pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.09392 · v1 · pith:TDL3JOLJnew · submitted 2025-09-11 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph · cs.SE

An Integrated Open Source Software System for the Generation and Analysis of Subject-Specific Blood Flow Simulation Ensembles

Simon Leistikow , Thomas Miro , Adrian Kummerl\"ander , Ali Nahardani , Katja Gr\"un , Markus Franz , Verena Hoerr , Mathias J. Krause
show 1 more author
Lars Linsen
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 22:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph cs.SE
keywords blood flow simulationhemodynamic analysisCFDMRIopen source softwaresimulation ensemblesvisual analysis2D embeddings
0
0 comments X

The pith

An open-source software system generates subject-specific blood flow simulation ensembles from MRI data and analyzes them through 2D embeddings of the similarity space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an interactive open-source tool that combines structural and 4D MRI data with computational fluid dynamics simulations to study blood flow in arteries and veins. Users can create ensembles of simulations by varying parameters and then examine the results alongside measurements using visual and analytical methods based on 2D projections of similarity. This setup targets hemodynamic factors such as turbulence and wall shear stress that matter for conditions like aneurysms and stenoses. The authors demonstrate the tool on three real-world cases and gather feedback from MRI and CFD experts to refine its features. The work rests on the idea that linking these two data sources produces clearer insights into cardiovascular biomarkers than either approach alone.

Core claim

The central claim is that an integrated open-source platform can generate varied subject-specific blood flow simulation ensembles from MRI-captured anatomy and flow data, then support interactive visual and analytical examination of those ensembles together with measurements through 2D embeddings of the similarity space, thereby uniting the strengths of CFD and MRI for hemodynamic analysis.

What carries the argument

The interactive visual analysis tool that creates simulation ensembles from MRI inputs and projects them into 2D similarity embeddings for exploration.

If this is right

  • The system enables configuration of high-variety simulation ensembles for subject-specific hemodynamic studies.
  • Visual and analytical examination of simulations and measurements becomes possible through 2D similarity embeddings.
  • The tool applies directly to real-world cases involving blood flow in arteries and veins.
  • Expert evaluation refines the software for both medical researchers and numerical analysts.
  • Combining CFD and MRI data supports more accurate analysis of hemodynamic biomarkers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could support more personalized assessment of cardiovascular risks if embedded in clinical workflows.
  • Similar ensemble-generation and embedding techniques might extend to other fluid-flow problems outside medicine.
  • Direct comparison of the 2D embedding results against expert manual review would test whether the visualizations reliably highlight key flow features.

Load-bearing premise

That interactive analysis of simulation ensembles through 2D embeddings will produce clinically or scientifically meaningful insights into blood flow dynamics when applied to real MRI and CFD data.

What would settle it

A test on real patient MRI and CFD data sets for aneurysms or stenoses that shows no interpretable clusters, correlations, or actionable patterns emerging from the 2D embeddings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09392 by Adrian Kummerl\"ander, Ali Nahardani, Katja Gr\"un, Lars Linsen, Markus Franz, Mathias J. Krause, Simon Leistikow, Thomas Miro, Verena Hoerr.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The discrete velocity set D3Q19[22] 4. Our Integrated Software System As discussed in section 2, existing solutions address parts of the challenges in creating, visualizing, and analyzing simulation ensembles, but lack an interactive and customizable tool tailored for CFD and cardiovascular imaging experts. We address this by integrating the high-performance Lattice Boltzmann framework OpenLB into the inte… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Automated meshing and decomposition [1] 4.3. Integration We integrate OpenLB into Voreen as a flexible backend module, reading simula￾tion parameters from Voreen’s XML parameter file. This case is compiled once with a suitable choice of parallelization modes and then executed via the Voreen UI. This integration extends Voreen’s feature set with fluid flow simulation capabili￾ties. Together, Voreen and Open… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ensemble Analysis Pipeline: Processing and configuration of simulation ensembles as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In-situ simulation result for Use Case A. Multiple linked views visualize the geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Segmentation result for Use Case B: upper left the segmentation, other windows display [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulation result for Use Case B similar to Figure 4. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Multiple linked views visualize the 2D Similarity Plot (top left), deviation of two mem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Background and Objective: Hemodynamic analysis of blood flow through arteries and veins is critical for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases, such as aneurysms and stenoses, and for investigating cardiovascular parameters, such as turbulence and wall shear stress. For subject-specific analyses, the anatomy and blood flow of the subject can be captured non-invasively using structural and 4D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), on the other hand, can be used to generate blood flow simulations by solving the Navier-Stokes equations. To generate and analyze subject-specific blood flow simulations, MRI and CFD have to be brought together. Methods: We present an interactive, customizable, and user-oriented visual analysis tool that assists researchers in both medicine and numerical analysis. Our open-source tool is applicable to domains such as CFD and MRI, and it facilitates the analysis of simulation results and medical data, especially in hemodynamic studies. It enables the creation of simulation ensembles with a high variety of parameters. Furthermore, it allows for the visual and analytical examination of simulations and measurements through 2D embeddings of the similarity space. Results: To demonstrate the effectiveness of our tool, we applied it to three real-world use cases, showcasing its ability to configure simulation ensembles and analyse blood flow dynamics. We evaluated our example cases together with MRI and CFD experts to further enhance features and increase the usability. Conclusions: By combining the strengths of both CFD and MRI, our tool provides a more comprehensive understanding of hemodynamic parameters, facilitating more accurate analysis of hemodynamic biomarkers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an open-source software system for generating and analyzing subject-specific blood flow simulation ensembles by integrating structural/4D MRI data with CFD simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations. The tool supports creation of high-variety parameter ensembles and enables visual/analytical examination of simulations and measurements via 2D embeddings of the similarity space. Effectiveness is demonstrated by application to three real-world use cases, with additional expert evaluation for usability and feature refinement; the central conclusion is that combining CFD and MRI strengths yields a more comprehensive understanding of hemodynamic parameters and facilitates more accurate biomarker analysis.

