A Large-Scale Study of Relevance Assessments with Large Language Models: An Initial Look
read the original abstract
The application of large language models to provide relevance assessments presents exciting opportunities to advance information retrieval, natural language processing, and beyond, but to date many unknowns remain. This paper reports on the results of a large-scale evaluation (the TREC 2024 RAG Track) where four different relevance assessment approaches were deployed in situ: the "standard" fully manual process that NIST has implemented for decades and three different alternatives that take advantage of LLMs to different extents using the open-source UMBRELA tool. This setup allows us to correlate system rankings induced by the different approaches to characterize tradeoffs between cost and quality. We find that in terms of nDCG@20, nDCG@100, and Recall@100, system rankings induced by automatically generated relevance assessments from UMBRELA correlate highly with those induced by fully manual assessments across a diverse set of 77 runs from 19 teams. Our results suggest that automatically generated UMBRELA judgments can replace fully manual judgments to accurately capture run-level effectiveness. Surprisingly, we find that LLM assistance does not appear to increase correlation with fully manual assessments, suggesting that costs associated with human-in-the-loop processes do not bring obvious tangible benefits. Overall, human assessors appear to be stricter than UMBRELA in applying relevance criteria. Our work validates the use of LLMs in academic TREC-style evaluations and provides the foundation for future studies.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
DoGMaTiQ: Automated Generation of Question-and-Answer Nuggets for Report Evaluation
DoGMaTiQ automates creation of QA-based nuggets via document-grounded generation, paraphrase clustering, and quality subselection, producing report evaluations that correlate strongly with human judgments on cross-lin...
-
Hybrid Pooling with LLMs via Relevance Context Learning
Relevance Context Learning generates explicit relevance narratives from judged examples to guide LLM assessors, outperforming zero-shot and standard in-context learning for IR relevance judgments.
-
DoGMaTiQ: Automated Generation of Question-and-Answer Nuggets for Report Evaluation
DoGMaTiQ automates QA-nugget creation via document-grounded generation, paraphrase clustering, and quality-based subselection, yielding strong rank correlations with human judgments on cross-lingual TREC tasks.
-
Formalized Information Needs Improve Large-Language-Model Relevance Judgments
Synthetically formalizing information needs into topics with descriptions and narratives improves LLM relevance assessor agreement with humans and reduces over-labeling of relevant documents on TREC Deep Learning and ...
-
When LLM Judges Inflate Scores: Exploring Overrating in Relevance Assessment
LLMs consistently overrate relevance of inadequate passages in IR evaluations due to biases toward length and lexical features rather than true content match.
-
Prompt Perturbation for Reliable LLM Evaluation over Comparison Graphs
A prompt perturbation approach builds comparison graphs from LLM judgments, filters inconsistent cycles or ties, and aggregates more reliable rankings.
-
Plans for Evaluating Structured Generative Search Summaries
The authors propose an evaluation framework for LLM-generated structured search summaries and describe plans for implementing and testing it.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.