REVIEW 2 cited by
Curriculum Design of Competitive Programming: a Contest-based Approach
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Competitive programming (CP) has been increasingly integrated into computer science curricula worldwide due to its efficacy in enhancing students' algorithmic reasoning and problem-solving skills. However, existing CP curriculum designs predominantly employ a problem-based approach, lacking the critical dimension of time pressure of real competitive programming contests. Such constraints are prevalent not only in programming contests but also in various real-world scenarios, including technical interviews, software development sprints, and hackathons. To bridge this gap, we introduce a contest-based approach to curriculum design that explicitly incorporates realistic contest scenarios into formative assessments, simulating authentic competitive programming experiences. This paper details the design and implementation of such a course at Purdue University, structured to systematically develop students' observational skills, algorithmic techniques, and efficient coding and debugging practices. We outline a pedagogical framework comprising cooperative learning strategies, contest-based assessments, and supplemental activities to boost students' problem-solving capabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Evaluating Performance Consistency in Competitive Programming: Educational Implications and Contest Design Insights
Across ten years of ICPC data, Codeforces online ratings predicted World Finals rankings (tau = 0.596) better than any superregional contest, and Northern Eurasia had the strongest regional-to-superregional consistenc...
-
The Failure of Plagiarism Detection in Competitive Programming
Code similarity detectors miss obfuscated or AI-generated submissions in competitive programming, so the author recommends combining automated screening, manual review, and oral interviews.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.