Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Active Learning Guided Computational Discovery of 2D Materials with Large Spin Hall Conductivity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports an active-learning material search that, starting from 24 diverse 2D systems, found Fe2TeSe with a computed spin Hall conductivity of 271.52 (ħ/e) Ω⁻¹ — about 23 times the best value in the initial round.

desk verdict The active-learning loop is internally consistent and a legitimate new application, but the headline 23x SHC claim rests on an under-validated numerical protocol; send to review with demands for convergence tests and external validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.21077 v2 pith:TGGRJHF6 submitted 2025-12-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Abhijeet J. Kale , Sanjeev S. Navaratna , Pratik Sahu , Henry Chan , B. R. K. Nanda , Rohit Batra This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spinHallconductivityactivelearning2DmaterialsdensityfunctionaltheoryWanniertight-bindingexpectedimprovementspintronicsdiscovery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that active learning — an iterative loop in which a machine-learning model proposes candidates and density functional theory verifies them — can find 2D materials with very large spin Hall conductivity (SHC) without computing all ~2,000 candidates. Starting from 24 chemically diverse systems, the loop selected 41 materials over three rounds using an expected-improvement acquisition function, with SHC ground truth from DFT plus Wannier tight-binding and the Kubo formula. The authors report steady improvement each round, with Fe2TeSe reaching 271.52 (ħ/e) Ω⁻¹, nearly 23 times the best initial-round value (AuSe, 11.7). They also extract chemical trends: the strongest candidates tend to be metallic, dominated by d-orbitals near the Fermi level, and free of rotoinversion symmetry. If the computed values survive experimental scrutiny, this is evidence that active learning can replace broad high-throughput screening in expensive transport-property searches.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the expected-improvement acquisition loop built around a ridge-regression surrogate. Features are 158 symmetry and elemental descriptors; the target is a symmetric-log transform of the computed SHC. Ground truth comes from a DFT-SOC calculation whose bands are fitted by a tight-binding Hamiltonian from maximally localized Wannier functions, with atomic spin-orbit parameter λ tuned to match the ab initio bands; the Kubo formula on an 800×800×1 k-grid then yields the spin (and orbital) Hall conductivity. Expected improvement is what drives the search: it selects candidates with high predicted SHC and high uncertainty, so each round adds the most informative extrem

What would settle it

Recompute the SHC of Fe2TeSe and K2PtTe2 with a denser k-mesh, a different Wannier projection set, or a small rigid shift of the Fermi level; if the value at EF drops from 271.52 (ħ/e) Ω⁻¹ by a large factor, changes sign, or reorders the top candidates, the central claim fails. A second check is to rerun the active-learning loop from a different random seed or with a different ground-truth method: if it cannot beat the initial round's best candidate, the claimed acceleration is not robust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an expected-improvement active-learning loop can accelerate the discovery of high-SHC 2D materials by concentrating expensive electronic-structure calculations on the most promising candidates. The loop trains a ridge-regression model on SHC values computed from density-functional-theory bands, Wannier-fitted tight-binding Hamiltonians, and the Kubo formula with explicit spin-orbit coupling; it then scores the remaining ~2,000 candidate materials by expected improvement, which balances predicted SHC against model uncertainty, and sends 5–7 top scorers for full calculation. Across three rounds the computed SHC distribution shifts upward, and the best material, Fe2TeS

