Joint Planning and Operations of Wind Power under Decision-dependent Uncertainty

Caihua Chen; Jingshi Cui; Qian Hu; Wei Xu; Zhiqiang Chen

Joint Planning and Operations of Wind Power under Decision-dependent Uncertainty

T0 review · 3 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes a two-stage distributionally robust wind farm planning model in which both the Wasserstein ambiguity set's reference distribution and its radius depend on the chosen turbine layout, and proves the model reduces to a mixed

desk verdict The submission is the wrong full text, so only the abstract can be judged; the decision-dependent radius idea is reasonable, but nothing in the submitted material supports the reformulation or the guarantee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10437 v3 pith:TF7A7NXT submitted 2025-08-14 math.OC

Zhiqiang Chen , Caihua Chen , Jingshi Cui , Qian Hu , Wei Xu This is my paper

classification math.OC MSC 90C1590C1190C90

keywords windfarmplanningdecision-dependentuncertaintydistributionallyrobustoptimizationWassersteinambiguitysetsmoothingeffectmixed-integersecond-orderconeprogramout-of-sampleguaranteeconstraintgeneration

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Wind farm capacity planning faces a circular problem: where you build turbines changes the distribution of aggregate wind power through the smoothing effect, so the uncertainty you must be robust against is itself a function of your decision. The paper models this with a two-stage distributionally robust optimization program whose Wasserstein ambiguity set — both its center and its radius — depends on the first-stage turbine-count decisions. It shows the problem can be reformulated exactly as a mixed-integer second-order cone program, and that the optimal objective value provides a probabilistic guarantee on out-of-sample performance. A constraint-generation solution framework solves the reformulation hundreds of times faster than a direct approach. If correct, planners could compute a capacity plan and a statistically meaningful worst-case operating cost in one pass.

What carries the argument

The central object is the decision-dependent Wasserstein ambiguity set, a ball in the space of probability distributions centered at a nominal distribution $P(x)$ with radius $r(x)$, where both center and radius are functions of the planning decision vector $x$ (turbine counts per location). As $x$ changes, the ambiguity set reflects the smoothing effect: geographical diversification shifts the plausible distributions of aggregate wind power. This object makes the uncertainty itself an optimization variable; it is what turns the planning problem into a two-stage DRO, and it is what the MISOCP reformulation exploits.

What would settle it

Using historical wind data at candidate sites, split the sample into a calibration block and an evaluation block. Fit $P(x)$ and $r(x)$ on the calibration block, solve the MISOCP for the optimal turbine counts, then run out-of-sample simulations on the evaluation block for that fixed plan. If the empirical frequency with which realized operating cost exceeds the claimed probabilistic bound is greater than the prescribed confidence level, the guarantee fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We study a two-stage distributionally robust optimization model for joint wind farm planning and operational scheduling under decision-dependent uncertainty. The key proposal is a Wasserstein ambiguity set whose reference distribution and radius are both functions of the first-stage planning decisions: $P(x)$ and $r(x)$, where $x$ is the number of turbines at each location. This makes the uncertainty set respond to the smoothing effect, so that dispersing turbines can reshape the plausible distributions of aggregate wind power. We prove the model can be reformulated exactly as a mixed-integer second-order cone program (MISOCP), and the optimal objective value provides a probabilistic guarant

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the decision-dependent ambiguity set — specifically its center and radius as functions of the turbine layout — is correctly specified, which the abstract does not show how to estimate; if the radius is calibrated on the same data used to evaluate the guarantee, the guarantee is no longer truly out-of-sample.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Planners can solve for both turbine counts and operational recourse in one pass, with the ambiguity set shifting in response to the chosen layout.
The exact MISOCP reformulation makes the decision-dependent DRO amenable to standard conic mixed-integer solvers, not just bespoke algorithms.
The reported speedup from constraint generation makes realistic, large-scale wind portfolios computationally feasible.
The out-of-sample probabilistic guarantee turns the optimal value into a statistically meaningful budget figure for investment decisions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The abstract does not specify how $P(x)$ and $r(x)$ are learned; a natural extension is to fit them as parametric functions of turbine counts, and the out-of-sample guarantee would depend on the accuracy of that fit.
If the spatial correlation that drives the smoothing effect is estimated from historical data that does not represent future conditions, the realized out-of-sample cost could exceed the bound.
The same decision-dependent Wasserstein construction could be applied to siting solar, storage, or hybrid plants, where portfolio choice likewise alters the aggregate uncertainty.
One can test the claimed benefit directly: compare the decision-dependent model against a fixed-radius Wasserstein DRO on the same data; the former should deliver lower out-of-sample cost at the same confidence level.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this manuscript cannot be evaluated as submitted because the full text is a completely different paper (on rocket landing guidance). All we have to work with is the abstract. Based on the abstract alone, the work sounds like a plausible and potentially useful contribution to distributionally robust wind farm planning, but nothing in the submitted material supports the claimed reformulation or the probabilistic guarantee.

