pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18651 · v1 · pith:THL23ZKTnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🧮 math-ph · math.AP· math.MP· nlin.PS· nlin.SI

Arbitrary-genus dark soliton gases in the defocusing nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger hydrodynamics

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.APmath.MPnlin.PSnlin.SI
keywords dark soliton gasdefocusing nonlinear Schrödingerfinite-gap solutionslong-time asymptoticsgenus reductionsoliton ensembleself-similar evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Arbitrary-genus dark soliton gas potential approaches finite-gap solution on the left and background on the right while reducing genus during long-time evolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a potential for dark soliton gases of arbitrary genus by taking the limit of solutions with many dark solitons in the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger hydrodynamics. It shows that this potential matches a genus-N finite-gap solution as position goes to negative infinity and the constant background value as position goes to positive infinity. In long-time dynamics, as the ratio of position to time increases, the gas passes through unmodulated and modulated high-genus regions before successively lowering the genus until it reaches the uniform background. A reader cares because this supplies an exact description of interacting ensembles of dark solitons that model nonlinear waves in optics and fluids.

Core claim

The authors define the dark soliton gas potential through the limit of the N-dark soliton solution as N tends to infinity. They establish that this potential tends to the genus-N finite-gap solution as x tends to negative infinity and to the background value of 1 as x tends to positive infinity. During long-time evolution parameterized by the self-similar variable xi equal to x over t, the configuration displays unmodulated and modulated genus-N regions that progressively reduce in genus down to the planar genus-0 region. The evolution of lower-genus gases is embedded inside that of higher-genus gases through their underlying spectra.

What carries the argument

The arbitrary-genus dark soliton gas potential, obtained as the limit of the N-dark soliton solution when N grows large, which encodes the interacting ensemble and carries the asymptotic and evolutionary analysis.

If this is right

  • Lower-genus soliton gas evolutions embed inside higher-genus ones and display identical dynamics inside shared regimes.
  • The spectra of the solutions encode the embedding of lower-genus dynamics within higher-genus gases.
  • Direct numerical simulations of the system match the predicted cascade from high-genus regions to the planar background.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed genus-reduction cascade may describe a relaxation process by which soliton gases approach the uniform background state.
  • The embedding property points to a hierarchical organization among solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation that could be exploited for constructing new families of exact solutions.

Load-bearing premise

The limit of the N-dark soliton solution as N grows without bound produces a well-defined potential to which asymptotic analysis applies directly without extra adjustments for convergence.

