Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Neutrino NSI in archaeological Pb

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper projects that a ton-year array of archaeological-lead PbWO4 bolometers detecting solar neutrinos can, if its energy threshold is lowered to 0.5 keV or below, constrain neutrino non-standard interactions more tightly than current

desk verdict A genuinely useful sensitivity study whose headline claim outruns its own comparison plots: the 'beyond global fits' conclusion rests on 90% contours vs 95% bars with an ill-defined rescaling, while the underlying PbWO4/CEvNS physics case is sound. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.23419 v3 pith:TEMD625B submitted 2026-02-26 hep-ph

D. Alloni , G. Benato , P. Carniti , M. Cataldo , D. Cerdeño , A. Cheek , L. Cheng , M. Clemenza
show 42 more authors
M. Consonni G. Croci I. Dafinei F.A. Danevich C. de Vecchi D. Di Martino E. Di Stefano N. Ferreiro Iachellini F. Ferroni F. Filippini P. Foldenauer S. Ghislandi A. Giachero L. Gironi C. Gotti P. Gorla D.L. Helis D.V. Kasperovych V.V. Kobychev G. Marcucci A. Melchiorre A. Menegolli S. Nisi M. Musa L. Pagnanini L. Pattavina G. Pessina S. Pirro S. Pozzi M.C. Prata A. Puiu S. Quitadamo M.P. Riccardi M. Rossella R. Rossini E. Sala F. Saliu A. Salvini V.I. Tretyak L. Trombetta D. Trotta H. Yuan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords coherentelasticneutrino-nucleusscatteringnon-standardneutrinointeractionssolarneutrinoscryogenicbolometersleadtungstatearchaeologicalenergythresholdfog
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a proposed cryogenic detector made of lead tungstate crystals grown from archaeological lead can use solar-neutrino coherent scattering to probe physics beyond the Standard Model. At its nominal 1 keV threshold and 1 ton·year exposure, the detector would match but not beat existing bounds on neutrino non-standard interactions. The central claim is that lowering the nuclear-recoil threshold to 0.5 keV or 0.1 keV—by trading target mass for more readout channels—would let the experiment surpass global-fit constraints on the flavor-diagonal couplings εee, εττ and the flavor-changing coupling εeτ. A tenfold increase in exposure would give a similar improvement. A sympathetic reader would care because this is a concrete, near-term experimental path to new neutrino physics that does not require a larger or more expensive target, only better low-energy sensitivity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross section in a heavy PbWO4 target, where the large neutron numbers of lead and tungsten amplify the coherence factor and hence the event rate. The analysis uses a generalized NSI cross section that includes flavor-dependent couplings, a modified solar-neutrino matter Hamiltonian, and a profile-likelihood statistical treatment with an Asimov dataset and a 10% systematic uncertainty on the 8B flux. The detector's dual heat-and-scintillation readout provides event-by-event rejection of electron and gamma backgrounds, which defines the optimistic background scenario; the key parametric lever is the energy threshold, which

What would settle it

A measurement showing that kilogram-scale PbWO4 bolometers cannot sustain a threshold below about 1 keV while preserving a ton-year exposure, or a background assessment revealing that bulk-crystal radioactivity cannot be suppressed to the assumed e/γ-rejection level, would invalidate the claim that the experiment can surpass current global NSI fits. The internal discrepancy between the 0.2 keV threshold stated in the abstract and the 0.1 keV threshold used in the main analysis should also be resolved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that RES-NOVA, a cryogenic bolometer array using PbWO4 crystals made from archaeological lead, can detect solar neutrinos via coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering and use the observed nuclear-recoil spectrum to set limits on non-standard neutrino interactions. The discovery is that at the baseline configuration (1 keV threshold, 1 ton·year exposure, with full heat-plus-scintillation background rejection) the projected sensitivity reaches the level of current global NSI fits, while a moderate threshold improvement to 0.5 keV or a substantial improvement to 0.1 keV pushes the sensitivity beyond those fits in the electron and tau neutrino sectors. The authors explicitly

