Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Unraveling Quantum Size-Dependent Optoelectrical Phenomena in Hot Carrier Quantum Well Structures

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The widest quantum well sustains the hottest photogenerated carriers, while the surrounding barrier sets the device voltage and photocurrent.

desk verdict Solid experimental study with a plausible electrical story, but the headline thickness trend in hot-carrier temperature is confounded by an undefined 'absorbed power density' and needs re-analysis against well-absorbed power. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.04112 v1 pith:TA4UI5F6 submitted 2025-07-05 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Nil Selen Aydin , Leopold Rothmayer , Nabi Isaev , Pavel Avdienko , Nori N. Chavira Leal , Kai Müller , Jonathan J. Finley , Gregor Koblmüller
show 1 more author
Hamidreza Esmaielpour
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hotcarriersolarcellsquantumwellsInGaAs/InAlAsphotoluminescencequasi-Fermilevelsplittingopen-circuitvoltageconfinementfull-spectralfitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the width of a quantum well controls how hot photogenerated carriers get before they cool, and whether that heat shows up in the device's electrical output. In lattice-matched InGaAs/InAlAs p-i-n diodes with 4 nm, 5.5 nm, and 7.5 nm wells, it finds that the widest well sustains the highest carrier temperature at fixed absorbed power, while thinner wells cool faster because interface roughness broadens them more. The open-circuit voltage follows the quasi-Fermi level splitting trend but sits above the quantum-well bandgap, pointing to the InAlAs barrier, not the well, as the source of the voltage. Short-circuit current scales with power but not with well width, because the barrier absorbs roughly 60 times more of the 740 nm pump light than the well. The study matters for hot-carrier solar cells because it separates confinement-controlled thermodynamics from the electrical transport signal, and suggests that future devices should pump the well directly and use energy-selective contacts.

What carries the argument

The fitting machinery is the generalized Planck radiation law (Eq. 1), which writes photoluminescence intensity as black-body radiation weighted by an energy-dependent absorptivity $A(E)$, combined with the parameterized absorptivity of Eqs. (2)--(5). That model contains quantum-well excitonic peaks, band-to-band transitions, barrier absorption, and a Fermi-Dirac band-filling factor, so fitting each photoluminescence spectrum over its full range simultaneously fixes the hot-carrier temperature $T$ and the quasi-Fermi level splitting $\Delta\mu$. The band-filling factor is the load-bearing piece: it makes the absorptivity depend on the very thermodynamic quantities being extracted, so the fit self-consistently accounts for state filling at high excitation power.

