Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A damping term in ultralight dark matter reduces dynamical friction enough to resolve the Fornax timing problem for globular cluster GC3.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 00:34 UTC pith:TI642QBS

load-bearing objection The damped friction formula is real and reusable; the Fornax "resolution" is a model-dependent claim resting on an unexamined damping term in the noninteracting limit. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2511.06123 v3 pith:TI642QBS submitted 2025-11-08 astro-ph.GA

Damping of dynamical friction force in self-interacting ultralight dark matter and Fornax timing problem

E.V. Gorbar , O.V. Barabash , V.M. Gorkavenko , K. Korshynska , A.I. Momot , A.O. Zaporozhchenko This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA PACS 95.35.+d
keywords ultralight dark matterdynamical frictionFornax globular cluster timing problemGross-Pitaevskii equationdamping termself-interacting dark matterBose-Einstein condensate dark matterglobular cluster infall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that a damping term in the generalized Gross-Pitaevskii equation for ultralight dark matter substantially reduces the dynamical friction force on orbiting objects, offering a resolution to the long-standing Fornax timing problem. In standard cold dark matter, the globular clusters of the Fornax dwarf should have spiraled into the center within about a billion years, yet GC3 is roughly 12 Gyr old and still sits 0.64 kpc from the galaxy's center. The authors derive an analytic formula for the friction force that includes the damping term, show numerically that it weakens the force, and find infall times of 12 Gyr for GC3 both for weakly self-interacting (Gaussian) ULDM with boson mass near 3.09e-22 eV and for strongly self-interacting (Thomas-Fermi) ULDM with mass above about 2.7e-21 eV. If correct, this makes dissipative ultralight dark matter a viable resolution of the timing problem without relying solely on a cored halo.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the phenomenological damping term in the generalized Gross-Pitaevskii–Poisson equation, with strength ξ = 2kBT/ℏ, essentially decreases the magnitude of the dynamical friction force acting on stars, globular clusters, or dwarf galaxies moving in an ultralight dark matter halo. Concretely, the authors derive an analytic expression for the tangential friction force on a circularly orbiting point mass (Eq. 16) and show that the damping introduces an exponential suppression e^{-ξτ/2} in the force integral, reducing the force compared to the undamped case. Applying this to the Fornax dwarf galaxy, they find that the infall time of globular cluster GC3 can reach t

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the damping term in the generalized Gross-Pitaevskii equation (Eq. 1), with coefficient ξ = 2kBT/ℏ set by the halo temperature, identified with the stellar velocity dispersion through kBT = mσv²/2. In the linearized density-perturbation equation (Eq. 4) this term appears as ξ∂tα, shifting the response poles (Eq. 11) and producing an e^{-ξτ/2} factor in the friction-force integral (Eq. 12). The paper combines this with two analytical soliton density profiles—a Gaussian for weak or no self-interaction and a Thomas-Fermi profile for strong repulsive self-interaction—matched to an isothermal NFW envelope, to compute the force and the inspiral trajectory of GC3.

Load-bearing premise

The result hinges on the phenomenological damping term in the generalized Gross-Pitaevskii equation, with its strength fixed by equating kBT to mσv²/2 using the observed stellar velocity dispersion; if ultralight dark matter is not actually dissipative in this way, the reduced dynamical friction—and the proposed resolution of the Fornax timing problem—disappears. It also assumes the homogeneous-medium circular-orbit force applies locally during the inspiral.

