Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

IRAS 16475-4609: A Young Compact HII Region Sculpting Its Molecular Environment

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that IRAS 16475-4609 is a compact HII region in transition between the ultra-compact and compact phases, powered by an early B-type star (B0-B0.7 V) at 3.51±0.74 kpc, whose feedback is carving a conical cavity and…

desk verdict Solid single-object study that deserves refereeing, but the Gaia counterpart ID and the N_Ly error need fixing before the distance claims carry weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08180 v1 pith:TFSW2FLL submitted 2025-06-09 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR

Felipe Navarete , Sean D. Points , Augusto Damineli This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR
keywords stars:massivedistancesHIIregionsISM:individualobjects(IRAS16475-4609)techniques:spectroscopicnear-infraredspectroscopyGaiaparallaxtriggeredstarformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

IRAS 16475-4609, until now a barely characterized infrared and radio source, is shown to be a young compact HII region (a dense cloud of ionized hydrogen) whose central engine is a single early B-type star of spectral type B0-B0.7 V rather than an O star. New near-infrared spectra and images, combined with archival radio and sub-millimeter data, yield a distance of $3.51\pm0.74$ kpc from three independent methods, and an ionized-gas radius of $0.27\pm0.06$ pc that places the region in the short-lived transition between ultra-compact and compact HII phases. The same data show the ionization front expanding into a dense molecular clump to the southwest, with molecular hydrogen emission excited by ultraviolet fluorescence, and so identify IRAS 16475-4609 as a young high-mass star-forming region whose stellar feedback is actively shaping its environment. The paper thus offers a well-observed example of an early B star, not an O star, producing the compact HII structures that surveys commonly flag as ultra-compact HII candidates.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three linked pieces. First, near-infrared spectroscopy of the central point source is compared line by line with published OB standard-star spectra, fixing the spectral type at B0-B0.7 V and thereby setting the stellar luminosity used in the spectrophotometric distance. Second, a Boltzmann diagram of molecular hydrogen ro-vibrational lines—a plot of $\ln(N_J/g_J)$ against upper-level energy whose slope gives the gas excitation temperature—is fitted to derive both the K-band extinction ($A_{K_s}=1.80\pm0.1$ mag, about $A_V\simeq27$ mag) and the rotational temperature of the warm molecular gas ($T_{\rm rot}\approx3.9\times10^3$ K); the ratio of the (1–0) S(1) to (2–1) S(1) lines, $3.6\pm0.5$, separates ultraviolet-pumped fluorescence (ratio near 2) from shock excitation (ratio near 10). Third, three distance indicators—spectrophotometric, astrometric from Gaia, and kinematic from radio recombination lines—combine into the weighted mean distance, and the same radio data at that distance yield the Lyman continuum photon flux and electron temperature. The interpretive mechanism is the blister/champagne flow model: a massive star born near the edge of a dense molecular clump ionizes a cavity, and the resulting ionization front advances into the surrounding gas, producing the cometary radio morphology, the conical near-infrared cavity, and the outer shell of H2 emission at the photodissociation region (the interface where ultraviolet light breaks up molecules).