What would settle it

A numerical integration of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation initialized from a large but finite-N dark soliton configuration that fails to approach the predicted genus-N finite-gap solution on the far left or to exhibit the successive genus reduction as xi increases would falsify the claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18651 by Deng-Shan Wang, Dinghao Zhu, Marco Bertola, Peng Yan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The different time evolution regions on the upper x-t plane. Long-time behaviour. Next, consider the long-time evolution of initial arbitrary-genus dark soliton gas potential q(x, 0) in Theorem 1.1. Define the self-similar variable ξ = x/t. There are 2N + 1 different asymptotic regions, as t → ∞ with ξ fixed, which are illustrated qualitatively in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example with interpolation function r(z) ≡ 1, see (2.5). Numerical simulation results of equation (1.1) for N = 1 and N = 2, with the initial condition given by (1.10) (interpolated smoothly with a convex combination using tanh(x)). The initial discrete spectrum restricted by setting η1 = e 0.293iπ , η2 = e 0.423iπ (for N = 1) complemented by η3 = e 0.567iπ , η4 = e 0.811iπ for N = 2. The breaking line (gr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the initial potential and time evolution of the genus-1 dark soliton gas in terms of Riemann invariants. The red curve shows the evolution of Re α1 with respect to the self-similar variable ξ according to (1.15). (c) and (d) are two different types of formal degeneration of the genus-1 dark soliton gas. Remark 1.5. The genus-1 results across Theorems 1.1-1.3 are in complete agreement, as fo… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Band-gap conversion. The red curves are gaps, and the blue curves are bands of the genus-one solution. After the transformation, the roles of the band and the gap are interchanged. while the complement being bands. This distinction is important for determining the genus of the dark soliton gas, which is consistent with the genus of the correponding finite-gap solution. This phenomenon should be valid for s… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic diagram of solitons concentrated within 2N curve intervals. It follows that the residue conditions on {zl,j} nj l=1 ∪ {z −1 l,j } nj l=1 are reformulated as the following jump conditions: D+(z) = D−(z)    [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Example with genus 1: shown are snapshots of the zero level sets (blue) for Re[tiφℓ(z; ξ, 1)] (3.12), Re[tiφˆ(z; ξ, 1)] (3.41), and Re[tiΦ(z; ξ, 1)] across different values of ξ. The blue curves partition the complex plane into regions, with the labels indicating the sign of the corresponding function in each domain. Green curve: the unit circle. Plot data: η1 = e0.3543iπ , η2 = e0.7414iπ , t = 10, ξ1 ≈ 0.… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plots of Im(φ) for different values of ξ, illustrating the obstacle problem. Here N = 2; the hor￾izontal axis is a parametrization of the upper semicircle e iπs , s ∈ [0, 1]; indicated are the two bands with {η1, . . . , η4} = {e iπ0.2 , e iπ0.45 , e iπ0.61 , e iπ0.7}. The corresponding points of transition between modulated and unmodulated regions are {ξ1, . . . , ξ4} ≃ {1.618, −0.51, −1.5052 − 2.5292}, c… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: In the upper half-plane, the red (blue) curves from above (below) γj , j = 1, · · · , ℓ, are denoted by Γαℓ+ (Γαℓ−). Symmetrically, in the lower half-plane, the red (blue) curves from below (above) γ¯j , j = 1, · · · , ℓ, are denoted by Γ¯ αℓ+ (Γ¯ αℓ−). are given by T+(z) = T−(z)    [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic diagram of the jump line transformation from the z-plane to the k-plane in modulated genus ℓ region. The gap (band) on the z-plane becomes the band (gap) on the k-plane, with the blue segments representing the bands on the k-plane. is positive definite. We define the Abel-Jacobi map Jℓ(k) := Z k 1 (ω ℓ 1 , ωℓ 2 , · · · , ωℓ ℓ ) T (3.61) and the constant vector dℓ = X ℓ j=1 Jℓ  p ℓ j  − ℓ 2 X ℓ … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The canonical homology basis {a˜j , ˜bj} ℓ j=1 for a hyper-elliptic Riemann surface of genus ℓ, defined as a two￾sheeted covering of the complex k-plane branched over 2ℓ + 2 points. where E(z) and P(z) are defined by (C.25) and (C.26), respectively. Letting z → ∞, we obtain M(z; x, t) = δ σ3 ℓ∞e igℓ∞σ3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The canonical homology basis cycles for genus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Jump matrices of P (1)(ζ) and P (2)(ζ) on their respective ζ-planes around ζ = 0. 3. Asymptotic condition: MBe(ζ) = (2πζ 1 2 ) −1 2 σ3 1 √ 2  1 i i 1  h I + O(ζ −1 2 ) i e 2ζ 1 2 σ3 ζ → ∞. (C.6) 4. The singularity at ζ = 0: MBe(ζ) =  O(ln |ζ|) O(ln |ζ|) O(ln |ζ|) O(ln |ζ|)  . (C.7) △ The solution of the RHP C.2 is given by MBe(ζ) =    [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The rate at which the jump matrices of E(z) and E˜(z) approach I as large-|x| and long-time behaviours, where c ∈ R + is a fixed constant. Now we are ready to define the error matrix as follows E(z) = T(z)[P(z)]−1 , (C.11) where P(z) =    Y (z), z ∈ C \ ∪2N j=1D η ±1 j ρ , P η ±1 j (z), z ∈ D η ±1 j ρ , j = 1, . . . , 2N, (C.12) where D η ±1 j ρ := {z ∈ C||z − η ±1 j | < ρ}, j = 1, . . . , 2N. Note tha… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The defocusing nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger hydrodynamics supports exact dark solitons under finite density boundary conditions. However, the dark soliton gas, an interacting ensemble of dark solitons, has not yet been studied. In this work, we introduce an arbitrary-genus potential of dark soliton gases by considering the limit of the $\mathcal{N}$-dark soliton as $\mathcal{N}\to \infty$. The large-space asymptotics and long-time evolution of this dark soliton gas potential are analytically investigated through Deift-Zhou nonlinear steepest descent approach. The genus-$N$ dark soliton gas potential approaches the genus-$N$ finite-gap solution as $x \to -\infty$ and the background $1$ as $x \to +\infty$. In the long-time evolution, as the self-similar variable $\xi=x/t$ increases, the gas configuration exhibits a cascade of behaviours, passing from unmodulated and modulated genus-$N$ regions and progressively reducing the genus down to the planar region (unmodulated genus-$0$ region). Notably, the evolution of lower-genus soliton gases can be embedded within that of higher-genus gases, exhibiting identical dynamics within specific regimes. This phenomenon is encoded by the underlying spectra. We also include numerical validations, in perfect agreement with the theoretical predictions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs an arbitrary-genus dark soliton gas potential in the defocusing NLS hydrodynamics by taking the limit of the N-dark soliton solution as N→∞. It then applies the Deift-Zhou nonlinear steepest descent method to derive large-space asymptotics (genus-N finite-gap solution as x→−∞ and background 1 as x→+∞) and long-time evolution, in which the configuration exhibits a cascade of behaviors as the self-similar variable ξ=x/t increases, passing through unmodulated and modulated genus-N regions and reducing genus down to the planar (genus-0) region, with lower-genus dynamics embedded in higher-genus ones. Numerical validations are reported to agree with the predictions.