What would settle it

A reader could settle this by running the paper's fitting routine on synthetic photoluminescence spectra generated from Eqs. (1)--(5) with known $T$ and $\Delta\mu$: if the fit does not recover the input parameters uniquely, the thickness trend is unproven. Independently, exciting below the InAlAs barrier so only the quantum well absorbs should preserve the 7.5 nm hotter-than-4 nm ordering if the effect is intrinsic to confinement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that quantum-well thickness tunes the thermodynamics of hot carriers without changing the measured photocurrent. From full-spectral fits of photoluminescence to the generalized Planck radiation law, the authors extract carrier temperature $T$ and quasi-Fermi level splitting $\Delta\mu$ for three In$_{0.53}$Ga$_{0.47}$As wells (4, 5.5, and 7.5 nm) embedded in identical In$_{0.52}$Al$_{0.48}$As barriers. At 10 K, the 7.5 nm well shows the largest carrier temperature at each absorbed power density, while the 4 nm well shows the largest $\Delta\mu$ because its fewer confined states fill more strongly. The open-circuit voltage tracks $\Delta\mu$ with lattice temperature but exceeds the quantum-well bandgap, so the authors attribute $V_{OC}$ to quasi-Fermi level splitting in the barrier rather than in the well. Short-circuit current is power-dependent but thickness-independent, and absorption simulations place about 60 times more absorbed light in the barrier than in the well, so the photocurrent is barrier-dominated. The paper also connects thinning-induced linewidth broadening to interface roughness that scales as $1/L_z^2$, and treats this roughness-assisted relaxation as a reason thin wells cool faster.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the full-spectral photoluminescence fit: if the absorptivity model in Eqs. (2)--(5) is misspecified, or if the fit returns multiple equally good $(T, \Delta\mu)$ pairs, the ordering "7.5 nm hotter than 4 nm" could be an artifact of the fitting procedure rather than a physical size effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Widening the InGaAs well from 4 to 7.5 nm increases the steady-state hot-carrier temperature at a given absorbed power, so confinement geometry is a real lever on carrier cooling.
  • Thinner wells show larger quasi-Fermi level splitting at fixed power, a signature of fewer confined states and stronger band filling.
  • Since the measured $V_{OC}$ exceeds the quantum-well bandgap and tracks the barrier response, the barrier's quasi-Fermi level splitting, not the well's thermodynamics, sets the device voltage in these diodes.
  • Because $J_{SC}$ is nearly identical across well widths and scales with power, photocurrent is generated overwhelmingly in the InAlAs barrier, with negligible contribution from hot carriers inside the quantum wells.
  • Interface roughness broadening that scales as $1/L_z^2$ makes thinner wells cool faster, connecting a growth-quality parameter to hot-carrier performance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: excite below the barrier energy so only the quantum well absorbs, and remeasure the thickness trend; if the 7.5 nm advantage persists, the effect is intrinsic to confinement rather than a barrier artefact.
  • The result that $V_{OC}$ is set by the barrier implies a design rule for hot-carrier quantum-well solar cells: move the well closer to the surface or pump below the barrier, otherwise the extracted voltage and current report the barrier, not the hot-carrier population.
  • If thin wells thermalize faster mainly because of interface roughness, smoother interfaces could make thin wells as hot as wide ones while retaining their larger $\Delta\mu$; this is a growth-oriented route the paper leaves implicit.
  • The low-temperature ideality factor near 50, matched by a tunneling-enhanced interface recombination model, implies that cryogenic electrical characterization is dominated by interface transport, so low-temperature comparisons between $V_{OC}$ and well $\Delta\mu$ should be read with that caveat.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a comparative optoelectronic study of InGaAs/InAlAs single-quantum-well p-i-n diodes with well widths of 4 nm, 5.5 nm, and 7.5 nm. Photoluminescence spectra are analyzed with a full-spectral fitting procedure based on the generalized Planck radiation law with a parameterized absorptivity, yielding hot-carrier temperature T and quasi-Fermi-level splitting Δμ for each sample and excitation condition. The main claims are that the 7.5 nm quantum well exhibits the strongest hot-carrier effects (highest carrier temperature at a given absorbed power density), that the open-circuit voltage follows the trend of Δμ but exceeds the quantum-well bandgap and is dominated by the InAlAs barrier, and that the short-circuit current depends on excitation power but not on well thickness because most photocurrent is generated in the barrier. These statements are supported by PL spectra, current-voltage measurements, and a Lumerical absorption simulation.