What would settle it

A high-resolution adaptive-optics or space-based near-infrared image that registers the Gaia DR3 position of source 5940120644325949824 against the near-infrared central star would settle the association; an independent VLBI trigonometric parallax of the radio continuum source would test the distance itself. If the Gaia source is not the central star, or if its parallax disagrees with ~3.5 kpc, the distance and all derived sizes and ionizing fluxes would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that IRAS 16475-4609 is a young, compact HII region powered by an early B-type main-sequence star (B0-B0.7 V). The evidence is the near-infrared spectrum: broad hydrogen recombination lines in absorption with narrow nebular emission superimposed, strong HeI absorption, an absence of HeII and NIII features typical of O stars, and HeI line profiles that match B0-B0.7 V standard stars. Three independent distance estimates—a spectrophotometric distance from 2MASS photometry, a Gaia DR3 photogeometric parallax, and a kinematic distance from radio recombination lines—agree at about 3.5 kpc and combine to a weighted mean of $3.51\pm0.74$ kpc. At this distance, the radio and Brackett-γ emission give a Lyman continuum photon flux (hydrogen-ionizing photon rate) of $N_{\rm Ly}=(2.3\pm0.3)\times10^{47}$ photons s$^{-1}$ and an electron temperature of $T_e=(5.4\pm0.2)\times10^3$ K, and the Brγ emission extends to $0.27\pm0.06$ pc, placing the object in the transition zone between ultra-compact and compact HII regions. The morphology—a cometary centimeter-wave structure, a conical near-infrared cavity open to the northeast, and a shell of H2 emission at the ionization boundary—is interpreted as a blister/champagne flow in which the ionizing star sits at the edge of a dense molecular clump traced by sub-millimeter 870 μm emission.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that Gaia DR3 source 5940120644325949824 is the same object as the near-infrared star powering the HII region; if instead it is a chance-aligned field star, the distance and every distance-dependent quantity would lose their anchor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • IRAS 16475-4609 becomes a well-characterized example of an early B star in the act of ionizing its birth cloud, a stage that is usually harder to isolate than O-star-driven regions.
  • With a Brγ radius of $0.27\pm0.06$ pc, the region sits in the short-lived transition between ultra-compact and compact HII phases, making it a direct target for studying how such regions expand and disperse their natal gas.
  • The H2 excitation analysis shows the molecular gas is predominantly heated by ultraviolet fluorescence, with a (1–0) S(1)/(2–1) S(1) ratio of $3.6\pm0.5$, so radiative feedback, not shocks, dominates the photodissociation region.
  • The sub-millimeter clump southwest of the ionization front is a predicted site of triggered star formation, and the paper's geometry implies that deeply embedded protostars should be found inside that clump.
  • A weighted distance of $3.51\pm0.74$ kpc places the region near the Scutum-Crux arm and, on sky and distance, close to the massive cluster Westerlund 1, linking a single IRAS source to the larger Galactic structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The astrometric association can be checked directly: registering the Gaia DR3 position of source 5940120644325949824 against a high-resolution near-infrared image would confirm whether the parallax source is indeed the central star, a test the paper did not perform.
  • The same three-method distance combination—spectrophotometric, parallax, and radio-recombination-line kinematic—could be applied to other IRAS-selected ultra-compact HII candidates, using Gaia parallaxes to validate kinematic distances in reddened fields.
  • The near-infrared H2 Boltzmann-diagram method, which recovers both extinction and excitation temperature from the same spectrum, is directly transferable to other embedded early-B HII regions where radio data are unavailable.
  • If the triggered-star-formation interpretation is correct, future millimeter-wave interferometric observations of the 870 μm peak should reveal compact cores with inward motions or outflows whose luminosity function tracks the advancing ionization front.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents near-infrared spectroscopy (TripleSpec/SOAR) and narrow- and broad-band imaging (NEWFIRM/CTIO and VVV) of the star-forming region IRAS 16475-4609, together with archival radio, sub-millimeter, and Gaia DR3 data. The central source is classified as an early B-type star (B0-B0.7 V) from comparison with OB spectral atlases. A distance of 3.51±0.74 kpc is claimed from the weighted mean of a spectrophotometric distance, a Gaia photogeometric distance, and a kinematic distance based on radio recombination lines and Gaia proper motions. Using this distance, the authors derive an ionizing photon flux log[N_Ly/(s^-1)] = 47.36±0.06, an electron temperature Te = (5.4±0.2)×10^3 K, a Brγ radius of 0.27±0.06 pc, and an H2 rotational temperature of about 3.9×10^3 K. They interpret the morphology as a young compact HII region in transition to a more evolved state, with the ionization front triggering star formation in an adjacent molecular clump.

