Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Modular Hamiltonian of holographic time band states

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the modular Hamiltonian of a holographic time band is local, with entanglement temperature equal to an envelope of causal-diamond temperatures.

desk verdict A plausible new formula for a local modular Hamiltonian of holographic time bands, derived by two independent heuristics, but the central claim is a conjecture: the defining KMS condition is never checked and the local form is assumed. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.13739 v1 pith:TEVC6XHD submitted 2025-04-18 hep-th

Xin-Xiang Ju , Bo-Hao Liu , Ya-Wen Sun , Yang Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T4081P4083C47 PACS 11.25.Tq04.60.-m
keywords modularHamiltonianholographictimebandentanglementtemperatureconditionalmutualinformationgeometricflowAdS3/CFT2firstlawcausalwedge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that a holographic time band—a boundary region of finite lifetime whose bulk causal wedge is a spacelike-convex region—has a local modular Hamiltonian, not the generally nonlocal operator one expects. Specifically, it claims that in AdS3/CFT2 with a modified IR geometry, the modular Hamiltonian is $K_{tb} = \int f_T(x) T_{00}(x)\,dx$, where $f_T(x)$ is the maximum, over all causal diamonds inside the band, of the known entanglement temperature $f_{R_i}(x)=\pi(R_i^2-(x-x_i)^2)/R_i$. This matters because only a handful of regions—Rindler wedges and spherical regions—were previously known to have local modular Hamiltonians, and locality is what lets one define a meaningful entropy for the subsystem. The paper gives two independent derivations that arrive at the same formula, and it checks the entanglement first law for the simplest time band.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the vanishing conditional mutual information condition $I(A:B|E)=0$ for subregions $A$ and $B$ that are causally disconnected inside the time band, with $E$ large enough to touch the IR-region edge. In quantum information theory this equality is equivalent to modular-Hamiltonian additivity, $K_{AEB}=K_{AE}+K_{EB}-K_E$, which pins down how the entanglement temperature of a larger band must be built from smaller causal diamonds. The second route uses geometric modular flows: boundary observers inside the band move on timelike hyperbolas that are orthogonal to the band's edge and non-intersecting; each observer's own causal diamond contributes its vacuum entanglement temperature, and the observer whose diamond vertex touches the band's edge contributes the maximum at that spatial point. The identity $f_T(x)=\max_i f_{R_i}(x)$ is thus an envelope formula, structurally analogous to how the extremal surface of the time band in the modified IR geometry is the envelope of extremal surfaces of substates. An explicit calculation shows that the diamond solving the maximization condition has its observer worldline exactly the one orthogonal to the band, which is the proof that the two methods agree.