Significance. An integrated, customizable, user-oriented open-source platform for MRI-CFD ensemble generation and 2D-embedding-based visual analysis could meaningfully lower barriers for subject-specific hemodynamic studies if the claimed improvements in biomarker insight hold. The release of the software and its application to real MRI/CFD data constitute concrete strengths that would support reproducibility and adoption in medical physics and cardiovascular research.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section: the claim that the tool 'facilitates more accurate analysis of hemodynamic biomarkers' is load-bearing for the central contribution, yet the reported evidence consists only of qualitative application to three use cases plus expert feedback on usability; no quantitative metrics (error reduction in WSS or turbulence estimates, blinded diagnostic comparisons, or correlation with clinical outcomes) are supplied to substantiate accuracy gains over standard CFD/MRI workflows.
  2. [Conclusions] Conclusions: the assertion that 2D embeddings of simulation ensembles 'yield clinically or scientifically meaningful insights' into blood flow dynamics rests on the same three use cases and expert comments; without a concrete test (e.g., inter-observer variability reduction or new biomarker discovery validated against ground truth), the interpretive step from visual analysis to improved accuracy remains unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'expert evaluation' is used without stating the number of experts, their specialties, or the structured feedback protocol employed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to ensure claims are appropriately supported by the presented evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section: the claim that the tool 'facilitates more accurate analysis of hemodynamic biomarkers' is load-bearing for the central contribution, yet the reported evidence consists only of qualitative application to three use cases plus expert feedback on usability; no quantitative metrics (error reduction in WSS or turbulence estimates, blinded diagnostic comparisons, or correlation with clinical outcomes) are supplied to substantiate accuracy gains over standard CFD/MRI workflows.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript provides qualitative demonstration through three use cases and expert usability feedback rather than quantitative metrics such as error reductions in wall shear stress or clinical outcome correlations. The central contribution is the open-source integrated tool for ensemble generation and 2D-embedding analysis; the use cases illustrate its application to real MRI/CFD data. We have revised the Results section to qualify the language, stating that the integration enables a more comprehensive examination of hemodynamic parameters that can support biomarker analysis, without asserting quantified accuracy improvements. This change aligns the claims with the evidence shown. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Conclusions] Conclusions: the assertion that 2D embeddings of simulation ensembles 'yield clinically or scientifically meaningful insights' into blood flow dynamics rests on the same three use cases and expert comments; without a concrete test (e.g., inter-observer variability reduction or new biomarker discovery validated against ground truth), the interpretive step from visual analysis to improved accuracy remains unverified.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the demonstration of insights from the 2D embeddings relies on the three use cases and expert comments, without formal validation such as inter-observer studies or ground-truth biomarker discovery. These cases were selected to show how embeddings can surface patterns across parameter-varied ensembles. In the revised Conclusions, we have adjusted the wording to indicate that the embeddings 'can yield' insights as illustrated by the examples, and we note that rigorous validation against clinical ground truth would be a valuable direction for subsequent studies. This revision maintains honesty about the current scope while preserving the tool's described utility. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Software description paper exhibits no circularity