What would settle it

An N-body or wave simulation of a self-interacting ULDM halo that includes the same damping coefficient and finds that GC3-like clusters still sink in a few Gyr—or an observational determination that the Fornax globular clusters' orbital decay times are much shorter than claimed—would falsify the proposed resolution. More directly, a measurement or bound on the ULDM temperature/dissipation that rules out ξ = 2kBT/ℏ would remove the effect.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The damping-induced reduction of dynamical friction applies not only to GC3 but to any compact object orbiting inside an ULDM halo, potentially altering predicted merger rates and orbital decays in dwarf galaxies.
  • Fornax's timing problem can be resolved in nearly noninteracting (fuzzy) ULDM with m ≈ 3.09e-22 eV, provided GC3 formed at a galactocentric distance of about 1.5 kpc rather than much closer to the center.
  • In strongly self-interacting ULDM, the timing problem is resolved for m ≳ 2.7e-21 eV at r0 = 1.5 kpc, and even at r0 = 1 kpc if the boson mass is sufficiently large.
  • The analytic formula (Eq. 16) provides a ready tool for estimating dynamical friction in other self-interacting ULDM systems where the damping term is relevant.
  • Because the damping term also changes the force's radial dependence, the predicted rotation curves and infall times could be used to distinguish damped ULDM from ordinary CDM cores.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the damping term is real and as strong as assumed, similar suppression should affect the orbital decay of satellite galaxies and black-hole binaries in ULDM halos; testing these systems could independently confirm or bound the dissipation strength.
  • The value of ξ is fixed by observational velocity dispersion via a thermodynamic relation; this is a phenomenological input rather than a derivation from a fundamental ULDM Lagrangian, so the central result hinges on that identification being valid.
  • The homogeneous-medium, circular-orbit treatment likely underestimates the damping effect for eccentric orbits; extending the calculation to eccentric trajectories might either strengthen or weaken the claimed resolution, a testable modification.
  • One could search for the damped wake's signature—reduced amplitude and altered phase of the density perturbation behind the perturber—in future high-resolution ULDM simulations or gravitational lensing observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the dynamical friction force acting on globular cluster GC3 in the Fornax dwarf spheroidal, assuming an ultralight bosonic dark matter halo described by a generalized Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson equation that includes a temperature-dependent damping term. Starting from linear-response theory, the authors derive an analytic expression for the dynamical friction force for a point mass on a circular orbit in a homogeneous ULDM medium in the presence of damping (Eq. 16). Using observationally motivated density profiles (Gaussian soliton core for weak/noninteracting ULDM, Thomas-Fermi core for strong repulsive self-interaction, matched to an NFW envelope), they compute the tangential force and integrate the orbital decay equations for GC3. With the damping term, they find that infall times can reach 12 Gyr for noninteracting ULDM with m≈3.09e-22 eV if the initial radius is 1.5 kpc, and for strongly interacting ULDM with m≳2.7e-21 eV at the same initial radius, resolving the Fornax timing problem in those cases.