What would settle it

Compute the actual reduced density matrix of a small time band in a tractable boundary theory, such as a free CFT or a small tensor-network model, and test whether $\log\rho$ equals $\int f_T(x) T_{00}(x)\,dx$ with $f_T=\max_i f_{R_i}(x)$; any deviation, such as operator dependence beyond $T_{00}$, would falsify the formula. A cheaper check: in the IR-modified geometry, measure $I(A:B|E)$ for finite $A$, $B$, $E$; the derivation requires it to vanish exactly, not just to second order in the sizes of $A$ and $B$, so a nonzero finite conditional mutual information at any order would break the additivity condition that determines $f_T$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the modular Hamiltonian of a holographic time band state is local and is given exactly by $K_{tb} = \int f_T(x) T_{00}(x)\,dx$ with $f_T(x)=\max_i f_{R_i}(x)$ (Eq. 6.1), where $i$ runs over every causal diamond fully inside the time band and $f_{R_i}(x)=\pi(R_i^2-(x-x_i)^2)/R_i$ is the vacuum entanglement temperature of that diamond. For the simplest uniform band spanning $[-L/2-R,\,L/2+R]$, this reduces to $f_T=\pi R$ on the middle plateau and to the causal-diamond parabola $\pi(R^2-(x\mp L/2)^2)/R$ on each edge. The authors prove uniqueness of this form for the flat uniform band under natural constraints, and they show that two independent routes—the vanishing-conditional-information property of the state and the construction of non-intersecting hyperbolic observer worldlines orthogonal to the band's edge—select the same envelope formula. They also verify the entanglement first law for the simplest band using the Noether-charge and symplectic-potential formalism, with a bulk modular flow vector $\xi=\pi(1-z^2-t^2)\partial_t - 2\pi t z\partial_z$ that is Killing only on the $t=0$ slice.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the time band state's modular Hamiltonian is exactly a single integral of the boundary energy density, $K_{tb} = \int f_T(x) T_{00}(x)\,dx$, with no other operators contributing at any point; if additional terms appear, the formula $f_T = \max_i f_{R_i}(x)$ is not the modular Hamiltonian of the state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Time band states are legitimate holographic states: the IR-modified construction gives them a local modular Hamiltonian, contradicting the earlier claim that such states cannot exist with the differential-entropy area interpretation.
  • The envelope formula $f_T(x)=\max_i f_{R_i}(x)$ determines the modular Hamiltonian for arbitrary convex-shaped time bands, not only the uniform band; the result depends on the shape through which causal diamonds touch the band's edge.
  • The entanglement first law $\delta S=\delta\langle K_{tb}\rangle$ holds for the simplest time band, verified via the Noether-charge and symplectic-potential formalism.
  • For causal wedges that are not entanglement wedges, the same IR-modification method yields a density matrix whose local modular Hamiltonian has entropy equal to the wedge's area, giving a new handle on the causal holographic information problem.
  • The modular Hamiltonians of two time bands with coinciding modular flows are consistent: the flow generated by one is compensated by the other up to a constant, as shown for bands built from eye-shaped, Rindler-shaped, and hyperbolic-shaped pieces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the max formula is an upper envelope of local equilibrium temperatures, suggesting a possible variational principle—entanglement temperature at a point is the largest over all reconstructable diamonds—that might generalize beyond AdS3 to define a modular temperature field for any causal domain.
  • Editorial inference: the non-intersection of the observer worldlines is tied to convexity of the bulk surface; one could test whether non-convex or wiggly time bands necessarily lack any local modular Hamiltonian, which would sharpen the link between state existence and geometric convexity.
  • Editorial inference: the saturation $f_T \le \pi R$ at large $L$ matches a relative-entropy bound; if the same bound holds in higher dimensions, the plateau value may serve as a universal maximum entanglement temperature for planar bands.
  • Editorial inference: the two derivations agreeing is strong but not a proof of uniqueness for arbitrary shapes; a direct verification that the flow generated by the hypothesized $K$ is the true modular flow of the state would close the gap.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims to construct the local modular Hamiltonian of holographic time band states in AdS3/CFT2. Working in an IR-modified geometry in which the causal wedge coincides with the entanglement wedge, the authors assume the modular Hamiltonian has the single-integral form K_tb = ∫ f_T(x) T00(x) dx and determine f_T from the vanishing conditional mutual information condition together with four constraints. They find f_T(x) = max_i f_{R_i}(x), i.e. the envelope of entanglement temperatures of causal diamonds inside the time band. An independent construction based on geometric modular flows generated by observer worldlines is claimed to give the same result. The paper also performs a linearized holographic entanglement first law check for the simplest time band and includes appendices on uniqueness, non-intersection of worldlines, equivalence of the two methods, and commutation of modular Hamiltonians with coinciding flows.