Load-bearing premise

The entire ranking rests on the computed DFT–Wannier–Kubo spin Hall conductivity values being accurate and converged, especially for metallic candidates where the SHC fluctuates sharply near the Fermi level; if those numbers change with k-grid, smearing, or the fitted spin-orbit parameter λ, the 23-fold improvement and the candidate ordering collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A pool of ~2,000 2D materials can be screened with only 41 full electronic-structure calculations, suggesting this loop is a template for other expensive transport properties such as the anomalous Hall or orbital Hall effect.
  • The identified candidates, especially Fe2TeSe, are put forward as concrete targets for experimental spin-orbit-torque measurements and device testing.
  • The design signature 'metallic, d-orbital dominated near EF, no rotoinversion' is offered as a cheap screening filter for future high-SHC searches.
  • The public dataset and trained model let other groups score any 2D material for SHC before committing to expensive DFT calculations.
  • Because OHC is computed to dominate SHC in all 41 cases, experiments on these systems should be designed to disentangle spin-current torque from orbital-current conversion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The 271.52 value is a computed intrinsic SHC in the clean limit; disorder, temperature, and Fermi-level shifts from doping or gating could substantially alter it, so the 23x claim is a computational hypothesis awaiting transport experiments.
  • Editorial inference: The paper's Round 2.1 shows that targeting THC did not work as well as targeting SHC; a natural extension is to run the same active loop with the spin Hall angle or OHC-to-SHC conversion ratio as the objective, which might produce different optimal materials.
  • Editorial inference: Two of the top five candidates contain no heavy elements, which contradicts the usual 'heavy atoms are required for strong spin-orbit effects' heuristic; with only 41 samples this is a weak signal, but it suggests a targeted search over light-element compounds could surprise.
  • Editorial inference: The sharp Fermi-level sensitivity of the best metallic candidates means the same material could act as a tunable spin Hall switch via electrostatic gating; the authors note this tunability but stop short of proposing a device, and a transport calculation with a gate-induced μ shift would be a direct test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents an active-learning workflow that combines DFT band structures, Wannier interpolation, and Kubo-formula SHC calculations with ridge-regression ML models to screen ~2000 2D materials from MC2D. Starting with 24 manually selected systems, three active-learning rounds (sampling 17 additional systems via expected improvement) expand the dataset to 41 systems and identify Fe2TeSe with computed SHC = 271.52 (hbar/e) Ohm^-1, ~23 times the Round-1 best (AuSe, 11.7). The authors also report chemical trends from SHAP and correlation analyses and make data and code publicly available.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, the paper is a compelling demonstration that active learning can accelerate the discovery of 2D materials with large intrinsic SHC, which is a computationally expensive target. The workflow is reproducible (public GitHub data/code), the ground-truth DFT-Wannier-TB pipeline is state-of-the-art, and the round-over-round improvement is internally consistent. The SHAP analysis connects to physical intuition (d-orbital character, heavy elements, symmetry). However, the central quantitative claim—the 23x enhancement—rests on computed SHC values that are not shown to be converged or validated. For metallic systems, the intrinsic SHC is extremely sensitive to Fermi-level details and k-mesh sampling; the paper itself shows sharp fluctuations in Figure 5. Without convergence tests or comparison to prior SHC data, the ranking of candidates could change materially, undercutting the headline claim. Thus the significance depends on establishing the numerical reliability of the computed SHC values.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (2)-(3); Figure 5] The SHC values are computed on a single 800x800x1 k-grid with no smearing parameter, no convergence tests, and no error bars. Figure 5 explicitly shows sharp fluctuations in SHC/OHC near EF for the top candidates (e.g., K2PtTe2), and the Results text acknowledges that these metallic systems are sensitive to minor EF shifts. Since 9 of the top-10 candidates are metallic, the 23x claim and the round-over-round ranking could be an artifact of the unconverged k-integration. Please provide k-grid and smearing convergence tests for at least the top candidates, and report error bars on the SHC values.
  2. [Results, Figure 3; Table S1, Figure S6] The SOC parameter λ is fitted per material to match the DFT+SOC band structure, but validation of the TB fit is shown only for AuSe (Fig. S6). For Fe2TeSe, K2PtTe2, and the other top candidates, no comparison of TB vs DFT+SOC bands is shown, and there is no error propagation from the λ fit to the SHC. Please display the fit quality for all top candidates and quantify how SHC changes under small variations in λ and Fermi-level position.
  3. [Results, Chemical insights] The authors state that owing to the limited 41-system dataset, the trends should be treated as 'indicative', yet the Abstract and Results present 'nearly 23 times higher' as a quantitative discovery. The proof-of-concept is weakened by the small number of candidates per round (5-7) and the large ML uncertainties for the top candidates (e.g., Fe2TeSe and BaFe8As2 in Fig. 3 are far from the parity line, and MnC6N4Se2 deviates strongly). Please either temper the claim or add validation, for example by benchmarking the computed SHC values against published high-throughput 2D SHC data or by providing confidence intervals.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure S2] The label 'Round 4' in Figure S2 is inconsistent with the three active-learning loops described in the main text; the figure should be renamed (e.g., 'Round 3' or 'Final ML model').
  2. [Methods, Eq. (1)] The phase factor in the TB Hamiltonian is written as exp(i k·d_j), which is a sign convention opposite to the usual tight-binding convention; please clarify the convention used and ensure consistency with the Wannier90 output.
  3. [Figure 2(b)] The color/legend for Round 2.1 versus Round 2.2 is difficult to distinguish in grayscale; consider using different symbols or a colorblind-safe palette.
  4. [Abstract and Results] The initial set is described as 'random but chemically diverse', while the Results section says the 24 systems were 'selected based on domain knowledge and prior literature'. Please reconcile these statements.
  5. [Data Availability] The sentence 'The SHC data generated in this work can be accessed at the GitHub Repository or is available as a separate excel sheet' does not provide a specific URL or repository identifier; please include the exact link and a DOI if available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the active-learning discovery claim is supported by independent DFT–Wannier–TB evaluations of candidates not in the training set.