Significance. If the central comparison is robust, the paper provides a useful systematic experimental data set on how quantum-well thickness affects hot-carrier thermodynamics in a material system relevant to hot-carrier solar cells. The strengths include the use of three thickness-controlled samples grown under the same conditions, the consistency of optical and electrical measurement conditions, the full-spectral fitting methodology, and the inclusion of supplementary absorption simulations and interface-roughness analysis. However, the main claim—that the 7.5 nm well is hotter than the thinner wells—currently rests on fit outputs without reported uncertainties, fit-parameter values, or stability tests, and on an undefined 'absorbed power density' that may not isolate the quantum-well excitation density. These issues are load-bearing rather than cosmetic.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (1)-(5), Figs. 2-3] The central result that the 7.5 nm QW exhibits a higher hot-carrier temperature than the 4 nm and 5.5 nm QWs is extracted from a multi-parameter full-spectral fit, but the manuscript reports no uncertainties on T or Δμ, no fit residuals, no fitted values or constraints for the absorptivity parameters (a_x, a_i, a_b, E_x, E_i, E_b, Γ_x, Γ_i, Γ_b, R_y), and no stability analysis with respect to initial guesses or the number of discrete transitions. Because the absorptivity in Eq. (5) itself depends on T and Δμ through the band-filling factor, the fit may have degeneracies among these parameters. The paper must demonstrate that the extracted rank ordering of carrier temperatures is unique and stable; otherwise the size-dependent trend could be an artifact of the fitting model.
  2. [Fig. 3 and Fig. S2] The x-axis in Fig. 3 is labeled 'absorbed power density' but this quantity is never defined. The Lumerical simulation in Fig. S2 shows that at 740 nm the InAlAs barrier absorbs roughly 60 times more than the InGaAs well, so if the x-axis is the total device absorbed power, the power absorbed directly in the QW scales approximately linearly with well thickness. At a given nominal absorbed power density, the 7.5 nm well receives about 1.9 times more direct pump power than the 4 nm well, and barrier-generated carriers captured into the well also scale with well volume. The observed thicker-well-higher-temperature trend could therefore be a trivial excitation-density effect rather than an intrinsic thickness-dependent thermalization rate. The authors should specify whether the abscissa is QW-absorbed or total-device-absorbed power and, if the latter, re-analyze the data against QW-absorbed power or otherwise correct for the thickness-dependent well absorption.
  3. [Figs. 5 and 6, V_OC comparison] The comparison of V_OC with the QW quasi-Fermi-level splitting is not quantitatively grounded as presented. The text argues that V_OC exceeds the QW bandgap and therefore reflects the barrier rather than the QW, yet no barrier Δμ is measured or simulated to support the comparison. Since the QW Δμ is obtained from QW emission while V_OC is a device-level quantity, the claim that V_OC 'mirrors' the QW Δμ trend would be strengthened by presenting the barrier contribution explicitly, for example by measuring the high-energy barrier PL under the same conditions or by modeling the device electrostatics.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] Several typographical and formatting errors appear, such as '3 𝑘𝑊 𝑐𝑚2⁄' and '4 × 1018𝑐𝑚−3' lacking proper superscripts and units formatting; these should be corrected.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (2)] The notation for the absorption coefficients is inconsistent: Eq. (2) uses α_w and α_b, while Eqs. (3) and (4) define α_w0 and α_b0. Clarify whether the band-filling reduction in Eq. (5) is applied to both the well and the barrier terms and which quantities are used in the final fits.
  3. [Abstract and Section I] The abstract states that hot-carrier effects are pronounced at lower lattice temperatures, but Fig. 3 presents data only at 10 K and Fig. 6 only at 10 K and 150 K; the manuscript should either present the temperature-dependent carrier-temperature data or temper the abstract claim.
  4. [Conclusion] The conclusion states that reducing the quantum-well width 'leads to increased rates of hot carrier thermalization,' but the experiment measures steady-state carrier temperatures, not thermalization rates; rephrase to avoid overstating the dynamical interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: hot-carrier temperatures are model-dependent extractions from measured PL spectra, not predictions derived from the fit inputs; self-citations are background and not load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental characterization, not a derivation from first principles. The hot-carrier temperature T and quasi-Fermi level splitting Δμ are obtained by fitting each measured PL spectrum to the generalized Planck law with a modeled absorptivity (Eqs. 1–5); they are reported as extracted quantities and compared across identically processed samples using the same fitting model. This is a model-dependent measurement, so any systematic error in the absorptivity model could affect absolute T values, but it is not a case of a fitted parameter being renamed a prediction or of a claimed result being equivalent to an input by construction. The correlation between V_OC and Δμ is a comparison of independent electrical and optical measurements. The citations to prior work by the same group (e.g., refs. 8, 10, 12) provide background and theoretical context; they are not used as a uniqueness argument or as the sole justification of the main claim. The most substantive concern is the undefined 'absorbed power density' on the x-axes of Figs. 3, 5, and 6: since the barrier absorbs about 60× more at 740 nm than the well (Fig. S2), comparing samples at fixed total absorbed power may not equalize the carrier density generated directly in the wells. That is a potential experimental confound that should be addressed by re-analyzing with QW-absorbed power, but it is a scientific-control issue, not a circularity. No circular step could be identified with a specific reduction; the score of 2 reflects minor self-citations and model-based extraction, not a circular dependency.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard PL fitting, sample growth, and an optical simulation. The main extracted quantities T and Delta-mu are fit outputs rather than independent measurements, and the absorptivity model introduces many unstated parameter values. No new physical entities are required.