Significance. If the central formula is correct, this is a genuinely new example of a local modular Hamiltonian beyond the well-known Rindler and spherical-region cases, and it would strengthen the case for local modular structure in holographic subregions whose causal and entanglement wedges coincide. The paper is explicit and parameter-free: the proposed f_T contains no free parameters, the flat-space uniqueness argument in Appendix A is a real attempt at a proof, and the entanglement first law check in Section 5 is a nontrivial consistency test. The construction also connects to the generalized entropy program of Jensen-Sorce-Speranza and to the causal holographic information problem. However, the advertised result is not yet established: the central assumptions are not derived from the modular theory of the state, and several load-bearing inputs are deferred to other papers.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.3)] The starting point 'We assume' that the modular Hamiltonian has the local form K_tb = ∫ f_T(x) T00(x) dx is not derived, and the paper does not verify the defining KMS condition for this operator with respect to the time band algebra. The constraints I-IV and the vanishing-CMI relation (3.2) are necessary consistency conditions, but they do not characterize a modular Hamiltonian outside the assumed ansatz; Appendix A proves uniqueness only among functions satisfying these conditions. The central claim (6.1) is therefore conditional on an unproven locality assumption. The paper should either derive (3.3) from the algebraic structure, or provide a direct check that the proposed flow preserves the time band algebra and satisfies KMS, or be reframed as a conjecture supported by consistency checks.
  2. [Section 3.3 and Appendix A] The large-L limit lim_{L→∞} f_T = πR is stated in Eq. (A.2) to be derived from Constraint 3 and Constraint 4, and Constraint III is attributed to the non-negativity of relative entropy 'as found in [19]'. But Section 3.1 disputes the validity of [19]'s analysis of time band states. The paper needs to prove Constraint III independently of [19], or explain why the disputed argument can still be used in this context; otherwise the uniqueness proof relies on an input whose status is internally inconsistent.
  3. [Section 4.1-4.2] The two conditions defining the geometric modular flows, namely orthogonality of worldlines to the edge of the time band and the requirement that the worldlines be timelike hyperbolas with time reflection symmetry, are imposed rather than derived. The identification of the observer's temperature with the modular Hamiltonian of the time band state assumes that the state's modular flow is generated by these worldlines, which is precisely what needs to be proven. The agreement between the two methods in Section 4.2 is a consistency check between two constructions that share several assumptions, not an independent proof of modularity. Moreover, Appendix C only demonstrates the equivalence of the two formulas locally through a first-order expansion, so a global argument is still missing.
  4. [Section 3.1 and reference [42]] Several load-bearing facts are not established in this manuscript: the exact vanishing of CMI in Eq. (3.1) for finite A and B, the existence of the time band state, and the refutation of the argument in [19]. These are either asserted from the authors' previous work [27] or deferred to a forthcoming paper [42]. Since the derivation of (3.2) and hence of the central formula (6.1) depends on these inputs, the manuscript should either present self-contained derivations of these facts or explicitly characterize the main result as conditional on [27,42].
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.3)] The integration domain and the support of f_T are not specified; in the explicit flat-space result (3.4) f_T vanishes outside [−L/2−R, L/2+R], and this should be stated in the general formula.
  2. [Appendix C, Eq. (C.1)] The quantities R(x0) and R'(x0) are used before being defined; the paper should define the edge profile of the time band and its derivative in the notation of Appendix C.
  3. [Section 4.3, Eq. (4.3)] The statement that e^{iK2δs2}e^{-iK1δs1} commutes with all operators in the vacuum state should be phrased more precisely: commutation with all operators of the algebra does not by itself imply proportionality, and the interpolation argument in Appendix D remains a sketch rather than a rigorous limiting proof.
  4. [References] The paper cites the in-progress work [42] for the detailed refutation of [19], for the higher-dimensional generalization, and for further discussion of the entanglement first law; relying on an unpublished paper for central claims weakens the self-containedness of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No explicit circular reduction: the final f_T formula is the unique solution of stated constraints, not a fitted input; however the local ansatz (3.3) and the authors' prior work [27]/forthcoming [42] are load-bearing assumptions.

full rationale

The central formula f_T(x) = max_i f_Ri(x) is not simply re-labeled input: Appendix A verifies the candidate against the functional equation (A.1) derived from the vanishing-CMI identity (3.2) and then proves uniqueness among functions satisfying the stated constraints, so within the assumed ansatz the result is derived rather than fitted. The two methods are independent in their construction but share the same local ansatz (3.3) and the same causal-diamond modular Hamiltonians; their agreement (Appendix C) is a mathematical consistency result, not an independent proof of modularity. The principal non-circular weaknesses are: (i) Section 3.2 says "We assume that the local modular Hamiltonian of the time band state has the following form K_tb = ∫ f_T(x) T_00(x) dx", so the local single-integral form is assumed rather than derived; (ii) the existence of the time band state and the exact vanishing of CMI are imported from the same authors' [27], and the detailed refutation of [19] is deferred to a forthcoming paper [42]; (iii) the worldline conditions in Section 4.1 are proposed as natural constraints, and the defining KMS condition that would certify the modular flow is never directly checked. These are assumption-stacking and reliance on self-citations, not an equation reducing to its own input by construction; therefore no circular step is flagged.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on three kinds of premises: (1) the existence of the time band state and its vanishing CMI from the authors' prior work [27]; (2) an assumed local form for the modular Hamiltonian (3.3); (3) physical constraints I-IV and the choice of hyperbolic observer worldlines, which select the unique answer. There are no free parameters fit to data.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The holographic time band state exists and satisfies the vanishing CMI property (3.1) for the chosen subregions in the IR modified geometry.
    Taken from the authors' prior paper [27]; used to derive (3.2) and hence the constraints on f_T in Section 3.1.
  • ad hoc to paper The modular Hamiltonian of the time band state is a local integral K_tb = ∫ f_T(x) T00(x) dx.
    Assumed in Section 3.2; the entire derivation of f_T depends on this form.
  • domain assumption The entanglement temperature f_T(x) satisfies constraints I-IV: continuity, evenness, the Rindler limit as L→0, the bound πR as L→∞, and monotonicity with respect to time band size.
    Stated as 'natural constraints' in Section 3.2; used in Appendix A to prove uniqueness of the max formula.
  • ad hoc to paper The observer worldlines generating the geometric modular flow are timelike hyperbolas with time reflection symmetry and are orthogonal to the time band edge.
    Conditions I-II in Section 4.1; this selects the geometric flows and is needed for the second derivation.
  • domain assumption The bulk curve generating the time band is convex, which guarantees that the observer worldlines never intersect.
    Assumed in Section 2 and Appendix B; the non-intersection proof uses convexity of the bulk curve.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modular Hamiltonian of holographic time band states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TEVC6XHD

