pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18662 · v2 · pith:T52UVEEMnew · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

Coherence-gated quantum devices via real-time weak measurement

Priyank Singh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 00:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords coherence-gated routingweak measurementsstochastic master equationquantum random number generatorentanglement certificationBloch sphere geometrypurity monotonicitytail bounds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Real-time weak measurements enable coherence-gated photon routing for secure quantum applications.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces coherence-gated routing as an alternative to conventional single-photon routers that rely on projective measurements of the qubit energy eigenstate. Instead, the routing decision is based on the magnitude of the qubit's quantum coherence, estimated continuously in real time from simultaneous weak measurements of σ_x and σ_z. The conditional density matrix evolves according to the stochastic master equation, yielding a coherence score S(T) that is compared against a tunable threshold to decide whether to accept the photon. This approach certifies coherence at the moment of emission without destroying it through projection. As a result, it supports a quantum random number generator whose min-entropy has a geometric lower bound on the Bloch sphere and a phase-tracked photon source that certifies bounds on matter-matter entanglement fidelity after Bell-state measurement.

Core claim

The central claim is that coherence-gated routing accepts a photon only when the coherence score S(T) = sqrt(⟨σ_x⟩_c² + ⟨σ_y⟩_c²), extracted from the conditional density matrix via the stochastic master equation, exceeds a chosen threshold S_th. Certifying coherence at emission enables a quantum random number generator with min-entropy H_∞ ≥ -log₂((1 + sqrt(1 - S_th²))/2) bounded by Bloch-sphere geometry, and a phase-tracked photon source whose two-node coherence certification bounds the matter-matter entanglement fidelity after Bell-state measurement. The estimator acts as a security primitive, with benchmarking showing that underestimating detector efficiency stabilizes numerics and limits

What carries the argument

The coherence score S(T) extracted in real time from simultaneous weak measurements of σ_x and σ_z through the stochastic master equation, which serves as the decision variable for accepting or rejecting photons based on estimated coherence magnitude.

If this is right

  • A quantum random number generator achieves a min-entropy lower bound H_∞ ≥ -log₂((1 + sqrt(1 - S_th²))/2) set directly by the chosen coherence threshold via Bloch-sphere geometry.
  • Coherence certification at emission in a two-node setup bounds the fidelity of matter-matter entanglement generated after Bell-state measurement.
  • Underestimating detector efficiency in the weak measurement chain stabilizes the numerical estimates and suppresses overcertification of coherence.
  • A purity-monotonicity result shows how undercertification of purity amplifies into coherence overcertification through a geometric loophole by a factor of roughly twelve.
  • Complementary tail bounds from an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck comparison and an exponential supermartingale limit overcertification to at most 9 percent.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The real-time coherence estimator could be integrated into adaptive feedback loops for maintaining coherence in larger quantum networks or distributed sensors.
  • This gating primitive suggests extensions to multi-qubit or hybrid quantum-classical control schemes where coherence is preserved across sequential operations.
  • Experimental tests in circuit QED setups could directly measure the gap between estimated and actual coherence to quantify the geometric loophole in practice.
  • The approach connects to continuous quantum control methods, potentially enabling new protocols for generating certified resources in noisy open systems.

Load-bearing premise

Simultaneous weak measurements of σ_x and σ_z can be performed continuously and their outcomes fed into the stochastic master equation to produce an accurate real-time estimate of the conditional coherence score without the measurement back-action destroying the coherence being certified.

