Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 69 references

A systematic search for periodic oscillations in core-collapse supernova lightcurves shows that the handful of known binary-accretion supernovae is likely the tip of a much larger population hidden by short observing campaigns.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 17:01 UTC pith:T6RN4NUX

load-bearing objection Solid, honest sensitivity study for binary-oscillation searches in SN lightcurves; the qualitative conclusion holds, but the abstract percentages are prior-averaged, not population rates. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.01994 v1 pith:T6RN4NUX submitted 2026-08-03 astro-ph.HE

Searching for core-collapse supernovae in binaries with ZTF

Sylvia J. Zhu , Jakob Nordin , Emma de O\~na-Wilhelmi , Andrea Ercolino This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords supernovae: generalbinaries: generalaccretionlight curvesmethods: data analysissurveysperiodogramcore-collapse supernovae
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that periodic oscillations in core-collapse supernova lightcurves, expected when a surviving binary companion accretes material onto the newborn compact object, are systematically missed by today's surveys because most supernovae are only monitored for a month or two. Using 10,000 simulated lightcurves spanning a wide range of binary-interaction parameters, it shows that a 200-day, three-day-cadence campaign retrieves about half of the injected oscillations, while a typical 30-day campaign retrieves only a few percent and a 75-day campaign about ten percent. The search itself is a simple two-step procedure: a penalized spline fit removes the underlying supernova, and a Lomb-Scargle periodogram finds any residual periodicity. Applied to 212 moderately bright ZTF supernovae, the method recovers the known 12.4-day oscillations of SN 2022jli and the 32-day oscillations of SN 2022esa, and flags two new candidates (SN 2022pss and SN 2022oeh). The paper concludes that a substantial fraction of core-collapse supernovae could have binary-companion interactions that have simply gone undetected.

Core claim

The paper demonstrates that, for a wide range of binary interaction parameters, 200 days of three-day-cadence observations can effectively recover roughly 50% of accretion-driven oscillations in core-collapse supernova lightcurves, but the recovery rate plummets for the observation durations typical of current surveys: only a few percent for 30 days and about 10% for 75 days. This leads to the central claim that a substantial fraction of supernovae could have binary-companion interactions that have been undetected, meaning the handful of known cases (SN 2022jli, SN 2022esa, SN 2015ap) may not be representative of the population. The authors further show that the search can be made computatio

What carries the argument

The method combines a penalized smoothing spline, whose stiffness parameter lambda controls how much of the underlying supernova shape is subtracted, with a generalized Lomb-Scargle periodogram applied to the residuals. The tuning trade-off is central: a loose spline tends to absorb the oscillations themselves, a stiff spline leaves long-period residual structure that generates false periodogram power, and an intermediate spline recovers short-period signals well while the stiff spline is better for periods longer than about 50 days. The search also exploits aliasing, so that signals with periods shorter than twice the cadence can be recovered at longer aliased periods, allowing a search gri

Load-bearing premise

The population-level conclusion assumes that the simulated oscillation parameters—periods uniformly from 1 to 100 days, amplitudes uniformly from 20 to 200 scaled flux, and delays 0 to 100 days—match the real distribution of binary-accretion supernovae; if real oscillations are typically short-period and high-amplitude, the missed fraction would be smaller, and if they are longer-period or weaker, larger.

What would settle it

Run the same search on a sample of core-collapse supernovae with at least 200 days of dense (3-day or better) multi-band coverage. If the fraction of lightcurves with recovered periodic oscillations is well below the ~50% predicted from the uniform-prior simulations, or if the recovered periods cluster below 20 days, the claim of a large undetected population would be contradicted. Alternatively, re-compute recovery fractions using an orbital-period distribution from binary population synthesis: if most post-supernova binaries have periods under 20 days and large accretion amplitudes, the 30-d

