A Convex Route to Thermomechanics: Learning Internal Energy and Dissipation
Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:32 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Input convex neural networks represent internal energy and dissipation potential to learn thermodynamically consistent constitutive models in thermomechanics from temperature and deformation data.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
By expressing the internal energy and dissipation potential in terms of deformation and entropy and representing both with input convex neural networks, the formulation ensures thermodynamic admissibility, objectivity, material symmetry, and normalization by architecture alone for isotropic materials without preferred directions or internal variables; temperature serves as the independent observable while entropy is recovered through the constitutive relation.
What carries the argument
Input convex neural networks (networks whose outputs remain convex functions of chosen inputs) representing the internal energy and dissipation potential, combined with invariant-based inputs for objectivity and zero-anchored outputs for normalization.
If this is right
- Thermodynamic admissibility holds automatically without post-hoc checks or penalty terms.
- No separate entropy measurements are required because entropy is recovered from the temperature-dependent constitutive relations.
- Objectivity and material symmetry for isotropic cases are satisfied through the choice of invariant inputs rather than added constraints.
- The same architecture applies to purely thermal problems and to fully coupled thermomechanical loading of soft tissues and rubbers.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The method could be tested on materials that develop anisotropy or internal variables by augmenting the network inputs with directional or history-dependent features.
- If the convexity guarantee remains intact, the approach might integrate directly into finite-element solvers to produce on-the-fly constitutive updates during simulation.
- Extending the zero-anchored normalization to multiple reference states could allow consistent modeling across wide temperature intervals without retraining.
Load-bearing premise
Input convex neural networks are expressive enough to capture the full response of isotropic materials without preferred directions or internal variables, and entropy can be inferred reliably from temperature observations alone across the relevant range.
What would settle it
Training the networks on a dataset and then checking whether the predicted dissipation potential becomes negative or the inferred entropy leads to a violation of the second law on an independent test set that includes direct entropy measurements.
Figures
read the original abstract
We present a physics-based neural network framework for the discovery of constitutive models in fully coupled thermomechanics. In contrast to classical formulations based on the Helmholtz energy, we adopt the internal energy and a dissipation potential as primary constitutive functions, expressed in terms of deformation and entropy. This choice avoids the need to enforce mixed convexity--concavity conditions and facilitates a consistent incorporation of thermodynamic principles. In this contribution, we focus on materials without preferred directions or internal variables. While the formulation is posed in terms of entropy, the temperature is treated as the independent observable, and the entropy is inferred internally through the constitutive relation, enabling thermodynamically consistent modeling without requiring entropy data. Thermodynamic admissibility of the networks is guaranteed by construction. The internal energy and dissipation potential are represented by input convex neural networks, ensuring convexity and compliance with the second law. Objectivity, material symmetry, and normalization are embedded directly into the architecture through invariant-based representations and zero-anchored formulations. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed framework on synthetic and experimental datasets, including purely thermal problems and fully coupled thermomechanical responses of soft tissues and filled rubbers. The results show that the learned models accurately capture the underlying constitutive behavior. All code, data, and trained models are made publicly available via https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19248596.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper presents a physics-based neural network framework for discovering constitutive models in fully coupled thermomechanics. It represents the internal energy u(F,s) and dissipation potential using input convex neural networks (ICNNs) to enforce convexity and the second law by architectural construction, infers entropy internally from observed temperature via T=∂u/∂s, and embeds objectivity, isotropy, and normalization via invariants and zero-anchored formulations. The approach is demonstrated on synthetic and experimental datasets for purely thermal problems and thermomechanical responses of soft tissues and filled rubbers, with all code, data, and models released publicly.
Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a route to thermodynamically admissible constitutive modeling that avoids explicit enforcement of mixed convexity-concavity conditions. The use of ICNNs supplies built-in guarantees, and the public release of code, data, and trained models is a clear strength that supports reproducibility and community validation in data-driven thermomechanics.
major comments (1)
- [Results section] Results section (demonstrations on experimental datasets): the claim that the learned models 'accurately capture the underlying constitutive behavior' is not supported by any reported quantitative metrics (e.g., stress or temperature prediction errors, thermodynamic residual norms, or comparisons to baseline models); reliance on qualitative descriptions alone leaves the validation of the framework's performance on real data load-bearing but incomplete.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by a brief mention of the quantitative performance measures obtained on the synthetic and experimental cases.
- [§2-3] Notation for the deformation gradient and entropy arguments in the ICNN definitions should be cross-checked for consistency with the invariant-based representations described later.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the quantitative validation of the experimental results.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Results section] Results section (demonstrations on experimental datasets): the claim that the learned models 'accurately capture the underlying constitutive behavior' is not supported by any reported quantitative metrics (e.g., stress or temperature prediction errors, thermodynamic residual norms, or comparisons to baseline models); reliance on qualitative descriptions alone leaves the validation of the framework's performance on real data load-bearing but incomplete.
Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics are necessary to rigorously support the performance claims on experimental datasets. In the revised manuscript we will augment the Results section with tables reporting stress and temperature prediction errors (e.g., relative L2 norms and RMSE), thermodynamic residual norms confirming second-law compliance, and direct comparisons against baseline constitutive models. These additions will replace reliance on qualitative descriptions alone. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity
full rationale
The paper's central construction directly represents internal energy u(F,s) and dissipation potential via input convex neural networks, enforcing convexity and the dissipation inequality by architecture rather than by fitting then renaming. Entropy is inferred from the standard thermodynamic relation T = ∂u/∂s with temperature as observable; this is a direct application of the definition, not a self-referential prediction. Objectivity and isotropy are incorporated via invariants, which is a standard embedding and does not reduce the result to its inputs. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation are invoked. The framework is self-contained against external thermodynamic principles and ICNN properties.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- neural network weights and architecture hyperparameters
axioms (2)
- domain assumption First and second laws of thermodynamics must hold for admissible constitutive models
- domain assumption Materials under consideration are isotropic with no preferred directions or internal variables
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
Thermodynamic admissibility of the networks is guaranteed by construction. The internal energy and dissipation potential are represented by input convex neural networks, ensuring convexity and compliance with the second law.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost.leanJcost_convexity echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
We therefore adopt the internal energy e and describe the material state in terms of the pair (F, s) ... strict convexity of the internal energy with respect to the entropy (∂²e/∂s² > 0)
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Bernard D. Coleman and Walter Noll. The thermodynamics of elastic materials with heat conduction and viscosity.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 13(1):167–178, 1963
work page 1963
-
[2]
S. C. H. Lu and K. S. Pister. Decomposition of deformation and representation of the free energy function for isotropic thermoelastic solids.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 11(7-8):927–934, 1975
work page 1975
-
[3]