Significance. If the N→∞ limit is rigorously justified, the work extends finite-gap and soliton-gas theory to arbitrary genus, furnishing analytic large-space and long-time asymptotics for an infinite ensemble of dark solitons. The embedding of lower-genus dynamics and the ξ-cascade are potentially useful for understanding modulated waves in integrable hydrodynamics; the combination of steepest-descent analysis with numerics adds concrete support.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2–3] §2–3 (construction of the potential): The arbitrary-genus dark soliton gas is defined via the N→∞ limit of the N-dark soliton solution, yet no explicit convergence rate or norm (e.g., L^∞ or weighted Sobolev) is supplied for the potential or its scattering data. This is load-bearing for the subsequent application of the Deift-Zhou method, because the claimed asymptotics presuppose that the limiting Riemann-Hilbert problem inherits the required analyticity, decay, and spectral properties uniformly in N without additional regularization.
  2. [Long-time asymptotics] Long-time asymptotics section: The description of the genus-reduction cascade as ξ increases is qualitative; the boundaries between the unmodulated genus-N, modulated genus-N, and lower-genus regions are not located explicitly via the g-function or phase analysis, leaving the precise transition mechanism and its uniformity in the limit open to verification.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states 'perfect agreement' with numerics; the relevant figures or tables should report quantitative error measures (e.g., L^2 or pointwise discrepancies) rather than qualitative statements.
  2. Notation: Distinguish consistently between the finite-N dark soliton solution and the limiting arbitrary-genus gas; the repeated use of 'genus-N dark soliton gas' for both the finite and limiting objects can be clarified.
  3. Add a brief comparison paragraph with existing literature on dark soliton gases and Deift-Zhou applications to finite-gap or soliton-gas problems.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below, clarifying our approach and indicating planned revisions to improve rigor and precision.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§2–3] The arbitrary-genus dark soliton gas is defined via the N→∞ limit of the N-dark soliton solution, yet no explicit convergence rate or norm (e.g., L^∞ or weighted Sobolev) is supplied for the potential or its scattering data. This is load-bearing for the subsequent application of the Deift-Zhou method, because the claimed asymptotics presuppose that the limiting Riemann-Hilbert problem inherits the required analyticity, decay, and spectral properties uniformly in N without additional regularization.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence details would strengthen the foundation. The construction proceeds by letting the discrete poles of the finite-N soliton solutions accumulate densely on the bands of the limiting genus-N spectral curve; the associated Riemann-Hilbert problem is then defined directly on this curve. The jump matrices, contour geometry, and decay at infinity are inherited uniformly from the finite-N cases because the band endpoints and residue conditions remain bounded independently of N. While a full quantitative convergence theorem in a specific norm lies outside the present scope, we will add a remark in §2–3 explaining the uniform preservation of analyticity and spectral properties that justify applying Deift-Zhou to the limiting problem. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Long-time asymptotics] The description of the genus-reduction cascade as ξ increases is qualitative; the boundaries between the unmodulated genus-N, modulated genus-N, and lower-genus regions are not located explicitly via the g-function or phase analysis, leaving the precise transition mechanism and its uniformity in the limit open to verification.

