Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 32 references

The paper shows that whirling magnetic order in Tsai-type approximants is not a geometric necessity of the Tsai cluster; it requires spin anisotropy, so in the Heisenberg limit (isotropic Gd) the universal whirling state breaks down and a m

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-05 00:54 UTC pith:TCBGLUO5

load-bearing objection The Tb/Gd XRMS data are fresh and the negative result is systematic, but the 'breakdown of whirling order' claim is premature until the authors test a globally rotated whirling structure. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.00467 v1 pith:TCBGLUO5 submitted 2026-08-01 cond-mat.str-el

Breakdown of Universal Whirling Order in a Heisenberg Tsai-Type Approximant

Farid Labib , Guillaume Beutier , Alessandro Bombardi , Marc de Boissieu , Ryuji Tamura This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Tsai-type approximantswhirling magnetic orderspin anisotropyHeisenberg limitX-ray resonant magnetic scatteringAu-Al-GdAu-Al-Tbantiferromagnetic order
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Tsai-type approximants are cubic crystals built from icosahedral clusters of rare-earth ions, and several of them order magnetically into the same noncoplanar "whirling" spin pattern. This paper asks whether that pattern is forced by the cluster geometry or by the rare-earth spin anisotropy. It compares single crystals of Au-Al-Tb (anisotropic, non-Heisenberg) and Au-Al-Gd (isotropic, Heisenberg) using x-ray resonant magnetic scattering. The Tb compound follows the whirling model; the Gd compound, despite nearly the same crystal structure, same propagation vector k=(1,0,0), and comparable magnetic energy scales, shows azimuthal dependencies that no whirling or symmetry-based model can explain. The conclusion is that the apparent universality of whirling order is not a consequence of Tsai-cluster geometry alone—spin anisotropy is required, and in its absence a manifold of nearly degenerate competing magnetic states appears.

Core claim

The central discovery is a negative result that reframes a proposed universal. In the cubic 1/1 approximants Au-Al-Tb and Au-Al-Gd, the rare-earth ions occupy the same 24g sites on icosahedron shells and both order antiferromagnetically at comparable Néel temperatures (11.4 K and 9.4 K) with the same propagation vector k=(1,0,0). Resonant x-ray magnetic scattering at the L3 edges yields azimuthal intensity profiles proportional to |k'(ψ)·M(hkl)|². For Au-Al-Tb, the profiles are reproduced by the previously proposed whirling magnetic structure (space group Ipm'3̄', moments at 28° from a cubic axis). For Au-Al-Gd, six measured reflections all show qualitatively different azimuthal dependences

What carries the argument

The key object is the whirling spin configuration on the Tsai-cluster icosahedron, in which rare-earth moments lie in the local mirror plane at 28° from a cubic axis (86° from the fivefold axis) with magnetic space group Ipm'3̄'. The discriminating probe is the azimuthal-angle dependence of resonant magnetic scattering at the rare-earth L3 edge, where the intensity is proportional to |k'(ψ)·M(hkl)|² and therefore encodes the direction of the magnetic structure factor M(hkl). Rotating the sample around the scattering vector sweeps the projection of M onto the scattered beam direction, producing a characteristic modulation for each magnetic model. The paper uses the failure of the whirling mod

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that anisotropy alone changes the magnetic state assumes the Gd and Tb compounds are identical in every other relevant way—same structure, same couplings, same electron behavior—except that the Gd spin has no directional preference.

What would settle it

Take azimuthal and polarization-resolved resonant scattering data on a larger set of Gd magnetic reflections and fit them with the whirling model while allowing a global rotation of the whole spin configuration and arbitrary domain weights. If any such global rotation reproduces all profiles, then whirling order survives in the Heisenberg limit and the breakdown claim fails; if none does, and a Heisenberg simulation with the known couplings reproduces the competing manifold, the anisotropy-selection claim is confirmed.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • The whirling ground state is not guaranteed for Tsai-type approximants: compounds with isotropic rare-earth moments can order differently at the same propagation vector.
  • Predictive models of these magnets must treat spin anisotropy as a selection parameter on par with cluster geometry and exchange couplings.
  • In the Heisenberg limit, the magnetic ground state sits in a nearly degenerate manifold, so small perturbations such as field, strain, or disorder can plausibly switch between distinct magnetic configurations.
  • X-ray resonant magnetic scattering is a viable route to magnetic-structure determination in Gd-based approximants, where neutron diffraction is strongly hampered by absorption.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The near-identical (5,4,0) and (5,6,0) azimuthal profiles suggest the Gd state is a single-k structure with a strongly selected domain population, although the full spin arrangement is not determined in the paper.
  • A continuous Tb-to-Gd substitution series would be a direct test of whether anisotropy alone interpolates between whirling and non-whirling order; that gradient is not measured here.
  • If the competing manifold is truly nearly degenerate, the Gd ground state may be unusually field- or strain-tunable, with possible switching between topologically distinct spin textures.
  • A complete magnetic-structure solution for Gd, not attempted with the partial scans, will likely identify which member of the competing manifold is realized and how it is selected.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports XRMS azimuthal scans on two Tsai-type 1/1 approximants, Au-Al-Tb and Au-Al-Gd. It confirms that the Tb compound is well described by the previously proposed whirling magnetic structure (Sato et al.). For Gd, however, azimuthal profiles of six magnetic reflections are reported to be incompatible with the same whirling model for any value of its single in-plane parameter φ, and also with a set of symmetry-allowed irreps and published Heisenberg models. The paper concludes that the apparent universality of whirling order in non-Heisenberg Tsai-type systems breaks down in the Heisenberg limit, and that spin anisotropy is an essential selector of magnetic topology.

