REVIEW 1 cited by
A Unified Pruning Framework for Vision Transformers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recently, vision transformer (ViT) and its variants have achieved promising performances in various computer vision tasks. Yet the high computational costs and training data requirements of ViTs limit their application in resource-constrained settings. Model compression is an effective method to speed up deep learning models, but the research of compressing ViTs has been less explored. Many previous works concentrate on reducing the number of tokens. However, this line of attack breaks down the spatial structure of ViTs and is hard to be generalized into downstream tasks. In this paper, we design a unified framework for structural pruning of both ViTs and its variants, namely UP-ViTs. Our method focuses on pruning all ViTs components while maintaining the consistency of the model structure. Abundant experimental results show that our method can achieve high accuracy on compressed ViTs and variants, e.g., UP-DeiT-T achieves 75.79% accuracy on ImageNet, which outperforms the vanilla DeiT-T by 3.59% with the same computational cost. UP-PVTv2-B0 improves the accuracy of PVTv2-B0 by 4.83% for ImageNet classification. Meanwhile, UP-ViTs maintains the consistency of the token representation and gains consistent improvements on object detection tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Preserving Deep Representations In One-Shot Pruning: A Hessian-Free Second-Order Optimization Framework
SNOWS prunes vision networks in one shot by optimizing a K-step nonlinear reconstruction objective with Hessian-free Newton steps, improving accuracy over layer-wise least-squares methods.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.