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Known binary-accretion supernovae are likely the tip of a larger population; the true number could be several times larger than the handful currently reported.
  • Any realtime or archival search for these systems requires at least ~100 days of post-peak observations at three-day cadence to suppress false alarms, so follow-up programs should plan for longer baselines.
  • Running two spline settings in parallel (lambda=1 and lambda=10) gives sensitivity over a wider range of oscillation periods than either setting alone.
  • Adding ~30 days of one-day-cadence follow-up to a 75-day base campaign matches the false-alarm rejection of a 200-day campaign, though it does not recover the longer-period signals lost to the shorter baseline.
  • The two periodogram outliers found in archival ZTF data are single-band and not confirmed; they warrant photometric and spectroscopic follow-up.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If most stripped-envelope supernovae form in binaries, the 'missed population' implied here suggests that existing samples of ordinary supernovae may include undetected accretion episodes, potentially biasing estimates of explosion properties.
  • The recovery fractions are defined as proximity to the true frequency without a formal detection threshold; adopting a stricter false-alarm criterion would likely lower the 50% figure, so the population-level claim is better read as an upper bound on what a 200-day campaign can retrieve.
  • A multiband generalization of the periodogram will likely be necessary for LSST if its observing strategy does not guarantee repeated visits in the same band, since single-band gaps introduce additional periodogram structure.
  • The prior on oscillation parameters (uniform in period and amplitude) is the main lever: a physically motivated distribution from binary-evolution modeling could substantially change the missed-fraction estimate in either direction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents an injection-recovery study for periodic lightcurve oscillations in core-collapse supernovae, motivated by SN 2022jli and similar candidates. The authors simulate 10,000 ZTF-like supernova lightcurves with added sinusoidal oscillations and optional rebrightening features, remove the underlying supernova signal with smoothing splines, and search the residuals with a Lomb-Scargle periodogram. They quantify the recoverable fraction of injected signals as a function of spline stiffness, observation duration, cadence, amplitude, period, and delay, and also characterize false-alarm fractions using oscillation-free SN lightcurves. The main quantitative claim is that a 200-day, three-day-cadence observation recovers about 50% of injected oscillations, while 30-day and 75-day observations recover only a few percent and about 10%, respectively. Applying the method to 212 moderately bright ZTF core-collapse SNe yields two periodogram-outlier candidates that the authors cautiously flag as promising for follow-up, and the method successfully recovers the known periodicities of SN 2022jli and SN 2022esa.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are made robust, this paper would provide a practical, computationally inexpensive search strategy for binary-interaction signatures in large optical surveys, with direct applicability to ZTF and LSST. The strengths are the systematic injection-recovery calibration, explicit false-alarm and true-acceptance curves, the investigation of observing-strategy dependence (duration, cadence, gaps, follow-up), and the honest listing of limitations, including the acknowledgment that the exact recovery percentages depend on the chosen simulation priors. The archival application and successful recovery of known periodic signals are useful validation steps. The central population-level conclusion, however, currently overstates the sensitivity because the headline percentages are raw recoverability fractions that include false alarms and are averaged over freely chosen uniform priors; this requires revision before the stated conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2 / Abstract] The recovery criterion is defined as Pmax falling within ±0.0021 d−1 of f_osc or an alias, and the text explicitly states that 'the set of recoverable signals will include false alarms produced by fluctuations.' No Pmax threshold is applied in the aggregate fractions quoted in the abstract and Sec. 4.2. The headline numbers ('~50%', '10%', 'a few percent') are therefore raw recoverability upper bounds, not false-alarm-corrected retrieval rates. Because the population conclusion is built on these numbers, the paper should recompute the fractions using a threshold that controls false alarms (e.g., Pmax≥0.4 as suggested in Sec. 4.2) or clearly relabel the quoted percentages as upper bounds throughout the abstract and conclusions.
  2. [Sec. 4.2 / Fig. 7] The manuscript states that for the 75-day observation 'the recoverable signals with T_osc>40 d are in fact almost all due to noise fluctuations.' Since T_osc is drawn uniformly up to 100 d, a large portion of the aggregate '10% recoverable' for t_obs=75 d is likely spurious. This is in tension with the abstract's presentation of 10% as a recovery rate. The false-alarm-free recovery fraction should be computed and reported, or the 75-day number should be removed from the abstract.
  3. [Sec. 2.1-2.2, Table 1 / Sec. 3.2] The aggregate recovery fractions are averages over a parameter volume with uniform T_osc in [1,100] d and A_osc in [20,200] scaled flux. The paper itself acknowledges that the exact percentages are not robust because the maximum A_osc is a free scaling choice. These numbers are injection-recovery calibration metrics, not population detection rates. The inference that 'a substantial fraction of supernovae could ... have been undetected' is only valid under these specific priors. Without a physical population prior from binary population synthesis (e.g., Ercolino et al. 2026) or an explicit sensitivity analysis over plausible prior shapes, the population-level claim is not supported. The authors should either reweight the recoverability estimates with a physical prior or soften the population claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The text refers to 'SN 2018gf' while the figure captions and Sec. 5.1 refer to 'SN 2018grf'; the naming should be made consistent.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] Typo: 'intution' should be 'intuition'. Also in Sec. 4.1, 'the the standard search' should be 'the standard search'.
  3. [Introduction] Typo: 'wit the gamma-ray' should be 'with the gamma-ray'.
  4. [Eqs. 3 and A.5] Equations 3 and A.5 are identical; cross-reference them to avoid duplication.
  5. [References] The citation 'Nordin, J. et al. 2019' in Sec. 3 is formatted differently from the reference list entry; unify the format.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper reports an injection-recovery sensitivity calibration, and its population-level inference is explicitly prior-dependent rather than derived from fitted outputs.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim is an injection-recovery completeness measurement: simulated core-collapse SN lightcurves with injected binary oscillations are searched with a spline fit plus Lomb-Scargle periodogram, and a signal is declared recoverable if the periodogram peak lies within ±0.0021 d^-1 of the injected frequency or an alias (Secs. 2-3.2). The reported fractions (~50% for 200 d, ~10% for 75 d, a few percent for 30 d) are therefore completeness metrics over the simulated parameter volume of Table 1, not predictions derived from the search output. The paper explicitly disclaims robustness of the exact percentages: "the exact percentages presented in this and the next section are not particularly relevant, as we are free to choose the maximum A_osc to scale the number of recoverable signals" (Sec. 3.2), and states that a physically motivated prescription "would allow for a prediction about the detectability of the population rather than simply the parameter space" (Sec. 6). The population-level statement that many binary interactions could be missed is conditional on the assumed uniform priors on T_osc, A_osc, and Δ_osc; this is a sensitivity of the conclusion to priors, not circularity. Self-citations to Ercolino et al. (2026) and Nordin et al. (in prep.) inform parameter ranges and template choices but are not load-bearing: the period range extends beyond the cited O(10 d) population-synthesis result, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from those works. Validation against the real SN 2022jli and SN 2022esa periodograms provides an external benchmark independent of the simulation outputs. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, so the derivation chain is self-contained against the paper's stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a simulation-based sensitivity study; its free parameters are the hand-chosen ranges and algorithmic settings that define the simulated population and the search. No new physical entities are introduced. The key assumptions are the sinusoidal constant-amplitude oscillation model and the representativeness of sncosmo templates.

