Large-scale peculiar velocity fields: Newtonian vs relativistic treatment
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:TELFYOTSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
We employ a perturbative analysis to study the evolution of large-scale peculiar velocity fields within the framework of Newtonian gravity and then compare our results to those of the corresponding relativistic treatment. In so doing, we use the same mathematical formalism and apply the same physical approach. This facilitates a direct and transparent comparison between the two treatments. Our study recovers and extends the familiar Newtonian results on the one hand, while on the other it shows that the Newtonian analysis leads to substantially weaker growth-rates for the peculiar velocity field, compared to the relativistic approach. This implies that, by using Newton's rather than Einstein's theory, one could seriously underestimate the overall kinematic evolution of cosmological peculiar motions. We are also in the position to identify the reason the two theories arrive at such considerably different results and conclusions.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cosmological peculiar velocities in general relativity
The 1+3 covariant formalism reproduces the standard result for peculiar velocity growth in cosmology and does not imply anomalous bulk flows or apparent acceleration.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.