full rationale

This is a software tool paper describing an open-source system for generating and visually analyzing subject-specific blood flow simulation ensembles from MRI and CFD data. The manuscript presents tool features, applies them to three use cases, and reports qualitative expert feedback on usability; it contains no mathematical derivations, parameter fits, predictions of new quantities, or load-bearing self-citations. All claims about improved hemodynamic analysis rest on the described functionality and external expert input rather than any reduction to the paper's own inputs or definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard assumptions from computational fluid dynamics and medical imaging rather than introducing new free parameters or entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Navier-Stokes equations can be solved to simulate blood flow in arteries and veins
    Invoked in the Background section when describing CFD generation of blood flow simulations.
  • domain assumption Subject-specific anatomy and flow can be captured non-invasively by structural and 4D MRI
    Stated in the opening paragraph as the basis for subject-specific analyses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5841 in / 1235 out tokens · 33188 ms · 2026-05-21T22:16:20.275235+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We present an interactive, customizable, and user-oriented visual analysis tool that assists researchers in both medicine and numerical analysis. ... It enables the creation of simulation ensembles with a high variety of parameters. Furthermore, it allows for the visual and analytical examination of simulations and measurements through 2D embeddings of the similarity space.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. J. Krause, A. Kummerländer, S. J. Avis, H. Kusumaatmaja, D. Dapelo, F. Klemens, M. Gaedtke, N. Hafen, A. Mink, R. Trunk, et al., Openlb—open source lattice boltzmann code, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 81 (2021) 258–288. 17

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Drees, S

    D. Drees, S. Leistikow, X. Jiang, L. Linsen, V oreen–an open-source frame- work for interactive visualization and processing of large volume data, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12746 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Kodman, B

    J. Kodman, B. Singh, M. Murugaiah, A comprehensive survey of open- source tools for computational fluid dynamics analyses, Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 119 (2024) 123–148. doi:10.37934/arfmts.119.2.123148

    work page doi:10.37934/arfmts.119.2.123148 2024

  4. [4]

    M. Winter, Benchmark and validation of open source cfd codes, with focus on compressible and rotating capabilities, for integration on the simscale platform, Master’s thesis, Chalmers University of Technology (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Updegrove, N

    A. Updegrove, N. M. Wilson, J. Merkow, H. Lan, A. L. Marsden, S. C. Shadden, Simvascular: an open source pipeline for cardiovascular simula- tion, Annals of biomedical engineering 45 (2017) 525–541

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Simvascular,https://simvascular.github.io/, accessed: 2025- 02-28 (2023)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    C. J. Arthurs, R. Khlebnikov, A. Melville, M. Marˇcan, A. Gomez, D. Dillon- Murphy, F. Cuomo, M. Silva Vieira, J. Schollenberger, S. R. Lynch, et al., Crimson: An open-source software framework for cardiovascular inte- grated modelling and simulation, PLoS computational biology 17 (5) (2021) e1008881

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Crimson: An advanced simulation environment for subject-specific hemo- dynamic analysis,https://crimson.software/index.html, ac- cessed: 2025-02-28 (2024)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    com/, accessed: 2025-02-27

    Simscale - cloud-based simulation platform,https://www.simscale. com/, accessed: 2025-02-27

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Simscale documentation,https://www.simscale.com/docs/, ac- cessed: 2025-02-27

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Ansys,https://www.ansys.com/, accessed: 2025-09-08 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Groen, H

    D. Groen, H. Arabnejad, D. Suleimenova, W. Edeling, E. Raffin, Y . Xue, K. Bronik, N. Monnier, P. V . Coveney, Fabsim3: An automation toolkit for verified simulations using high performance computing, Computer Physics Communications 283 (2023) 108596. 18

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Groen, Fabsim3: An automation toolkit for complex simula- tion tasks,https://fabsim3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/, accessed: 2025-02-28

    D. Groen, Fabsim3: An automation toolkit for complex simula- tion tasks,https://fabsim3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/, accessed: 2025-02-28. Official documentation of FabSim3. (2023)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Openfoam,https://www.openfoam.com/, accessed: 2025-02-28 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    G. Chen, Q. Xiong, P. J. Morris, E. G. Paterson, A. Sergeev, Y . Wang, Open- foam for computational fluid dynamics, Notices of the AMS 61 (4) (2014) 354–363

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Jasak, Openfoam: Open source cfd in research and industry, International journal of naval architecture and ocean engineering 1 (2) (2009) 89–94

    H. Jasak, Openfoam: Open source cfd in research and industry, International journal of naval architecture and ocean engineering 1 (2) (2009) 89–94

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    Leistikow, V oreen - volume rendering engine,https://www

