REVIEW 2 cited by
Are Large Language Models Actually Good at Text Style Transfer?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We analyze the performance of large language models (LLMs) on Text Style Transfer (TST), specifically focusing on sentiment transfer and text detoxification across three languages: English, Hindi, and Bengali. Text Style Transfer involves modifying the linguistic style of a text while preserving its core content. We evaluate the capabilities of pre-trained LLMs using zero-shot and few-shot prompting as well as parameter-efficient finetuning on publicly available datasets. Our evaluation using automatic metrics, GPT-4 and human evaluations reveals that while some prompted LLMs perform well in English, their performance in on other languages (Hindi, Bengali) remains average. However, finetuning significantly improves results compared to zero-shot and few-shot prompting, making them comparable to previous state-of-the-art. This underscores the necessity of dedicated datasets and specialized models for effective TST.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Step-by-Step Mastery: Enhancing Soft Constraint Following Ability of Large Language Models
A progressive data-construction pipeline with GPT-4o-based reordering, followed by DPO and curriculum training, improves soft constraint following on FollowBench, CFBench, and IFEval.
-
Multilingual and Explainable Text Detoxification with Parallel Corpora
New parallel text detoxification corpora for five languages, a GPT-4-based cross-lingual analysis of toxicity features, and a cluster-conditioned chain-of-thought prompting method that yields a marginal average gain.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.