Pith. sign in

REVIEW

AzTEC Survey of the Central Molecular Zone: Increasing Spectral Index of Dust with Density

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.12361 v3 pith:T6GOTSSZ submitted 2020-08-27 astro-ph.GA

AzTEC Survey of the Central Molecular Zone: Increasing Spectral Index of Dust with Density

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dustpropertiesaztecbetacentraldenseincreasingindex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Central Molecular Zone (CMZ) of our Galaxy hosts an extreme environment analogous to that found in typical starburst galaxies in the distant universe. In order to understand dust properties in environments like our CMZ, we present results from a joint SED analysis of our AzTEC/Large Millimeter Telescope survey, together with existing \textit{Herschel} far-IR data on the CMZ, from a wavelength range of $160$ $\mu m$ to $1.1$ $mm$. We include global foreground and background contributions in a novel Bayesian modeling that incorporates the Point Spread Functions (PSFs) of the different maps, which enables the full utilization of our high resolution ($10.5''$) map at 1.1 $mm$ and reveals unprecedentedly detailed information on the spatial distribution of dusty gas across the CMZ. There is a remarkable trend of increasing dust spectral index $\beta$, from $2.0-2.4$, toward dense peaks in the CMZ, indicating a deficiency of large grains or a fundamental change in dust optical properties. This environmental dependence of $\beta$ could have a significant impact on the determination of dust temperature in other studies. Depending on how the optical properties of dust deviate from the conventional model, dust temperatures could be underestimated by $10-50\%$ in particularly dense regions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.