What would settle it

An experiment demonstrating that the observed min-entropy of bits from the coherence-gated source falls below the predicted Bloch-sphere bound for a given S_th, or that post-selected entanglement fidelity is lower than the certified value, would falsify the practical claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18662 by Priyank Singh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Architecture of the coherence-gated single-photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Conditional versus unconditional coherence from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. QRNG certification from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Bloch-sphere diagnostic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Two-node entanglement distribution protocol. Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Input product-state quality (ideal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Mean coherence bias for each estimator. (b) Mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Composable security. (a) Min-entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Overcertification tail bounds. Red: empirical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Estimator performance across 3000 trajectories. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Single-trajectory comparison. (a) Direct SME [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Threshold sweep across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Single-photon routers in cavity and circuit QED direct photons by the qubit's energy eigenstate -- a projective decision that destroys coherence. We propose a different primitive: coherence-gated routing, where the decision depends on the magnitude of the qubit's quantum coherence, estimated in real time from simultaneous weak measurements of $\sigma_x$ and $\sigma_z$. A photon is accepted if the coherence score $S(T) = \sqrt{\langle\sigma_x\rangle_c^2 + \langle\sigma_y\rangle_c^2}$, extracted from the conditional density matrix via the stochastic master equation, exceeds a tunable threshold $S_{\mathrm{th}}$. Certifying coherence at emission enables two applications conventional heralded sources cannot: (i) a quantum random number generator with min-entropy bounded by Bloch-sphere geometry, $H_\infty \geq -\log_2\!\bigl(\frac{1+\sqrt{1-S_{\mathrm{th}}^2}}{2}\bigr)$, and (ii) a phase-tracked photon source whose two-node coherence certification bounds the matter--matter entanglement fidelity after Bell-state measurement. The estimator is itself a security primitive. Benchmarking seven configurations, we find that underestimating detector efficiency ($\eta_{\mathrm{a}} < \eta_{\mathrm{true}}$) both stabilizes the numerics and suppresses overcertification. We trace this via a purity-monotonicity result, identify a geometric loophole amplifying purity undercertification into coherence overcertification by an order of magnitude ($\sim$12$\times$), and prove two complementary tail bounds: an Ornstein--Uhlenbeck comparison giving $9.0\%$ overcertification (empirical $6.3\%$ from $10^6$ trajectories) and an exponential supermartingale establishing structural exponential decay.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces coherence-gated routing as a primitive for single-photon routers in cavity and circuit QED. Instead of projective decisions based on the qubit energy eigenstate, the scheme estimates the conditional coherence score S(T) = sqrt(<σ_x>_c² + <σ_y>_c²) in real time from simultaneous weak measurements of σ_x and σ_z via the stochastic master equation, accepting photons only when S(T) exceeds a tunable threshold S_th. This enables (i) a QRNG whose min-entropy satisfies the geometric bound H_∞ ≥ -log₂((1 + sqrt(1 - S_th²))/2) and (ii) a phase-tracked photon source that certifies matter-matter entanglement fidelity after Bell-state measurement. The work supplies numerical benchmarking across seven configurations, a purity-monotonicity result, quantification of a geometric loophole (~12× amplification of purity undercertification into coherence overcertification), and two tail bounds—an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck comparison (9.0 % theoretical) and an exponential supermartingale—validated on 10^6 trajectories (empirical 6.3 %).

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a new security primitive that certifies coherence at emission, enabling applications that standard heralded sources cannot achieve. The Bloch-sphere-derived min-entropy bound is parameter-light and falsifiable. The explicit tail bounds, large-scale numerical validation, purity-monotonicity theorem, and geometric-loophole analysis constitute concrete strengths that directly address estimator bias and back-action risks. These elements could influence the design of real-time feedback protocols in quantum information processing and secure communication.