Significance. Should the damping mechanism be physically valid, the paper offers an analytic and transparent route to resolving the Fornax timing problem within ULDM models, and it makes falsifiable predictions in the (m, r0) plane. The derivation of Eq. (16) is internally consistent, and the numerical parameter scan is clearly presented. However, the central claim rests on a phenomenological dissipation term whose microscopic justification is not established in the noninteracting limit, and the local application of a homogeneous-medium circular-orbit force involves uncontrolled approximations. The paper is therefore more a proof-of-principle exploration than a definitive resolution, but its identified parameter regions are concrete and testable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eqs. (1)-(2); Sec. 5, Eq. (46)] The damping term with strength ξ=2k_BT/ℏ is adopted from a finite-temperature dissipative BEC model (Ref. [14]) and is not derived from a fundamental action for ULDM. In the noninteracting limit a_s=0, which is the paper's headline Gaussian-regime solution (Sec. 6, Fig. 4b, m=3.09e-22 eV), there is no microscopic justification for this dissipation; one expects no thermal coupling for an ideal scalar field. Since the ξ=0 calculation already gives the known short infall times, the claimed resolution is entirely contingent on this unvetted term. Please provide a derivation or at least a quantitative estimate of ξ in the a_s→0 limit, and discuss why the same ξ applies inside the soliton core, where the equilibrium model takes k_BT effects to be negligible.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (16); Appendix, Eq. (A.5); Sec. 6, Eq. (47)] The derived force assumes a circular orbit in a homogeneous medium of constant density ρ_DM. It is then applied at each instantaneous radius of a spiraling orbit in the strongly inhomogeneous core-envelope profile of Sec. 4, and the radial component F_r is dropped with the only justification that it is 'much smaller' than the gravitational term. No quantitative estimate is given. This is a load-bearing approximation for the 12-Gyr infall claims. Please test it, e.g., by comparing with a local expansion in ρ'(r)/ρ(r), by including F_r, or by a direct simulation in a spherically symmetric halo.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 7, first paragraph] The quoted lower bound 'mlow ≈ 3.09·10^-21 eV' contradicts Eq. (27) and Sec. 6, where the noninteracting mass is 3.09·10^-22 eV. This typo is in a key conclusion and should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. 5, Eq. (45)] The notation is inconsistent: the dimensionless wavevector should appear as K in the denominator (K^2 \tilde{D}(K)), not as k. Please harmonize the notation.
  3. [Fig. 3] Panels a) and b) use different y-axis scales (0.6 vs 1.5), which exaggerates the visual suppression by the damping term. Consider a common scale or explicit annotation.
  4. [Sec. 6, Eq. (47)] The initial angular momentum l(0) is not specified. The integration of Eq. (47) requires an initial tangential velocity; please state explicitly whether the orbit is initially circular, l = m_GC r_0 v_c(r_0).
  5. [Throughout] Typos: 'Euristic' should be 'Heuristic' (Sec. 1); 'ultra light' should be 'ultralight' (Abstract, Sec. 1). References [7] and [13] appear to refer to the same paper with inconsistent journal volume/year; please reconcile.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: the claimed infall times are computed from externally fixed halo/damping inputs, not used to fit the 12-Gyr target.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The Fornax halo density is fixed by external observations (rho_obs at r_h, M = 5.8e7 M_sun; Sec. 4), and the damping coefficient xi = 2 k_B T / hbar is set from the observed stellar velocity dispersion sigma_v = 8 km/s via k_B T = m sigma_v^2 / 2 (Eqs. 2 and 46). The infall times in Sec. 6 are computed from the dynamical friction force in Eqs. (44)-(47), and the 12-Gyr GC3 age is not used to calibrate any parameter; the scan over m and r0 is openly exploratory. The only self-citations, Refs. [22,23], concern the Plummer-sphere generalization, which is not used in the point-perturber calculation, so they are contextual rather than load-bearing. The damping term is adopted from the external Chavanis model [14]; its microscopic validity in the as=0 limit is a physics assumption and a correctness risk, but it is a model input, not a circular restatement of the target result. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to the claimed Fornax resolution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's model is built on Chavanis's dissipative BEC halo construction; the damping term and its magnitude are not independently verified. The halo parameters are fitted to Fornax observations, and the timing result is obtained by scanning m and r0. No new particle or force is introduced, but the dissipation term functions as an effective friction that carries most of the explanatory load.