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a ton-scale PbWO4 array can actually run at a nuclear-recoil threshold of 0.5 keV or lower—the abstract says 0.2 keV while the body says 0.1 keV—while still delivering 1 ton·year of exposure, and that the idealized heat-plus-scintillation readout can achieve near-total electron/gamma background rejection; neither has been demonstrated at this mass scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the nominal 1 keV threshold and 1 ton·year exposure, RES-NOVA would place limits on NSI comparable to current global fits, particularly for flavor-changing eτ couplings in the optimistic background case.
  • Lowering the threshold to 0.5 keV would let the experiment improve on global-fit constraints for εee, εττ, and εeτ, especially in the proton, up-quark, and down-quark projections.
  • Lowering the threshold to 0.1 keV would make the Standard Model solar-neutrino signal detectable and would significantly expand the reachable NSI parameter space, even in the pessimistic background scenario.
  • Increasing the exposure to 10 ton·years at the nominal 1 keV threshold yields sensitivity gains similar to lowering the threshold to 0.5 keV.
  • The experiment could probe the NSI parameter region that has been suggested as a resolution to the tension in long-baseline accelerator neutrino data, for couplings of magnitude around 0.2.
  • Threshold improvements are more effective than background reduction: at sufficiently low thresholds the optimistic and pessimistic background scenarios converge, so the sensitivity becomes dominated by the threshold rather than by background rejection.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sub-keV threshold is achieved, the same detector could also make the first flavor-independent measurement of the solar neutrino flux via CEνNS, including a possible handle on the CNO component, complementing electron-scattering-based solar neutrino experiments.
  • The threshold-versus-mass trade-off implies that a modular, highly segmented detector may be more valuable than a monolithic larger target, so future design efforts should prioritize readout-channel scaling over total mass.
  • Combining RES-NOVA's neutral-current CEνNS measurement with charged-current solar neutrino data could help break degeneracies in the neutrino mass-ordering and the LMA-Dark solution, although this is left as an open question in the conclusions.
  • The projected sensitivity relies on an idealized background model and on threshold performance that has not yet been demonstrated at the ton scale; a realistic sub-keV threshold may require a longer measurement campaign or a larger exposure to reach the claimed beyond-global-fit region.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a sensitivity study of the RES-NOVA cryogenic PbWO4 detector (archaeological lead) to neutrino non-standard interactions (NSI) using solar-neutrino CEνNS. The rate calculation is performed with the SNuDD code in the (η, ε) parametrization of Ref. [44] for fermion directions (e,p,n), with φ=0, and the statistical analysis is a profile-likelihood ratio with an Asimov SM dataset, including a 10% signal normalization pull. For the benchmark 1 keV threshold and 1 ton·yr exposure, the paper finds ~35 SM events and sensitivity comparable to current NSI global fits; for improved thresholds of 0.5 keV/0.1 keV (or 10 ton·yr at 1 keV) it claims sensitivity beyond global fits for εee, εττ, and εeτ. The detector concept and the idealized full e/γ rejection ('optimistic') and heat-only ('pessimistic') background scenarios are described in Section 2.