major comments (2)
  1. [QRNG application] The min-entropy bound for the QRNG is presented as following directly from Bloch-sphere geometry and independent of data fitting, yet the mapping from the real-time estimator S(T) to the final security parameter must incorporate the tail-bound failure probability (9.0 % theoretical) to yield a rigorous overall ε-security statement; this composition is not shown explicitly.
  2. [Numerical benchmarking] The benchmarking section reports that underestimating detector efficiency η_a < η_true suppresses overcertification and stabilizes numerics, but the specific measurement strengths, decoherence rates, and η values for each of the seven configurations are not tabulated; without these, it is difficult to assess whether the 6.3 % empirical rate and the ~12× geometric amplification factor generalize beyond the simulated parameter sets.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that two complementary tail bounds are proved but names only the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck comparison; a one-sentence mention of the exponential supermartingale would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the trajectory plots should state the exact number of trajectories (10^6) and whether the plotted overcertification rate includes confidence intervals.
  3. [Notation] The notation ⟨·⟩_c for conditional expectation is used repeatedly; a brief reminder of its definition in the stochastic master equation would aid readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [QRNG application] The min-entropy bound for the QRNG is presented as following directly from Bloch-sphere geometry and independent of data fitting, yet the mapping from the real-time estimator S(T) to the final security parameter must incorporate the tail-bound failure probability (9.0 % theoretical) to yield a rigorous overall ε-security statement; this composition is not shown explicitly.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit composition is required for a complete ε-security statement. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph deriving the overall security parameter as the product of the geometric min-entropy bound and the tail-bound failure probability (using either the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck comparison or the exponential supermartingale). This follows the standard composition of conditional entropy with estimator failure probability and leaves the Bloch-sphere bound itself unchanged. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical benchmarking] The benchmarking section reports that underestimating detector efficiency η_a < η_true suppresses overcertification and stabilizes numerics, but the specific measurement strengths, decoherence rates, and η values for each of the seven configurations are not tabulated; without these, it is difficult to assess whether the 6.3 % empirical rate and the ~12× geometric amplification factor generalize beyond the simulated parameter sets.

    Authors: We accept that tabulating the simulation parameters will improve clarity and reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new table that lists, for each of the seven configurations, the measurement strengths, decoherence rates, and the assumed detector efficiencies η_a (both the underestimated value used in the estimator and the true value). This addition will allow direct verification of the reported empirical rate and geometric amplification factor. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The coherence score S(T) is obtained from the stochastic master equation driven by simultaneous weak measurements of σ_x and σ_z; this is a standard filtering step, not a self-definition. The min-entropy bound H_∞ ≥ -log₂((1 + sqrt(1 - S_th²))/2) follows directly from Bloch-sphere geometry and is independent of any fitted values or modeling choices. The two tail bounds (Ornstein–Uhlenbeck comparison and exponential supermartingale) are proved analytically and then validated on 10^6 independent trajectories, supplying external numerical confirmation rather than circular reuse of the same data. The purity-monotonicity result and explicit quantification of the ~12× geometric loophole for detector-efficiency underestimation are derived from the conditional dynamics and do not reduce to a tunable parameter renamed as a prediction. No self-citations appear in the load-bearing steps, and all central claims remain falsifiable against the modeled SME trajectories.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard quantum measurement theory and the stochastic master equation; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • S_th
    Tunable coherence threshold that trades off photon acceptance rate against the strength of the coherence certification and the resulting entropy bound.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The stochastic master equation governs the evolution of the conditional density matrix under simultaneous weak measurements of σ_x and σ_z.
    Invoked to extract the conditional expectations that define the coherence score S(T).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5849 in / 1384 out tokens · 57868 ms · 2026-05-21T00:56:27.316849+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Acoherence-certified quantum random number gen- erator(QRNG) whose min-entropy per bit is bounded by Bloch-sphere geometry (Sec. IV)

    work page

  2. [2]

    Acoherence-certified, phase-tracked photon source for quantum networks, with classical feedforward phase correction (Sec. V). We further show how independent coherence certifica- tion at two nodes constrains the achievable entanglement arXiv:2604.18662v1 [quant-ph] 20 Apr 2026 2 Q qubit Ix(t) Iz(t) σx σz FPGA:ρ c(t) S(T)≷S th Port A Port B S > S th S≤S th...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Thecoherence basis(σ z eigenstates) defines which off-diagonal elements ofρc constitute the re- source to be certified

    work page

  4. [4]

    Themeasurement axes(σ x,σ z)provideinforma- tion about the Bloch-vector components while in- troducing dephasing that is complementary to each measurement axis

    work page

  5. [5]

    We refer to this trio as themeasurement–coherence–drive triad

    Thetransverse drive(Ω xσx) continuously re- generates equatorial coherence by driving pop- ulation between|0⟩and|1⟩, counteracting the measurement-induced dephasing of thex-yplane. We refer to this trio as themeasurement–coherence–drive triad. Any alternative measurement scheme faces the same information–disturbance tradeoff: measurement of an observableO...