free parameters (4)
  • ULDM boson mass m = scanned over 3.09×10^-22 to 3×10^-21 eV
    m is not independently measured; a_s is fixed for each m via the halo mass-radius relations (Eqs. 22 and 27). The claimed timing solutions occur at specific scanned values (e.g., 3.09×10^-22 eV and ≈2.7×10^-21 eV).
  • Initial GC3 orbital radius r0 = 1.0 or 1.5 kpc
    Assumed formation radius; unobserved. The 1.5 kpc choice is necessary for the Gaussian-regime solution and is stated as an assumption in Sec. 6.
  • Soliton scale radii (R=581 pc for Gaussian, R_TF=1 kpc for TF) = 581 pc / 1 kpc
    Fixed by matching the central density profile to the observed Fornax density ρ_obs ≈ 1.6×10^-2 M_sun/pc^3 at r_h=710 pc (Secs. 4.1–4.2). These profiles directly set the dynamical friction force.
  • NFW envelope parameters ρ_e and r_e = ρ_e=2.59×10^3 M_sun/pc^3, r_e≈7.5 pc (Gaussian); ρ_e=2.06×10^3 M_sun/pc^3, r_e=8.4 pc (TF)
    Determined by matching the envelope to the velocity dispersion σ_v=8 km/s and to the soliton at r_t (Secs. 4.3–4.4). These parameters set the outer density profile used in the force calculation.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Generalized Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and damping term (Eq. 1, last term) governs ULDM halo dynamics
    Taken from Chavanis (Ref. [14]); this dissipation is a phenomenological addition not derived from a fundamental action. The dynamical-friction suppression depends on this term.
  • domain assumption Einstein/fluctuation-dissipation relation ξ = 2k_B T/ℏ (Eq. 2)
    From Ref. [14]; sets the damping strength used in the force formula.
  • domain assumption Halo temperature equated to observed stellar velocity dispersion: k_B T = m σ_v²/2 (Eq. 46)
    Assumes the GPP 'temperature' equals the observed σ_v=8 km/s; this fixes ξ numerically.
  • domain assumption Linearized density-perturbation equation (Eq. 4) with damping entering as +ξ∂_t α, solved in the homogeneous-medium approximation and applied locally to the inhomogeneous Fornax halo
    The force formula (16) is derived for constant ρ_DM; Sec. 5 applies it at each radius using the local profile without a WKB-type justification.
  • domain assumption Soliton density profiles: Gaussian ansatz (Eq. 25) and Thomas-Fermi profile (Eq. 20), and NFW envelope stitched by continuity (Secs. 4.1–4.4) describe the Fornax halo
    These analytic profiles come from Chavanis (Refs. [14,27]) and are matched to Fornax observations; the friction force depends on their shape.
  • ad hoc to paper Circular-orbit dynamical-friction force is used at each instantaneous radius during the inspiraling orbit, and the radial component F_r is dropped
    Force formula (16) assumes a circular orbit; the trajectory in Eq. (47) is not circular. Neglect of F_r is justified only by an unquantified assertion in the Appendix.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13650 in / 24238 out tokens · 226194 ms · 2026-08-04T00:34:29.475635+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The dynamics of globular clusters in the Fornax dwarf galaxy pose a challenge for the standard cold dark matter and can be used to test other models of dark matter. We study this dynamics in the context of an ultralight bosonic dark matter model, accounting for the damping term in a generalized Gross-Pitaevskii equation. Employing analytic formulas for the dynamical friction force, the infall time and evolution of globular clusters are compared in the cases with and without the damping term. It is argued that the damping term plays an important role in the Fornax timing problem in ultralight dark matter (ULDM) models. We found that the ULDM model with repulsive self-interaction can solve the Fornax timing problem in the absence of or with very small self-interaction, even if the initial position of the globular cluster is not far from the center of the galaxy. Still, the problem is resolved for strongly interacting repulsive ULDM, even for the most pressing case of globular cluster GC3, if its starting position exceeds 1.5 kpc.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.06123 by A.I. Momot, A.O. Zaporozhchenko, E.V. Gorbar, K. Korshynska, O.V. Barabash, V.M. Gorkavenko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The dependence of s-wave scattering length as (in meters) on the mass of the ULDM particle m defined by Eq. (22) for m > 10−21 eV and Eq. (27) for m < 10−21 eV. The dashed vertical line separates the Gaussian density (left) from the TF (right) density approximation. scattering length as (or the coupling strength of the self-interaction g = 4π~ 2as/m) on mass of the DM particle  m eV/c2 2 = 4.76 · 10−44 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panel a) Fornax mass density profiles ρDM (in kg/m3 ). At the inflection points, the soliton dark matter density is stitched together with the NFW density profile. Panel b) Fornax rotation curves for the TF and Gaussian density distributions of ULDM soliton. of ULDM as ρDM(r) = ( ρ TF 0 sin(πr/RTF) πr/RTF , r ≤ rt ρe 1 r/re(1+r/re) 2 , r > rt , (42) where ρ TF 0 = 0.0456 M⊙/pc3 , ρe = 2.06 · 103 M⊙/pc3 . T… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The tangential component of the dimensionless dynamical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The trajectory r(t) of the globular cluster GC3 as a function of time in the Gaussian regime and several values of the ULDM boson mass in the range 3.09 · 10−22 eV < m < 7 · 10−22 eV with its initial position panel a) r0 = 1 kpc and panel b) r0 = 1.5 kpc. The black horizontal line indicates the current position of GC3. where mGC is the mass of GC, l = mGCr 2φ˙ is the angular momentum, see details in Append… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The trajectory r(t) of the globular cluster GC3 as a function of time in the Thomas-Fermi regime for several values of the ULDM boson mass in the range 10−21 eV < m < 3 · 10−21 eV with its initial position panel a) r0 = 1 kpc and panel b) r0 = 1.5 kpc. The black horizontal line indicates the current position of GC3. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Vortex State of Ultralight Dark Matter and the Fornax Timing Problem