Significance. If the headline result survives closer scrutiny, it would be a useful addition to the NSI literature: RES-NOVA's high-A target makes it competitive at much smaller exposures than xenon, and the paper gives a transparent calculation using the publicly available SNuDD code. The use of an Asimov profile likelihood is standard, and the treatment of SM solar-neutrino CEνNS rates appears consistent with existing calculations. However, the central comparison with global fits is currently not reliable because of confidence-level mismatch and the inconsistent mapping of global-fit bounds onto the parametrization, and the decisive threshold-improvement scenarios are asserted rather than derived. The paper is therefore not yet acceptable in its present form, but the issues are local and fixable within the manuscript's scope.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2 and footnote 4, Figs. 4–6] The translation of global-fit bounds onto the plotted (η, ε) plane is internally inconsistent with the parametrization. For φ=0, Eq. (3.7) gives ξ_p = √5 cosη, not √5, so the proton-direction rescaling in footnote 4 should be η-dependent. For up/down quark directions, Eq. (3.20) implies G_NSI = (2ε^u+ε^d)Z + (ε^u+2ε^d)N; a pure up-quark bound corresponds to (ξ_p, ξ_n)=(2,1) and a pure down-quark bound to (1,2), both with norm √5. It is not 'by construction ξ_u=1 and ξ_d=1' in the sense of Eq. (3.5). Consequently the red/blue bars do not represent the actual global-fit constraints on the plotted quantity ε, and the claimed improvement over them in the Abstract and §4.2 is not established.
  2. [§4.1–4.2, Figs. 4–7] The comparison is made at unmatched confidence levels and dimensionalities. The new contours are 90% C.L. regions for two parameters (q=4.61), while the global-fit bars are 2σ credible intervals, which in a 1D marginal correspond to ~95% C.L. Comparing a 90% 2D contour with a 95% 1D interval inflates the apparent improvement. The conclusion that RES-NOVA can 'reach sensitivities beyond NSI global fit results' should be re-derived at matched confidence levels, e.g. by projecting the global-fit 90% 2D region onto ε for the relevant fermion direction, or by showing the 95% contour for RES-NOVA.
  3. [§2.2 and Figs. 5–6] The headline projections depend on 0.5 keV and 0.1 keV thresholds at 1 ton·yr. The only demonstrated thresholds quoted in §2.1 are ~eV for a 15 g absorber and ~1 keV for kg-scale modules. The mechanism 'trading target mass for increased detector granularity and readout channel count' is stated without a scaling law or feasibility analysis (number of channels, noise, microphonics, radio-purity of additional materials). Unless the authors provide at least an order-of-magnitude scaling estimate, the 'beyond global fits' claim should be explicitly labeled as an assumption-dependent sensitivity target rather than a projection of the demonstrated RES-NOVA technology.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract vs. Figs. 5–6] The Abstract refers to thresholds down to '0.5 keV and 0.2 keV', while the body and figures use 0.5 keV and 0.1 keV. Please make this consistent.
  2. [Eq. (3.3)] The phrase 'also known as coherence factor' after the Helm form factor is misleading: Q_νN is the coherence factor, while F(q) is the nuclear form factor. Please rephrase.
  3. [§4.1] With only ~35 expected signal events and Poisson bins, the asymptotic χ² approximation (Wilks' theorem) may be inaccurate. A brief Monte Carlo validation of the 4.61 threshold, or a caveat about small-sample statistics, would strengthen the analysis.
  4. [§4.2, text before Fig. 4] Minor typos: 'lead by 8.5%' should be 'led by 8.5%', and 'un-chartered regions' should be 'uncharted regions'.
  5. [Figs. 4–7] The global-fit intervals are shown only as bars without numerical values. For reproducibility, please provide the exact 1D intervals (or a table) used to place the red and blue bars.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sensitivity projection is an independent Asimov-based calculation; the flagged global-fit rescaling is a comparison/statistical issue, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central result is a projected sensitivity of RES-NOVA to neutrino NSI. It is obtained by setting an Asimov dataset equal to the SM expectation, scanning the NSI parameters (η, ε), and profiling the nuisance parameter δ; no NSI parameter is fitted to data, so no 'prediction' is statistically forced by an input fit. The NSI formalism is taken from the authors' earlier Ref. [44], but the relevant equations (3.4)-(3.20) are reproduced in the paper, and the SNuDD code [77] is used as a rate-computation tool rather than as a source of the final result. These self-citations are therefore not load-bearing in a circular way. The one substantive weakness—footnote 4's translation of global-fit bars via ξ_p=√5 and the assertion 'by construction ξ_u=1 and ξ_d=1'—is inconsistent with Eq. (3.5) (ξ_p=√5 cosη) and Eq. (3.20) (nuclear coupling (ξ_p Z+ξ_n N)ε), and the comparison mixes 90% 2D contours with 95% 1D intervals. This undermines the 'beyond global fits' claim, but it is a statistical/comparison correctness problem, not a case where a derived quantity reduces to its own input. The derivation chain itself is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The projected sensitivities are functions of the assumed thresholds, exposure, backgrounds, and the imported NSI cross-section. None of these numbers is measured or fitted in this paper; they are design choices and inputs from prior work.