What is actually reasonable: making the Wasserstein radius decision-dependent is a sensible way to capture the smoothing effect—the distribution of aggregate wind power shifts with the chosen mix of turbine sites, so fixing the radius independent of the plan would miss exactly the phenomenon the paper wants to exploit. That is a legitimate modeling idea, and the two-stage setup with a MISOCP reformulation and constraint generation is a standard, believable toolkit. The abstract's lack of any citation to prior work is a real concern, though: you cannot tell whether the decision-dependent radius variant is new relative to the existing literature.

The soft spots are large. First, the manuscript is mis-filed: the full text is an unrelated paper, so there is no mathematics, no numerical experiments, no proof, no data. That alone prevents any soundness check. Second, the probabilistic guarantee is asserted, not derived; the abstract does not state assumptions or how the radius function is obtained. The stress-test note is right that if the radius parameters are tuned on the evaluation sample, the out-of-sample coverage claim could be inflated. That is a fair concern, but it is about missing details, not a demonstrated error. Third, the 'hundreds of times' speedup is unverifiable without code or experiments.

Who this is for: people working on distributionally robust optimization for energy systems or on decision-dependent ambiguity sets more broadly. If the actual paper delivers the MISOCP reformulation and a clean proof, it would be a solid, citable contribution. As submitted, it deserves a desk reject and a request to the authors to resubmit with the correct file—not because the science is bad, but because the document is wrong. My recommendation: ask the authors to fix the submission, and then send the corrected version to a referee. The abstract is enough to make that a reasonable use of referee time.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The abstract of arXiv:2508.10437 announces a two-stage distributionally robust optimization model for joint wind farm planning and operations under decision-dependent uncertainty. The proposed model uses a decision-dependent Wasserstein ambiguity set, claims an exact reformulation as a mixed-integer second-order cone program, a probabilistic out-of-sample guarantee for the optimal objective value, and a constraint-generation algorithm that accelerates solution by hundreds of times. The full text supplied in this submission, however, is an unrelated paper titled "Onboard Dual Quaternion Guidance for Rocket Landing." None of the wind-power model, its reformulation, theoretical guarantees, or numerical experiments appear anywhere in the manuscript as submitted.

Significance. The topic of the abstract is timely and potentially significant: decision-dependent uncertainty and distributional robustness are active research areas in energy systems, and a tractable reformulation with finite-sample guarantees would be a useful contribution. If the claimed results were rigorously developed and supported, the paper could merit publication. However, as submitted, the manuscript contains no verifiable content supporting any of the abstract's claims. There is no model statement, no theorem, no proof, no algorithm description, no dataset, and no code. The claimed probabilistic guarantee and the dramatic computational speedup cannot be assessed because the relevant material is absent. Thus, the manuscript in its current form does not make a citable contribution.

major comments (3)

[Full Text (entire submission)] The body of the manuscript is a different paper on dual quaternion guidance for rocket landing. The abstract describes a wind-power planning model, but the full text contains none of the model, definitions, theorem statements, proofs, or experiments from that abstract. This is a load-bearing omission: every central claim in the abstract is unsupported by the submitted manuscript. The referee cannot evaluate the correctness or novelty of the proposed approach because the approach itself is not present.
[Abstract, paragraph 2] The assertion that 'the optimal objective value provides a probabilistic guarantee on the out-of-sample performance' is stated without any derivation or even a precise statement of assumptions. In particular, the decision-dependent Wasserstein radius is not defined, and the manuscript does not explain how the radius function is calibrated or bounded. If the radius is learned from the same evaluation data, the finite-sample guarantee could be inflated by selection bias. Because no proof or details are provided, this concern cannot be resolved from the submitted material.
[Abstract, paragraph 3] The claimed computational speedup ('accelerates the solution procedure by hundreds of times') is unsubstantiated. No numerical experiments, dataset descriptions, baseline comparisons, or implementation details are included anywhere in the manuscript. Even if the model were present, this claim would require experimental evidence to be verifiable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be established: the supplied full text is a different paper, so the claimed derivation chain is absent and no equation reduces to its own input.