free parameters (6)
  • Oscillation period range T_osc = 1-100 d (uniform)
    Choice of simulated period range, based on known X-ray binary periods and population synthesis (Sec 2.2); directly sets the parameter space over which recovery fractions are computed.
  • Oscillation amplitude range A_osc = 20-200 scaled flux (uniform, ZP=25)
    Amplitude range, upper limit chosen where recovery performance plateaus (Sec 2.2); paper states exact recovery percentages depend on this choice (Sec 3.2).
  • Spline stiffness lambda = 0.1, 1, 10 (heuristic grid)
    Spline penalty, chosen by testing a few values; 'more rigorous optimization... outside the scope' (Sec 3.2); affects which periods are recovered.
  • Spline fit start time = t0+5 to t0+20 d, standard t0+20 d
    Start of spline fit relative to peak; affects recovery, especially for stiff splines (Fig 2).
  • Recovery tolerance = ±0.0021 d^-1 (4.2 periodogram grid points)
    Criterion defining 'recoverable'; chosen to capture spread around true frequency (Sec 3.2, App A.3).
  • P_max detection threshold = recommended 0.4
    Threshold on periodogram peak chosen as compromise between false alarms and true acceptance (Sec 4.2).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Oscillations are modeled as pure sinusoids with constant amplitude over the observation (Sec 2.2)
    Assumed shape for accretion-induced variability; the paper notes this is optimistic if accretable material depletes, and tests sawtooth as a variant (App A.4).
  • domain assumption sncosmo CC SN templates represent the diversity of real CCSN lightcurves (Sec 2.1, A.6)
    Base lightcurves drawn from 115 built-in templates; templates are observationally biased and may already contain variability (Sec 6).
  • domain assumption Sky noise model from ZTF IPAC data, with skew-normal fits, describes observing noise (Sec A.2)
    Simulated noise properties derived from actual ZTF visits, used in sncosmo's realize_lcs().
  • standard math Lomb-Scargle periodogram with least-squares normalization has the statistical properties assumed (Sec 3.1)
    Standard periodogram analysis methods, per VanderPlas (2018); no new statistical formalism introduced.
  • domain assumption Binary companion accretion is the cause of periodic oscillations (motivated by SN 2022jli)
    The paper searches for this class of signal; physical interpretation is from prior literature (Hirai et al. 2025, Lu et al. 2025, King & Lasota 2024).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 27894 in / 10394 out tokens · 106196 ms · 2026-08-04T17:01:44.516528+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Searching for core-collapse supernovae in binaries with ZTF." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T6RN4NUX