    Authors: The cascade is governed by the g-function constructed to satisfy the equilibrium conditions on the bands for each fixed ξ. Transitions occur at critical ξ values where the imaginary part of the phase function changes sign or where a band endpoint collides with a zero of the modulation equations, causing a gap to close and the genus to drop. These critical values are determined by solving the system of algebraic equations obtained from the g-function variational conditions at the boundary of each region. We will revise the long-time asymptotics section to state these explicit transition equations in terms of the spectral parameters, thereby locating the boundaries and clarifying the mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies external steepest-descent method to a constructed limit

full rationale

The paper defines the arbitrary-genus dark soliton gas explicitly as the N→∞ limit of the finite-N dark soliton solution (abstract and §2–3). It then invokes the standard external Deift-Zhou nonlinear steepest descent technique to obtain large-space asymptotics (genus-N finite-gap as x→−∞, background 1 as x→+∞) and the long-time ξ-cascade. These results are not equivalent to the input by construction; they depend on the analytic continuation and contour deformation properties of the limiting potential under an independent method. No self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear. The construction is presented as an extension of known finite-N solutions, and the asymptotics are derived rather than presupposed. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks for the purpose of this circularity check.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The work rests on the standard defocusing NLS equation and the Deift-Zhou method as background tools; the novel element is the infinite-N limit construction itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation supports exact dark solitons under finite density boundary conditions.
    Stated as given in the opening sentence of the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • arbitrary-genus dark soliton gas potential no independent evidence
    purpose: Models an interacting ensemble of infinitely many dark solitons obtained as the N→∞ limit.
    Introduced as the central new object whose asymptotics are then derived.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5787 in / 1436 out tokens · 73368 ms · 2026-05-20T07:53:55.772484+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bendahmane, G

    A. Bendahmane, G. Xu, M. Conforti, A. Kudlinski, A. Mussot, S. Trillo: The piston Riemann problem in a photon superfluid.Nature Commun.13(1), 3137 (2022)

  2. [2]

    Bertola, A

    M. Bertola, A. Tovbis: Dirichlet energy and focusing NLS condensates of minimal intensity.Comm. Math. Phys.to appear (2026)

  3. [3]

    Biondini, D

    G. Biondini, D. Mantzavinos: Long-time asymptotics for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions at infinity and asymptotic stage of modulational instability.Comm. Pure Appl. Math.70, 2300-2365 (2017)

  4. [4]

    Burger, K

    S. Burger, K. Bongs, S. Dettmer, W. Ertmer, K. Sengstock, A. Sanpera, G. V . Shlyapnikov, M. Lewenstein: Dark solitons in Bose-Einstein condensates.Phys. Rev. Lett.83(25), 5198-5201 (1999)

  5. [5]

    Chiron: Traveling waves for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with general nonlinearity in dimension one.Nonlinearity25, 813-850 (2012)

    D. Chiron: Traveling waves for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with general nonlinearity in dimension one.Nonlinearity25, 813-850 (2012)

  6. [6]

    Claeys, A

    T. Claeys, A. B. J. Kuijlaars: Universality in unitary random matrix ensembles when the soft edge meets the hard edge.Contemp. Math.458, 265-279 (2008)

