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    & Soter, S.\ 1966, , 5, 1, 375

    Goldreich, P. & Soter, S.\ 1966, , 5, 1, 375. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(66)90051-0

    1966 doi

  12. [20]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141145

    Grieves, N., Bouchy, F., Lendl, M., et al.\ 2021, , 652, A127. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141145

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    X., Vanderburg, A., P \'a l, A., et al.\ 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 204

    Huang, C. X., Vanderburg, A., P \'a l, A., et al.\ 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 204. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    X., Vanderburg, A., P \'a l, A., et al.\ 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 206

    Huang, C. X., Vanderburg, A., P \'a l, A., et al.\ 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 206. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2d

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    doi:10.1086/529187

    Jackson, B., Greenberg, R., & Barnes, R.\ 2008, , 678, 1396. doi:10.1086/529187

    2008 doi

  16. [24]

    doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac2ef0

    Kunimoto, M., Huang, C., Tey, E., et al.\ 2021, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 5, 234. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac2ef0

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aca158

    Kunimoto, M., Tey, E., Fong, W., et al.\ 2022, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 6, 236. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aca158

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    S., Saumon, D., Visscher, C., et al.\ 2021, , 920, 85

    Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., Visscher, C., et al.\ 2021, , 920, 85. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac141d

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al.\ 2011, , 192, 3. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al.\ 2013, , 208, 4. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  21. [29]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al.\ 2015, , 220, 15. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243454

    Psaridi, A., Bouchy, F., Lendl, M., et al.\ 2022, , 664, A94. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243454

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al.\ 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    2015 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M.\ 1998, , 500, 525. doi:10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  25. [33]

    W., Deleuil, M., et al.\ 2022, , 516, 636

    Sebastian, D., Guenther, E. W., Deleuil, M., et al.\ 2022, , 516, 636. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2131

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    C., Stumpe, M

    Smith, J. C., Stumpe, M. C., Van Cleve, J. E., et al.\ 2012, , 124, 919, 1000. doi:10.1086/667697

    2012 doi

  27. [35]

    S., Burrows, A., & Milsom, J

    Spiegel, D. S., Burrows, A., & Milsom, J. A.\ 2011, , 727, 57. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/57

    2011 doi

  28. [36]

    G., Oelkers, R

    Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Pepper, J., et al.\ 2018, , 156, 102. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad050

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    C., Smith, J

    Stumpe, M. C., Smith, J. C., Van Cleve, J. E., et al.\ 2012, , 124, 919, 985. doi:10.1086/667698

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    C., Smith, J

    Stumpe, M. C., Smith, J. C., Catanzarite, J. H., et al.\ 2014, , 126, 935, 100. doi:10.1086/674989

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    W., et al.\ 2020, , 159, 151

    S ubjak, J., Sharma, R., Carmichael, T. W., et al.\ 2020, , 159, 151. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab7245

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    M., Rizzuto, A

    Tofflemire, B. M., Rizzuto, A. C., Newton, E. R., et al.\ 2021, , 161, 171. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abdf53

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    Retrieved from https://github.com/avanderburg/keplersplinev2

    Vanderburg, A.\ 2024, Kepler Spline, version 2.0, GitHub repository. Retrieved from https://github.com/avanderburg/keplersplinev2

    2024

  34. [42]

    E., Quinn, S

    Vowell, N., Rodriguez, J. E., Quinn, S. N., et al.\ 2023, , 165, 268. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acd197

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    E., et al.\ 2026, , 545, staf2161

    Vowell, N., Dong, J., Rodriguez, J. E., et al.\ 2026, , 545, staf2161. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2161

    2026 doi

  36. [44]

    \'A ., Bayliss, D., et al.\ 2019, , 157, 31

    Zhou, G., Bakos, G. \'A ., Bayliss, D., et al.\ 2019, , 157, 31. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf1bb

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    W., & Butler, R

    Marcy, G. W., & Butler, R. P.\ 2000, , 112, 137. doi:10.1086/316516

    2000 doi

  38. [46]

    H.\ 2006, , 640, 1051

    Grether, D., & Lineweaver, C. H.\ 2006, , 640, 1051. doi:10.1086/500161

    2006 doi

  39. [47]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630051

    Alibert, Y.\ 2017, , 606, A69. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630051

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    M., Rosenfeld, K

    Andrews, S. M., Rosenfeld, K. A., Kraus, A. L., et al.\ 2013, , 771, 129. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/129

    2013 doi

  41. [49]

    J.\ 2020, , 498, 2270

    Barker, A. J.\ 2020, , 498, 2270. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2405

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    doi:10.1017/S1743921313013138

    Baruteau, C., & Masset, F.\ 2013, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 8, 372. doi:10.1017/S1743921313013138

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220159

    Bitsch, B., Crida, A., Morbidelli, A., et al.\ 2013, , 549, A124. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220159

    2013 doi

  44. [52]

    doi:10.2458/azu\_uapress\_9780816531240-ch027

    Chabrier, G., Johansen, A., Janson, M., et al.\ 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 619. doi:10.2458/azu\_uapress\_9780816531240-ch027

    2014 doi

  45. [53]

    H.\ 2010, , 724, 730

    D'Angelo, G., & Lubow, S. H.\ 2010, , 724, 730. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/730