@misc{pith2026260801994,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Searching for core-collapse supernovae in binaries with ZTF},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T6RN4NUX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01994}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Context. Stripped envelope supernovae occur in massive stars that have lost their outer layers before exploding, possibly from binary interactions. Recently, SN 2022jli was detected with significant periodic oscillations in its lightcurve, likely due to accretion from a binary companion onto the newborn compact object. Aims. While evidence for periodic oscillations has been found in a few bright and noteworthy supernovae, the population properties are best understood with systematic searches of large data sets. We present prospects for running a search on data from ZTF and similar surveys that is flexible and computationally inexpensive, with the goal of setting up a search in realtime on data from ZTF, LSST, and similar surveys. Methods. We simulate core collapse supernova lightcurves with additional features from the binary interactions. We use spline fits to remove the underlying supernova behavior and isolate the periodicities, then apply a Lomb-Scargle periodogram to recover the simulated period. By varying the conditions, we can make recommendations for different kinds of data sets. Finally, we run the search on two sets of archival ZTF supernovae to illustrate the concept. Results. For a wide range of binary interaction parameters, we find that a long baseline (200 days) of observations with a three-day cadence effectively retrieve ~50% of the binary oscillations. However, this rate plummets with more typical observation durations; only a few percent are recoverable with a 30-day observation, and 10% with a 75-day observation. A substantial fraction of supernovae could therefore have binary companion interactions that have simply been undetected. Out of 212 moderately bright and well observed ZTF supernovae, we find suggestions of periodic oscillations in two candidates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01994 by Andrea Ercolino, Emma de O\~na-Wilhelmi, Jakob Nordin, Sylvia J. Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Lightcurves and spline fits (left), residuals (middle), and periodograms (right) for three values of the spline fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fraction of recoverable signals using spline fits with dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Recovered (Trecov) versus true (Tosc) periods in a search with T min LS = 6 d, where the simulated SN lightcurves (gray circles) are observed with a three-day cadence. The x-axis for Tosc < 10 d is zoomed in to better illustrate the short-period sig￾nals that are recovered at longer aliased periods (Eq. 3), which fall along the orange curves for Tosc < 6 d. For Tosc > 6 d, there is a clear excess that corr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Fraction of recoverable signal using spline fits with di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The fraction of recoverable signals as a function of the oscillation parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Periodograms for three lightcurves with the same obser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: False alarm (blue) and true acceptance (orange) fractions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The fraction of recoverable signals drops dramatically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The false alarm and true acceptance (top) as well as the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (Top) Similar to Fig. 8 but comparing a few di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The recoverable fraction as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Pmax vs. the number of data points included in the spline fit Nobs for the g and r bands individually, with the results from 10 000 simulations shown in the gray 2D histogram in the background (logarithmic scaling). The outlier SNe are labeled. The larger number of r-band outliers is likely due to the SNe being on average brighter and more variable in the r than in the g band. The lightcurves and periodog… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Lightcurves and spline fits (left) and periodograms (right) for ten SNe in the moderately bright and nearby ZTF sample. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    and Jones, David O