  7. [7]

    Congy, G

    T. Congy, G. El, G. Roberti: Soliton gas in bidirectional dispersive hydrodynamics.Phys. Rev. E103, 042201 (2021)

  8. [8]

    Cuccagna, R

    S. Cuccagna, R. Jenkins: On the asymptotic stability of N-soliton solutions of the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation.Comm. Math. Phys.343, 921-969 (2016)

  9. [9]

    Deift: Orthogonal polynomials and random matrices: a Riemann-Hilbert approach.Courant Lecture Notes 3 (1999)

    P. Deift: Orthogonal polynomials and random matrices: a Riemann-Hilbert approach.Courant Lecture Notes 3 (1999). 40

  10. [10]

    Deift, T

    P. Deift, T. Kriecherbauer, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, S. Venakides, X. Zhou: Strong asymptotics of orthogonal polynomials with respect to exponential weights.Comm. Math. Phys.192, 1491-1552 (1999)

  11. [11]

    Deift, X

    P. Deift, X. Zhou: A steepest descent method for oscillatory Riemann-Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the MKdV equation.Ann. Math.137(2), 295-368 (1993)

  12. [12]

    Deift, X

    P. Deift, X. Zhou: Perturbation theory for infinite-dimensional integrable systems on the line. A case study. Acta Math.188, 163-262 (2002)

  13. [13]

    Dodson:Defocusing Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations

    B. Dodson:Defocusing Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations. Cambridge University Press (2019)

  14. [14]

    Dyachenko, D

    S. Dyachenko, D. Zakharov, V . Zakharov: Primitive potentials and bounded solutions of the KdV equation. Physica D333, 148-156 (2016)

  15. [15]

    G. A. El, V . V . Geogjaev, A. V . Gurevich, A. L. Krylov: Decay of an initial discontinuity in the defocusing NLS hydrodynamics.Physica D87, 186-192 (1995)

  16. [16]

    G. A. El, A. M. Kamchatnov: Kinetic equation for a dense soliton gas.Phys. Rev. Lett.95(20), 204101 (2005)

  17. [17]

    G. A. El, A. Tovbis: Spectral theory of soliton and breather gases for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation.Phys. Rev. E101(5), 052207 (2020)

  18. [18]

    L. D. Faddeev, L. A. Takhtajan:Hamiltonian methods in the theory of solitons. Springer (1987)

  19. [19]

    H. M. Farkas, I. Kra:Riemann Surfaces. Second Edition, Springer (1992)

  20. [20]

    Flaschka, M

    H. Flaschka, M. G. Forest, D. W. McLaughlin: Multiphase averaging and the inverse spectral solution of the Korteweg-de Vries equation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math.33, 739-784 (1980)

  21. [21]

    D. J. Frantzeskakis: Dark solitons in atomic Bose-Einstein condensates: from theory to experiments.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.43(21), 213001 (2010)

  22. [22]

    X. G. Geng, D. Yan, M. X. Jia: Large-space and large-time asymptotics of the Camassa-Holm soliton gas.J. Diff. Equations444, 113581 (2025)

  23. [23]

    Girotti, T

    M. Girotti, T. Grava, R. Jenkins, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin: Rigorous asymptotics of a KdV soliton gas.Comm. Math. Phys.384, 733-784 (2021)

  24. [24]

    Girotti, T

    M. Girotti, T. Grava, R. Jenkins, K. T.-R. McLaughlin, A. Minakov: Soliton versus the gas: Fredholm de- terminants, analysis, and the rapid oscillations behind the kinetic equation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math.76, 3233-3299 (2023)

  25. [25]

    Grava, R

    T. Grava, R. Jenkins, X. Zhang, Z. Zhang: Direct scattering of the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with step-like oscillatory initial data. arXiv:2603.02855 (2026)

  26. [26]

    Gregorio, T

    F. Gregorio, T. Grava, C. Puntini: Shielding of breathers for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Physica D481, 134744 (2025)

  27. [27]