    work page

  6. [6]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead, Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    I.-C. Hoi, C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, T. Palomaki, B. Peropadre, and P. Delsing, Demonstration of a single- photon router in the microwave regime, Physical Review Letters107, 073601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Shomroni, S

    I. Shomroni, S. Rosenblum, Y. Lovsky, O. Bechler, G. Guendelman, and B. Dayan, All-optical routing of sin- gle photons by a one-atom switch controlled by a single photon, Science345, 903 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    T. Aoki, A. S. Parkins, D. J. Alton, C. A. Regal, B. Dayan, E. Ostby, K. J. Vahala, and H. J. Kimble, Efficient routing of single photons by one atom and a mi- crotoroidal cavity, Physical Review Letters102, 083601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Zhou, L.-P

    L. Zhou, L.-P. Yang, Y. Li, and C. P. Sun, Quantum routing of single photons with a cyclic three-level system, Physical Review Letters111, 103604 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    K. M. Sliwa, M. Hatridge, A. Narla, S. Shankar, L. Frun- zio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Reconfigurable Josephson circulator/directional amplifier, Physical Re- view X5, 041020 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Baumgratz, M

    T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Quanti- fying coherence, Physical Review Letters113, 140401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Streltsov, G

    A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 041003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    K. W. Murch, S. J. Weber, C. Macklin, and I. Siddiqi, Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconduct- ing quantum bit, Nature502, 211 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    S. J. Weber, K. W. Murch, M. E. Kimchi-Schwartz, N. Roch, and I. Siddiqi, Quantum trajectories of super- conducting qubits, Comptes Rendus Physique17, 766 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Hacohen-Gourgy, L

    S. Hacohen-Gourgy, L. S. Martin, E. Flurin, V. V. Ra- masesh, K.B.Whaley,andI.Siddiqi,Quantumdynamics of simultaneously measured non-commuting observables, Nature538, 491 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    A. N. Jordan and A. N. Korotkov, Qubit feedback and control with kicked quantum nondemolition measure- ments: A quantum Bayesian analysis, Physical Review B74, 085307 (2006)

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Measure- ment and Control(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Jacobs,Quantum Measurement Theory and its Appli- cations(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    K. Jacobs,Quantum Measurement Theory and its Appli- cations(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    H. J. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quan- tum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, 1993)

    work page 1993

  22. [22]

    Dalibard, Y

    J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics, Physical Review Letters68, 580 (1992)

    work page 1992

  23. [23]

    van Handel, J

    R. van Handel, J. K. Stockton, and H. Mabuchi, Mod- elling and feedback control design for quantum state preparation, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semi- classical Optics7, S179 (2005)

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    J. F. Ralph, J. Combes, and H. M. Wiseman, An inter- leaved sampling scheme for the characterization of sin- glequbitdynamics,QuantumInformationProcessing11, 1523 (2012)

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Herrero-Collantes and J

    M. Herrero-Collantes and J. C. Garcia-Escartin, Quan- tum random number generators, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    X. Ma, X. Yuan, Z. Cao, B. Qi, and Z. Zhang, Quantum random number generation, npj Quantum Information2, 16021 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Pironio, A

    S. Pironio, A. Acín, S. Massar, A. B. de la Giroday, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, S. Olmschenk, D. Hayes, L. Luo, T. A. Manning, and C. Monroe, Random numbers certi- fied by Bell’s theorem, Nature464, 1021 (2010)

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    Y. Liu, Q. Zhao, M.-H. Li, J.-Y. Guan, Y. Zhang, B. Bai, W. Zhang, W.-Z. Liu, C. Wu, X. Yuan,et al., Device- independent quantum random-number generation, Na- ture562, 548 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Jennewein, U

    T. Jennewein, U. Achleitner, G. Weihs, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, A fast and compact quantum random number generator, Review of Scientific Instruments71, 1675 (2000)

    work page 2000

  32. [32]