full rationale

The central discovery claim is not circular. The ML models are trained on SHC values computed from DFT+TB calculations, and the screened candidates (e.g., Fe2TeSe) are subsequently evaluated by new DFT–SOC+TB calculations that were not part of the model fitting. The text states that 'the candidates were screened using EI acquisition function' and then 'The computed SHC values were again added to the initial training dataset to retrain next version of ML model,' showing the computed values are independent validation, not fitted outputs. The SOC parameter λ is fitted to reproduce DFT+SOC band structure ('the band structure was fit with the DFT EBS with SOC ... by tuning the atomistic SOC parameter λ'), which is model calibration to a first-principles input, not fitting of the target SHC. The self-citations (refs. 9 and 50) are used as supporting context for the TB/SOC methodology and for an interpretive trend; they are not the load-bearing justification for the discovery, and independent references (59, 60) are also cited for the method. Numerical convergence of the SHC values for metallic candidates is a correctness concern, but it is not a circularity issue. Therefore the paper's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The free parameters are the per-material fitted SOC strengths lambda, which are the main numerical inputs controlling the SHC, and the arbitrary symlog constant. The stated axioms are the computational and modeling assumptions that the DFT-Wannier-TB ground truth and the ML ranking rely on; none are independently verified within the paper beyond internal consistency checks.

free parameters (2)
  • Per-material SOC strength lambda (element/orbital resolved) = e.g., Fe2TeSe: lambda_Fe=0.0688 eV, lambda_Se=0.354 eV, lambda_Te=0.719 eV; full list in Table S1
    Added to the tight-binding Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) and tuned so that TB bands match DFT+SOC bands. These fitted lambda values directly control the Berry curvature and therefore all reported SHC values, making them free parameters that the central claim depends on.
  • Symlog constant C = 1
    The ML target is transformed as y = sign(x) * ln(1 + |x|/C) with C chosen as 1. The choice of C affects the loss landscape and thus candidate selection, though it does not affect the computed SHC values themselves.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE with norm-conserving PseudoDojo pseudopotentials describes the electronic structure and spin-orbit coupling sufficiently for intrinsic SHC.
    Used throughout the DFT workflow (Methods). No benchmarking against experimental SHC or higher-level theory is provided, so this is an unverified domain assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper MLWFs constructed without SOC plus a fitted lambda L·S term reproduce the true DFT+SOC eigenstates for all 41 materials.
    The SOC term in Eq. (1) is fit per material to match DFT+SOC bands, but only AuSe is shown as a band-fit example (Figure S6). SHC is computed from these fitted TB eigenstates, so this is an assumption introduced specifically to make the workflow work.
  • domain assumption The Kubo formula with an 800x800x1 k-grid is converged for metallic systems without smearing or explicit Fermi-surface treatment.
    The Methods state the dense k-grid but provide no convergence tests, despite Figure 5 showing sharp near-E_F variations in SHC/OHC for several metallic candidates.
  • domain assumption MC2D database structures and the cleaned 1,947-candidate pool form a valid search space for 2D SHC discovery.
    All candidates come from the MC2D database; later rounds were not re-relaxed, and dynamic stability was checked only for Fe2TeSe. The validity of the candidate pool is taken from the database rather than established here.
  • ad hoc to paper Composition and symmetry features (Magpie + hand-crafted) are sufficient for ridge regression to rank SHC across compositions outside the training distribution.
    There is no theoretical guarantee that these features capture SHC; the model extrapolates from 24 initial systems to ternary/quaternary candidates, and the paper itself notes significant prediction errors for screened candidates such as MnC6N4Se2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Active Learning Guided Computational Discovery of 2D Materials with Large Spin Hall Conductivity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TGGRJHF6