    Barbary, Kyle and Bailey, Stephen and Barentsen, Geert and Barclay, Tom and Biswas, Rahul and Boone, Kyle and Craig, Matt and Feindt, Ulrich and Friesen, Brian and Goldstein, Danny and Jha, Saurabh W. and Jones, David O. and Mondon, Florian and Papadogiannakis, Seméli and Perrefort, Daniel and Pierel, Justin and Rodney, Steve and Rose, Benjamin and Saunde...

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    A 12.4-day periodicity in a close binary system after a supernova. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06787-x , archivePrefix =. 2310.07784 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    SN 2022jli: A Type Ic Supernova with Periodic Modulation of Its Light Curve and an Unusually Long Rise. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acfc25 , archivePrefix =. 2309.12750 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  4. [4]

    Precursor Activity Preceding Interacting Supernovae I: Bridging the Gap with SN 2022mop

    Precursor Activity Preceding Interacting Supernovae I: Bridging the Gap with SN 2022mop. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.08768 , archivePrefix =. 2503.08768 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.08768

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    On the binary nature of the progenitor of SN2015ap: insights from its light curve and spectral evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1054 , archivePrefix =. 2503.15977 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. II. A Public Statistical Sample for Exploring Supernova Demographics. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbd98 , archivePrefix =. 2009.01242 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    BlackCAT: A catalogue of stellar-mass black holes in X-ray transients. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527130 , archivePrefix =. 1510.08869 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Understanding the Lomb-Scargle Periodogram. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab766 , archivePrefix =. 1703.09824 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Sana and S

    H. Sana and S. E. de Mink and A. de Koter and N. Langer and C. J. Evans and M. Gieles and E. Gosset and R. G. Izzard and J.-B. Le Bouquin and F. R. N. Schneider , title =. Science , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  10. [10]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201935634

    Transient processing and analysis using AMPEL: alert management, photometry, and evaluation of light curves , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201935634", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935634", journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935634

  11. [11]

    Young, David R. , doi =

  12. [12]

    , title =

    Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. , title =. 1996 , month =. doi:10.1086/309985 , url =

    doi:10.1086/309985 1996

  13. [13]

    and Ivezi\'

    VanderPlas, Jacob T. and Ivezi\'. PERIODOGRAMS FOR MULTIBAND ASTRONOMICAL TIME SERIES , journal =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/18 , url =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/18 2015

  14. [14]

    Automated supervised classification of variable stars. I. Methodology. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077638 , archivePrefix =. 0711.0703 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Construction of a Calibrated Probabilistic Classification Catalog: Application to 50k Variable Sources in the All-Sky Automated Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/203/2/32 , archivePrefix =. 1204.4180 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Photometric classification of supernovae detected by the Zwicky Transient Facility using noise augmentation. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.13036 , archivePrefix =. 2602.13036 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.13036

  17. [17]