free parameters (3)
  • Energy thresholds = 1 keV (baseline), 0.5 keV (moderate), 0.1 keV (substantial)
    Assumed detection thresholds that directly set the signal rates and hence the sensitivity contours (§4.2, Figs. 4–6).
  • Exposure = 1 ton·yr (baseline), 10 ton·yr (increased)
    Assumed experimental exposures; the 10 ton·yr case in Fig. 7 mimics the 0.5 keV improvement (§4.2).
  • Signal normalization systematic σ_δ = 10% (8.5% rounded up by hand)
    Pull parameter in the likelihood to cover the 8B flux uncertainty, stated in §4.1.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Generalized CEνNS cross section with NSI, Eq. (3.19), and the two-angle NSI parametrization, Eqs. (3.5)–(3.8), from Ref. [44]
    The paper builds on the authors' own framework; the cross-section and parametrization are imported rather than re-derived (§3.3).
  • domain assumption Solar neutrino fluxes from standard solar models (Bahcall 2005 [65] / Vinyoles 2017 [17])
    Fluxes are input; the 8B flux uncertainty enters the pull term (§3.2, §4.1).
  • domain assumption Adiabatic neutrino propagation in the solar medium and δ_CP = 0
    Explicitly assumed in footnote 1 (§3.3); the paper notes this breaks down for |ε| ~ O(1).
  • domain assumption Background model (pessimistic/optimistic scenarios) from Ref. [54]
    Background rates are imported from the collaboration's dark-matter paper, not recomputed here (§2.2, §4.2).
  • standard math Helm form factor and SM CEνNS cross section, Eq. (3.3)
    Standard, widely used nuclear/form-factor formalism (§3.2).
  • standard math Wilks' theorem for the asymptotic distribution of the profile likelihood ratio, Eq. (4.4)
    Used to set the 90% C.L. threshold q = 4.61 (§4.1); assumes the Asimov data are in the asymptotic regime.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutrino NSI in archaeological Pb." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TEMD625B

@misc{pith2026260223419,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutrino NSI in archaeological Pb},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TEMD625B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.23419}
}
abstract

Dark matter direct detection experiments can observe solar neutrinos via coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, making it possible to test new physics in the neutrino sector. In this article, we study the sensitivity of RES-NOVA, a novel cryogenic calorimetric experiment employing PbWO$_4$ crystals grown from archaeological lead, to neutrino non-standard interactions (NSI). We perform a sensitivity study for a benchmark setup with a nominal energy threshold of 1 keV and an exposure of 1 ton$\cdot$y, both for a conservative (only heat readout) and ideal (heat and scintillation) background rejection scenario. We find that, in its nominal configuration, while not being sensitive to Standard Model solar $\nu$ interactions, RES-NOVA can reach sensitivities to NSI at the level of current global fits. With moderate or significant improvements of the threshold down to $0.5$ keV and $0.2$ keV, RES-NOVA will be able to achieve sensitivities beyond NSI global fit results, testing new areas of the parameter space in the electron and tau sectors, $\varepsilon_{ee}$, $\varepsilon_{\tau\tau}$, and $\varepsilon_{e\tau}$. A similar improvement in sensitivities is expected when instead increasing the exposure to 10 ton$\cdot$y.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 46 linked inside Pith

  1. [44]

    Amaral, D

    D.W.P. Amaral, D. Cerdeño, A. Cheek and P. Foldenauer,A direct detection view of the neutrino NSI landscape,JHEP07(2023) 071 [2302.12846]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Vitagliano, I