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A vortex state of ultralight dark matter suppresses dynamical friction for co-rotating globular clusters, potentially resolving the Fornax timing problem.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 12 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Gratton, A

    R. Gratton, A. Bragaglia, E. Carretta, V. D’Orazi, S. Lucatello a nd A. Sollima, What is a globular cluster? an observational perspective , The Astronony and Astrophysics Review 27 (2019) 8

    2019

  2. [2]

    Tremaine, J

    S. Tremaine, J. Ostriker and S. Spitzer, The formation of the nuclei of galaxies. I. M31., The Astrophysical Journal 196 (1975) 407

    1975

  3. [3]

    Pace, M.G

    A.B. Pace, M.G. Walker, S.E. Koposov, N. Caldwell, M. Mateo, E.W. Ols zewski et al., Spectroscopic confirmation of the sixth globular cluster in the Fornax dwarf spheroidal galaxy , The Astrophysical Journal 923 (2021) 77

    2021

  4. [4]

    Tremaine, The formation of the nuclei of galaxies

    S. Tremaine, The formation of the nuclei of galaxies. II - The local group , The Astrophysical Journal 203 (1976) 345

    1976

  5. [5]

    K. Oh, D. Lin and H. Richer, Globular clusters in the Fornax dwarf spheroidal galaxy, The Astrophysical Journal 531 (2000) 727

    2000

  6. [6]

    Meadows, J

    N. Meadows, J. Navarro, I. Santos-Santos, A. Benitez-Llamb ay and C. Frenk, Cusp or core? Revisiting the globular cluster timing problem in F ornax, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 491 (2020) 3336

    2020

  7. [7]

    N. Bar, S. Danieli and K. Blum, Dynamical friction in globular cluster-rich ultra-diffuse galaxies: The case of NGC5846-UDG1 , The Astrophysical Journal Letters 932 (2021) L10

    2021

  8. [8]

    Sanchez-Salcedo, J

    F. Sanchez-Salcedo, J. Reyes-Iturbide and X. Hernandez, An extensive study of dynamical friction in dwarf galaxies: the role of stars, dar k matter, halo profiles and MOND , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 370 (2006) 1829

    2006

  9. [9]

    D. Cole, W. Dehnen, J. Read and M. Wilkinson, The mass distribution of the Fornax dSph: constraints from its globular cluster distrib ution, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (2012) 1829

    2012

  10. [10]

    Goerdt, B

    T. Goerdt, B. Moore, J. Read, J. Stadel and M. Zemp, Does the Fornax dwarf spheroidal have a central cusp or core? , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 368 (2006) 1073

    2006

  11. [11]

    Boldrini, R

    P. Boldrini, R. Mohayaee and J. Silk, Fornax globular cluster distributions: implications for the cusp-core problem , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (2019) 2546

    2019

  12. [12]

    Ferreira, Ultra-light dark matter , Astron

    E.G.M. Ferreira, Ultra-light dark matter , Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 29 (2021) 7 [2005.03254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    N. Bar, S. Danieli and K. Blum, Dynamical friction in globular cluster-rich ultra-diffuse galaxies: the case of ngc5846-udg1 , The Astrophysical Journal 932 (2022) L10

    2022

  14. [14]

    Chavanis, Predictive model of BEC dark matter halos with a solitonic co re and an isothermal atmosphere , Physical Review D 100 (2019) 083022