full rationale

The abstract describes a two-stage distributionally robust optimization model with a decision-dependent Wasserstein ambiguity set and claims that the optimal objective value provides a probabilistic guarantee on out-of-sample performance. To assess circularity, I would need the model equations, the radius construction, and the proof of the guarantee. However, the 'Full Text' portion of the submission is the unrelated paper 'Onboard Dual Quaternion Guidance for Rocket Landing' by Kamath et al. No equations, theorem, or numerical experiments for the wind-power model are present. Under Hard Rule 1, circularity may only be claimed by quoting the paper and exhibiting a specific reduction (e.g., Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction). The reader's concern that the decision-dependent radius could be fitted to the evaluation data is a conjecture; the manuscript gives no procedure for learning the radius, so there is no exhibited reduction. A missing proof or a mismatched full text is an evidential/correctness problem, not a circularity. Therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity, with score 0, while noting that the submitted material does not support the abstract's claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract introduces no new physical entities. The modeling hinges on two domain assumptions about how uncertainty depends on planning decisions and how the radius is learned, plus one ad hoc claim about tractability. Without the full paper, the most honest ledger is short and uncertain.

free parameters (2)

Wasserstein radius function parameters = unknown
The ambiguity set radius is modeled as a function of planning decisions. These parameters must be estimated from wind data, but the abstract does not specify the functional form or estimation method.
Cost weights between investment and operations = unknown
The objective includes both investment and operational expenses; the relative weighting likely requires tuning or choice, which is not described.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The distribution of aggregated wind power is a function of turbine capacity allocation decisions.
Assumes the smoothing effect can be captured by a decision-dependent ambiguity set; this is the core modeling premise.
domain assumption The Wasserstein radius is a function of planning decisions and can be estimated from data.
Needed to define the ambiguity set; no estimation method is given in the abstract.
ad hoc to paper The two-stage distributionally robust model with this ambiguity set can be reformulated as a mixed-integer second-order cone program.
The reformulation is claimed in the abstract but no derivation or reference is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Joint Planning and Operations of Wind Power under Decision-dependent Uncertainty." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TF7A7NXT

@misc{pith2026250810437,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Joint Planning and Operations of Wind Power under Decision-dependent Uncertainty},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TF7A7NXT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10437}
}

read the original abstract

We study a joint wind farm planning and operational scheduling problem under decision-dependent uncertainty. The objective is to determine the optimal number of wind turbines at each location to minimize total cost, including both investment and operational expenses. Due to the stochastic nature and geographical heterogeneity of wind power, fluctuations across dispersed wind farms can partially offset one another, thereby influencing the distribution of aggregated wind power generation-a phenomenon known as the smoothing effect. Effectively harnessing this effect requires strategic capacity allocation, which introduces decision-dependent uncertainty into the planning process. To address this challenge, we propose a two-stage distributionally robust optimization model with a decision-dependent Wasserstein ambiguity set, in which both the distribution and the radius are modeled as functions of the planning decisions, reflecting the statistical characteristics of wind power resources. Then, we reformulate the model as a mixed-integer second-order cone program, and the optimal objective value provides a probabilistic guarantee on the out-of-sample performance. To improve computational efficiency, we develop a constraint generation based solution framework that accelerates the solution procedure by hundreds of times. Numerical experiments using different datasets validate the effectiveness of the solution framework and demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed model.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

IEEE/PES Transmission and distribution Conference and Exhibition, volume 2, 938--943 (IEEE)

Asari M, Nanahara T, Maejima T, Yamaguchi K, Sato T (2002) A study on smoothing effect on output fluctuation of distributed wind power generation. IEEE/PES Transmission and distribution Conference and Exhibition, volume 2, 938--943 (IEEE)

work page 2002
[2]

European Journal of Operational Research 292(2):548--561

Basciftci B, Ahmed S, Shen S (2021) Distributionally robust facility location problem under decision-dependent stochastic demand. European Journal of Operational Research 292(2):548--561

work page 2021
[3]

Bertsekas D (2009) Convex optimization theory, volume 1 (Athena Scientific)

work page 2009
[4]

IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 9(1):228--236

Bitaraf H, Rahman S (2017) Reducing curtailed wind energy through energy storage and demand response. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 9(1):228--236

work page 2017
[5]

https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/Energy-Transition-Investment-Trends-2024.pdf, accessed: July 1, 2024

BloombergNEF (2024) Energy transition investment trends 2024. https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/Energy-Transition-Investment-Trends-2024.pdf, accessed: July 1, 2024

work page 2024
[6]

Bobkov S, Ledoux M (2019) One-dimensional empirical measures, order statistics, and Kantorovich transport distances, volume 261 (American Mathematical Society)

work page 2019
[7]