    E. Vitagliano, I. Tamborra and G. Raffelt,Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spectral Components,Rev. Mod. Phys.92(2020) 45006 [1910.11878]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [2]

    Agostini, K

    M. Agostini, K. Altenmüller, S. Appel, V. Atroshchenko, Z. Bagdasarian, D. Basilico et al., Comprehensive measurement of pp-chain solar neutrinos,Nature562(2018) 505

    2018

  4. [3]

    Bellini et al.,Precision measurement of the7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino,Phys

    G. Bellini et al.,Precision measurement of the7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 141302 [1104.1816]. [4]Borexinocollaboration,First real time detection of Be-7 solar neutrinos by Borexino,Phys. Lett. B658(2008) 101 [0708.2251]. [5]Borexinocollaboration,Final results of Borexino on CNO solar neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D 108...

    arXiv 2011

  5. [6]

    Bahcall and C

    J.N. Bahcall and C. Peña-Garay,Solar neutrinos before and after neutrino oscillations,New J. Phys.6(2004) 63

    2004

  6. [7]

    Bahcall, A.M

    J.N. Bahcall, A.M. Serenelli and S. Basu,10,000 standard solar models: a Monte Carlo simulation,Astrophys. J. Suppl.165(2006) 400 [astro-ph/0511337]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [8]

    de Holanda and A.Y

    P.C. de Holanda and A.Y. Smirnov,Solar neutrinos: Global analysis with day and night spectra from SNO,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 113005 [hep-ph/0205241]

    arXiv 2002

  8. [9]

    Davis, D.S

    R.J. Davis, D.S. Harmer and K.C. Hoffman,Search for Neutrinos from the Sun,Phys. Rev. Lett.20(1968) 1205. [10]GALLEXcollaboration,GALLEX solar neutrino observations: Results for GALLEX IV, Phys. Lett. B447(1999) 127. [11]GNOcollaboration,Complete results for five years of GNO solar neutrino observations, Phys. Lett. B616(2005) 174 [hep-ex/0504037]

    arXiv 1968

Show all 67 references
  1. [12]

    Hirata et al.,Observation of 8B Solar Neutrinos in the Kamiokande-II Detector,Phys

    K. Hirata et al.,Observation of 8B Solar Neutrinos in the Kamiokande-II Detector,Phys. Rev. Lett.63(1989) 16. [13]Super-Kamiokandecollaboration,Solar Neutrino Measurements in Super-Kamiokande-IV, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 052010 [1606.07538]

    1989

  2. [14]

    Ahmad et al.,Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral-Current Interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,Phys

    Q.R. Ahmad et al.,Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral-Current Interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 011301

    2002

  3. [15]

    Gando et al.,Solar Neutrino Measurements with KamLAND,Phys

    A. Gando et al.,Solar Neutrino Measurements with KamLAND,Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 055808

    2015

  4. [16]

    Haxton, R.G.H

    W.C. Haxton, R.G.H. Robertson and A.M. Serenelli,Solar neutrinos: Status and prospects, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.51(2013) 21

    2013

  5. [17]

    Vinyoles, A.M

    N. Vinyoles, A.M. Serenelli, F.L. Villante, S. Basu, J. Bergström, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia et al.,A new Generation of Standard Solar Models,Astrophys. J.835(2017) 202 [1611.09867]. – 18 –

    2017 arXiv

  6. [18]

    Miranda and H

    O.G. Miranda and H. Nunokawa,Non standard neutrino interactions: current status and future prospects,New J. Phys.17(2015) 095002 [1505.06254]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [19]

    Gonzalez-Garcia, M

    M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler and N. Song,Non-standard neutrino interactions in the Earth and the flavor of astrophysical neutrinos,Astropart. Phys.84 (2016) 15 [1605.08055]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [20]

    Farzan and M

    Y. Farzan and M. Tortola,Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions,Front. in Phys.6(2018) 10 [1710.09360]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [21]

