Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On high-dimensional classification by sparse generalized Bayesian logistic regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.12832 v1 pith:T6VIFFXS submitted 2024-03-19 math.ST stat.TH

classification math.STstat.TH
keywords regressionbayesianfractionalgeneralizedlogisticresultsclassificationdistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This work addresses the problem of high-dimensional classification by exploring the generalized Bayesian logistic regression method under a sparsity-inducing prior distribution. The method involves utilizing a fractional power of the likelihood resulting the fractional posterior. Our study yields concentration results for the fractional posterior, not only on the joint distribution of the predictor and response variable but also for the regression coefficients. Significantly, we derive novel findings concerning misclassification excess risk bounds using sparse generalized Bayesian logistic regression. These results parallel recent findings for penalized methods in the frequentist literature. Furthermore, we extend our results to the scenario of model misspecification, which is of critical importance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Handling bounded response in high dimensions: a Horseshoe prior Bayesian Beta regression approach

    stat.ME 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A sparse Bayesian Beta regression method is proposed, but its Gibbs sampler does not target the Beta model and its theoretical results are not proven.

Pith tools