free parameters (5)
  • Hot carrier temperature T per spectrum and sample = not reported numerically; plotted as Delta-T vs power
    Fitted via Eq. (1) with the absorptivity model; the central size-dependent trend is a difference between these fitted values.
  • Quasi-Fermi level splitting Delta-mu per spectrum and sample = not reported numerically
    Second main fit output; compared to V_OC in Fig. 5 and used for the barrier-dominance interpretation.
  • Absorptivity amplitudes, transition energies, and broadenings (a_x, a_i, a_b, E_x, E_i, E_b, Gamma_x, Gamma_i, Gamma_b) = not reported
    Many adjustable parameters in Eqs. (3)-(4) needed for full-spectral fitting; no values, constraints, or parameter tables are given.
  • Effective Rydberg energy R_y = not specified
    Appears in the excitonic absorption term in Eq. (3); must be chosen for the material system, but the chosen value is not stated.
  • Characteristic tunneling energy E_00 = 49 meV
    Fitted to the temperature dependence of the ideality factor using the tunneling-enhanced recombination model in Eq. (7).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Each photoexcited carrier population is internally thermalized and can be described by a single temperature T and quasi-Fermi level splitting Delta-mu in the generalized Planck law (Eq. 1).
    Standard hot-carrier PL analysis assumes quasi-equilibrium within bands; if carriers are not thermalized, the extracted hot-carrier temperature is not well-defined.
  • domain assumption The QW absorptivity model in Eqs. (2)-(5), including discrete levels, exciton terms, and Fermi-Dirac band filling, correctly captures the spectral shape across all samples and powers.
    Full-spectral fitting relies on this model; a misspecified absorptivity would shift T and Delta-mu.
  • domain assumption The three samples are identical except for QW thickness, including barrier composition, doping, and interface quality nominally.
    Growth and processing are described as identical, but no structural characterization such as TEM or XRD is shown to verify thicknesses and interfaces.
  • domain assumption The Lumerical optical simulation (Figure S2) correctly predicts the 740 nm absorption ratio between barrier and QW.
    The 60x barrier absorption estimate is the basis for attributing J_SC to the barrier; simulation inputs are not detailed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unraveling Quantum Size-Dependent Optoelectrical Phenomena in Hot Carrier Quantum Well Structures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TA4UI5F6

@misc{pith2026250704112,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unraveling Quantum Size-Dependent Optoelectrical Phenomena in Hot Carrier Quantum Well Structures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TA4UI5F6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.04112}
}
read the original abstract