    Coloma, P.B

    P. Coloma, P.B. Denton, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz,Curtailing the Dark Side in Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions,JHEP04(2017) 116 [1701.04828]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [22]

    Esteban, M.C

    I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler and J. Salvado,Updated constraints on non-standard interactions from global analysis of oscillation data,JHEP08 (2018) 180 [1805.04530]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [23]

    Esteban, M.C

    I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni,On the Determination of Leptonic CP Violation and Neutrino Mass Ordering in Presence of Non-Standard Interactions: Present Status,JHEP06(2019) 055 [1905.05203]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [24]

    Freedman,Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current,Phys

    D.Z. Freedman,Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 1389

    1974

  13. [25]

    Drukier and L

    A. Drukier and L. Stodolsky,Principles and Applications of a Neutral Current Detector for Neutrino Physics and Astronomy,Phys. Rev.D 30(1984) 2295

    1984

  14. [26]

    Cerdeño, M

    D.G. Cerdeño, M. Fairbairn, T. Jubb, P.A.N. Machado, A.C. Vincent and C. Bœhm,Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments,JHEP05(2016) 118 [1604.01025]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [27]

    Bento et al.,Solar neutrinos in cryogenic detectors,Eur

    A. Bento et al.,Solar neutrinos in cryogenic detectors,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1118 [2405.02482]. [28]XENONcollaboration,First Indication of Solar 8B Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 191002 [2408.02877]. [29]Pand...

    2024 arXiv

  16. [30]

    Pandey,Recent progress in low energy neutrino scattering physics and its implications for the standard and beyond the standard model physics,Prog

    V. Pandey,Recent progress in low energy neutrino scattering physics and its implications for the standard and beyond the standard model physics,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.134(2024) 104078 [2309.07840]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [31]

    Baxter et al.,Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the European Spallation Source,JHEP02(2020) 123 [1911.00762]

    D. Baxter et al.,Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the European Spallation Source,JHEP02(2020) 123 [1911.00762]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [32]

    Essig et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detection in the next decade, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.08297]

    R. Essig et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detection in the next decade, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.08297]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [33]

    Billard, L

    J. Billard, L. Strigari and E. Figueroa-Feliciano,Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 023524 [1307.5458]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [34]

    O’Hare,New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,Phys

    C.A.J. O’Hare,New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 251802 [2109.03116]. – 19 – [35]XENONcollaboration,First Search for Light Dark Matter in the Neutrino Fog with XENONnT,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 111802 [2409.17868]. [3...

    2021 arXiv

  21. [37]

    Billard, L.E

    J. Billard, L.E. Strigari and E. Figueroa-Feliciano,Solar neutrino physics with low-threshold dark matter detectors,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 095023 [1409.0050]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [38]

    Newstead, L.E

    J.L. Newstead, L.E. Strigari and R.F. Lang,Detecting CNO solar neutrinos in next-generation xenon dark matter experiments,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 043006 [1807.07169]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [39]

    Dutta and L.E

    B. Dutta and L.E. Strigari,Neutrino physics with dark matter detectors,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69(2019) 137 [1901.08876]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [40]

    Dutta, R.F

    B. Dutta, R.F. Lang, S. Liao, S. Sinha, L. Strigari and A. Thompson,A global analysis strategy to resolve neutrino NSI degeneracies with scattering and oscillation data,JHEP09 (2020) 106 [2002.03066]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [41]

    Gonzalez-Garcia, M

    M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz,Global analyses of neutrino oscillation experiments,Nucl. Phys. B908(2016) 199 [1512.06856]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [42]

    Gonzalez-Garcia, M

    M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Neutrino Discovery Limit of Dark Matter Direct Detection Experiments in the Presence of Non-Standard Interactions,JHEP07(2018) 019 [1803.03650]. [43]Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: A Status Re...