    , year = 1975, month = jan, volume =

    Radiation-driven winds in Of stars. , year = 1975, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1086/153315 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/153315 1975

  18. [18]

    , year = 2011, month = nov, volume =

    The theory of stellar winds. , year = 2011, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1007/s10509-011-0636-7 , archivePrefix =. 1112.0952 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025 , archivePrefix =. 1402.1237 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Encyclopedia of Astrophysics , year = 2026, volume =

    Interacting supernovae. Encyclopedia of Astrophysics , year = 2026, volume =. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00010-9 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21439-4.00010-9 2026

  21. [21]

    Population synthesis based on detailed binary evolution models , author=

    Neutron star-companion interaction in core collapse supernovae. Population synthesis based on detailed binary evolution models , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  22. [22]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Gúrpide, Andrés and Middleton, Matthew , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf196 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf196 2025

  23. [23]

    Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    ZTF Transient Classification Report for 2022-08-01. Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    2022

  24. [24]

    Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    ZTF Transient Classification Report for 2020-04-16. Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    2020

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    ZTF SN Ia DR2: Simulations and volume-limited sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452134 , archivePrefix =. 2409.04650 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    SN 2022jli: The ultraluminous birth of a low-mass X-ray binary. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349002 , archivePrefix =. 2402.09509 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Supernova-induced Binary-interaction-powered Supernovae: A Model for SN2022jli. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae172e , archivePrefix =. 2507.09974 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Unveiling the nature of SN 2022jli: The first double-peaked stripped-envelope supernova showing periodic undulations and dust emission at late times. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452729 , archivePrefix =. 2410.21381 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  29. [29]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Accretion from a shock-inflated companion: double-peaked supernova lightcurve with periodic modulations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.14284 , archivePrefix =. 2507.14284 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.14284

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    SN 2022jli modeled with a ^ 56 Ni double layer and a magnetar. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555311 , archivePrefix =. 2507.21304 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    The Origin and Evolution of Multiple Star Systems. Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.10066 , archivePrefix =. 2203.10066 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.10066 2023

  32. [32]

    Decin and M

    L. Decin and M. Montargès and A. M. S. Richards and C. A. Gottlieb and W. Homan and I. McDonald and I. El Mellah and T. Danilovich and S. H. J. Wallström and A. Zijlstra and A. Baudry and J. Bolte and E. Cannon and E. De Beck and F. De Ceuster and A. de Koter and J. De Ridder and S. Etoka and D. Gobrecht and M. Gray and F. Herpin and M. Jeste and E. Lagad...

    2020

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    The demographics of binary companions to stripped-envelope supernovae: confronting population synthesis models with observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2208 , archivePrefix =. 2508.12677 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    , year = 1997, month = jan, volume =

    Optical Spectra of Supernovae. , year = 1997, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 1997

  35. [35]

    Memoires of the Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege , keywords =

    On the relationship between Of and WR stars. Memoires of the Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege , keywords =

  36. [36]

    Liege International Astrophysical Colloquia , year = 1996, editor =

    Wolf-Rayet stars in the framework of stellar evolution : Problems, opportunities, and a summary. Liege International Astrophysical Colloquia , year = 1996, editor =

    1996

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    Presupernova Evolution in Massive Interacting Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/171341 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/171341

  38. [38]

    Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 2 , year = 2026, volume =

    Core-collapse supernovae. Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 2 , year = 2026, volume =. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00090-0 , archivePrefix =. 2503.01321 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Stellar Binary Companions to Supernova Progenitors. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1578 , archivePrefix =. 0909.4295 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Predicting the Presence of Companions for Stripped-envelope Supernovae: The Case of the Broad-lined Type Ic SN 2002ap. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7467 , archivePrefix =. 1705.07898 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Giant outbursts of clumpy material preceding Type II supernova 2024qiw. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558402 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558402