The enhancement of power conversion efficiency beyond the theoretical limit of single-junction solar cells is a key objective in the advancement of hot carrier solar cells. Recent findings indicate that quantum wells (QWs) can effectively generate hot carriers by confining charged carriers within their potential wells and by optimizing material properties. Here, we investigate the impact of quantum confinement on the thermodynamic properties of photogenerated hot carriers in p-i-n InGaAs/InAlAs heterostructure diodes, utilizing QW thicknesses of 4 nm, 5.5 nm, and 7.5 nm. The optical properties of these nanostructures reveal significant hot carrier effects at various lattice temperatures, with a pronounced effect noted at lower temperatures. The experimental results indicate that the widest QW exhibits stronger hot carrier effects than the thinner QWs. Additionally, the open-circuit voltage of the samples demonstrates a correlation with the degree of quantum confinement, mirroring trends observed in the quasi-Fermi level splitting of hot carriers. However, the magnitudes recorded exceed the bandgap of the quantum structures, suggesting that this behavior may be influenced by the barrier layer. Furthermore, the short-circuit current of the samples reveals a strong dependence on excitation power, but not on the degree of quantum confinement. This indicates that the majority of the photocurrent is generated in the barrier, with negligible contributions from photogenerated carriers within the QWs. This study provides insights into the role of quantum confinement on the opto-electrical properties of non-equilibrium hot carrier populations in QW structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.04112 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the p-i-n InGaAs QW mesa structures with metal contacts for electrical studies. (b) Band￾energy diagram of the entire QW heterostructure. The investigation into the hot carrier properties of the QW structures is performed utilizing micro￾photoluminescence (µ-PL) spectroscopy at varying excitation power levels and lattice temperatures. The optical configuration comprises a Ti-Sapphire laser operating… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Excitation power-dependent PL spectra at 10 K of (a) 4 nm, (b) 5.5 nm, and (c) 7.5 nm thin QWs. The black solid lines and the red dashed lines illustrate the experimental and the full PL fitting results, respectively. All measurements were performed at 10K. Upon photo-excitation, the availability of states in both the conduction and valence bands diminishes, resulting in a corresponding decrease in absorptivity, whi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) The temperature and (b) the quasi-Fermi level splitting of the QW structures of various thicknesses versus the absorbed power density at 10 K. The results of the hot carrier temperature (ΔT: the temperature difference between the hot carriers and the lattice temperature) and the quasi-Fermi level splitting as a function of excitation power at 10 K are presented in Figures 3 (a) and (b) for the different QW struc… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The current-voltage characteristics of the 7.5 nm QW at 10 K under different excitation power levels. (b) Current-voltage curves of the QW in the dark at various lattice temperatures. The inset shows the relationship between the ideality factor and lattice temperat…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The results of short-circuit current density versus the absorbed power density of the QW structures at (a) 10 K, and (b) 150 K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ross R T and Nozik A J 1982 Efficiency of hot-carrier solar energy converters Journal of Applied Physics 53 3813 – 8 Online: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.331124

    doi:10.1063/1.331124 1982

  2. [2]

    Shah J 1986 Hot carriers in quasi -2-D polar semiconductors IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 22 1728 –43 Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/jqe.1986.1073164

    work page arXiv 1986

  3. [3]

    Ferry D K 2021 Non-equilibrium longitudinal optical phonons and their lifetimes Applied Physics Reviews 8 Online: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0044374

    doi:10.1063/5.0044374 2021

  4. [4]

    and Guillemoles, J.F., 2018

    Nguyen, D.T., Lombez, L., Gibelli, F., Boyer -Richard, S., Le Corre, A., Durand, O. and Guillemoles, J.F., 2018. Quantitative experimental assessment of hot carrier -enhanced solar cells at room temperature. Nature Energy, 3(3), pp.236-242 Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0106-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0106-3 2018

  5. [5]

    and Ekins -Daukes, N.J., 2014

    Hirst, L.C., Walte rs, R.J., Führer, M.F. and Ekins -Daukes, N.J., 2014. Experimental demonstration of hot -carrier photo-current in an InGaAs quantum well solar cell. Applied Physics Letters, 104(23) Online: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4883648

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4883648 2014

  6. [6]

    Esmaielpour H, Whiteside V R, Piyathilaka H P, Vijeyaragunathan S, Wang B, Adcock-Smith E, Roberts K P, Mishima T D, Santos M B, Bristow A D and Sellers I R 2018 Enhanced hot electron lifetimes in quantum wells with inhibited phonon coupling Scientific Reports 8 Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30894-9

    doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30894-9 2018

  7. [7]

    Hirst L C, Fujii H, Wang Y, Sugiyama M and Ekins -Daukes N J 2014 Hot carriers in quantum wells for photovoltaic efficiency enhancement IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 4 244 –52 Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2013.2289321 13

    arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Esmaielpour H, Isaev N, Makhfudz I, Döblinger M, Finley J J and Koblmüller G 202 4 Strong dimensional and structural dependencies of hot carrier effects in INGAAS Nanowires: Implications for photovoltaic solar cells ACS Applied Nano Materials 7 2817–24 Online: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c05041

    work page doi:10.1021/acsanm.3c05041

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Zou Y, Esmaielpour H, Suchet D, Guillemoles J-F and Goodnick S M 2023 The role of nonequilibrium LO phonons, Pauli exclusion, and intervalley pathways on the relaxation of hot carriers in InGaAs/InGaAsP multi-quantum-wells Scientific Reports 13 Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/...