Significance. If the conclusion holds, this is an important negative result that changes the understanding of magnetic-state selection in Tsai-type approximants: cluster geometry alone would not determine the magnetic ground state, and tuning rare-earth anisotropy would be a control parameter for noncoplanar magnetic topology. The experimental work is valuable in its own right: XRMS on Gd circumvents the strong neutron absorption of Gd, and the systematic incompatibility across six reflections is a strong, falsifiable constraint for future models. The Tb control experiment provides a useful positive benchmark. The central inference, however, rests on an incomplete model test: the whirling model is only tested in its anisotropy-pinned orientation, while a Heisenberg system allows arbitrary global spin rotations. This omission means the paper does not yet rule out a globally rotated whirling state for Gd; the missing test is feasible with the already-collected data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Au–Al–Gd results, Fig. 4 and subsequent paragraph] The Gd azimuthal data are compared only with the Sato whirling model in its lattice-pinned orientation, with a single in-plane angle φ varied within the same magnetic space group. Because Au-Al-Gd is described as a Heisenberg system, the exchange Hamiltonian is invariant under global SO(3) spin rotations. A global rotation of the whirling texture changes M(hkl) accordingly and therefore changes the predicted azimuthal intensity |k'(ψ)·M(hkl)|². The manuscript does not report testing this continuous family, although it explicitly acknowledges arbitrary global rotations for Heisenberg models in the next paragraph. The statement that 'none of the measured azimuthal profiles can be reproduced by the whirling magnetic model' is thus only established for the anisotropy-pinned copy. If a globally rotated whirling state fits the six Gd reflections, the breakdown would be a loss of orientational
  2. [Gd model testing / Supplemental Material] The manuscript states that a broad range of alternative models was tested and that 'none provides a consistent description of all measured reflections', but no fit results, χ² values, model parameters, or comparison plots are shown in the main text; the supporting material is not provided. The negative claim is load-bearing for the conclusion that Gd is incompatible with 'whirling or symmetry-based models'. Without this evidence being inspectable, the claim is not verifiable. At minimum, the main text should summarize the quality-of-fit statistics and the domain-weight treatment for each tested model family.
  3. [Abstract and concluding paragraph] The conclusion 'the apparent universality of whirling order ... requires spin anisotropy' is presented as a causal attribution based on a two-compound comparison. The data establish that Gd does not follow the pinned whirling model and that its profiles differ qualitatively from Tb. They do not exclude the possibility that the difference arises from other compound-specific factors, such as slight structural differences, RKKY coupling changes, or site-occupancy effects, despite the 'nearly identical' structural and energy-scale characterization. The wording should be softened to 'is consistent with spin anisotropy being the decisive factor' or an additional control should be provided; the present data cannot prove that anisotropy is the unique cause.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Experimental details] The azimuthal scans for Gd are described as 'partial' but the accessible range and step size are not stated in the main text. A statement of the covered azimuthal range for each reflection would help the reader judge the constraining power of the data.
  2. [Discussion of (5,4,0) and (5,6,0)] The near-identical profiles of (5,4,0) and (5,6,0) are called 'striking' and used to infer a nearly single-domain state. Since no model is fit to these data, this inference is speculative; it should be framed as a qualitative observation rather than a conclusion.
  3. [Introduction] The sentence 'the two compounds share identical crystal structures' is immediately followed by 'nearly identical' and a lattice parameter for only one compound. The precise structural relation (space group, lattice parameters, atomic coordinates) should be stated consistently, especially if it is used to justify the controlled comparison.
  4. [References] Ref. [27] and Ref. [32] are cited with placeholder or future arXiv numbers; these need to be updated before publication. The link to the Supplemental Material is also a placeholder.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the breakdown claim is an external falsification of the published whirling model against new XRMS data; self-citations are not load-bearing, though an acknowledged untested global-rotation variant limits the strength of the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central inference is that the whirling order fails for the Heisenberg Au-Al-Gd compound while describing Au-Al-Tb. This is derived from new azimuthal XRMS data (Figs. 3-4) and a search over the whirling model's one free parameter φ plus a range of symmetry-allowed irreps and published Heisenberg models. The conclusion does not reduce to an input fit: the Gd data are not predicted from the Tb fit; rather, the whirling model is tested and rejected. The self-citations (Refs. [16], [18], [20], [28], [29]) supply the candidate models and structural characterization, but the load-bearing evidence is the measured azimuthal profiles, which are independent of those citations. The paper itself flags a genuine limitation: it tested the whirling model only within the magnetic space group Ipm'3' with varying φ, and acknowledges that Heisenberg textures are 'energetically invariant by an arbitrary and global rotation of the spins' — meaning a globally rotated whirling state was not tested. This is an omitted test, not a circular reduction: the model could still fit the data after a global SO(3) rotation, but that would make the conclusion a statement about orientational pinning rather than about magnetic-state selection. Similarly, the attribution to spin anisotropy rests on the unverified assumption that the two compounds differ only in anisotropy; this is an empirical-controls concern, not a circularity. No step in the derivation is self-definitional, no fitted parameter is renamed a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. Score reflects only minor non-load-bearing self-citation and the flagged untested alternative.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the scattering model, the assumption of identical structure except for anisotropy, and the correctness of the Tb whirling model as a baseline. No new particles or entities are introduced. The free parameters are the whirling model's phi and unknown domain weights; these are tested but not successfully fitted for the Gd compound.