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Bumpy Declining Light Curves Are Common in Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac67dd , archivePrefix =. 2109.09743 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Lense─Thirring precessing magnetar engine drives a superluminous supernova. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10151-0 , archivePrefix =. 2509.08051 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    General Relativity and Gravitation , keywords =

    On the gravitational effects of rotating masses: the Thirring-Lense papers. General Relativity and Gravitation , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF00762913 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1007/bf00762913

  45. [45]

    and Fryer, Chris L

    Kobulnicky, Henry A. and Fryer, Chris L. , title =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1086/522073 , url =

    doi:10.1086/522073 2007

  46. [46]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    GWTC-5.0: Observations from the Second Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run and Updates to the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.27225 , archivePrefix =. 2605.27225 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27225

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe , archivePrefix =. 1902.01932 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  48. [48]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    An extragalactic gamma-ray binary formed in supernova 2022jli. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.09223 , archivePrefix =. 2512.09223 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.09223

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    The evolution of compact binaries. , keywords =

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Formation and Evolution of Galactic Intermediate/Low-Mass X-ray Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/99 , archivePrefix =. 1512.02789 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac , archivePrefix =. 1902.01872 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  52. [52]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A New Forced Photometry Service for the Zwicky Transient Facility. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.16279 , archivePrefix =. 2305.16279 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.16279

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Investigating the properties of stripped-envelope supernovae; what are the implications for their progenitors?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3399 , archivePrefix =. 1812.03716 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Aryan, Amar and Pandey, S B and Zheng, WeiKang and Filippenko, Alexei V and Vinko, Jozsef and Ouchi, Ryoma and Shivvers, Isaac and Yuk, Heechan and Kumar, Sahana and Stegman, Samantha and Halevi, Goni and Ross, Timothy W and Gould, Carolina and Yunus, Sameen and Baer-Way, Raphael and deGraw, Asia and Maeda, Keiichi and Bhattacharya, D and Kumar, Amit and ...

    2021

  55. [55]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Gangopadhyay, Anjasha and Misra, Kuntal and Sahu, D K and Wang, Shan-Qin and Kumar, Brajesh and Li, Long and Anupama, G C and Dastidar, Raya and Elias-Rosa, N and Kumar, Brijesh and Singh, Mridweeka and Pandey, S B and Sanwal, Pankaj and Singh, Avinash and Srivastav, S and Tartaglia, L and Tomasella, L , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical ...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1821 2020

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Interacting Supernovae and Supernova Impostors: SN 2009ip, is this the End?. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/1 , archivePrefix =. 1210.3568 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    A Panchromatic View of the Restless SN 2009ip Reveals the Explosive Ejection of a Massive Star Envelope. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/21 , archivePrefix =. 1306.0038 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Nordin and others

    J. Nordin and others. placeholder title. in prep

  59. [59]

    Undulation analysis of SN2020qlb: a slow-rising and bright superluminous supernova , author =

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Periodograms for Multiband Astronomical Time Series. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/18 , archivePrefix =. 1502.01344 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c , archivePrefix =. 0805.2366 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and. Nature Methods , year =

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Least-Squares Frequency Analysis of Unequally Spaced Data. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF00648343 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1007/bf00648343

  64. [64]

    Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/160554 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/160554

  65. [65]

    A new formalism for the floating-mean and Keplerian periodograms

    The generalised Lomb-Scargle periodogram. A new formalism for the floating-mean and Keplerian periodograms. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811296 , archivePrefix =. 0901.2573 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Hunter, J. D. , Title =. Computing in Science & Engineering , Volume =

  67. [67]

    Harris and K

    Charles R. Harris and K. Jarrod Millman and St. Array programming with. 2020 , month = sep, journal =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , publisher =

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  68. [68]

    Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    ePESSTO+ Transient Classification Report for 2022-08-27. Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    2022

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Peculiar SN Ic 2022esa: An explosion of a massive Wolf─Rayet star in a binary as a precursor to a BH─BH binary?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf140 , archivePrefix =. 2512.02680 , primaryClass =

    arXiv