North- Holland, Amsterdam, 2nd revised edition edition, 2012
Hans Ziegler.An Introduction to Thermomechanics, volume 21 ofNorth-Holland Series in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. North- Holland, Amsterdam, 2nd revised edition edition, 2012
work page 2012
-
[4]
Maurice A. Biot. Linear thermodynamics and the mechanics of solids. InProceedings of the Third U.S. National Congress of Applied Mechanics, pages 1–18, Providence, RI, 1958. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
work page 1958
-
[5]
Bernard D. Coleman and Morton E. Gurtin. Thermodynamics with internal state variables.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 47(2):597– 613, 1967
work page 1967
-
[6]
Sur les matériaux standard généralisés.Journal de mécanique, 14(1):39–63, 1975
Bernard Halphen and Quoc Son Nguyen. Sur les matériaux standard généralisés.Journal de mécanique, 14(1):39–63, 1975
work page 1975
-
[7]
Q. Yang, L. Stainier, and M. Ortiz. A variational formulation of the coupled thermo-mechanical boundary-value problem for general dissipative solids.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 54(2):401–424, 2006
work page 2006
-
[8]
A Variational Approach to Modeling Coupled Thermo-Mechanical Nonlinear Dissipative Behaviors
Laurent Stainier. A Variational Approach to Modeling Coupled Thermo-Mechanical Nonlinear Dissipative Behaviors. InAdvances in Applied Mechanics, pages 69–126. Academic press, 2013
work page 2013
-
[9]
S. Teichtmeister and M.-A. Keip. A variational framework for the thermomechanics of gradient-extended dissipative solids – with applications to diffusion, damage and plasticity.Journal of Elasticity, 148(1):81–126, January 2022
work page 2022
-
[10]
Kevin Linka, Markus Hillgärtner, Kian P. Abdolazizi, Roland C. Aydin, Mikhail Itskov, and Christian J. Cyron. Constitutive artificial neural networks: A fast and general approach to predictive data-driven constitutive modeling by deep learning.Journal of Computational Physics, 429:110010, 2021
work page 2021
-
[11]
Kevin Linka and Ellen Kuhl. A new family of constitutive artificial neural networks towards automated model discovery.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 403:115731, 2023
work page 2023
-
[12]
Klein, Mauricio Fernández, Robert J
Dominik K. Klein, Mauricio Fernández, Robert J. Martin, Patrizio Neff, and Oliver Weeger. Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networks.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 159:104703, 2022
work page 2022
-
[13]
KianP.Abdolazizi, RolandC.Aydin, ChristianJ.Cyron, andKevinLinka. Constitutivekolmogorov–arnoldnetworks(ckans): Combining accuracy and interpretability in data-driven material modeling.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 203:106212, 2025
work page 2025
-
[14]
Prakash Thakolkaran, Yaqi Guo, Shivam Saini, Mathias Peirlinck, Benjamin Alheit, and Siddhant Kumar. Can kan cans? input-convex kolmogorov-arnold networks (kans) as hyperelastic constitutive artificial neural networks (cans).Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 443:118089, 2025
work page 2025
-
[15]
Abdolazizi, Hagen Holthusen, Christian J
Chenyi Ji, Kian P. Abdolazizi, Hagen Holthusen, Christian J. Cyron, and Kevin Linka. Inelastic constitutive kolmogorov-arnold networks: A generalized framework for automated discovery of interpretable inelastic material models, 2026
work page 2026
-
[16]
Peiyi Chen and Johann Guilleminot. Polyconvex neural networks for hyperelastic constitutive models: A rectification approach.Me- chanics Research Communications, 125:103993, 2022
work page 2022
-
[17]
Dominik K. Klein, Fabian J. Roth, Iman Valizadeh, and Oliver Weeger. Parametrized polyconvex hyperelasticity with physics-augmented neural networks.Data-Centric Engineering, 4:e25, 2023
work page 2023
-
[18]
Lennart Linden, Dominik K. Klein, Karl A. Kalina, Jörg Brummund, Oliver Weeger, and Markus Kästner. Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A guide to enforcing physics.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 179:105363, October 2023
work page 2023
-
[19]
Hagen Holthusen, Lukas Lamm, Tim Brepols, Stefanie Reese, and Ellen Kuhl. Theory and implementation of inelastic constitutive artificial neural networks.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 428:117063, 2024
work page 2024
-
[20]
Moritz Flaschel, Paul Steinmann, Laura De Lorenzis, and Ellen Kuhl. Convex neural networks learn generalized standard material models.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 200:106103, 2025
work page 2025
-
[21]
Abdolazizi, Kevin Linka, and Christian J