free parameters (3)
  • phi (moment orientation in mirror plane) = Not converged for Gd; for Tb, refinement did not improve over published value
    Free parameter of the whirling model; varied for Gd to attempt a fit, but no phi reproduces the data.
  • Domain weights = Unknown
    When testing alternative magnetic models, the weights of symmetry-related domains are free; no combination gives a consistent fit to all measured reflections.
  • Curie-Weiss parameters (theta_W, mu_eff, chi0) = theta_W = +12.0 K (Tb), +11.1 K (Gd); mu_eff = 10.06 mu_B (Tb), 7.95 mu_B (Gd)
    Fitted to susceptibility data to establish comparable energy scales and localized moments; supports the comparison but is not the central result.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption XRMS intensity scales as |k'(psi) . M(hkl)|^2 (Hill-McMorrow approximation)
    Used to convert azimuthal intensity modulations into projections of the magnetic structure factor; standard but essential for the interpretation.
  • domain assumption Au-Al-Tb and Au-Al-Gd differ only in spin anisotropy
    The paper states the compounds have 'nearly identical crystal structures' and 'comparable magnetic energy scales', so the difference in magnetic order is attributed solely to anisotropy. This is load-bearing for the central conclusion.
  • domain assumption The whirling magnetic structure of Ref. [18] correctly describes Au-Al-Tb
    The Tb data are used as a positive control; the whirling model is assumed to be correct for the non-Heisenberg compound, based on prior neutron diffraction.
  • domain assumption The propagation vector is k = (1,0,0) in both compounds
    Inferred from the observation of magnetic reflections at h+k+l = 2n+1; necessary for the comparison of the two systems.
  • domain assumption Rare-earth moments are well-localized free-ion spins (Tb3+, Gd3+)
    Based on Curie-Weiss fits giving effective moments close to free-ion values; supports the Heisenberg vs. anisotropic spin characterization.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Breakdown of Universal Whirling Order in a Heisenberg Tsai-Type Approximant." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TCBGLUO5

