Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rethinking the Starting Point: Collaborative Pre-Training for Federated Downstream Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02225 v4 pith:T43TCT5F submitted 2024-02-03 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords downstreamtasksaccuracycopreflperformancepre-trainingacrossarbitrary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A few recent studies have demonstrated that leveraging centrally pre-trained models can offer advantageous initializations for federated learning (FL). However, existing pre-training methods do not generalize well when faced with an arbitrary set of downstream FL tasks. Specifically, they often (i) achieve limited average accuracy, particularly when there are unseen downstream labels, and (ii) result in significant accuracy variance, failing to provide a balanced performance across clients. To address these challenges, we propose CoPreFL, a collaborative/distributed pre-training approach which provides a robust initialization for downstream FL tasks. The key idea of CoPreFL is a model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) procedure that tailors the global model to closely mimic heterogeneous and unseen FL scenarios, resulting in a pre-trained model that is rapidly adaptable to arbitrary FL tasks. Our MAML procedure incorporates performance variance into the meta-objective function, balancing performance across clients rather than solely optimizing for accuracy. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that CoPreFL obtains significant improvements in both average accuracy and variance across arbitrary downstream FL tasks with unseen/seen labels, compared with various pre-training baselines. We also show how CoPreFL is compatible with different well-known FL algorithms applied by the downstream tasks, enhancing performance in each case.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fairness in Federated Learning: Fairness for Whom?

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A critical review of 121 federated learning fairness papers identifies five recurring pitfalls and proposes a harm-centered, lifecycle-based framework.

Pith tools