@misc{pith2026251221077,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Active Learning Guided Computational Discovery of 2D Materials with Large Spin Hall Conductivity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TGGRJHF6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.21077}
}
read the original abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) materials are promising candidates for next-generation spintronic devices due to their tunable properties and potential for efficient spin-charge interconversion. However, discovering materials with intrinsically high spin Hall conductivity (SHC) is hindered by the vast chemical space and expensive nature of conventional experimental and first-principles methods. In this work, we employ an active learning framework to accelerate the discovery of high-SHC 2D materials. Machine learning (ML) models were trained on SHC values computed from density functional theory calculations, incorporating the Kubo formalism via tight-binding Hamiltonians constructed from maximally localized Wannier functions, with explicit treatment of spin-orbit coupling. Starting from random but chemically diverse 24 2D systems, the dataset was expanded to 41 cases (from an overall pool of around 2000 materials) over three active learning loops using an expected improvement acquisition strategy. The ML technique successfully identified several high SHC candidates with the best candidate exhibiting a SHC of 271.52 (hbar/e) Ohm^-1, nearly 23 times higher than the top performer in the initial round. Beyond candidate discovery, several features such as orbital symmetry near the Fermi energy, types of atomic species, material composition, covalent radii, and electronegativity of constituent atoms were found to play critical role in shaping the spin Hall response in 2D systems. The data generated is made publicly available to facilitate further advances in 2D spintronics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.21077 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Active machine learning framework to identify 2D materials with high SHC. The workflow primarily consists of DFT (for EBS computation), MLWF (for minimal basis set formation), TB modeling (for computation of Berry curvature and thereby SHC) and ML techniques (for SHC prediction and material selection). First, 2D structures are obtained from MC2D database for which EBS is determined. This is followed by MLWF construc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Performance of active learning rounds: (a) 2D systems selected across different rounds for SHC (or THC) computations using active learning approach. While diverse candidates were manually selected in Round 1, EI was used for selection in Rounds 2.1, 2.2 and 3. The number in parenthesis next to the system name indicates its rank when ordered based on absolute SHC value. (b) Variation in joint kernel density and multi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Predictive capability of ML Models. Parity plot comparing the ML predictions against true (computed) SHC values in modulus symmetric log space. Results are shown for candidates screened in Round 2.2 (yellow squares) and Round 3 (blue triangles). The error bars indicate uncertainty (±1σ) in model predictions. The diagonal and vertical dashed line denote the parity line and the SHC value for best candidate (AuSe) from… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Chemical insights from ML model (a) SHAP summary plot highlighting the most influential features for the final ML model trained on 41 SHC computations (in symlog space). (b) The Pearson correlation coefficients between features retained after RFE for the final model an…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Variation of Hall conductivity with energy. The plot shows energy-dependent variation of orbital (OHC) and spin (SHC) Hall conductivity for best candidate systems from each round computed using TB model HTB and Kubo formalism. The abscissa of point on curves at which z…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C

    Sinova, J., V alenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H. & Jungwirth, T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213–1260, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213 (2015). Publisher: American Physical Society

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.1213 2015

  2. [2]

    & Y ang, J

    Li, X. & Y ang, J. First-principles design of spintronics materials. Natl. Sci. Rev. 3, 365–381, DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nww026 (2016). _eprint: https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article-pdf/3/3/365/31566317/nww026.pdf

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nww026 2016

  3. [3]