Kian P. Abdolazizi, Kevin Linka, and Christian J. Cyron. Viscoelastic constitutive artificial neural networks (vcanns) – a framework for data-driven anisotropic nonlinear finite viscoelasticity.Journal of Computational Physics, 499:112704, 2024
work page 2024
-
[22]
Kalina, Jörg Brummund, and Markus Kästner
Karl A. Kalina, Jörg Brummund, and Markus Kästner. A physics-augmented neural network framework for finite strain incompressible viscoelasticity, 2025
work page 2025
-
[23]
Hagen Holthusen, Kevin Linka, Ellen Kuhl, and Tim Brepols. A generalized dual potential for inelastic constitutive artificial neural networks: A jax implementation at finite strains.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 206:106337, 2026
work page 2026
-
[24]
Asghar Arshad Jadoon, Knut Andreas Meyer, and Jan Niklas Fuhg. Automated model discovery of finite strain elastoplasticity from uniaxial experiments.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 435:117653, 2025
work page 2025
-
[25]
Birte Boes, Jaan-Willem Simon, and Hagen Holthusen. Accounting for plasticity: An extension of inelastic constitutive artificial neural networks.European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 117:105998, 2026
work page 2026
-
[26]
KonradFriedrichs, FranzDammaß, KarlA.Kalina, andMarkusKästner. Precise, efficientandflexiblemodelingofcrystallizingelastomers based on physics-augmented neural networks.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 455:118852, 2026
work page 2026
-
[27]
Hagen Holthusen, Tim Brepols, Kevin Linka, and Ellen Kuhl. Automated model discovery for tensional homeostasis: Constitutive machine learning in growth and remodeling.Computers in Biology and Medicine, 186:109691, 2025
work page 2025
-
[28]
Hagen Holthusen and Ellen Kuhl. A complement to neural networks for anisotropic inelasticity at finite strains.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 450:118612, 2026
work page 2026
-
[29]
Reese E. Jones and Jan N. Fuhg. A hierarchy of thermodynamics learning frameworks for inelastic constitutive modeling, 2026
work page 2026
-
[30]
KarlA.Kalina, PhilippGebhart, JörgBrummund, LennartLinden, WaiChingSun, andMarkusKästner. Neuralnetwork-basedmultiscale modeling of finite strain magneto-elasticity with relaxed convexity criteria.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 421:116739, 2024
work page 2024
-
[31]
Heinrich T. Roth, Philipp Gebhart, Karl A. Kalina, Thomas Wallmersperger, and Markus Kästner. A data-driven multiscale scheme for anisotropic finite strain magneto-elasticity, 2025
work page 2025
-
[32]
Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E. Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations.Journal of Computational Physics, 378:686–707, 2019
work page 2019
-
[33]
George E. Karniadakis, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis, Lu Lu, Paris Perdikaris, Sifan Wang, and Liu Yang. Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6):422–440, 2021
work page 2021
-
[34]
Salvatore Cuomo, Vincenzo Schiano Di Cola, Francesco Giampaolo, Gianluigi Rozza, Maziar Raissi, and Francesco Piccialli. Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next.Journal of Scientific Computing, 92:88, 2022. 29
work page 2022
-
[35]
Hao Tian, Zijian Wang, Yanyan Liu, Yaoqi Qin, Li Yu, Xiang Liang, and Wei Gao. A physics-informed deep learning method for solving direct and inverse heat conduction problems of materials.Materials Today Communications, 28:102719, 2021
work page 2021
-
[36]
Benrong Zhang, Guozheng Wu, Yan Gu, Xiao Wang, and Fajie Wang. Multi-domain physics-informed neural network for solving forward and inverse problems of steady-state heat conduction in multilayer media.Physics of Fluids, 34(11):117122, 2022
work page 2022
-
[37]
ZebinXing, HengCheng, andJingCheng. Deeplearningmethodbasedonphysics-informedneuralnetworkfor3danisotropicsteady-state heat conduction problems.Mathematics, 11(19):4049, 2023
work page 2023
-
[38]
Kaicheng Zhu, Yang Zeng, and Jin Yang. Physics-informed neural networks for studying heat transfer in porous media.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 217:124671, 2023
work page 2023
-
[39]
Jongmok Lee, Seungmin Shin, Ho Choi, Anna Lee, Bumsoo Park, and Seungchul Lee. Extended multiphysics-informed neural network for conjugate heat transfer problems.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 251:127098, 2025
work page 2025
-
[40]
He Yang, Fei Ren, Yan-Jie Song, Hai-Sui Yu, and Xiaohui Chen. Physics-informed neural network solution for thermo-elastic cavity expansion problem.Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 10(4):440–450, 2024
work page 2024
-
[41]