    2018 arXiv

  27. [45]

    Aristizabal Sierra, N

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, N. Mishra and L. Strigari,Implications of first neutrino-induced nuclear recoil measurements in direct detection experiments: Probing nonstandard interaction via CEνNS,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 055007 [2409.02003]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [46]

    Celestino-Ramírez, F.J

    J.M. Celestino-Ramírez, F.J. Escrihuela, L.J. Flores, O.G. Miranda and R. Sánchez-Vélez, Searching for generalized neutrino interactions in direct detection experiments with EνES, 2510.17027

    arXiv

  29. [47]

    Pirro and P

    S. Pirro and P. Mauskopf,Advances in Bolometer Technology for Fundamental Physics,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.67(2017) 161

    2017

  30. [48]

    Pattavina, N

    L. Pattavina, N. Ferreiro Iachellini and I. Tamborra,Neutrino observatory based on archaeological lead,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 063001 [2004.06936]. [49]RES-NOV Acollaboration,RES-NOVA sensitivity to core-collapse and failed core-collapse supernova neutrinos,JCAP10(2021) 064 [2103.08672]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [50]

    Beeman et al.,New experimental limits on the alpha decays of lead isotopes,Eur

    J.W. Beeman et al.,New experimental limits on the alpha decays of lead isotopes,Eur. Phys. J.A 49(2013) 50 [1212.2422]. [51]RES-NOV Acollaboration,Radiopurity of a kg-scaleP bW O4 cryogenic detector produced from archaeological Pb for the RES-NOVA experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C82(...

    2013 arXiv

  32. [52]

    Pattavina et al.,Radiopurity of an archeological Roman Lead cryogenic detector,Eur

    L. Pattavina et al.,Radiopurity of an archeological Roman Lead cryogenic detector,Eur. Phys. J.A 55(2019) 127 [1904.04040]. – 20 –

    2019 arXiv

  33. [53]

    RES-NOVA sensitivity to axions

    N. Ferreiro Iachellini et al.,Operation of an Archaeological Lead PbWO4 Crystal to Search for Neutrinos from Astrophysical Sources with a Transition Edge Sensor,J. Low Temp. Phys.209(2022) 872 [2111.07638]. [54]RES-NOV Acollaboration,New dark matter direct search based on arch...

    2022 arXiv

  34. [56]

    Zhang, M

    L. Zhang, M. Xue, K. Zhao, X. Zhou, X. Sun, L. Han et al.,Study of a Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering experiment at a reactor with a PbWO4-based bolometer,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1043(2022) 167469

    2022

  35. [57]

    Bellini et al.,Cosmic-muon flux and annual modulation in Borexino at 3800 m water-equivalent depth,J

    G. Bellini et al.,Cosmic-muon flux and annual modulation in Borexino at 3800 m water-equivalent depth,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2012(2012) 015

    2012

  36. [58]

    Pröbst, M

    F. Pröbst, M. Frank, S. Cooper, P. Colling, D. Dummer, P. Ferger et al.,Model for cryogenic particle detectors with superconducting phase transition thermometers,J. Low Temp. Phys. 100(1995) 69

    1995

  37. [59]

    Strauss et al.,Gram-scale cryogenic calorimeters for rare-event searches,Phys

    R. Strauss et al.,Gram-scale cryogenic calorimeters for rare-event searches,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 022009 [1704.04317]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [60]

    Cadeddu, F

    M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei and C. Giunti,A view of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, EPL143(2023) 34001 [2307.08842]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [61]

    Laubenstein and I

    M. Laubenstein and I. Lawson,Low Background Radiation Detection Techniques and Mitigation of Radioactive Backgrounds,Front. in Phys.8(2020) 577734

    2020

  40. [62]

    Clemenza, C

    M. Clemenza, C. Maiano, L. Pattavina and E. Previtali,Radon-induced surface contaminations in low background experiments,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1805

    2011

  41. [63]

    Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys

    L. Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 2369

    1978

  42. [64]

    Mikheyev and A.Y

    S.P. Mikheyev and A.Y. Smirnov,Resonance Amplification of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.42(1985) 913