    2010 doi

  46. [54]

    & Mayor, M.\ 1991, , 248, 485

    Duquennoy, A. & Mayor, M.\ 1991, , 248, 485

    1991

  47. [55]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424742

    Dürmann, C., & Kley, W.\ 2015, , 574, A52. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424742

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    L., Mayor, M., & Udry, S.\ 2005, , 431, 1129

    Halbwachs, J. L., Mayor, M., & Udry, S.\ 2005, , 431, 1129. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041219

    2005 doi

  49. [57]

    Hegedus, T., Gimenez, A., & Claret, A.\ 2005, in Tidal Evolution and Oscillations in Binary Stars: Third Granada Workshop on Stellar Structure, 333, 88

    2005

  50. [58]

    Hekker, S., Snellen, I. A. G., Aerts, C., et al.\ 2008, , 480, 215. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078321

    2008 doi

  51. [59]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/69

    Helled, R., & Bodenheimer, P.\ 2014, , 789, 69. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/69

    2014 doi

  52. [60]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/89

    Janson, M., Bonavita, M., Klahr, H., et al.\ 2011, , 736, 89. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/89

    2011 doi

  53. [61]

    A., Butler, R

    Johnson, J. A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., et al.\ 2007, , 670, 833. doi:10.1086/522211

    2007 doi

  54. [62]

    A., Aller, K

    Johnson, J. A., Aller, K. M., Howard, A. W., et al.\ 2010, , 122, 905. doi:10.1086/655775

    2010 doi

  55. [63]

    & Dirksen, G.\ 2006, , 447, 369

    Kley, W. & Dirksen, G.\ 2006, , 447, 369. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053914

    2006 doi

  56. [64]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054061

    Kley, W., & Dirksen, G.\ 2006, , 447, 369. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054061

    2006 doi

  57. [65]

    W., Stefanik, R

    Latham, D. W., Stefanik, R. P., Torres, G., et al.\ 2002, , 124, 1144. doi:10.1086/341384

    2002 doi

  58. [66]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424343

    Lambrechts, M., & Johansen, A.\ 2014, , 572, A107. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424343

    2014 doi

  59. [67]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832727

    Lindegren, L., Hern \'a ndez, J., Bombrun, A., et al.\ 2018, , 616, A2. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832727

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C.\ 1996, , 380, 606. doi:10.1038/380606a0

    1996 doi

  61. [69]

    H., Seibert, M., & Artymowicz, P.\ 1999, , 526, 1001

    Lubow, S. H., Seibert, M., & Artymowicz, P.\ 1999, , 526, 1001. doi:10.1086/308045

    1999 doi

  62. [70]

    L., Rieke, G

    Luhman, K. L., Rieke, G. H., Lada, C. J., et al.\ 1999, , 525, 466. doi:10.1086/307872

    1999 doi

  63. [71]

    S., Xu, S., Federrath, C., Hu, Y., & Seta, A.\ 2024, arXiv:2406.18184

    Mathew, S. S., Xu, S., Federrath, C., Hu, Y., & Seta, A.\ 2024, arXiv:2406.18184

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526293

    Mathis, S.\ 2015, , 580, L3. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526293

    2015 doi

  65. [73]

    J., & Rasio, F

    Matsumura, S., Peale, S. J., & Rasio, F. A.\ 2010, , 725, 1995. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1995

    2010 doi

  66. [74]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118464

    Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Georgy, C., et al.\ 2012, , 547, A112. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118464

    2012 doi

  67. [75]

    J., et al.\ 2016, , 831, 125

    Pascucci, I., Testi, L., Herczeg, G. J., et al.\ 2016, , 831, 125. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/125

    2016 doi

  68. [76]

    J., Sellek, A

    Qiao, L., Haworth, T. J., Sellek, A. D., & Ali, A. A.\ 2023, , 523, 3495. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1487

    2023 doi

  69. [77]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424846

    Ribas, Á., Bouy, H., & Merín, B.\ 2015, , 576, A52. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424846

    2015 doi

  70. [78]

    & Whitworth, A

    Stamatellos, D. & Whitworth, A. P.\ 2008, , 480, 879. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078628

    2008 doi

  71. [79]

    A., & Whitworth, A

    Stamatellos, D., Hubber, D. A., & Whitworth, A. P.\ 2008, , 382, L30. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00415.x

    2008

  72. [80]

    P., & Latham, D

    Stefanik, R. P., & Latham, D. W.\ 1992, in IAU Colloquium 135: Complementary Approaches to Double and Multiple Star Research, ed. H. A. McAlister & W. I. Hartkopf (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 173. doi:10.1017/S0252921100006345

    1992 doi

  73. [81]

    & Moe, M.\ 2020, , 491, 5158

    Tokovinin, A. & Moe, M.\ 2020, , 491, 5158. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3299

    2020 doi

  74. [82]

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/177 Deleted stuff We also consider the tidal synchronization timescale of the system

    Tokovinin, A.\ 2015, , 150, 177. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/177 Deleted stuff We also consider the tidal synchronization timescale of the system. The expression for this timescale is given by Goldreich & Soter ( blue 1966 ) and Šubjak et al. ( blue 2020 ) as equation 1 _ = 9 ...

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.