M. H. Sabour, M. A. Ezzat, and A. E. Abouelregal. The modified physics-informed neural network (pinn) method for the thermoelastic wave propagation analysis based on the moore–gibson–thompson theory in porous materials.Composite Structures, 348:118485, 2024
work page 2024
- [42]
-
[43]
Mohebbi, Christian Leinenbach, Laura De Lorenzis, and Ehsan Hosseini
Jian Tang, Pooriya Scheel, Mohammad S. Mohebbi, Christian Leinenbach, Laura De Lorenzis, and Ehsan Hosseini. On the calibration of thermo-microstructural simulation models for laser powder bed fusion process: Integrating physics-informed neural networks with cellular automata.Additive Manufacturing, 96:104574, 2024
work page 2024
-
[44]
James Casey. On elastic-thermo-plastic materials at finite deformations.International Journal of Plasticity, 14(1-3):173–191, 1998
work page 1998
-
[45]
James Casey. Nonlinear thermoelastic materials with viscosity, and subject to internal constraints: a classical continuum thermodynamics approach.Journal of Elasticity, 104(1-2):91–104, 2011
work page 2011
-
[46]
Vlado A. Lubarda. Constitutive theories based on the multiplicative decomposition of deformation gradient: Thermoelasticity, elasto- plasticity, and biomechanics.Applied Mechanics Reviews, 57(2):95–108, 2004
work page 2004
-
[47]
The principle of the minimum of the dissipation potential for non-isothermal processes
Philipp Junker, Jerzy Makowski, and Klaus Hackl. The principle of the minimum of the dissipation potential for non-isothermal processes. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 26(2):259–268, 2014
work page 2014
- [48]
-
[49]
L. Lamm, A. Awada, J. M. Pfeifer, H. Holthusen, S. Felder, S. Reese, and T. Brepols. A gradient-extended thermomechanical model for rate-dependent damage and failure within rubberlike polymeric materials at finite strains.International Journal of Plasticity, 173:103883, 2024
work page 2024
-
[50]
M. Dittmann, F. Aldakheel, J. Schulte, F. Schmidt, M. Krüger, P. Wriggers, and C. Hesch. Phase-field modeling of porous-ductile fracture in non-linear thermo-elasto-plastic solids.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 361:112730, April 2020
work page 2020
-
[51]
Marreddy Ambati, Roland Kruse, and Laura De Lorenzis. A phase-field model for ductile fracture at finite strains and its experimental verification.Computational Mechanics, 57(1):149–167, November 2015
work page 2015
-
[52]
Martin Zlatić and Marko Čanađija. Incompressible rubber thermoelasticity: a neural network approach.Computational Mechanics, 71(5):895–916, February 2023
work page 2023
-
[53]
Fuhg, Asghar Jadoon, Oliver Weeger, D
Jan N. Fuhg, Asghar Jadoon, Oliver Weeger, D. Thomas Seidl, and Reese E. Jones. Polyconvex neural network models of thermoelasticity. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 192:105837, 2024
work page 2024
-
[54]
John M. Ball. Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 63(4):337–403, December 1976
work page 1976
-
[55]
Philippe G. Ciarlet.Mathematical Elasticity, Volume I: Three-Dimensional Elasticity, volume 20 ofStudies in Mathematics and its Applications. North-Holland, 1988
work page 1988
-
[56]
Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970
Ralph Tyrell Rockafellar.Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970
work page 1970
-
[57]
Functional concepts in continuum mechanics.Meccanica, 33(5):433–444, October 1998
Paul Germain. Functional concepts in continuum mechanics.Meccanica, 33(5):433–444, October 1998
work page 1998
-
[58]
Springer International Publishing, 2016
Jože Korelc and Peter Wriggers.Automation of Finite Element Methods. Springer International Publishing, 2016
work page 2016
-
[59]
Brandon Amos, Lei Xu, and J. Zico Kolter. Input convex neural networks, 2017
work page 2017
-
[60]
Ronald S. Rivlin. On the general theory of isotropic tensors.Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 52(2):194–198, 1956
work page 1956
-
[61]
A. J. M. Spencer. Theory of invariants. In A. C. Eringen, editor,Continuum Physics, volume 1, pages 239–353. Academic Press, New York, 1971
work page 1971
-
[62]
G. F. Smith. On isotropic functions of symmetric tensors, skew-symmetric tensors and vectors.International Journal of Engineering Science, 9(10):899–916, 1971
work page 1971
-
[63]
B. R. Anderson. The measurement of u-values on site. In Refrigerating American Society of Heating, Air-Conditioning Engineers, U.S. Department of Energy, and Building Thermal Envelope Coordinating Council, editors,Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Buildings III: Proceedings of the ASHRAE/DOE/BTECC Conference, volume 49 ofASHRAE/SP. American...