@misc{pith2026260800467,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Breakdown of Universal Whirling Order in a Heisenberg Tsai-Type Approximant},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TCBGLUO5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00467}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Noncoplanar whirling magnetic order has recently been proposed as a universal magnetic state in non-Heisenberg Tsai-type quasicrystal approximants. Here, X-ray resonant magnetic scattering measurements on Heisenberg and non-Heisenberg Au-Al-R (R = Gd, Tb) 1/1 approximants reveal a clear breakdown of this universality in the Heisenberg limit. While the non-Heisenberg Au-Al-Tb system is well described by the previously identified whirling magnetic structure, the Heisenberg Au-Al-Gd counterpart exhibits qualitatively different azimuthal-angle dependences that are incompatible with the universal whirling-order model. Despite nearly identical crystal structures and comparable magnetic energy scales, the two systems stabilize distinct antiferromagnetic ground states with the same propagation vector k = (1, 0, 0), demonstrating that the apparent universality of whirling order is not a consequence of Tsai-cluster geometry alone but requires spin anisotropy. These results further reveal the emergence of a competing manifold of nearly degenerate magnetic states in the Heisenberg limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00467 by Alessandro Bombardi, Farid Labib, Guillaume Beutier, Marc de Boissieu, Ryuji Tamura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Arrangement of Gd ions on the icosahedron shells [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Low temperature magnetic susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Azimuthal scans of the (8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Shechtman, I

    D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J. W. Cahn, Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 1951 (1984)

    1951

  2. [2]

    Shechtman and I

    D. Shechtman and I. A. Blech, The microstructure of rapidly solidified Al 6Mn, Metall. Trans. A16, 1005 (1985)

    work page 1985

  3. [3]

    A. I. Goldman and R. F. Kelton, Quasicrystals and crys- talline approximants, Rev. Mod. Phys.65, 213 (1993)

    1993

  4. [4]

    K. Nawa, D. Okuyama, A. Ebina, T. J. Sato, A. Ishikawa, and R. Tamura, Single-crystal neutron diffraction study on the quasicrystal approximant au 70al16tb14, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.2461, 012015 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Labib, K

    F. Labib, K. Nawa, S. Suzuki, H.-C. Wu, A. Ishikawa, K. Inagaki, T. Fujii, K. Kinjo, T. J. Sato, and R. Tamura, Unveiling exotic magnetic phase diagram of a non-Heisenberg quasicrystal approximant, Mater. Today Phys.40, 101321 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Labib, T

    F. Labib, T. Sugimoto, H. Takakura, A. Ishikawa, and R. Tamura, Identification of two distinct antiferromag- netic phases in the au-al-gd quasicrystal approximant, Phys. Rev. B111, 174409 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Labib, H

    F. Labib, H. Takakura, A. Ishikawa, T. Fujii, and R. Tamura, Derivation of a nonstoichiometric 1/1 qua- sicrystal approximant from a stoichiometric 2/1 qua- sicrystal approximant and maximization of the magne- tocaloric effect, J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 33424 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Labib, S

    F. Labib, S. Suzuki, A. Ishikawa, T. Fujii, and 5 R. Tamura, Emergence of long-range magnetic order from spin-glass state by tuning electron density in a stoichio- metric ga-based quasicrystal approximant, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174436 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Labib, T

    F. Labib, T. D. Yamamoto, A. Ishikawa, and R. Tamura, Comparative study of ferromagnetism in non-heisenberg 1/1 and 2/1 quasicrystal approximants, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174429 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Tamura, Y

    R. Tamura, Y. Muro, T. Hiroto, K. Nishimoto, and T. Takabatake, Long-range magnetic order in the qua- sicrystalline approximant Cd 6Tb, Phys. Rev. B82, 220201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Tamura, A

    R. Tamura, A. Ishikawa, S. Suzuki, T. Kotajima, Y. Tanaka, T. Seki, N. Shibata, T. Yamada, T. Fujii, C.-W. Wang, M. Avdeev, K. Nawa, D. Okuyama, and T. J. Sato, Experimental observation of long-range mag- netic order in icosahedral quasicrystals, J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 19938 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Takeuchi, F

    R. Takeuchi, F. Labib, T. Tsugawa, Y. Akai, A. Ishikawa, S. Suzuki, T. Fujii, and R. Tamura, High phase-purity and composition-tunable ferromagnetic icosahedral qua- sicrystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 176701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Tamura, T

    R. Tamura, T. Abe, S. Yoshida, Y. Shimozaki, S. Suzuki, A. Ishikawa, F. Labib, M. Avdeev, K. Kinjo, K. Nawa, and T. J. Sato, Observation of antiferromagnetic order in a quasicrystal, Nat. Phys.21, 974 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Labib, T

    F. Labib, T. D. Yamamoto, A. Ishikawa, and R. Tamura, Recent progress and design principles of magnetism in tsai-type hypermaterials: Long-range magnetic order in quasicrystals and approximant crystals, Mater. Trans. 10.2320/matertrans.MT-MD2025010 (2026), in press

    work page doi:10.2320/matertrans.mt-md2025010 2026

  15. [15]

    K. Nawa, M. Avdeev, A. Ishikawa, H. Takakura, C.-W. Wang, D. Okuyama, R. Murasaki, R. Tamura, and T. J. Sato, Magnetic properties of the quasicrystal approxi- mant au65ga21tb14, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 054412 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Labib, K