@misc{pith2026250413739,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modular Hamiltonian of holographic time band states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TEVC6XHD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.13739}
}
abstract

A holographic time band is a causal incomplete boundary spacetime subregion whose causal wedge is a causal complete bulk spacetime subregion. In an AdS$_3$ spacetime with a specifically modified IR geometry, its causal wedge coincides with its entanglement wedge, which suggests the existence of a local modular Hamiltonian for the holographic time band state. In this work, we construct the local modular Hamiltonian for holographic time bands using two independent methods: from the quantum information properties of the time band state and from the construction of consistent geometric modular flows. Both methods lead to the same unique result of the local modular Hamiltonian, reflecting the intrinsic property of the time band state. The entanglement first law has also been checked to hold for the simplest time band state. This is a substantial addition to the known holographic subsystems with a local modular Hamiltonian, beyond the few cases previously identified.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Czech, P

    B. Czech, P. Hayden, N. Lashkari and B. Swingle, The Information Theoretic Interpretation of the Length of a Curve , JHEP 06 (2015) 157, [ 1410.1540]

    arXiv 2015

  2. [42]

    Ju, B.-H

    X.-X. Ju, B.-H. Liu, Y.-W. Sun and Y. Zhao, In progress,

    work page

  3. [27]

    Ju, T.-Z

    X.-X. Ju, T.-Z. Lai, B.-H. Liu, W.-B. Pan and Y.-W. Sun, Entanglement structures from – 19 – modified IR geometry, 2404.02737

    arXiv

  4. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, [ hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [2]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602, [ hep-th/0603001]

    arXiv 2006

  6. [3]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy , JHEP 08 (2006) 045, [hep-th/0605073]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [4]

    Czech, J

    B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009, [ 1204.1330]

    arXiv 2012

  8. [5]

    A. C. Wall, Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007, [ 1211.3494]. – 18 –

    arXiv 2014

Show all 50 references
  1. [6]

    Headrick, V

    M. Headrick, V. E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence and M. Rangamani, Causality & holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 12 (2014) 162, [ 1408.6300]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Bousso and G

    R. Bousso and G. Penington, Entanglement Wedges for Gravitating Regions , 2208.04993

    arXiv

  3. [8]

    Esp´ ındola, A

    R. Esp´ ındola, A. Guijosa and J. F. Pedraza, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and Entanglement of Purification , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 646, [ 1804.05855]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Saraswat and N

    K. Saraswat and N. Afshordi, Extracting Hawking Radiation Near the Horizon of AdS Black Holes, JHEP 02 (2021) 077, [ 2003.12676]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [10]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and A. C. Wall, Reconstruction of bulk operators within the entanglement wedge in gauge-gravity duality , Physical review letters 117 (2016) 021601

    2016

  6. [11]

    Harlow, TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT , PoS TASI2017 (2018) 002, [ 1802.01040]

    D. Harlow, TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT , PoS TASI2017 (2018) 002, [ 1802.01040]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Bousso, S

    R. Bousso, S. Leichenauer and V. Rosenhaus, Light-sheets and AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 046009, [ 1203.6619]

    2012 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, Subalgebra-subregion duality: emergence of space and time in holography, 2212.13266

    arXiv

  9. [14]

    Balasubramanian, B

    V. Balasubramanian, B. Czech, B. D. Chowdhury and J. de Boer, The entropy of a hole in spacetime, JHEP 10 (2013) 220, [ 1305.0856]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Balasubramanian, B

    V. Balasubramanian, B. D. Chowdhury, B. Czech, J. de Boer and M. P. Heller, Bulk curves from boundary data in holography , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 086004, [ 1310.4204]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [16]

    V. E. Hubeny, Covariant residual entropy, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (sep, 2014)

    2014

  12. [17]

    Ju, W.-B

    X.-X. Ju, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun and Y.-T. Wang, Generalized Rindler Wedge and Holographic Observer Concordance, 2302.03340

    arXiv

  13. [18]

    Ju, B.-H

    X.-X. Ju, B.-H. Liu, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun and Y.-T. Wang, Squashed Entanglement from Generalized Rindler Wedge, 2310.09799

    arXiv

  14. [20]