The Annals of Probability 27(4):1903--1921

Bobkov SG (1999) Isoperimetric and analytic inequalities for log-concave probability measures. The Annals of Probability 27(4):1903--1921

work page 1999
[8]

Wind Engineering 85--98

Bowden G, Barker P, Shestopal V, Twidell J (1983) The weibull distribution function and wind power statistics. Wind Engineering 85--98

work page 1983

Show all 45 references

[9]

Operations Research Letters 51(3):226--233

Chen Z, Kuhn D, Wiesemann W (2023) On approximations of data-driven chance constrained programs over wasserstein balls. Operations Research Letters 51(3):226--233

2023
[10]

Operations Research 72(1):410--424

Chen Z, Kuhn D, Wiesemann W (2024) Data-driven chance constrained programs over wasserstein balls. Operations Research 72(1):410--424

2024
[11]

European Journal of Operational Research 300(1):73--84

Doan XV (2022) Distributionally robust optimization under endogenous uncertainty with an application in retrofitting planning. European Journal of Operational Research 300(1):73--84

2022
[12]

Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1--13

Dunn R, Gangrade A, Wasserman L, Ramdas A (2024) Universal inference meets random projections: a scalable test for log-concavity. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1--13

2024
[13]

https://www.elia.be/en/grid-data/generation-data/wind-power-generation, accessed: July 1, 2024

Elia (2024) Wind power generation. https://www.elia.be/en/grid-data/generation-data/wind-power-generation, accessed: July 1, 2024

2024
[14]

https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Wind_resource_measurement, accessed: July 1, 2024

Energy Education (2023) Wind resource measurement. https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Wind_resource_measurement, accessed: July 1, 2024

2023
[15]

European Journal of Operational Research 306(3):1047--1058

Esteban-P \'e rez A, Morales JM (2023) Distributionally robust optimal power flow with contextual information. European Journal of Operational Research 306(3):1047--1058

2023
[16]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.03542

Gangrade A, Rinaldo A, Ramdas A (2023) A sequential test for log-concavity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.03542

2023 arXiv
[17]

Operations Research 72(3):1177--1191

Gao R, Chen X, Kleywegt AJ (2024) Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization and variation regularization. Operations Research 72(3):1177--1191

2024
[18]

Solar energy 62(2):139--144

Garcia A, Torres J, Prieto E, De Francisco A (1998) Fitting wind speed distributions: a case study. Solar energy 62(2):139--144

1998
[19]

https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2017, accessed: July 1, 2024

GEWC (2017) Global wind report 2017. https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2017, accessed: July 1, 2024

2017
[20]

https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2024, accessed: July 1, 2024

GEWC (2024) Global wind report 2024. https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2024, accessed: July 1, 2024

2024
[21]

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30:133--144

Gonz \'a lez JS, Pay \'a n MB, Santos JMR, Gonz \'a lez-Longatt F (2014) A review and recent developments in the optimal wind-turbine micro-siting problem. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30:133--144

2014
[22]

https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2023, accessed: July 1, 2024

IEA (2023) Renewables 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2023, accessed: July 1, 2024

2023
[23]

https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024#overview, accessed: July 1, 2024

IEA (2024) World energy investment 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024#overview, accessed: July 1, 2024

2024
[24]

Energy 36(2):985--992

Islam M, Saidur R, Rahim N (2011) Assessment of wind energy potentiality at kudat and labuan, malaysia using weibull distribution function. Energy 36(2):985--992

2011
[25]

Energy Conversion and Management 198:111841

Jung C, Schindler D (2019) Changing wind speed distributions under future global climate. Energy Conversion and Management 198:111841

2019
[26]

https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mubashirrahim/wind-power-generation-data-forecasting, accessed: 2024-7-1

Kaggle (2024) Wind power generation data. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mubashirrahim/wind-power-generation-data-forecasting, accessed: 2024-7-1

2024
[27]

2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), 1--7 (IEEE)

Li B, Mathieu JL, Jiang R (2018) Distributionally robust chance constrained optimal power flow assuming log-concave distributions. 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), 1--7 (IEEE)

2018
[28]

Energy 288:129765

Martinez A, Iglesias G (2024) Global wind energy resources decline under climate change. Energy 288:129765

2024
[29]

Mathematical Programming 171(1):115--166

Mohajerin Esfahani P, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Mathematical Programming 171(1):115--166

2018
[30]

2022 2nd International Conference on Computer, Control and Robotics (ICCCR), 120--125 (IEEE)