    1985

  43. [65]

    Bahcall, A.M

    J.N. Bahcall, A.M. Serenelli and S. Basu,New solar opacities, abundances, helioseismology, and neutrino fluxes,Astrophys. J. Lett.621(2005) L85 [astro-ph/0412440]

    2005 arXiv

  44. [66]

    Coloma, M.C

    P. Coloma, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J.P. Pinheiro and S. Urrea,Constraining new physics with Borexino Phase-II spectral data,JHEP07(2022) 138 [2204.03011]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [67]

    Helm,Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Electrons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei,Phys

    R.H. Helm,Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Electrons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei,Phys. Rev.104(1956) 1466

    1956

  46. [68]

    Lewin and P.F

    J.D. Lewin and P.F. Smith,Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil,Astropart. Phys.6(1996) 87

    1996

  47. [69]

    Guzzo, A

    M.M. Guzzo, A. Masiero and S.T. Petcov,On the MSW effect with massless neutrinos and no mixing in the vacuum,Phys. Lett. B260(1991) 154

    1991

  48. [70]

    Guzzo and S.T

    M.M. Guzzo and S.T. Petcov,On the matter enhanced transitions of solar neutrinos in the absence of neutrino mixing in vacuum,Phys. Lett. B271(1991) 172

    1991

  49. [71]

    Gonzalez-Garcia, M.M

    M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M.M. Guzzo, P.I. Krastev, H. Nunokawa, O.L.G. Peres, V. Pleitez et al.,Atmospheric neutrino observations and flavor changing interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett. 82(1999) 3202 [hep-ph/9809531]. – 21 –

    1999 arXiv

  50. [72]

    Bergmann, M.M

    S. Bergmann, M.M. Guzzo, P.C. de Holanda, P.I. Krastev and H. Nunokawa,Status of the solution to the solar neutrino problem based on nonstandard neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 073001 [hep-ph/0004049]

    2000 arXiv

  51. [73]

    Guzzo, H

    M.M. Guzzo, H. Nunokawa, P.C. de Holanda and O.L.G. Peres,On the massless ’just-so’ solution to the solar neutrino problem,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 097301 [hep-ph/0012089]

    2001 arXiv

  52. [74]

    Guzzo, P.C

    M. Guzzo, P.C. de Holanda, M. Maltoni, H. Nunokawa, M.A. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, Status of a hybrid three neutrino interpretation of neutrino data,Nucl. Phys. B629(2002) 479 [hep-ph/0112310]

    2002 arXiv

  53. [75]

    Gonzalez-Garcia and M

    M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni,Atmospheric neutrino oscillations and new physics, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 033010 [hep-ph/0404085]

    2004 arXiv

  54. [76]

    Gavela, D

    M.B. Gavela, D. Hernandez, T. Ota and W. Winter,Large gauge invariant non-standard neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 013007 [0809.3451]

    2009 arXiv

  55. [77]

    SNuDD [computer software]

    D. Amaral, D. Cerdeño, A. Cheek and P. Foldenauer, “SNuDD [computer software].” https://github.com/snudd/snudd.git, 2023

    2023

  56. [78]

    Coloma, I

    P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni,Improved global fit to Non-Standard neutrino Interactions using COHERENT energy and timing data,JHEP02 (2020) 023 [1911.09109]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [79]

    Coloma, M.C

    P. Coloma, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J.P. Pinheiro and S. Urrea,Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,JHEP08 (2023) 032 [2305.07698]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [80]

    Denton, J

    P.B. Denton, J. Gehrlein and R. Pestes,CP-Violating Neutrino Nonstandard Interactions in Long-Baseline-Accelerator Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 051801 [2008.01110]

    2021 arXiv

  59. [81]

    Denton and J

    P.B. Denton and J. Gehrlein,New constraints on the dark side of non-standard interactions from reactor neutrino scattering data,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 015022 [2204.09060]. – 22 –

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.