Significance. If the main claims survive revision, the paper provides a useful multi-wavelength characterisation of a poorly studied massive young stellar object: the spectral type, distance, ionizing photon rate, electron temperature, and H2 excitation temperature are each derived from independent or complementary data sets, and the Brγ size places the object in an interesting evolutionary phase between ultra-compact and compact HII regions. Strengths include the use of 19 radio recombination lines for Te, the use of an OB spectral atlas at matching spectral resolution, and the combination of public radio and sub-mm surveys with new NIR data. The main weaknesses are the unsupported identification of the Gaia counterpart and the under-reported uncertainty on N_Ly, both of which directly affect the headline distance and ionizing-flux claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.2, Table 5, Fig. 2] The adopted Gaia counterpart is never positionally tied to the near-IR central source. The paper reports two Gaia sources separated by 0.84 arcsec but does not give their offsets from the central source at RA=16:51:14.156, Dec=-46:14:21.23, nor a chance-alignment probability in this crowded, heavily reddened field. This is load-bearing because the photogeometric distance and the proper motions used in the kinematic distance of Sec. 5.3 both refer to source 5940120644325949824; if that source is a chance-aligned field star, the Gaia and kinematic entries in Table 6 lose their connection to the HII region and the weighted mean distance collapses to the spectrophotometric value of 3.6±1.6 kpc. An internal check makes the ambiguity concrete: with A_Ks=0.75 mag, mu≈12.7, and M_V≈-4.0 for a B0 V star, the expected G magnitude is roughly 19-20, much fainter than the adopted G=16.6 and even fainter than the rejected G=17.7 source. The authors should provide a finding chart with both Gaia positions, estimate the chance-alignment probability, and recompute the distance budget under alternative identifications.
  2. [Sec. 5.4, Eq. (3), Table 6] The quoted Lyman-continuum uncertainty, N_Ly=47.36±0.06 dex, is not an end-to-end error budget. Equation (3) scales as d^2, and with the paper's own distance uncertainty of 0.74 kpc at d=3.51 kpc, the distance term alone contributes 2σ_d/(d ln10) ≈ 0.18 dex to log N_Ly. The text of Sec. 5.4 actually states d=3.51±0.91 kpc, which is inconsistent with Table 6's 3.51±0.74 kpc. The ±0.06 dex therefore appears to reflect only the scatter of the radio flux measurements. Please propagate the distance uncertainty explicitly and reconcile the two quoted values of σ_d; this will increase the N_Ly error to roughly ±0.18-0.22 dex, a ~50% uncertainty in the ionizing photon rate, which must be reflected in the abstract and in the comparison with B0 V calibrations.
  3. [Secs. 5.2-5.3, Table 6] The claim of three independent distance estimates is overstated. The kinematic distance in Sec. 5.3 uses the proper motions of the same Gaia DR3 source that provides the photogeometric distance in Sec. 5.2, so the two estimates share a common (and currently unverified) assumption about the counterpart. The weighted mean of 3.51±0.74 kpc and the associated 21% uncertainty are therefore not robust until the counterpart identification is established. Please present the weighted mean both with and without the Gaia-based entries, and discuss the dependence of the result on the counterpart assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 5.4 vs Table 6] The distance quoted in the text of Sec. 5.4, 3.51±0.91 kpc, does not match the weighted mean value in Table 6, 3.51±0.74 kpc; these should be reconciled.
  2. [Sec. 4.1.1, Abstract, Sec. 6.2] The spectral type range is stated as O9.5-B0.7 V in Sec. 4.1.1 but as B0-B0.7 V in the abstract and Sec. 6.2; please justify or correct the narrowing of the allowed range.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.1, Figs. 9-10] The H2 rotational temperatures for individual knots are derived with A_Ks fixed at 1.80 mag, and the quoted uncertainties are formal fit errors that do not include the ±0.1 mag uncertainty in A_Ks or the spatial variation of extinction along the slit; this should be stated or propagated.
  4. [Secs. 1 and 4.1] There are minor textual inconsistencies: the introduction contains the typo 'metanol' instead of 'methanol,' and the [SIII] line wavelength is given as 0.9534 µm in Sec. 4 but 0.9532 µm in Sec. 4.1; also, the solid angle Ω in Eq. (1) is not defined in the text.