    Symul, S

    T. Symul, S. M. Assad, and P. K. Lam, Real time demon- stration of high bitrate quantum random number gener- ation with coherent laser light, Applied Physics Letters 98, 231103 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Li, Z.-Q

    H.-W. Li, Z.-Q. Yin, Y.-C. Wu, X.-B. Zou, S. Wang, W. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-F. Han, Semi-device- independent random-number expansion without entan- glement, Physical Review A84, 034301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Bowles, M

    J. Bowles, M. T. Quintino, and N. Brunner, Certify- ing the dimension of classical and quantum systems in a prepare-and-measure scenario with independent devices, Physical Review Letters112, 140407 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Lunghi, J

    T. Lunghi, J. B. Brask, C. C. W. Lim, Q. Lavigne, J. Bowles, A. Martin, H. Zbinden, and N. Brunner, Self- testing quantum random number generation, Physical Review Letters114, 150501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Meyer-Scott, C

    E. Meyer-Scott, C. Silberhorn, and A. Migdall, Single- photon sources: Approaching the ideal through mul- tiplexing, Review of Scientific Instruments91, 041101 13 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Kurpiers, P

    P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, T. Walter, B. Royer, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, Y. Salathé, A. Akin, S. Storz, J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons, Nature558, 264 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, K. J. Biber, E. Biber, K. J. Satzinger, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, É. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, K. Y. Noh, Y. P. Xu, and A. N. Cleland, Deterministic multi-qubit entan- glement in a quantum network, Nature590, 571 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    P. A. Parrilo, Semidefinite programming relaxations for semialgebraic problems, Mathematical Programming96, 293 (2003)

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    C. Wang, X. Li, H. Xu, Z. Li, J. Wang, Z. Yang, Z. Mi, X. Liang, T. Su, C. Yang, G. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Li, M. Chen, C. Li, K. Linghu, J. Han, Y. Zhang, Y. Feng, Y. Song, T. Ma, J. Zhang, R. Wang, P. Zhao, W. Liu, G. Xue, Y. Jin, and H. Yu, Towards practical quantum computers: transmon qubit with a lifetime approaching 0.5 milliseconds, npj Quantum Informat...

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    A. P. M. Place, L. V. H. Rodgers, P. Mundada, B. M. Smitham, M. Fitzpatrick, Z. Leng, A. Premkumar, J. Bryon, A. Vrajitoarea, S. Sussman, G. Cheng, T. Mad- havan, H. K. Babla, X. H. Le, Y. Gang, B. Jäck, A. Gye- nis, N. Yao, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and A. A. Houck, New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding...

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Somoroffet al., Millisecond coherence in a super- conducting qubit, Physical Review Letters130, 267001 (2023)

    A. Somoroffet al., Millisecond coherence in a super- conducting qubit, Physical Review Letters130, 267001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Tuokkola, Y

    M. Tuokkola, Y. Sunada, H. Kivijärvi, E. Hyyppa, A. Vi- itanen, M. Kervinen, R. Kokkoniemi, J. Govenius, and M. Möttönen, Methods to achieve near-millisecond en- ergy relaxation and dephasing times for a superconduct- ing transmon qubit, Nature Communications16, 5421 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Vijay, C

    R. Vijay, C. Macklin, D. H. Slichter, S. J. Weber, K. W. Murch, R. Naik, A. N. Korotkov, and I. Siddiqi, Stabi- lizing Rabi oscillations in a superconducting qubit using quantum feedback, Nature490, 77 (2012)

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    Ficheux, S

    Q. Ficheux, S. Jezouin, Z. Leghtas, and B. Huard, Dy- namics of a qubit while simultaneously monitoring its re- laxation and dephasing, Nature Communications9, 1926 (2018)

    work page 1926

  46. [46]

    Y. Chen, C. Neill, P. Roushan, N. Leung, M. Fang, R. Barends, J. Kelly, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, A. Megrant, J. Y. Mu- tus, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. M. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, M. R. Geller, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Qubit architecture with high coherence and fast tunable coupling, ...

    work page 2014