pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09898 · v1 · pith:T5JKEEQSnew · submitted 2026-06-05 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.MA· q-bio.QM

TRAPS: Therapeutic Response Analysis via Pathway-informed Stratification

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.MAq-bio.QM
keywords therapyacrosspredictioncancerclinicalmoleculartargetedarchitectures
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Cancer treatment planning requires decisions across multiple clinical dimensions at once. Clinicians must determine whether a patient should receive targeted molecular therapy, radiation therapy, and whether they are likely to survive beyond six months. Existing pathway-informed deep learning models have been developed and tested in isolation, making fair comparison across architectures impossible. We present the first unified benchmark for pathway-guided therapy response modeling, evaluating three biologically informed architectures, BINN, GraphPath, and PATH, across five cancer cohorts drawn from The Cancer Genome Atlas, representing 2,622 patients encoded using Reactome pathway activity scores. Each model is trained jointly on all three clinical outcomes under identical data and evaluation conditions, the first study to treat pathway-structured deep learning as a combined therapy and survival prediction problem. Our results show that no single architecture wins across all tasks: PATH performs best for targeted molecular therapy prediction overall, BINN is most reliable for survival prediction, and no model produces useful predictions for radiation therapy, as the key drivers of that decision are clinical variables not captured in gene expression data. Most strikingly, GraphPath achieves an AUROC of 0.92 on prostate targeted molecular therapy prediction, the highest score in the entire benchmark, demonstrating that lateral co-regulation structure produces exceptional discriminative power when matched to a cohort with a narrow targetable driver programme, even under conditions of extreme class imbalance at only 11\% positive prevalence.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.