  5. [Sec. 2.3, Table 1] The notation is inconsistent for the ionizing photon flux (N_ly in the abstract vs N_Ly in Sec. 5.4); please standardize. Also, the phrase 'entire Y J HK photometric range' in Sec. 2.3 should read 'YJHK range.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: each central parameter is derived from independent observables; self-citations and the Gaia counterpart association are not load-bearing circular reductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The spectral type is obtained by comparing photospheric HI and HeI line profiles with standards from the published Hanson et al. atlases and with standard-star spectra displayed in the paper (Figs. 5 and 11), so the in-prep Triplespec atlas cited by the authors is presentational data, not an unverified conclusion imported by citation. The spectrophotometric distance uses 2MASS photometry and published absolute-magnitude calibrations (Vacca et al. 1996; Koornneef 1983; Carpenter 2001) with extinction from Damineli et al. (2016); the Gaia distance uses the DR3 parallax; the kinematic distance uses SHRDS recombination-line velocities and Gaia proper motions; N_Ly follows from Eq. (3) with SHRDS flux densities; T_e follows from Eq. (4) with RRL/continuum ratios. None of these equations is defined in terms of the quantity it is used to predict. The H2 A_Ks is estimated by maximizing the Pearson correlation of the Boltzmann diagram and then used to derive T_rot; this is a standard self-consistent reddening fit, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and the resulting line ratios (3.6 vs. the fluorescent value 1.8) are not forced. The possibility that the adopted Gaia DR3 source is not the near-IR counterpart is a real robustness concern, and a misidentification would affect both the photogeometric and kinematic distances, but that is an empirical association error, not a circular derivation. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input or to an unverified self-citation, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard physical assumptions (LTE, optically thin emission, photoionization equilibrium), on a fitted extinction value A_Ks, and on the identification of the Gaia source with the near-IR star. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • A_Ks (K-band extinction) = 1.80 ± 0.10 mag
    Chosen to maximize the Pearson correlation coefficient between ln(N_J/g_J) and E_J for the H2 lines (Fig. 9). This is a fit to the same data used to derive T_rot and N_tot, so uncertainties are not independent.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption H2 lines are optically thin and in local thermodynamic equilibrium, so Eqs. (1) and (2) hold.
    Invoked in Section 4.2.1 to build the Boltzmann diagram; non-LTE or optically thick emission would bias T_rot and N_tot.
  • domain assumption The ionized gas is in photoionization equilibrium and optically thin at radio wavelengths, enabling the N_Ly conversion of Eq. (3).
    Stated in Section 5.4. If the radio continuum is partially optically thick or clumpy, the derived Lyman flux is underestimated.
  • domain assumption The electron temperature formula (Eq. 4) assumes LTE and optically thin emission, with N(He)/N(H)=0.068±0.023.
    Standard RRL analysis; deviations from LTE change T_e.
  • domain assumption Gaia DR3 5940120644325949824 is the near-infrared counterpart of the ionizing star, so its parallax measures the distance.
    Assumed in Section 5.2; the paper does not explicitly demonstrate positional coincidence. If the Gaia star is a chance-aligned field star, the photogeometric distance and the weighted mean are invalid.
  • domain assumption The reddening law with A_V/A_K=14.95 from Damineli et al. (2016) applies to this line of sight.
    Used in Section 4.2.1 to convert A_Ks to A_V; a different extinction curve changes the H2 temperature and column density.
  • domain assumption Absolute magnitudes and intrinsic colors from Vacca et al. (1996) and Koornneef (1983) are reliable for B0-B0.5 V stars.
    Underpins the spectrophotometric distance; systematic errors of about 0.67 mag dominate that distance error.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of IRAS 16475-4609: A Young Compact HII Region Sculpting Its Molecular Environment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TFSW2FLL