    Ren, H. et al. Hybrid spin Hall nano-oscillators based on ferromagnetic metal/ferrimagnetic insulator heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 14, 1406, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37028-4 (2023). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37028-4 2023

  4. [4]

    & Maekawa, S

    Kimura, T., Otani, Y ., Sato, T., Takahashi, S. & Maekawa, S. Room-Temperature Reversible Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 156601, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.156601 (2007). Publisher: American Physical Society

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.156601 2007

  5. [5]

    Guo, G. Y . Ab initio calculation of intrinsic spin Hall conductivity of Pd and Au. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 07C701, DOI: 10.1063/1.3054362 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3054362 2009

  6. [6]

    Pai, C.-F. et al. Spin transfer torque devices utilizing the giant spin Hall effect of tungsten. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 122404, DOI: 10.1063/1.4753947 (2012)

    doi:10.1063/1.4753947 2012

  7. [7]

    Chernyshov, A. et al. Evidence for reversible control of magnetization in a ferromagnetic material by means of spin–orbit magnetic field. Nat. Phys. 5, 656–659, DOI: 10.1038/nphys1362 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1362 2009

  8. [8]

    Xu, H. et al. High Spin Hall Conductivity in Large-Area Type-II Dirac Semimetal PtTe2. Adv. Mater. 32, 2000513, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202000513 (2020). _eprint: https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adma.202000513

    doi:10.1002/adma.202000513 2020

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    K., Biswal, B., Satpathy, S

    Sahu, P ., Bidika, J. K., Biswal, B., Satpathy, S. & Nanda, B. R. K. Emergence of giant orbital Hall and tunable spin Hall effects in centrosymmetric transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 110, 054403, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.110. 054403 (2024). Publisher: American Physi...

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Ahn, E. C. 2D materials for spintronic devices. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 4, 17, DOI: 10.1038/s41699-020-0152-0 (2020)

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    & Jungwirth, T

    Wunderlich, J., Kaestner, B., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Experimental Observation of the Spin-Hall Effect in a Two- Dimensional Spin-Orbit Coupled Semiconductor System. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 047204, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94. 047204 (2005). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2005 doi

  4. [12]

    Coexistence of large conventional and planar spin Hall effect with long spin diffusion length in a low- symmetry semimetal at room temperature

    Song, P .et al. Coexistence of large conventional and planar spin Hall effect with long spin diffusion length in a low- symmetry semimetal at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 19, 292–298, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0600-4 (2020)

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    K., Gmitra, M

    Han, W., Kawakami, R. K., Gmitra, M. & Fabian, J. Graphene spintronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 794–807, DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.214 (2014). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. 10/13

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    Mermin, N. D. & Wagner, H. Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133–1136, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133 (1966). Publisher: American Physical Society

    1966 doi

  7. [15]

    Hong, J. et al. Room-temperature Magnetic Ordering in Functionalized Graphene. Sci. Reports 2, 624, DOI: 10.1038/ srep00624 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Nair, R. et al. Dual origin of defect magnetism in graphene and its reversible switching by molecular doping. Nat. Commun. 4, 2010, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3010 (2013)

    2010 doi

  9. [17]

    Y azyev, O. V . & Helm, L. Defect-induced magnetism in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 75, 125408, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75. 125408 (2007). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2007 doi

  10. [18]

    ˇCervenka, J., Katsnelson, M. I. & Flipse, C. F. J. Room-temperature ferromagnetism in graphite driven by two-dimensional networks of point defects. Nat. Phys. 5, 840–844, DOI: 10.1038/nphys1399 (2009)

    2009 doi

  11. [19]

    Nanda, B. R. K., Sherafati, M., Popovi ´c, Z. S. & Satpathy, S. Electronic structure of the substitutional vacancy in graphene: density-functional and Green’s function studies. New J. Phys. 14, 083004, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/8/083004 (2012). Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    & Nanda, B

    Padmanabhan, H. & Nanda, B. R. K. Intertwined lattice deformation and magnetism in monovacancy graphene. Phys. Rev. B 93, 165403, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.165403 (2016). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    & Brataas, A

    Haugen, H., Huertas-Hernando, D. & Brataas, A. Spin transport in proximity-induced ferromagnetic graphene. Phys. Rev. B 77, 115406, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.115406 (2008). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2008 doi