Niu F, Yang C, Zhang J, Sun Y, Wang R (2022) Missing wind speed imputation research for wind farm considering wake effect. 2022 2nd International Conference on Computer, Control and Robotics (ICCCR), 120--125 (IEEE)

2022
[31]

INFORMS Journal on Computing 34(2):729--751

Noyan N, Rudolf G, Lejeune M (2022) Distributionally robust optimization under a decision-dependent ambiguity set with applications to machine scheduling and humanitarian logistics. INFORMS Journal on Computing 34(2):729--751

2022
[32]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19244

Rigollet P, H \"u tter JC (2023) High-dimensional statistics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19244

2023 arXiv
[33]

(2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk

Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S, et al. (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of risk 2:21--42

2000
[34]

Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 44:101068

Saeed MA, Ahmed Z, Hussain S, Zhang W (2021) Wind resource assessment and economic analysis for wind energy development in pakistan. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 44:101068

2021
[35]

Nonconvex Optimization and its Applications 57:135--155

Shapiro A (2001) On duality theory of conic linear problems. Nonconvex Optimization and its Applications 57:135--155

2001
[36]

Tong W (2010) Fundamentals of wind energy, volume 44 (WIT press Southampton, UK)

2010
[37]

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 33(6):6074--6086

Wang C, Gao R, Qiu F, Wang J, Xin L (2018) Risk-based distributionally robust optimal power flow with dynamic line rating. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 33(6):6074--6086

2018
[38]

Energy 291:130305

Wang S, Zhang W, Sun Y, Trivedi A, Chung C, Srinivasan D (2024) Wind power forecasting in the presence of data scarcity: A very short-term conditional probabilistic modeling framework. Energy 291:130305

2024
[39]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(29):16880--16890

Wasserman L, Ramdas A, Balakrishnan S (2020) Universal inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(29):16880--16890

2020
[40]

IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 11(3):1161--1172

Yang M, Zhang L, Cui Y, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Yan G (2019) Investigating the wind power smoothing effect using set pair analysis. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 11(3):1161--1172

2019
[41]

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 38(3):2845--2857

Yin W, Feng S, Hou Y (2022 a ) Stochastic wind farm expansion planning with decision-dependent uncertainty under spatial smoothing effect. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 38(3):2845--2857

2022
[42]

IEEE Systems Journal 17(2):2247--2258

Yin W, Li Y, Hou J, Miao M, Hou Y (2022 b ) Coordinated planning of wind power generation and energy storage with decision-dependent uncertainty induced by spatial correlation. IEEE Systems Journal 17(2):2247--2258

2022
[43]

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 34(4):2991--3001

Zhu R, Wei H, Bai X (2019) Wasserstein metric based distributionally robust approximate framework for unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 34(4):2991--3001

2019
[44]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution isbn issn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sen...
[45]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

IEEE/PES Transmission and distribution Conference and Exhibition, volume 2, 938--943 (IEEE)

Asari M, Nanahara T, Maejima T, Yamaguchi K, Sato T (2002) A study on smoothing effect on output fluctuation of distributed wind power generation. IEEE/PES Transmission and distribution Conference and Exhibition, volume 2, 938--943 (IEEE)

work page 2002

[2] [2]

European Journal of Operational Research 292(2):548--561

Basciftci B, Ahmed S, Shen S (2021) Distributionally robust facility location problem under decision-dependent stochastic demand. European Journal of Operational Research 292(2):548--561

work page 2021

[3] [3]

Bertsekas D (2009) Convex optimization theory, volume 1 (Athena Scientific)

work page 2009

[4] [4]

IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 9(1):228--236

Bitaraf H, Rahman S (2017) Reducing curtailed wind energy through energy storage and demand response. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 9(1):228--236

work page 2017

[5] [5]

https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/Energy-Transition-Investment-Trends-2024.pdf, accessed: July 1, 2024

BloombergNEF (2024) Energy transition investment trends 2024. https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/Energy-Transition-Investment-Trends-2024.pdf, accessed: July 1, 2024

work page 2024

[6] [6]

Bobkov S, Ledoux M (2019) One-dimensional empirical measures, order statistics, and Kantorovich transport distances, volume 261 (American Mathematical Society)

work page 2019

[7] [7]

The Annals of Probability 27(4):1903--1921

Bobkov SG (1999) Isoperimetric and analytic inequalities for log-concave probability measures. The Annals of Probability 27(4):1903--1921

work page 1999

[8] [8]

Wind Engineering 85--98

Bowden G, Barker P, Shestopal V, Twidell J (1983) The weibull distribution function and wind power statistics. Wind Engineering 85--98

work page 1983