    S. Leistikow, V oreen - volume rendering engine,https://www. uni-muenster.de/Voreen/index.html, accessed: 2025-02-17 (2024)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    V oreen Project, V oreen,https://github.com/voreen-project/ voreen, accessed: 2025-02-17 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    A. T. Wilson, K. C. Potter, Toward visual analysis of ensemble data sets, in: Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Ultrascale Visualization, 2009, pp. 48–53

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Evers, L

    M. Evers, L. Linsen, Multi-dimensional parameter-space partitioning of spatio-temporal simulation ensembles, Computers & Graphics 104 (2022) 140–151

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Hummel, H

    M. Hummel, H. Obermaier, C. Garth, K. I. Joy, Comparative visual analysis of lagrangian transport in cfd ensembles, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19 (12) (2013) 2743–2752

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    Simonis, Lattice Boltzmann Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Doctoral thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) (2023).doi:10

    S. Simonis, Lattice Boltzmann Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Doctoral thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) (2023).doi:10. 5445/IR/1000161726

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Krüger, H

    T. Krüger, H. Kusumaatmaja, A. Kuzmin, O. Shardt, G. Silva, E. M. Viggen, The Lattice Boltzmann Method: Principles and Practice, Graduate Texts in Physics, Springer International Publishing, 2017.doi:10.1007/ 978-3-319-44649-3. 19

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Kummerländer, T

    A. Kummerländer, T. Bingert, F. Bukreev, L. E. Czelusniak, D. Dapelo, S. Englert, N. Hafen, M. Heinzelmann, S. Ito, J. Jeßberger, F. Kaiser, E. Kummer, H. Kusumaatmaja, J. E. Marquardt, M. Rennick, T. Pertzel, F. Prinz, M. Sadric, M. Schecher, S. Simonis, P. Sitter, D. Teutscher, M. Zhong, M. J. Krause, Openlb user guide 1.7,https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenod...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.13293033(2024 2024

  25. [25]

    Kummerländer, T

    A. Kummerländer, T. Bingert, F. Bukreev, L. E. Czelusniak, D. Dapelo, C. Gaul, N. Hafen, S. Ito, J. Jeßberger, D. Khazaeipoul, T. Krüger, H. Kusumaatmaja, J. E. Marquardt, A. Raeli, M. Rennick, F. Prinz, M. Schecher, A. Schneider, Y . Shimojima, S. Simonis, P. Sitter, P. Spelten, A. Tacques, D. Teutscher, M. Zhong, M. J. Krause, Openlb release 1.8.1: Open...

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Kummerländer, M

    A. Kummerländer, M. Dorn, M. Frank, M. J. Krause, Implicit propagation of directly addressed grids in lattice boltzmann methods, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 35 (8) (2023) e7509

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Kummerländer, F

    A. Kummerländer, F. Bukreev, S. F. R. Berg, M. Dorn, M. J. Krause, Ad- vances in computational process engineering using lattice boltzmann meth- ods on high performance computers, in: W. E. Nagel, D. H. Kröner, M. M. Resch (Eds.), High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’22, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 233–247.doi:10.1007/ 978-3-0...

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Theyieldcurveandpredictingrecessions

    A. Kummerländer, F. Bukreev, D. Teutscher, M. Dorn, M. J. Krause, Opti- mization of single node load balancing for lattice boltzmann methods on het- erogeneous high performance computers (2024).doi:10.2139/ssrn. 4713497

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn 2024

  29. [29]

    M. J. Krause, Fluid flow simulation and optimisation with lattice boltzmann methods on high performance computers - application to the human respira- tory system, Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) (2010). doi:10.5445/IR/1000019768

    work page doi:10.5445/ir/1000019768 2010

  30. [30]

    M. J. Krause, V . Heuveline, Parallel fluid flow control and optimisation with lattice boltzmann methods and automatic differentiation, Computers & Flu- ids 80 (2013) 28–36.doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.07.026. 20

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.07.026 2013

  31. [31]

    Leistikow, A

    S. Leistikow, A. Nahardani, V . Hoerr, L. Linsen, Interactive visual similarity analysis of measured and simulated multi-field tubular flow ensembles., in: VCBM, 2020, pp. 139–150

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Szilv ´si-Nagy, G

    M. Szilv ´si-Nagy, G. Matyasi, Analysis of stl files, Mathematical and com- puter modelling 38 (7-9) (2003) 945–960

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Vtk file formats,https://docs.vtk.org/en/latest/design_ documents/VTKFileFormats.html, accessed: 2025-06-24 (2023)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Grady, Random walks for image segmentation, IEEE transactions on pat- tern analysis and machine intelligence 28 (11) (2006) 1768–1783

    L. Grady, Random walks for image segmentation, IEEE transactions on pat- tern analysis and machine intelligence 28 (11) (2006) 1768–1783. 21

    work page 2006