    P.-H. Chavanis, Predictive model of BEC dark matter halos with a solitonic co re and an isothermal atmosphere , Physical Review D 100 (2019) 083022 . 16

    2019

  15. [15]

    Schive, M.-H

    H.-Y. Schive, M.-H. Liao, T.-P. Woo, S.-K. Wong, T. Chiueh, T. Bro adhurst et al., Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark M atter from 3D Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 261302 [1407.7762]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Hui, J.P

    L. Hui, J.P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine and E. Witten, Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 043541 [1610.08297]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Lancaster, C

    L. Lancaster, C. Giovanetti, P. Mocz, Y. Kahn, M. Lisanti and D.N. Spergel, Dynamical Friction in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Universe , JCAP 01 (2020) 001 [1909.06381]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    de Boer and M

    T.J.L. de Boer and M. Fraser, Four and one more: The formation history and total mass of globular clusters in the Fornax dSph , Astronomy & Astrophysics 590 (2016) A35 [1510.05642]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    N. Bar, D. Blas, K. Blum and H. Kim, Assessing the Fornax globular cluster timing problem in different models of dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 043021 [2102.11522]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Desjacques, A

    V. Desjacques, A. Nusser and R. Buehler, Analytic solution to the dynamical friction acting on circularly moving perturbers , The Astrophysical Journal 928 (2022) 64

    2022

  21. [21]

    Buehler and V

    R. Buehler and V. Desjacques, Dynamical friction in fuzzy dark matter: Circular orbits, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 023516 [2207.13740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Gorkavenko, A.I

    V.M. Gorkavenko, A.I. Yakimenko, A.O. Zaporozhchenko and E.V . Gorbar, Dynamical friction in ultralight dark matter: Plummer sphe re perspective, Phys. Scripta 100 (2025) 075039 [2412.15428]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Barabash, T.V

    O.V. Barabash, T.V. Gorkavenko, V.M. Gorkavenko, O.M. Teslyk , N.S. Yakovenko, A.O. Zaporozhchenko et al., Analytic calculation of dynamical friction for Plummer sphere in ultralight dark matter , 2504.06448

    arXiv

  24. [24]

    Berezhiani, G

    L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia, V. De Luca and J. Khoury, Dynamical friction in dark matter superfluids: The evolution of black hole binaries , JCAP 06 (2024) 024 [2311.07672]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Jardel and K

    J.R. Jardel and K. Gebhardt, The dark matter density profile of the Fornax dwarf , The Astrophysical Journal 746 (2012) 89

    2012

  26. [26]

    McConnachie, The observed properties of dwarf galaxies in and around the local group, The Astronomical Journal 144 (2012) 4

    A.W. McConnachie, The observed properties of dwarf galaxies in and around the local group, The Astronomical Journal 144 (2012) 4

    2012

  27. [27]

    Chavanis, Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self-gravitating Bose- Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: I

    P.-H. Chavanis, Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self-gravitating Bose- Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: I. Analytical results, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 043531 [1103.2050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    Chavanis, Self-gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates , Quantum Aspects of Black Holes (2015) 151

    P.-H. Chavanis, Self-gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates , Quantum Aspects of Black Holes (2015) 151 . 17

    2015

  29. [29]

    Chavanis, Mass-radius relation of self-gravitating Bose-Einstein c ondensates with a central black hole , The European Physical Journal Plus 134 (2019) 352

    P.-H. Chavanis, Mass-radius relation of self-gravitating Bose-Einstein c ondensates with a central black hole , The European Physical Journal Plus 134 (2019) 352

    2019

  30. [30]

    Navarro, C.S

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, A Universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J. 490 (1997) 493 [astro-ph/9611107]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  31. [31]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic dynamics , vol. 13, Princeton university press (2011)

    2011

  32. [32]

    Walker, M

    M.G. Walker, M. Mateo, E.W. Olszewski, O.Y. Gnedin, X. Wang, B. Se n et al., Velocity Dispersion Profiles of Seven Dwarf Spheroidal Gala xies, Astrophys. J. Lett. 667 (2007) L53 [0708.0010]. 18

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007