@misc{pith2026250608180,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: IRAS 16475-4609: A Young Compact HII Region Sculpting Its Molecular Environment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TFSW2FLL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08180}
}
abstract

We present a near-infrared spectroscopic and imaging analysis of the star-forming region IRAS 16475-4609, based on TripleSpec/SOAR spectroscopy and NEWFIRM/CTIO imaging, complemented by archival radio and sub-millimeter data. Our spectroscopic analysis indicates that the central source is an early B-type star (B0-B0.7V) powering a compact HII region characterized by strong HI and HeI recombination lines, and molecular H$_2$ emission. We derive a distance of 3.51$\pm$0.74 kpc, consistent with the position of the Scutum-Crux near arm at Galactic longitudes of $\sim$340$^\circ$. At this distance, the ionized gas traced by Brackett-$\gamma$ emission has a radius of 0.27$\pm$0.06 pc, placing the source in a transition phase between ultra-compact and compact HII regions. From radio data, we estimate an ionizing photon flux of N$_{ly}$=(2.3$\pm$0.3)$\times10^{47}$ photons s$^{-1}$, and an electron temperature of T$_e$=(5.4$\pm$0.2)$\times$10$^3$ K for the ionized gas. The analysis also reveals an obscured high-density molecular clump southwest of the HII region, coincident with an ATLASGAL sub-millimeter peak, indicating a potential site of ongoing and triggered star formation as the ionization front advances into the surrounding molecular material. These results suggest that IRAS 16475-4609 is a young high-mass star-forming region with stellar feedback actively shaping its environment, offering valuable insight into the early evolution of compact HII regions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08180 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two-dimensional spectroimage of the order n=3 (K-band) resampled into a 2040×80 pixel linear grid. ionizing source has carved a cavity within a dense molec￾ular cloud. Such interpretation is supported by the pres￾ence of deeply embedded near-infrared objects located to the south (S) and west (W) of the source, likely hid￾den within the dusty environment. The K-band emission (top left panel) indicates that the contin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. VVV/VISTA observations of IRAS 16475−4609 in a 2. ′ 25×2. ′ 25 region. The map shows a false-color RGB image highlighting the nebular emission around the IRAS object. A 30′′ scale bar is indicated in the lower left region of the panel. The contours indicate the emission at 870 µm from ATLASGAL (white curves), the ATCA maps at 3 cm (red) and 6 cm (black), and the near-IR Brγ emission (cyan). malized spectrum of the p… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Continuum-normalized near-IR spectrum of IRAS 16475 (black curve) and the associated nebulosity (blue). The nebular spectrum was scaled by a factor of 0.05 with respect to the central source. Vertical dashed lines indicate the wavelength of relevant spectral features: …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Zoom around He I lines in the continuum-normalized near-IR spectrum of IRAS 16475−4609. The red curves are a sample of representative OB-type stars observed with TripleSpec (Navarete et al., in prep.), from top to bottom: HD37468(O9.5 V), HD149438 (B0 V), HD37042 (B0.7…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectroimages of the He I (λ = 2.0587 µm, left panel), H2 (1–0) S(1) (λ = 2.1218 µm, middle) and Brγ (λ = 2.1661 µm, right). The color bar to the right indi￾cates the flux intensity for all three features. White contours represent the continuum emission, with the dashe…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Integrated flux of the extended emission along the slit. The Brγ, H2. and He I emission from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Analysis of the molecular hydrogen emission as￾sociated with the nebular component of IRAS 16475−4609. Top panel: Pearson correlation between the logarithm of the upper-level column density as a function of the upper-level energy of the H2 transitions by varying the AK…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top panel: Spatial distribution of the mean flux of 11 H2 transitions along the slit direction (black curve). The gray points correspond to the Trot of the gas evalu￾ated at each spaxel. The colored points correspond to the weighted mean Trot values for each of the th…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: compares the normalized spectrum of IRAS 16475−4609 with six OB standards with spectral types ranging from O9.5 V to B2 V (from top to bottom). Each panel exhibits useful spectral regions within the near-infrared atmospheric windows covered by the TripleSpec observati…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2023, in IAU

    Araya, I., Cur´ e, M., Machuca, N., & Arcos, C. 2023, in IAU

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    370, Winds of Stars and Exoplanets, ed

    Symposium, Vol. 370, Winds of Stars and Exoplanets, ed. A. A. Vidotto, L. Fossati, & J. S. Vink, 180–184, doi: 10.1017/S1743921322004537

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921322004537

  3. [3]

    G., Probst, R

    Autry, R. G., Probst, R. G., Starr, B. M., et al. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, ed. M. Iye & A. F. M. Moorwood, 525–539, doi: 10.1117/12.460419

    doi:10.1117/12.460419 2003

  4. [4]