    A. R. Its: LargeNasymptotics in random matrices: the Riemann-Hilbert approach.CRM Ser. Math. Phys. 351-413 (2011)

  28. [28]

    Jenkins: Regularization of a sharp shock by the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation.Nonlinearity 28, 2131-2144 (2015)

    R. Jenkins: Regularization of a sharp shock by the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation.Nonlinearity 28, 2131-2144 (2015)

  29. [29]

    P. G. Kevrekidis, D. J. Frantzeskakis, R. Carretero-González:The Defocusing Nonlinear Schrödinger Equa- tion: From Dark Solitons to Vortices and Vortex Rings. SIAM (2015). 41

  30. [30]

    Kinderlehrer, G

    D. Kinderlehrer, G. Stampacchia:An introduction to variational inequalities and their applications. Classics Appl. Math.31(2000)

  31. [31]

    Y . S. Kivshar, G. P. Agrawal:Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals. Academic Press (2003)

  32. [32]

    Kuijlaars, K

    A. Kuijlaars, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, W. Van Assche, M. Vanlessen: The Riemann-Hilbert approach to strong asymptotics for orthogonal polynomials on[−1,1].Adv. Math.188, 337-398 (2004)

  33. [33]

    C. D. Levermore: The hyperbolic nature of the zero dispersion KdV limit.Comm. Partial Differential Equa- tions13, 495-514 (1988)

  34. [34]

    Orsatti: Soliton Gas for the Nonlinear Schrödinger equation

    G. Orsatti: Soliton Gas for the Nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Ph.D thesis,SISSA(2023)

  35. [35]

    Pitaevskii, S

    L. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari:Bose-Einstein Condensation. Oxford University Press (2003)

  36. [36]

    Sprenger, M

    P. Sprenger, M. A. Hoefer, G. A. El: Hydrodynamic optical soliton tunneling.Phys. Rev. E97, 032218 (2018)

  37. [37]

    Tovbis, F

    A. Tovbis, F. Wang: Spectral theory of soliton gases for the defocusing NLS equation. arXiv:2503.01132 (2025)

  38. [38]

    Tsuzuki: Nonlinear waves in the Pitaevskii-Gross equation.J

    T. Tsuzuki: Nonlinear waves in the Pitaevskii-Gross equation.J. Low Temperature Phys.4(4), 441-457 (1971)

  39. [39]

    D. S. Wang, P. Yan: Rigorous asymptotic analysis for the Riemann problem of the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger hydrodynamics.Nonlinearity38(12), 125006 (2025)

  40. [40]

    D. S. Wang, D. H. Zhu, X. D. Zhu: Genus two KdV soliton gases and their long-time asymptotics.Forum of Mathematics, Sigma14, e57 (2026)

  41. [41]

    E. T. Whittaker, G. N. Watson:A course of modern analysis. Cambridge Mathematical Library (1996)

  42. [42]

    G. Xu, M. Conforti, A. Kudlinski, A. Mussot, S. Trillo: Dispersive dam-break flow of a photon fluid.Phys. Rev. Lett.118(25), 254101 (2017)

  43. [43]

    V . E. Zakharov: Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid.J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys.9(2), 190-194 (1968)

  44. [44]

    V . E. Zakharov: Kinetic equation for solitons.Soviet Physics-JETP33(3), 538-541 (1971);Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.60, 993-1000 (1971)

  45. [45]

    V . E. Zakharov, A. B. Shabat: Interaction between solitons in a stable medium.Soviet Physics-JETP37, 823-828 (1973)

  46. [46]

    Zhou: The Riemann-Hilbert problem and inverse scattering.SIAM J

    X. Zhou: The Riemann-Hilbert problem and inverse scattering.SIAM J. Math. Anal.20, 966-986 (1989)

  47. [47]

    Zhu: Direct scattering for the KdV equation with a step-like finite-gap potential: a Riemann-Hilbert ap- proach

    X. Zhu: Direct scattering for the KdV equation with a step-like finite-gap potential: a Riemann-Hilbert ap- proach. arXiv:2603.02905 (2026). 42