    Balasubramanian and C

    V. Balasubramanian and C. Rabideau, The dual of non-extremal area: differential entropy in higher dimensions, JHEP 09 (2020) 051, [ 1812.06985]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [21]

    V. E. Hubeny, Covariant Residual Entropy, JHEP 09 (2014) 156, [ 1406.4611]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Headrick, R

    M. Headrick, R. C. Myers and J. Wien, Holographic Holes and Differential Entropy , JHEP 10 (2014) 149, [ 1408.4770]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [23]

    R. C. Myers, J. Rao and S. Sugishita, Holographic Holes in Higher Dimensions , JHEP 06 (2014) 044, [ 1403.3416]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Czech, X

    B. Czech, X. Dong and J. Sully, Holographic Reconstruction of General Bulk Surfaces , JHEP 11 (2014) 015, [ 1406.4889]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Hayden, R

    P. Hayden, R. Jozsa, D. Petz and A. Winter, Structure of States Which Satisfy Strong Subadditivity of Quantum Entropy with Equality , Commun. Math. Phys. 246 (2004) 359–374

    2004

  20. [26]

    Fawzi and R

    O. Fawzi and R. Renner, Quantum conditional mutual information and approximate markov chains, Communications in Mathematical Physics 340 (Sept., 2015) 575–611

    2015

  21. [28]

    Chen and H

    L. Chen and H. Wang, Causal shadow and non-local modular flow: from degeneracy to perturbative genesis by correlation, JHEP 02 (2023) 052, [ 2211.12064]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Haag, Local quantum physics : fields, particles, algebras , 1993

    R. Haag, Local quantum physics : fields, particles, algebras , 1993

    1993

  23. [30]

    Araki, Relative Entropy of States of Von Neumann Algebras , Publ

    H. Araki, Relative Entropy of States of Von Neumann Algebras , Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. Kyoto 1976 (1976) 809–833

    1976

  24. [31]

    Casini, Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound , Class

    H. Casini, Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound , Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 205021, [0804.2182]

    2008 arXiv

  25. [32]

    D. L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S. J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004, [ 1512.06431]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [33]

    D. D. Blanco, H. Casini, L.-Y. Hung and R. C. Myers, Relative Entropy and Holography, JHEP 08 (2013) 060, [ 1305.3182]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [34]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062, [ 0705.0016]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R. C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036, [ 1102.0440]

    2011 arXiv

  29. [36]

    J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann, On the duality condition for a hermitian scalar field , Journal of Mathematical Physics 16 (04, 1975) 985–1007, [https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article-pdf/16/4/985/19024093/985 1 online.pdf]

    1975

  30. [37]

    P. D. Hislop and R. Longo, Modular Structure of the Local Algebras Associated With the Free Massless Scalar Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 84 (1982) 71

    1982

  31. [38]

    Jensen, J

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce and A. J. Speranza, Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity, JHEP 12 (2023) 020, [ 2306.01837]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten, An algebra of observables for de Sitter space, JHEP 02 (2023) 082, [ 2206.10780]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    V. E. Hubeny and M. Rangamani, Causal Holographic Information, JHEP 06 (2012) 114, [1204.1698]

    2012 arXiv

  34. [41]

    W. R. Kelly and A. C. Wall, Coarse-grained entropy and causal holographic information in ads/cft, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (Mar., 2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    Hayden, R

    P. Hayden, R. Jozsa, D. Petz and A. Winter, Structure of states which satisfy strong subadditivity of quantum entropy with equality , Communications in Mathematical Physics 246 (Apr., 2004) 359–374

    2004

  36. [44]

    M. B. Ruskai, Inequalities for quantum entropy: A review with conditions for equality , Journal of Mathematical Physics 43 (Sept., 2002) 4358–4375

    2002

  37. [45]

    E. H. Lieb and M. B. Ruskai, Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy, J. Math. Phys. 14 (1973) 1938–1941

    1973

  38. [46]

    Witten, APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory , Rev

    E. Witten, APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory , Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 045003, [1803.04993]

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Iyer and R

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, Some properties of the noether charge and a proposal for dynamical – 20 – black hole entropy , Physical Review D 50 (July, 1994) 846–864

    1994

  40. [48]

    Faulkner, M

    T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R. C. Myers and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitation from entanglement in holographic cfts , Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (Mar., 2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and E. Tonni, Global properties of causal wedges in asymptotically AdS spacetimes, JHEP 10 (2013) 059, [ 1306.4324]

    2013 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov, Looking for a bulk point , 2015. – 21 –

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.