    2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bertin, E., Mellier, Y., Radovich, M., et al. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 281, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XI, ed. D. A. Bohlender, D. Durand, & T. H. Handley, 228

    2002

  5. [5]

    H., & Dalgarno, A

    Black, J. H., & Dalgarno, A. 1976, ApJ, 203, 132, doi: 10.1086/154055 Caratti o Garatti, A., Stecklum, B., Linz, H., Garcia Lopez, R., & Sanna, A. 2015, A&A, 573, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423992

    doi:10.1086/154055 1976

  6. [6]

    Carpenter, J. M. 2001, AJ, 121, 2851, doi: 10.1086/320383

    doi:10.1086/320383 2001

  7. [7]

    M., Snell, R

    Carpenter, J. M., Snell, R. L., & Schloerb, F. P. 1990, ApJ, 362, 147, doi: 10.1086/169251

    doi:10.1086/169251 1990

  8. [8]

    S., Schuller, F., et al

    Csengeri, T., Urquhart, J. S., Schuller, F., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322434

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322434 2014

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    C., Vacca, W

    Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., & Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP, 116, 362, doi: 10.1086/382907

    2004 doi

  2. [10]

    1984, Canadian Journal of Physics, 62, 1639, doi: 10.1139/p84-210

    Dabrowski, I. 1984, Canadian Journal of Physics, 62, 1639, doi: 10.1139/p84-210

    1984 doi

  3. [11]

    A., Blum, R

    Damineli, A., Almeida, L. A., Blum, R. D., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 2653, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2122 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 202...

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    A., Breen, S

    Green, J. A., Breen, S. L., Fuller, G. A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 1383, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx887

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    H., Damineli, A., & Jablonski, F

    Groh, J. H., Damineli, A., & Jablonski, F. 2007, A&A, 465, 993, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066401

    2007 doi

  6. [14]

    2022, ApJS, 262, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7567

    Hamano, S., Kobayashi, N., Kawakita, H., et al. 2022, ApJS, 262, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7567

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    M., Conti, P

    Hanson, M. M., Conti, P. S., & Rieke, M. J. 1996, ApJS, 107, 281, doi: 10.1086/192366

    1996 doi

  8. [16]

    M., Kudritzki, R

    Hanson, M. M., Kudritzki, R. P., Kenworthy, M. A., Puls, J., & Tokunaga, A. T. 2005, ApJS, 161, 154, doi: 10.1086/444363

    2005 doi

  9. [17]

    M., Luhman, K

    Hanson, M. M., Luhman, K. L., & Rieke, G. H. 2002, ApJS, 138, 35, doi: 10.1086/324073

    2002 doi

  10. [18]

    G., & Han, J

    Hou, L. G., & Han, J. L. 2014, A&A, 569, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424039

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    Israel, F. P. 1978, A&A, 70, 769

    1978

  12. [20]

    1983, A&A, 128, 84

    Koornneef, J. 1983, A&A, 128, 84

    1983

  13. [21]

    2005, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Kurtz, S. 2005, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 227, Massive Star Birth: A Crossroads of Astrophysics, ed. R. Cesaroni, M. Felli, E. Churchwell, & M. Walmsley, 111–119, doi: 10.1017/S1743921305004424

    2005 doi

  14. [22]

    Kwok, S., Volk, K., & Bidelman, W. P. 1997, ApJS, 112, 557, doi: 10.1086/313038

    1997 doi

  15. [23]

    Lada, C. J. 1987, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 115, Star Forming Regions, ed. M. Peimbert & J. Jugaku, 1

    1987

  16. [24]

    2018, A&A, 616, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832727

    Lindegren, L., Hern´ andez, J., Bombrun, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832727

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    L., Hoare, M

    Lumsden, S. L., Hoare, M. G., Urquhart, J. S., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 11, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/11

    2013 doi

  18. [26]

    Martins, F., Schaerer, D., & Hillier, D. J. 2005, A&A, 436, 1049, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042386

    2005 doi

  19. [27]

    Menten, K. M. 1991, ApJL, 380, L75, doi: 10.1086/186177

    1991 doi

  20. [28]