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Makhfudz I, Cavassilas N, Giteau M, Esmaielpour H, Suchet D, Daré A and Michelini F 2022 Enhancement of hot carrier effect and signatures of confinement in terms of thermalization power in quantum well solar cell Journal of Physics D Applied Physics 55 475102 Online: https://d...

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Zhang Y, Conibeer G, Liu S, Zhang J and Guillemoles J 2022 Review of the mechanisms for the phonon bottleneck effect in III –V semiconductors and their application for efficient hot carrier solar cells Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications 30 581–96 Online: https...

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Esmaielpour H, Durant B K, Dorman K R, Whiteside V R, Garg J, Mishima T D, Santos M B, Sellers I R, Guillemoles J-F and Suchet D 2021 Ho t carrier relaxation and inhibited thermalization in superlattice heterostructures: The potential for phonon management Applied Physics Lett...

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    B, Condensed Matter 48 14675 –8 Online: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.48.14675

    Rosenwaks Y, Hanna M C, Levi D H, Szmyd D M, Ahrenkiel R K and Nozik A J 1993 Hot -carrier cooling in GaAs: Quantum wells versus bulk Physical Review. B, Condensed Matter 48 14675 –8 Online: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.48.14675

    1993 doi

  6. [14]

    Lyon S A 1986 Spectroscopy of hot carriers in semiconductors Journal of Luminescenc e 35 121 –54 Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2313(86)90066-9

    1986 doi

  7. [15]

    Esmaielpour H, Whiteside V R, Tang J, Vijeyaragunathan S, Mishima T D, Cairns S, Santos M B, Wang B and Sellers I R 2016 Suppression of phonon‐mediated hot carrier relaxation in type‐II I nAs/AlAsxSb1 − x quantum wells: a practical route to hot carrier solar cells Progress in ...

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    Gibelli F, Lombez L and Guillemoles J -F 2016 Two carrier temperatures non -equilibrium generalized Planck law for semiconductors Physica B Condensed Matter 498 7–14 Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2016.06.006

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    Esmaielpour H, Lombez L, Giteau M, Delamarre A, Ory D, Cattoni A, Collin S, Guillemoles J -F and Suchet D 2020 Investigation of the spatial distribution of hot carriers in quantum -well structures via hyperspectral luminescence imaging Journal of Applied Physics 128 Online: ht...

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Vezin T, Esmaielpour H, Lombez L, Guillemoles J -F and Suchet D 2024 Optical determination of thermoelectric transport coefficients in a hot -carrier absorber Physical Review Applied 22 Online: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.22.034018

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Binet F, Duboz J Y, Grattepain C, Scholz F and Off J 1999 Carrier capture in InGaN quantum wells and hot carrier effects in GaN Materials Science and Engineering B 59 323 –9 Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921 - 5107(98)00376-6

    1999 doi

  12. [20]

    Conibeer G, Ekins-Daukes N, Guillemoles J-F, Kőnig D, Cho E-C, Jiang C-W, Shrestha S and Green M 2008 Progress on hot carrier cells Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 93 713 –9 Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2008.09.034

    2008 doi

  13. [21]

    Bris A L, Lombez L, Laribi S, Boissier G, Christol P and Guillemoles J -f. 2012 Thermalisation rate study of GaSb- based heterostructures by continuous wave photoluminescence and their potential as hot carrier solar cell absorbers Energy & Environmental Science 5 6225 Online: ...

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    Sourabh, S. et al. (2024). Evidence of hot carrier extraction in metal halide perovskite solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3777

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Shrestha S K, Aliberti P and Conibeer G J 2010 Energy selective contacts for hot carrier solar cells Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 94 1546–50 Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2009.11.029 14

    2010 doi

  16. [24]

    Takeda Y, Ichiki A, Kusano Y, Sugimoto N and Motohiro T 2015 Resonant tunneling diodes as energy -selective contacts used in hot-carrier solar cells Journal of Applied Physics 118 Online: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4931888

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    Ferry D K 2019 In search of a true hot carrier solar cell Semiconductor Science and Technology 34 044001 Online: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/ab0bc3