work page 1986
-
[64]
Jinao Zhang, Jeremy Hills, Yongmin Zhong, Bijan Shirinzadeh, Julian Smith, and Chengfan Gu. Temperature-dependent thermome- chanical modeling of soft tissue deformation.Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 18(8):1840021, December 2018
work page 2018
-
[65]
Xintao Fu, Zepeng Wang, and Lianxiang Ma. Ability of constitutive models to characterize the temperature dependence of rubber hyperelasticity and to predict the stress-strain behavior of filled rubber under different defor mation states.Polymers, 13(3), 2021
work page 2021
-
[66]
Flory.Principles of Polymer Chemistry
P.J. Flory.Principles of Polymer Chemistry. Baker lectures 1948. Cornell University Press, 1953
work page 1948
-
[67]
E. Kirkinis and R. W. Ogden. On extension and torsion of a compressible elastic circular cylinder.Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 7(4):373–392, August 2002
work page 2002
-
[68]
C. Truesdell and W. Noll.The Non-linear Field Theories of Mechanics. Number Bd. 2 in The non-linear field theories of mechanics. Springer-Verlag, 1992
work page 1992
-
[69]
Lars Rose and Andreas Menzel. Optimisation based material parameter identification using full field displacement and temperature measurements.Mechanics of Materials, 145:103292, June 2020
work page 2020
-
[70]
Autoencoder-based non-intrusive model order reduction in continuum mechanics, 2025
Jannick Kehls, Ellen Kuhl, Tim Brepols, Kevin Linka, and Hagen Holthusen. Autoencoder-based non-intrusive model order reduction in continuum mechanics, 2025
work page 2025
-
[71]
Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networks.arXiv, 2023
Sifan Wang and Paris Perdikaris. Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networks.arXiv, 2023
work page 2023
-
[72]
A mechanics-informed neural network framework for data-driven nonlinear viscoelasticity
Faisal As’ad and Charbel Farhat. A mechanics-informed neural network framework for data-driven nonlinear viscoelasticity. InAIAA 30 SCITECH 2023 Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, January 2023
work page 2023
-
[73]
Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation.SIAM, 2005
Albert Tarantola. Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation.SIAM, 2005
work page 2005
-
[74]
Ulrich Römer, Stefan Hartmann, Jendrik-Alexander Tröger, David Anton, Henning Wessels, Moritz Flaschel, and Laura De Lorenzis. Reduced and all-at-once approaches for model calibration and discovery in computational solid mechanics.Applied Mechanics Reviews, 77(4):040801, 05 2025
work page 2025
-
[75]
Kalina, Jörg Brummund, Brain Riemer, and Markus Kästner
Lennart Linden, Karl A. Kalina, Jörg Brummund, Brain Riemer, and Markus Kästner. A dual-stage constitutive modeling framework based on finite strain data-driven identification and physics-augmented neural networks.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 447:118289, 2025. 31
work page 2025
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.