    G., & Henderson, A

    Mezger, P. G., & Henderson, A. P. 1967, ApJ, 147, 471, doi: 10.1086/149030

    1967 doi

  21. [29]

    W., Emerson, J

    Minniti, D., Lucas, P. W., Emerson, J. P., et al. 2010, NewA, 15, 433, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.12.002 Mois´ es, A. P., Damineli, A., Figuerˆ edo, E., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 705, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17713.x

    2010

  22. [30]

    C., Hoare, M

    Mottram, J. C., Hoare, M. G., Lumsden, S. L., et al. 2010, A&A, 510, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913319

    2010 doi

  23. [31]

    E., Rocha, D

    Navarete, F., Damineli, A., Ramirez, A. E., Rocha, D. F., & Almeida, L. A. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 1289, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2374

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Dame, T

    Reid, M. J., Dame, T. M., Menten, K. M., & Brunthaler, A. 2016, ApJ, 823, 77, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/77

    2016 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Menten, K

    Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    2003, A&A, 397, 133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021504

    Russeil, D. 2003, A&A, 397, 133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021504

    2003 doi

  27. [35]

    L., Henderson, C., et al

    Schlawin, E., Herter, T. L., Henderson, C., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, ed. S. K

    2014

  28. [36]

    Ramsay, I. S. McLean, & H. Takami, 91472H, doi: 10.1117/12.2055233

    doi

  29. [37]

    M., Contreras, Y., et al

    Schuller, F., Menten, K. M., Contreras, Y., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 415, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811568

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    Shi, H., Zhao, J.-H., & Han, J. L. 2010, ApJ, 710, 843, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/843

    2010 doi

  31. [39]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  32. [40]

    1979, A&A, 71, 59 Near-IR observations characterization of IRAS 16475–460917

    Tenorio-Tagle, G. 1979, A&A, 71, 59 Near-IR observations characterization of IRAS 16475–460917

    1979

  33. [41]

    1977, ApJS, 35, 281, doi: 10.1086/190481

    Turner, J., Kirby-Docken, K., & Dalgarno, A. 1977, ApJS, 35, 281, doi: 10.1086/190481

    1977 doi

  34. [42]

    S., Busfield, A

    Urquhart, J. S., Busfield, A. L., Hoare, M. G., et al. 2007, A&A, 461, 11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065837

    2007 doi

  35. [43]

    S., Moore, T

    Urquhart, J. S., Moore, T. J. T., Schuller, F., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1752, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt287

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    D., Garmany, C

    Vacca, W. D., Garmany, C. D., & Shull, J. M. 1996, ApJ, 460, 914, doi: 10.1086/177020

    1996 doi

  37. [45]

    J., Hyland, A

    Walsh, A. J., Hyland, A. R., Robinson, G., Bourke, T. L., & James, S. D. 1995, PASA, 12, 186, doi: 10.1017/S1323358000020257

    1995 doi

  38. [46]

    J., Hyland, A

    Walsh, A. J., Hyland, A. R., Robinson, G., & Burton, M. G. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 261, doi: 10.1093/mnras/291.2.261

    1997 doi

  39. [47]

    2006, MNRAS, 371, 185, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10549.x

    Wegner, W. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 185, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10549.x

    2006

  40. [48]

    V., Bania, T

    Wenger, T. V., Bania, T. M., Balser, D. S., & Anderson, L. D. 2013, ApJ, 764, 34, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/34

    2013 doi

  41. [49]

    V., Dawson, J

    Wenger, T. V., Dawson, J. R., Dickey, J. M., et al. 2021, ApJS, 254, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abf4d4

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    Wood, D. O. S., & Churchwell, E. 1989a, ApJS, 69, 831, doi: 10.1086/191329

    doi

  43. [51]

    Wood, D. O. S., & Churchwell, E. 1989b, ApJ, 340, 265, doi: 10.1086/167390 18Navarete et al. APPENDIX A.COMPARISON BETWEEN TRIPLESPEC/SOAR OBSER V ATIONS OF IRAS 16475−4609 AND OB STANDARDS Figure 11 compares the normalized spectrum of IRAS 16475−4609 with six OB standards wit...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.