  14. [22]

    Y ang, H. X.et al. Proximity Effects Induced in Graphene by Magnetic Insulators: First-Principles Calculations on Spin Filtering and Exchange-Splitting Gaps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 046603, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.046603 (2013). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    Shao, Q. et al. Strong Rashba-Edelstein Effect-Induced Spin–Orbit Torques in Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalco- genide/Ferromagnet Bilayers. Nano Lett. 16, 7514–7520, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03300 (2016). Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Mudgal, R. et al. Magnetic-Proximity-Induced Efficient Charge-to-Spin Conversion in Large-Area PtSe2/Ni80Fe20 Heterostructures. Nano Lett. 23, 11925–11931, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c04060 (2023). Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Interfacial magnetic spin Hall effect in van der Waals Fe3GeTe2/MoTe2 heterostructure

    Dai, Y .et al. Interfacial magnetic spin Hall effect in van der Waals Fe3GeTe2/MoTe2 heterostructure. Nat. Commun. 15, 1129, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45318-8 (2024)

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Meitei, O. R. & V an V oorhis, T. Electron Correlation in 2D Periodic Systems from Periodic Bootstrap Embedding. The J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 11992–12000 (2024). Publisher: ACS Publications

    2024

  19. [27]

    Jadaun, P ., Register, L. F. & Banerjee, S. K. Rational design principles for giant spin Hall effect in 5d-transition metal oxides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 11878–11886 (2020). Publisher: National Academy of Sciences

    2020

  20. [28]

    & Panagopoulos, C

    Soumyanarayanan, A., Reyren, N., Fert, A. & Panagopoulos, C. Emergent phenomena induced by spin–orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces. Nature 539, 509–517, DOI: 10.1038/nature19820 (2016)

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    Kong, W. et al. Path towards graphene commercialization from lab to market. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 927–938, DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0555-2 (2019)

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    Y ., Murakami, S., Chen, T.-W

    Guo, G. Y ., Murakami, S., Chen, T.-W. & Nagaosa, N. Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect in Platinum: First-Principles Calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.096401 (2008). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2008 doi

  23. [31]

    Sagasta, E. et al. Tuning the spin Hall effect of Pt from the moderately dirty to the superclean regime. Phys. Rev. B 94, 060412, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.060412 (2016). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    Different types of spin currents in the comprehensive materials database of nonmagnetic spin Hall effect

    Zhang, Y .et al. Different types of spin currents in the comprehensive materials database of nonmagnetic spin Hall effect. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 167, DOI: 10.1038/s41524-021-00635-0 (2021)

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    & Zhang, W

    Ji, Y ., Zhang, W., Zhang, H. & Zhang, W. Spin Hall conductivity and anomalous Hall conductivity in full Heusler compounds. New J. Phys. 24, 053027, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac696c (2022). Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Xu, X. et al. High-throughput calculation of large spin Hall conductivity in heavy-metal-based antiperovskite compounds. Mater. Genome Eng. Adv. e69 (2024). Publisher: Wiley Online Library

    2024

  27. [35]

    & Charlier, J.-C

    Zhou, J., Poncé, S. & Charlier, J.-C. High-throughput calculations of spin Hall conductivity in non-magnetic 2D materials. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 9, 39, DOI: 10.1038/s41699-025-00562-4 (2025). 11/13

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    & Zhao, W

    Qiao, J., Zhou, J., Y uan, Z. & Zhao, W. Calculation of intrinsic spin Hall conductivity by Wannier interpolation. Phys. Rev. B 98, 214402, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.214402 (2018). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    Automated high-throughput Wannierisation

    Vitale, V .et al. Automated high-throughput Wannierisation. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 66, DOI: 10.1038/s41524-020-0312-y (2020)

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Garrity, K. F. & Choudhary, K. Database of Wannier tight-binding Hamiltonians using high-throughput density functional theory. Sci. Data 8, 106, DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00885-z (2021)

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    Gresch, D. et al. Automated construction of symmetrized Wannier-like tight-binding models from ab initio calculations. Phys. Rev. Mater .2, 103805, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.103805 (2018). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    Mounet, N. et al. Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 246–252, DOI: 10.1038/s41565-017-0035-5 (2018). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    & Marzari, N