    F. Labib, K. Nawa, Y. Nambu, H. Takakura, Y. Ikeda, K. Deguchi, M. Matsuura, A. Ishikawa, R. Kajimoto, K. Ikeuchi, T. J. Sato, and R. Tamura, Universal whirling magnetic orders in non-heisenberg tsai-type quasicrystal approximants (2026), arXiv:2503.01517 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    K. K. Thilakan, F. Denoel, Y.-C. Huang, O. Fa- belo, R. Mathieu, C. P. G´ omez, and M. Sahlberg, Single-crystal neutron diffraction study on the Ho13.6Au61.1Al25.3 quasicrystal approximant, J. Al- loys Compd.1002, 175263 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    T. J. Sato, A. Ishikawa, A. Sakurai, M. Hattori, M. Avdeev, and R. Tamura, Whirling spin order in the quasicrystal approximant Au 72Al14Tb14, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054417 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Sugimoto, S

    T. Sugimoto, S. Suzuki, R. Tamura, and T. To- hyama, Revisiting the magnetic orders in heisenberg model for tsai-type quasicrystal approximant, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan93, 045001 (2024), https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.93.045001

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.93.045001 2024

  20. [20]

    Miyazaki, T

    H. Miyazaki, T. Sugimoto, K. Morita, and T. Tohyama, Magnetic orders induced by rkky interaction in tsai-type quasicrystalline approximant au-al-gd, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 024417 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Paolasini and F

    L. Paolasini and F. de Bergevin, Magnetic and reso- nant X-ray scattering investigations of strongly corre- lated electron systems, Comptes Rendus. Physique9, 550 (2008)

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    Gibbs, D

    D. Gibbs, D. R. Harshman, E. D. Isaacs, D. B. McWhan, D. Mills, and C. Vettier, Polarization and resonance prop- erties of magnetic x-ray scattering in holmium, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1241 (1988)

    work page 1988

  23. [23]

    J. W. Kim, Y. Lee, D. Wermeille, B. Sieve, L. Tan, S. L. Bud’ko, S. Law, P. C. Canfield, B. N. Harmon, and A. I. Goldman, Systematics of x-ray resonant scattering am- plitudes inRNi 2Ge2 (R= Gd,Tb,Dy,Ho,Er,Tm): The origin of the branching ratio at theledges of the heavy rare earths, Phys. Rev. B72, 064403 (2005)

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter Physics, 1st ed

    S. Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter Physics, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001)

    work page 2001

  25. [25]

    S. P. Collins, A. Bombardi, A. R. Marshall, J. H. Williams, G. Barlow, A. G. Day, M. R. Pearson, R. J. Woolliscroft, R. D. Walton, G. Beutier, and G. Nisbet, Diamond beamline I16 (materials & magnetism), AIP Conference Proceedings1234, 303 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    J. P. Hill and D. F. McMorrow, Resonant Exchange Scat- tering: Polarization Dependence and Correlation Func- tion, Acta Crystallographica Section A52, 236 (1996)

    work page 1996

  27. [27]

    See supplementary material at [link to be inserted] for further details of the experiments and analysis

    work page

  28. [28]

    M. G. Kim, G. Beutier, A. Kreyssig, T. Hiroto, T. Ya- mada, J. W. Kim, M. de Boissieu, R. Tamura, and A. I. Goldman, Antiferromagnetic order in the quasicrystal approximant Cd6Tb studied by x-ray resonant magnetic scattering, Phys. Rev. B85, 134442 (2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    Kreyssig, G

    A. Kreyssig, G. Beutier, T. Hiroto, M. G. Kim, G. S. Tucker, M. de Boissieu, R. Tamura, and A. I. Gold- man, Antiferromagnetic order and the structural or- der–disorder transition in the Cd 6Ho quasicrystal ap- proximant, Philosophical Magazine Letters93, 512 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    Suzuki, R

    S. Suzuki, R. Tamura, and T. Sugimoto, Classical and quantum magnetic ground states on an icosahedral clus- ter, MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS62, 367 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    S. Watanabe, Topological magnetic textures and long-range orders in terbium-based quasicrystal and approximant, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2112202118 (2021), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2112202118

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2112202118 2021

  32. [32]

    Woodland, F

    L. Woodland, F. Labib, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, F. Orlandi, H. Luetkens, and R. Tamura, Magnetic ground state of a prototype quasicrystal approximant: A candidate for octahedral spin ice physics (2026), arXiv:2605.26044 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.