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    Esmaielpour H, Dorman K R, Ferry D K, Mishima T D, Santos M B, Whiteside V R and Sellers I R 2020a Exploiting intervalley scattering to harness hot carriers in III –V solar cells Nature Energy 5 336 –43 Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0602-0

    doi

  19. [27]

    1088/1361-6641/ab312b

    Whiteside V R, Esmaielpour H, Mishima T D, Dorman K R, Santos M B, Ferry D K and Sellers I R 2019 The role of intervalley phonons in hot carrier transfer and extraction in type -II InAs/AlAsSb quantum -well solar cells Semiconductor Science and Technology 34 094001 Online: htt...

    2019

  20. [28]

    Esmaielpour H, Lombez L, Giteau M, Guillemoles J and Suchet D 2022 Impact of excitation energy on hot carrier properties in InGaAs multi‐quantum well structure Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications 30 1354 – 62 Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3599

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    and Stern, F., 1964

    Lasher, G. and Stern, F., 1964. Spontaneous and stimulated recombination radiation in semiconductors. Physical Review, 133(2A), p.A553 Online: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.133.A553

    1964 doi

  22. [30]

    and Guillemoles, J.F., 2016

    Gibelli, F., Lombez, L. and Guillemoles, J.F., 2016. Accurate radiation temperature and chemical potential from quantitative photoluminescence analysis of hot carrier populations. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 29(6), p.06LT02 Online: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/2...

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    Chemla D, Miller D, Smith P, Gossard A and Wiegmann W 1984 Room temperature exc itonic nonlinear absorption and refraction in GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum well structures IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 20 265–75 Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/jqe.1984.1072393

    1984

  24. [32]

    Conibeer, G. et al. (2017). Multiple quantum wells as slowed hot c arrier cooling absorbers in hot carrier cells. 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC). https://doi.org/10.1109/pvsc.2017.8366611

    2017

  25. [33]

    B./Physical Review

    Makhfudz I, Esmaielpour H, Hajati Y, Koblmüller G and Cavassilas N 2024 Interplay of electron trapping by defect midgap state and quantum confinement to optimize the hot-carrier effect in a nanowire structure Physical Review. B./Physical Review. B 110 Online: https://doi.org/1...

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Sandner D, Esmaielpour H, Del Giudice F, Meder S, N uber M, Kienberger R, Koblmüller G and Iglev H 2023 Hot Electron Dynamics in INAS –ALASSB Core –Shell nanowires ACS Applied Energy Materials 6 10467 –74 Online: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c01565

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Interface roughness scattering in GaAs/AlAs quantum wells,

    H. Sakaki, T. Noda, K. Hirakawa, M. Tanaka, and T. Mats usue, “Interface roughness scattering in GaAs/AlAs quantum wells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 51, no. 23, pp. 1934–1936, Dec. 1987, doi: 10.1063/1.98305

    1934 doi

  28. [36]

    Wang, Y. et al. (2017). Photoluminescence Study of the Interface Fluctuation Effect for InGaAs/InAlAs/InP Single Quantum Well with Different Thickness. Nanoscale Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671 -017-1998- 8

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    Nelson J 2003 The physics of solar cells Online: https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA63958087

    2003

  30. [38]

    Aperathitis E, Scott C G, Sands D, Foukaraki V, Hatzopoulos Z and Panayotatos P 1998 Effect of temperature on GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum well solar cells Materials Science and Engineering B 51 85 –9 Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-5107(97)00234-1

    1998 doi

  31. [39]

    Dalapati P, Manik N B and Basu A N 2014 Study of effective carrier lifetime and ideality factor of BPW 21 and BPW 34B photodiodes from above room temperature to liquid nitrogen temperature Cryogenics 65 10 –5 Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2014.10.002

    2014 doi

  32. [40]

    Nadenau V, Rau U, Jasenek A and Schock H W 2000 Electronic properties of CuGaSe2-based heterojunction solar cells. Part I. Transport analysis Journal of Applied Physics 87 584–93 Online: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.371903 15 Unraveling Quantum Size-Dependent Optoelectrical Pheno...

    2000 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.