    Campi, D., Mounet, N., Gibertini, M., Pizzi, G. & Marzari, N. Expansion of the Materials Cloud 2D Database. ACS Nano 17, 11268–11278, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c11510 (2023). Publisher: American Chemical Society. (MC2D website/database accessed on 10th October 2023)

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Ward, L. et al. Matminer: An open source toolkit for materials data mining. Comput. Mater. Sci. 152, 60–69, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.018 (2018)

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    Mostofi, A. A. et al. An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2309–2310, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.05.003 (2014)

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Guyon, I. et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Tsirkin, S. S. High performance Wannier interpolation of Berry curvature and related quantities with WannierBerri code. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 1–9, DOI: 10.1038/s41524-021-00498-5 (2021). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    & Gambardella, P

    Sala, G. & Gambardella, P . Giant orbital Hall effect and orbital-to-spin conversion in 3d, 5d, and 4f metallic heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033037, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033037 (2022). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    Xue, D. et al. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nat. Commun. 7, 11241, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11241 (2016)

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    F., de Groot, B

    Khalak, Y ., Tresadern, G., Hahn, D. F., de Groot, B. L. & Gapsys, V . Chemical Space Exploration with Active Learning and Alchemical Free Energies. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 6259–6270, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00752 (2022). Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    Roy, A., Guimarães, M. H. D. & Sławiıfmmode \acuten\else ´n\fiska, J. Unconventional spin Hall effects in nonmagnetic solids. Phys. Rev. Mater .6, 045004, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.045004 (2022). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    & Satpathy, S

    Sahu, P ., Bhowal, S. & Satpathy, S. Effect of the inversion symmetry breaking on the orbital Hall effect: A model study. Phys. Rev. B 103, 085113, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.085113 (2021). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    & Lee, H.-W

    Go, D. & Lee, H.-W. Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013177, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013177 (2020). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    Large spin hall conductivity in low-symmetry semiconductor ZrSe3

    Zhu, Y .et al. Large spin hall conductivity in low-symmetry semiconductor ZrSe3. J. Alloy. Compd. 918, 165579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165579 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    MacNeill, D. et al. Control of spin–orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe2/ferromagnet bilayers. Nat. Phys. 13, 300–305, DOI: 10.1038/nphys3933 (2017)

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials

    Giannozzi, P .et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Physics: Condens. Matter 21, 395502, DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 (2009)

    2009 doi

  47. [55]

    Stokes, H. T. & Hatch, D. M. FINDSYM: program for identifying the space-group symmetry of a crystal. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 38, 237–238, DOI: 10.1107/S0021889804031528 (2005). Publisher: International Union of Crystallography

    2005 doi

  48. [56]

    P ., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P ., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 (1996). Publisher: American Physical Society

    1996 doi

  49. [57]

    Hamann, D. R. Optimized norm-conserving V anderbilt pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevB.88.085117 (2013). Publisher: American Physical Society. 12/13

    2013

  50. [58]

    van Setten, M. J. et al. The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table (MMC S2. Notebook providing the analysis of the test results of the ONCVPSP PBE v0.4 PseudoDojo tables.). Comput. Phys. Commun. 226, 39–54, DOI: 10.1016/j...

    2018 doi

  51. [59]

    & Lee, H.-W

    Go, D., Jo, D., Kim, C. & Lee, H.-W. Intrinsic Spin and Orbital Hall Effects from Orbital Texture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.086602 (2018). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2018 doi

  52. [60]

    & Satpathy, S

    Bhowal, S. & Satpathy, S. Intrinsic orbital moment and prediction of a large orbital Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 101, 121112, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.121112 (2020). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    Sinova, J. et al. Universal Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126603, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.126603 (2004). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2004 doi

  54. [62]

    Webber, J. B. W. A bi-symmetric log transformation for wide-range data. Meas. Sci. Technol. 24, 027001, DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/24/2/027001 (2012). Publisher: IOP Publishing. Acknowledgements Author A.J.K. gratefully acknowledges financial support previously received from the Ce...

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.